Crosswalk Religion Today Summaries: The religious liberty group Alliance Defense Fund is now asking the European Court of Human Rights to overturn the mother’s sentence, although the father has already served his. Roger Kiska, ADF legal counsel, said, “Irene Wiens was well within her rights under the European Convention of Human Rights to opt to teach her children a view of sexuality that is in accord with her own religious beliefs, instead of sending them to four days of classes and an interactive play that she found to be objectionable.”
- Posted: 03/11/2011
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Roger Kiska, Category: Global, Country: Germany, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: Sex Indoctrination, ZZ: Wiens v. Germany
Christian Today: Roger Kiska, ADF legal counsel, said: “Parents, not the government, are the ones ultimately responsible for making educational choices for their children, and jailing them for standing on this universal right is simply unconscionable. “Irene Wiens was well within her rights under the European Convention of Human Rights to opt to teach her children a view of sexuality that is in accord with her own religious beliefs, instead of sending them to four days of classes and an interactive play that she found to be objectionable.”
- Posted: 03/10/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.christiantoday.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Roger Kiska, Alliance Defense Fund, Country: Germany, Court: European Court of Human Rights, Global: Marriage and Family, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Education, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: Sex Indoctrination
Noticias Diarias (Google translation from Spanish): Roger Kiska, who has been defending the case brought before the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg by the Alliance Defense Fund Foundation, which specializes in protecting freedom of conscience, argues that “the parents, not governments ultimately responsible for the education of their children. ” “Jailing parents for exercising a right universally accepted is simply unthinkable. The Wiens family is host to the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the right of parents to pass on to their children’s view of sexuality that is in accord with their beliefs.
- Posted: 03/09/2011
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Roger Kiska, Category: Global, Country: Germany, Global: Marriage and Family, Topic: Sex Indoctrination, ZZ: Wiens v. Germany
One News Now: Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) legal counsel Roger Kiska tells OneNewsNow that the German school system has made it mandatory for nine- and ten-year-olds to participate in the programs, including an interactive play. “The purpose of the play, they say, is to prevent abuse,” says Kiska, “but what they’re teaching is that if it feels good, do it.” [more quotes by Roger]
- Posted: 03/09/2011
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Roger Kiska, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Global, Country: Germany, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Education, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: School Choice
New American: “Parents, not the government, are the ones ultimately responsible for making educational choices for their children, and jailing them for standing on this universal right is simply unconscionable,” declared ADF attorney Roger Kiska. “Irene Wiens was well within her rights under the European Convention on Human Rights to opt to teach her children a view of sexuality that is in accord with her own religious beliefs, instead of sending them to four days of classes and an interactive play that she found to be objectionable.” Kiska noted that the ADF is defending four similar case . . . [more]
- Posted: 03/07/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.thenewamerican.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Roger Kiska, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Global, Country: Germany, Court: European Court of Human Rights, Global: Marriage and Family, Group: Rutherford Institute, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: Sex Indoctrination, Topic: Socialism, ZZ: Wiens v. Germany
Mercator.net: ADF filed an emergency appeal yesterday with the European Court of Human Rights, calling for Mrs Wien’s immediate release. Legal counsel Roger Kiska, based in the Slovak Republic, says the Wiens are well within their rights under the European Convention of Human Rights and other laws. ADF is representing four similar cases before the ECHR. “These types of cases are crucial battles in the effort to keep bad decisions concerning parental rights overseas from being adopted by American courts,” says Mr Kiska.
- Posted: 03/04/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.mercatornet.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Roger Kiska, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Global, Country: Germany, Court: European Court of Human Rights, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Education, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: Sex Indoctrination, ZZ: Wiens v. Germany
Peter Berger writing in The American Interest: “Conservative cassandras (please note: I am not one of them) are turning out to be empirically correct, even if one disagrees with their philosophy: once you legitimate same-sex marriage, you open the door to any number of other alternatives to marriage as a union of one man and one woman: polygamous (an interesting question for Muslims in Germany and dissident Mormons in Arizona), polyandrous, polygenerational – perhaps polyspecies?”
- Posted: 01/19/2011
- |
- Category: Global: Marriage and Family
- |
- Source: blogs.the-american-interest.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Germany, Global: Marriage and Family, Topic: Culture, Topic: Islam, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Polyamory
Boston.com (AP): “Police in France, Germany, the Netherlands and other countries have increased surveillance of Orthodox Coptic Christian churches. In Italy, Copts have asked for special protection. And in Chatenay-Malabry, just outside Paris, metal barricades surround the church of St. Mary and St. Mark — a vivid sign of the fear that has been injected into the Copts’ season of peace.”
- Posted: 01/04/2011
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.boston.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: France, Country: Germany, Country: Netherlands, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Islam
OneNewsNow: “The Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) is being allowed to represent a German pro-life group in a court challenge to the German government over its denying an assisted suicide request . . . ‘It’s a case of judicial activism. It’s a case that really shouldn’t be before the court, and it certainly may set a very dangerous precedent for all of Europe,’ [Roger Kiska] warns.”
- Posted: 12/16/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Roger Kiska, Alliance Defense Fund, Country: Germany, Court: European Court of Human Rights, Global: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Euthanasia, ZZ: Koch v. Germany, ZZADF: 29502
Samuel Gregg writing at the Action Institute Power Blog: “Since the 1950s, many European Christians have gradually reduced their Christian faith to a vacuous humanitarianism worthy of the best EU-funded NGO. One difficulty with ‘liberal Christianity’ (or whatever’s left of it) is that it isn’t especially interested in affirming any Christian values that go beyond sentimental platitudes about tolerance and equality which are routinely emptied of any specific Christian content. It’s goodbye Thomas Aquinas, hello John Rawls. This makes it even more ironic that increasing numbers of secular European thinkers believe Europe can only reinvigorate its distinct identity and values through reengaging its Judeo-Christian heritage.”
- Posted: 11/24/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: blog.acton.org
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Germany, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: History
Tobias Lock, Religious Symbols in Germany (November 15, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1709291
“The paper is concerned with religious symbols in Germany. It mainly focuses on decisions by the Federal Constitutional Court on religious symbols in schools. Court had to deal with two landmark cases concerning the topic of religious symbols. The facts and the outcome of the first decision very much resemble those in the recent Lautsi case: the parents of a child objected to a Bavarian law requiring that a crucifix be affixed in every class room. The Court regarded this as a violation of the student’s freedom of religion. The second case added another dimension: the school authority refused to employ a Muslim teacher who insisted on wearing a headscarf in class. In that case not only the students’ freedom of religion was at issue but also that of the teacher. The Court managed to avoid a ruling on this conflict of fundamental rights by arguing that the school authority had acted without a legislative basis, which made the refusal to employ the teacher illegal. The paper will look at the arguments made in the academic discussion and by inferior courts (most importantly by the Federal Administrative Court). Furthermore, it will examine the reaction by the legislatures of the Länder, which ranged from categorically banning all religious symbols to allowing only those which are in accordance with ‘Christian and occidental cultural and educational values’, a provision which was upheld by the Bavarian Constitutional Court. The paper also discusses unsuccessful challenges under anti-discrimination law as well as the possibilities of banning religious symbols worn by students.”
- Posted: 11/18/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Germany, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Education
Daniel Pipes writing at National Review Online: “A new German political party, Die Freiheit (The Freedom), had its inaugural meeting on October 28 in Berlin. As a reminder of how freedoms have eroded in Europe in this age of Islamist terror, a political party that resists Islamization and supports Israel cannot come into existence in broad daylight. So, like the other 50-plus attendees, I learned of the event’s time and location only shortly before it took place.”
- Posted: 11/03/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.nationalreview.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Germany, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Culture, Topic: Islam, Topic: Politics
David P. Goldman writing at First Things / On The Square: “Today, [Merkel's] party offered a position paper stating that while Germany had benefited from immigrants, it had problems ‘with a minority which will not integrate itself, doesn’t learn our language and shields its children from participation and advancement in our society.’ Germany should offer ‘no tolerance’ to those who refuse to integrate into German society, including consequences for residency’ . . . The facts the global press failed to mention, however, include the fact that an important motivation for the Chancellor’s remarks lies in Germany’s profound disillusionment at the radical Islamist tendencies in Turkey’s government, led by Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan, and Germany’s alarm at Turkey’s drift towards Islamism.”
- Posted: 10/22/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.firstthings.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Germany, Country: Turkey, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Culture, Topic: Demographics, Topic: Islam
Pat Buchanan writing at Townhall: “Is Europe’s adventure in international living about to end? . . . Across Europe, there is a resurgence of ethnonationalism that is feeding the ranks of populist and anti-immigrant parties that are gaining respectability and reaching for power . . . But the awakening of Europe’s establishment to the shallow roots of multiculturalism will likely prove frustrating and futile . . . For not one European nation, save Iceland and Albania, has had a birth rate for decades that is not below zero population growth.”
- Posted: 10/19/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: European Union, Country: Germany, Global: Miscellaneous, Topic: Culture, Topic: Immigration, Topic: Islam, Topic: Socialism
Stephanie R. Hoffer, Caesar as God’s Banker: Using Germany’s Church Tax as an Example of Non-Geographically Bounded Taxing Jurisdiction (September 16, 2010). Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Forthcoming; Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 132. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1677964
“This Article compares the modern-day German church tax to church taxes levied by the American colonies and early states and concludes that, unlike its American counterparts, the German church tax is not wholly a “church” tax. Rather, it is primarily a form of decentralized local taxation, the jurisdiction of which is determined by voluntary group affinity rather than geography. As such, it is a crucial part of the German taxing landscape that should not be abandoned but should instead be retained and extended to qualifying secular organizations. In that context – secular rather than sectarian – the tax may also serve as the starting point for developing a model of non-geographically bounded jurisdictions to be used for funding local government or non-profit provision of public goods within the United States.”
- Posted: 10/18/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Country: Germany, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Legal Periodicals
NY Times: “The report, on the rise of right-wing extremism, was prepared by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, a research organization affiliated with the opposition Social Democratic Party. Its publication coincides with a emotionally charged debate about immigration and the integration of the seven million foreigners living in Germany. With leading politicians singling out Turks and Arabs — even suggesting, as the Bavarian premier, Horst Seehofer, did last week that they would be better off returning to their countries of origin — public attitudes about foreigners are swinging increasingly toward intolerance and racism, according to the report . . . ”
- Posted: 10/14/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.nytimes.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Germany, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Culture, Topic: Immigration, Topic: Islam
Paul Williams, writing at Family Security Matters: “Chancellor Angela Merkel said that Germans have failed to grasp how Muslim immigration has transformed their country and will have to come to terms with more mosques than churches throughout the countryside, according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily. ‘Our country is going to carry on changing, and integration is also a task for the society taking up the task of dealing with immigrants,’ Ms. Merkel told the daily newspaper. ‘For years we’ve been deceiving ourselves about this. Mosques, for example, are going to be a more prominent part of our cities than they were before.’”
- Posted: 09/24/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.familysecuritymatters.org
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Germany, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Culture, Topic: Demographics, Topic: Islam
|

Latest Posts
-
www.christiannewswire.com
06/18/2013
Christian Newswire: Congressman Mark Meadows (R-NC) today introduced a resolution in the U.S. House to amend the United States Constitution to protect children and parents from governmental overreach. The proposed Parental Rights Amendment already has 40 original cosponsors. ParentalRights.org leads grassroots support for the measure.
-
www.lifenews.com
06/18/2013
LifeNews: The vote for the bill broke down on mostly partisan lines with Republicans supporting the ban on late-term abortions and Democrats opposing it. The House approved the bill on a 229-195 vote with 7 Democrats voting for the bill and 6 Republicans voting against it. The bill, if it receives a vote in the Democrat-controlled Senate, is not expected to pass and pro-abortion President Barack Obama has issued a veto threat.
-
www.lifesitenews.com
06/18/2013
LifeSiteNews: The Chinese government has given notice to citizens of the city Huizhou that all women of childbearing age must be fitted with Intrauterine Devices (IUDs) or be permanently sterilized via tubal ligations.

|