Thomas More Society: Autocam Corporation, the lead supplier of fuel injection parts to Bosch, Delphi, Conti, and Hitachi, has joined the growing number of businesses suing the government over religious freedom violations. The lawsuit, filed on October 8 by the Thomas More Society on behalf of the privately held manufacturer of precision automotive and health components and its owners, is a direct response to the Obamacare Health & Human Services (HHS) mandate requirement that they provide group insurance coverage of abortions, sterilization, and birth control for their employees.
- Posted: 10/09/2012
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.thomasmoresociety.org
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Thomas More Society, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Autocam v. Sebelius
National Review: Referencing the Department of Health and Human Services abortion-drug, contraception, sterilization mandate, the president said: “I don’t think a college student in Fairfax or Charlottesville should have to choose between text books or the preventive care that she needs. That’s why we passed this law. And I am proud of it. It was the right thing to do. And we are going to keep it.”
- Posted: 10/09/2012
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.nationalreview.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare
Matt Bowman appeared on the Zeb Bell Show to discuss the Tyndale Publishing challenge to the Obamacare mandate. | MP3 audio 11:19 mins
- Posted: 10/09/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37028
LifeNews: Today, East Texas Baptist University (ETBU) and Houston Baptist University (HBU) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, asking the court for relief from the Department of Health and Human Services’ “preventative services” mandate, which forces the Christian Universities to violate their deeply held religious beliefs or pay severe fines. “Baptists in America, by virtue of their history, are particularly sensitive to coercive government actions that infringe on religious liberty,” says Eric Rassbach, Deputy General Counsel for The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which filed suit this morning on behalf of the two universities.
- Posted: 10/09/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.lifenews.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Becket Fund, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Florida v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, ZZ: National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
A federal court has scheduled an Oct. 16 hearing to consider whether to halt enforcement of the Obama administration’s abortion pill mandate against a Bible publisher. The court scheduled the hearing in response to a preliminary injunction motion that Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys representing Tyndale House Publishers filed Monday.
- Posted: 10/09/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.adfmedia.org
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Press Releases, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37028
Kathryn Jean Lopez at National Review: “The law does not give any religious-freedom exemption to faith-based operations like Tyndale,” Taylor, who is being represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, points out. “Instead, it imposes crushing fines on employers who are doing nothing more than following their consciences against abortion-inducing pills. The government is supposed to promote conscience protection, not attack it. The best solution is for Congress or the administration to respect the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act by eliminating the abortion-pill mandate. But if they refuse to do their duty, we hope the courts will rule that the mandate is unlawful.”
- Posted: 10/08/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.nationalreview.com
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37028
The hearing concerns a lawsuit filed by Planned Parenthood against H.B. 2800, the “Whole Woman’s Healthcare Funding Prioritization Act,” which closes loopholes that allowed taxpayer dollars to fund abortions and prioritizes family planning funds to health care entities that best provide comprehensive health care to women. The hearing will consider Planned Parenthood’s motion for a preliminary injunction against the law, as well as the state’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit.
- Posted: 10/04/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Press Releases, ADF: Steven H. Aden, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Arizona Right to Life, Group: Center for Arizona Policy, Group: Planned Parenthood, Group: Susan B. Anthony List, State: Arizona, Topic: Abortion, ZZ: Planned Parenthood v. Betlach, ZZADF: 38362
Susan B. Anthony List: Today, the national pro-life Susan B. Anthony List (SBA List) slammed a brief filed by the Department of Justice aimed at overturning Arizona’s Whole Woman’s Health Funding Priority Act (HB 2800). The law, co-authored by the SBA List and Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), defunds abortion providers of state family planning funds. Family planning funds are prioritized away from abortion-centered businesses like Planned Parenthood to entities that provide comprehensive health care. Governor Jan Brewer signed HB 2800 into law in May. The law was challenged by Planned Parenthood and is before the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.
- Posted: 10/04/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.sba-list.org
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Arizona Right to Life, Group: Center for Arizona Policy, Group: Planned Parenthood, Group: Susan B. Anthony List, State: Arizona, Topic: Abortion, ZZ: Planned Parenthood v. Betlach, ZZADF: 38362
Kinder v. Geitner, No. 11-1973
A group of seven plaintiffs, including Samantha Hill and Missouri Lieutenant Governor Peter Kinder (acting in his personal capacity), brought this action to challenge various provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“the Act”). Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010). The district court dismissed the suit for lack of standing. Hill and Kinder appeal, and we affirm.
- Posted: 10/04/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.ca8.uscourts.gov
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Court: 8th Circuit, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Kinder v. Geitner
Religion Clause Blog: An ADF press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit explains: The publisher is subject to the mandate because Obama administration rules say for-profit corporations are categorically non-religious, even though Tyndale House is strictly a publisher of Bibles and other Christian materials and is owned by the non-profit Tyndale House Foundation.
- Posted: 10/03/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37028
Pro Life Blogs: “Bible publishers should be free to do business according to the book that they publish,” said Senior Legal Counsel Matt Bowman. “To say that a Bible publisher is not religious is patently absurd. Tyndale House is a prime example of how ridiculous and arbitrary the Obama administration’s mandate is. Americans today clearly agree with America’s founders: the federal government’s bureaucrats are not qualified to decide what faith is, who the faithful are, and where and how that faith may be lived out.”
- Posted: 10/03/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.prolifeblogs.com
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Colorado, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Newland v. Sebelius, ZZ: Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37028, ZZADF: 37155
Melissa Steffan at Christianity Today: “The federal government has deemed devout publishers of the Bible to be insufficiently ‘religious’ to enjoy religious freedom in America,” the complaint stated. According to a press release from Alliance Defending Freedom (formerly the Alliance Defense Fund), which is representing Tyndale, “The publisher is subject to the mandate because Obama administration rules say for-profit corporations are categorically non-religious.”
- Posted: 10/03/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: blog.christianitytoday.com
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37028
Catholic World News on Catholic Culture: “To say that a Bible publisher is not religious is patently absurd,” said Matt Bowman of the Alliance Defending Freedom. “Tyndale House is a prime example of how ridiculous and arbitrary the Obama administration’s mandate is…. The federal government’s bureaucrats are not qualified to decide what faith is, who the faithful are, and where and how that faith may be lived out.”
- Posted: 10/03/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.catholicculture.org
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37028
WorldNetDaily: “Bible publishers should be free to do business according to the book that they publish,” said Senior Legal Counsel Matt Bowman. “To say that a Bible publisher is not religious is patently absurd. Tyndale House is a prime example of how ridiculous and arbitrary the Obama administration’s mandate is. Americans today clearly agree with America’s founders: the federal government’s bureaucrats are not qualified to decide what faith is, who the faithful are, and where and how that faith may be lived out.”
- Posted: 10/03/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.wnd.com
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37028
Victor Morton at the Washington Times: The Alliance Defending Freedom, which is representing Tyndale, called the rule an unconstitutional and arbitrary threat to religious freedom. “Bible publishers should be free to do business according to the book that they publish,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Matt Bowman. “To say that a Bible publisher is not religious is patently absurd. Tyndale House is a prime example of how ridiculous and arbitrary the Obama administration’s mandate is. Americans today clearly agree with America’s founders: the federal government’s bureaucrats are not qualified to decide what faith is, who the faithful are, and where and how that faith may be lived out.”
- Posted: 10/03/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.washingtontimes.com
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37028
Examinder.com: In a press release from Alliance Defending Freedom, Senior Legal Counsel Matt Bowman stated, “Bible publishers should be free to do business according to the book that they publish. To say that a Bible publisher is not religious is patently absurd. Tyndale House is a prime example of how ridiculous and arbitrary the Obama administration’s mandate is. Americans today clearly agree with America’s founders: the federal government’s bureaucrats are not qualified to decide what faith is, who the faithful are, and where and how that faith may be lived out.”
- Posted: 10/03/2012
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.examiner.com
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37028
Wall Street Journal: There is growing evidence suggesting that freezing an embryo after fertilization and thawing it for use in the woman’s next monthly cycle leads to higher pregnancy rates, compared with using the embryo immediately. A recent scientific review of three small randomized and controlled studies found that 50% of women got pregnant after receiving in vitro fertilization, or IVF, treatment using a recently frozen embryo. By contrast, women receiving fresh embryos had a 38% pregnancy rate.
- Posted: 10/02/2012
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: online.wsj.com
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Bioethics, Topic: IVF
Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys representing Tyndale House Publishers filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday against the Obama administration’s abortion pill mandate. Tyndale House is one of the world’s largest privately held Christian publishers of books, Bibles, and digital media.
- Posted: 10/02/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.adfmedia.org
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Press Releases, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37028
ABA Journal: Is the possibility of a new challenge to the health-care law on the horizon? The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday asked the federal government for its views on a rehearing request by a religious university that is challenging the law, SCOTUSblog reports. Liberty University asked the Supreme Court to revive its lawsuit challenging the law in a rehearing request filed in July, Law360 (sub. req.) reported at the time.
- Posted: 10/02/2012
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.abajournal.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Court: U.S. Supreme, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Liberty University v. Geithner
Baptist Press: In filing its appeal, the administration sent a clear message that it wants to force families to abandon their faith in order to make a living,” said Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) attorney Matt Bowman. “That’s the opposite of religious freedom.”
- Posted: 10/02/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.bpnews.net
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Colorado, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Newland v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37155
Religion Clause Blog: In O’Brien v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (ED MO, Sept. 28, 2012), Judge Carol E. Jackson (a President George H. W. Bush appointee) first held that she need not decide whether O’Brien Industrial Holdings (“OIH”), a secular limited liability company, is capable of exercising religion within the meaning of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act or the First Amendment because, even if it is, the contraception coverage mandate does not infringe religious exercise rights.
- Posted: 10/01/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Missouri, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: O'Brien v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Biola U. Chimes: Alliance Defending Freedom’s . . . [Greg] Baylor, lead counsel on the case, said Biolans should care about the far-reaching effects of the decision — regardless of the outcome . . . Baylor participated in a panel two weeks ago that provided information to students and faculty on Biola’s decision to sue the government over the Health and Human Services mandate that would require organizations to provide for abortion-inducing drugs under Obamacare . . . With more than 25 different lawsuits filed against the government regarding the HHS mandate, the message is clear: People are unhappy, Baylor said. “I think the sheer volume of the cases is part of message that this is an egregious violation of freedom,” Baylor said. Biola’s lawsuit is one of many and it doesn’t have much to set it apart in any particular way, but the prestige of Biola’s name matters, Baylor said.
- Posted: 10/01/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: chimes.biola.edu
- Tags: ADF: Gregory S. Baylor, ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Colleges, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Grace Schools v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37243
Thomas More Law Center: The Government attorney, on the other hand, argued that because Weingartz was a secular corporation it had no constitutional right to free exercise of religion or free speech. The Government also contended that the organization Legatus lacked standing, as the group was a non-profit company potentially eligible for a one year safe-harbor from the law.
- Posted: 10/01/2012
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.thomasmore.org
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Legatus, Group: Thomas More Law Center, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Legatus v. Sebelius
Pottsmer.com: A federal judge has denied a civil rights group’s bid to join the government’s defense against a western Pennsylvania Christian college’s challenge to regulations requiring employers to offer birth control coverage
- Posted: 09/27/2012
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.pottsmerc.com
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Becket Fund, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Colleges, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Geneva College v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 36970
NRL News: “Every American, including family business owners, should be free to live and do business according to their faith,” said Senior Legal Counsel Matt Bowman. “The Obama administration claims ‘unwavering’ support for religious freedom, but this appeal demonstrates that the only thing unwavering is the administration’s tenacious opposition to that freedom.” “The cost of religious freedom for this family could be millions of dollars per year in fines that would cripple their business and potentially destroy jobs if the administration ultimately has its way,” Bowman said. “In filing its appeal today, the administration sent a clear message that it wants to force families to abandon their faith in order to earn a living. That’s the opposite of religious freedom.”
- Posted: 09/27/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.nationalrighttolifenews.org
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Colorado, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Newland v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37155
Christian Post: “Every American, including family business owners, should be free to live and do business according to their faith,” Senior Legal Counsel Matt Bowman said in a statement. “The Obama administration claims ‘unwavering’ support for religious freedom, but this appeal demonstrates that the only thing unwavering is the administration’s tenacious opposition to that freedom.”
- Posted: 09/27/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: global.christianpost.com
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Colorado, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Newland v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37155
Citizen Link: “The cost of religious freedom for this family could be millions of dollars per year in fines that would cripple their business and potentially destroy jobs if the administration ultimately had its way,” Bowman said.
- Posted: 09/27/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.citizenlink.com
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Colorado, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Newland v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37155
LifeNews: Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys obtained the first-ever order against the mandate on behalf of Hercules Industries and the Catholic family that owns it. The administration opposed the order, arguing, contrary to the U.S. Constitution, that people of faith forfeit their religious liberty once they engage in business . . . “Every American, including family business owners, should be free to live and do business according to their faith,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Matt Bowman. “The Obama administration claims ‘unwavering’ support for religious freedom, but this appeal demonstrates that the only thing unwavering is the administration’s tenacious opposition to that freedom.”
- Posted: 09/26/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.lifenews.com
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Colorado, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Newland v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37155
7DVT.com: Their attorney is Michael DePrimo, a First Amendment lawyer based in Hamden, Conn. He formerly worked as special assistant to the president of the American Family Association, a Christian group that rails against abortion, pornography and same-sex marriage. In a 2004 article for American Family Association Journal, DePrimo wrote that acceptance of same-sex marriage “may well signal the beginning of the end of Western civilization.” . . . DePrimo fought the Massachusetts case with financial backing from the Alliance Defense Fund, an Arizona-based Christian legal firm dedicated to defending “family values.” He’s taken the Burlington case pro bono and wouldn’t speculate about whether the ADF, now called the Alliance Defending Freedom, might bankroll it. DePrimo says his clients are peaceful people who have the right to engage in “sidewalk counseling” with women and couples entering Planned Parenthood. “Planned Parenthood does not want pro-life speech to reach their patrons,” DePrimo says by phone from Connecticut. “That’s what this ordinance is really about. That’s not what it says, but that’s the real purpose behind it.”
- Posted: 09/26/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.7dvt.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Connecticut, Topic: Abortion
LifeSiteNews: The cost of religious freedom for this family could be millions of dollars per year in fines that would cripple their business and potentially destroy jobs if the administration ultimately has its way,” said Matt Bowman, senior counsel at the Alliance Defending Freedom. “In filing its appeal today, the administration sent a clear message that it wants to force families to abandon their faith in order to earn a living. That’s the opposite of religious freedom.”
- Posted: 09/26/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.lifesitenews.com
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Colorado, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Newland v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37155
Thomas More Law Center: This Friday, September 28, 2012, Federal District Judge Robert H. Cleland, of the Eastern District of Michigan, will hear oral arguments in Thomas More Law Center’s motion for Preliminary Injunction to stop implementation of the HHS mandate. The oral arguments are scheduled to begin at 9:30am, in Courtroom #712, at the U.S. Courthouse in Detroit, Michigan.
- Posted: 09/26/2012
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.thomasmore.org
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Thomas More Law Center, State: Michigan, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Legatus v. Sebelius
|
Latest Posts
-
05/24/2013
The Alliance Alert will not be published on Memorial Day as we honor our nation’s veterans.
-
www.baltimoresun.com
05/24/2013
Baltimore Sun: State health regulators have suspended the licenses of several abortion clinics owned by Associates in OB/GYN Care for the second time after an employee with no health care license or certification gave a patient a drug to induce an abortion at the Baltimore facility.
-
www.reuters.com
05/24/2013
Reuters: The Church of England published a plan on Friday to approve the ordination of women bishops by 2015, a widely supported reform it just missed passing last November after two decades of divisive debate.
|