<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Court: 11th Circuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/court-11th-circuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit: Teacher fired over out of wedlock pregnancy can sue Christian school</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/11th-circuit-teacher-fired-over-out-of-wedlock-pregnancy-can-sue-christian-school/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/11th-circuit-teacher-fired-over-out-of-wedlock-pregnancy-can-sue-christian-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Law Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Church Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=133889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/16/us-pregnant-teacher-lawsuit-idUSBRE84F15G20120516">Reuters</a>: An appeals court on Wednesday revived a Florida teacher's lawsuit against a Christian school that fired her after she admitted to conceiving a child before her marriage. &#124; <a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201113696.pdf">Hamilton v. Southland Christian School</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/11th-circuit-teacher-fired-over-out-of-wedlock-pregnancy-can-sue-christian-school/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/11th-circuit-teacher-fired-over-out-of-wedlock-pregnancy-can-sue-christian-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit hears case of Christian school teacher fired for premarital pregnancy</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/10/11th-circuit-hears-case-of-christian-school-teacher-fired-for-pre-marital-pregnancy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/10/11th-circuit-hears-case-of-christian-school-teacher-fired-for-pre-marital-pregnancy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=130834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.boston.com/news/education/k_12/articles/2012/04/10/court_hears_case_of_fired_fla_teacher/">Boston Globe</a>: After fourth-grade teacher Jarretta Hamilton went to the principal of her Christian school with the news she was pregnant, he responded: You're fired. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/10/11th-circuit-hears-case-of-christian-school-teacher-fired-for-pre-marital-pregnancy/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/10/11th-circuit-hears-case-of-christian-school-teacher-fired-for-pre-marital-pregnancy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit blocks 2 portions of Alabama immigration law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/09/11th-circuit-blocks-2-portions-of-alabama-immigration-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/09/11th-circuit-blocks-2-portions-of-alabama-immigration-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Southern Poverty Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=128183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/article/20120308/NEWS/120308033/Federal-court-blocks-2-sections-Alabama-immigration-law?odyssey=tab%7Ctopnews%7Ctext%7CFrontpage">Montgomery Advertiser</a>: A federal appeals court Thursday blocked two sections of Alabama's immigration law, including one that had been partially enjoined by a U.S. District Judge in Montgomery.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/09/11th-circuit-blocks-2-portions-of-alabama-immigration-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/09/11th-circuit-blocks-2-portions-of-alabama-immigration-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate confirms Judge Adalberto Jordan to the 11th Circuit</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/15/senate-confirms-judge-adalberto-jordan-to-the-11th-circuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/15/senate-confirms-judge-adalberto-jordan-to-the-11th-circuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=125798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nakedpolitics/2012/02/senate-confirms-judge-adalberto-jordan-to-the-federal-appeals-court.html">Miami Herald</a>: The Senate on Wednesday confirmed Judge Adalberto Jose Jordan to the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which decides the major federal legal disputes of Florida, Georgia and Alabama. Jordan, of Miami, is the first Cuban-born judge to sit on the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/15/senate-confirms-judge-adalberto-jordan-to-the-11th-circuit/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/15/senate-confirms-judge-adalberto-jordan-to-the-11th-circuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul Holds Up Senate Action on 11th Cir. Nominee Over Detainees in Egypt</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/14/rand-paul-holds-up-senate-action-over-detainees-in-egypt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/14/rand-paul-holds-up-senate-action-over-detainees-in-egypt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: People for the American Way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=125737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rollcall.com/news/rand_paul_holds_up_senate_action_adalberto_jordan_detainees_egypt-212388-1.html">Roll Call News</a>: Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is delaying the confirmation of Adalberto Jose Jordan to join the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals as well as a transportation bill in an effort to force Senate leaders to schedule a vote on his proposal to cut off aid to Egypt until Americans being held there are released. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/14/rand-paul-holds-up-senate-action-over-detainees-in-egypt/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/14/rand-paul-holds-up-senate-action-over-detainees-in-egypt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miami federal judge likely to be confirmed to 11th Circuit, but in messy process</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/13/miami-federal-judge-likely-to-be-confirmed-to-11th-circuit-but-in-messy-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/13/miami-federal-judge-likely-to-be-confirmed-to-11th-circuit-but-in-messy-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=125572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nakedpolitics/2012/02/miami-federal-judge-likely-to-be-confirmed-but-in-messy-process.html">Miami Herald</a>: The U.S. Senate is scheduled this afternoon to vote on Adalberto Jose Jordan <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/13/miami-federal-judge-likely-to-be-confirmed-to-11th-circuit-but-in-messy-process/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/13/miami-federal-judge-likely-to-be-confirmed-to-11th-circuit-but-in-messy-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5th Circuit no en banc rehearing on TX sonogram law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/10/5th-circuit-no-en-banc-rehearing-on-tx-sonogram-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/10/5th-circuit-no-en-banc-rehearing-on-tx-sonogram-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Texas Medical Services v. Lakey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=125397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_TEXAS_ABORTION_RULES?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2012-02-10-11-53-25">News from The Associated Press</a>: A federal appeals court has denied a request to reconsider a lawsuit challenging a Texas law that requires doctors to perform a sonogram before an abortion. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/10/5th-circuit-no-en-banc-rehearing-on-tx-sonogram-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/10/5th-circuit-no-en-banc-rehearing-on-tx-sonogram-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA vetting shows White House wants Pryor for 11th Circuit, Cohen for district court; senators want opposite</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/27/aba-vetting-shows-white-house-wants-pryor-for-11th-circuit-cohen-for-district-court-senators-want-opposite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/27/aba-vetting-shows-white-house-wants-pryor-for-11th-circuit-cohen-for-district-court-senators-want-opposite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=124265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dailyreportonline.com/Editorial/News/singleEdit.asp?l=100460628152">Daily Report</a>: The White House and Georgia's U.S. senators may agree that Atlanta lawyers Jill A. Pryor and Mark H. Cohen should be federal judges—but they apparently differ on which lawyer should fill an opening at the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and which one should serve on Atlanta's U.S. District Court. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/27/aba-vetting-shows-white-house-wants-pryor-for-11th-circuit-cohen-for-district-court-senators-want-opposite/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/27/aba-vetting-shows-white-house-wants-pryor-for-11th-circuit-cohen-for-district-court-senators-want-opposite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit asked to reinstate $19.6 million award against Hustler</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/26/11th-circuit-asked-to-reinstate-19-6-million-award-against-hustler/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/26/11th-circuit-asked-to-reinstate-19-6-million-award-against-hustler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Toffoloni v. LFP Publishing Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=124178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/11th-circuit-asked-to-reinstate-19-6-million-award-against-hustler">First Amendment Center</a>: The <a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200816148.pdf" target="_blank">11<sup>th</sup> U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled</a> in June 2009 that a notorious death doesn’t give publishers a blank check to publish any images they wish. The case went to trial, and a jury in June 2011 voted to slap <em>Hustler Magazine</em> with $19.6 million in punitive damages for running the photos. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/26/11th-circuit-asked-to-reinstate-19-6-million-award-against-hustler/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/26/11th-circuit-asked-to-reinstate-19-6-million-award-against-hustler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA Senators send White House names for 11th Circuit vacancies  </title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/26/ga-senators-send-white-house-names-for-11th-circuit-vacancies-%c2%a0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/26/ga-senators-send-white-house-names-for-11th-circuit-vacancies-%c2%a0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=124116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/senators-send-white-house-1317204.html">Atlanta J. Constitution</a>: Republican Sens. Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson on Tuesday wrote White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler that they would not hold up Atlanta lawyer Mark Cohen if he is nominated to fill a vacancy on the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. They also said they would not block U.S. Magistrate Linda Walker and Atlanta lawyer Jill Pryor if they are nominated to the U.S. District Court. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/26/ga-senators-send-white-house-names-for-11th-circuit-vacancies-%c2%a0/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/26/ga-senators-send-white-house-names-for-11th-circuit-vacancies-%c2%a0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit weighs HIV-infected man&#8217;s fight to get job</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/25/11th-circuit-weighs-hiv-infected-mans-fight-to-get-job/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/25/11th-circuit-weighs-hiv-infected-mans-fight-to-get-job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=124002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_POLICE_HIV_LAWSUIT?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2012-01-25-11-45-58">News from The Associated Press</a>: A panel of federal judges appeared skeptical Wednesday of the Atlanta police department's decision to reject a job application from an HIV-infected man. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/25/11th-circuit-weighs-hiv-infected-mans-fight-to-get-job/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/25/11th-circuit-weighs-hiv-infected-mans-fight-to-get-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jill Pryor to join Bill Pryor on the Eleventh Circuit?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/05/jill-pryor-to-join-bill-pryor-on-the-eleventh-circuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/05/jill-pryor-to-join-bill-pryor-on-the-eleventh-circuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=122150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://howappealing.law.com/010512.html#044143">How Appealing</a> reports. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/05/jill-pryor-to-join-bill-pryor-on-the-eleventh-circuit/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/05/jill-pryor-to-join-bill-pryor-on-the-eleventh-circuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit rules in favor of legislative aide fired amid sex change</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/11th-circuit-rules-in-favor-of-legislative-aide-fired-amid-sex-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/11th-circuit-rules-in-favor-of-legislative-aide-fired-amid-sex-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Glenn v. Brumby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal appeals court in Atlanta has ruled in favor of a former Georgia state legislative aide who was fired amid her sex change. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/11th-circuit-rules-in-favor-of-legislative-aide-fired-amid-sex-change/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/11th-circuit-rules-in-favor-of-legislative-aide-fired-amid-sex-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Court appears ready to hand legal victory to transgender woman&#8221;  &#124; Atlanta J. Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/01/court-appears-ready-to-hand-legal-victory-to-transgender-woman-%c2%a0-atlanta-j-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/01/court-appears-ready-to-hand-legal-victory-to-transgender-woman-%c2%a0-atlanta-j-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Title VII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Glenn v. Brumby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=119773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/court-appears-ready-to-1247748.html">Atlanta J. Constitution</a>: A panel of three federal appeals court judges on Thursday appeared strongly inclined to grant a legal victory to Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender woman who was fired as a legislative editor at the General Assembly after she disclosed she was going to make the transition from man to woman. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/01/court-appears-ready-to-hand-legal-victory-to-transgender-woman-%c2%a0-atlanta-j-constitution/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/01/court-appears-ready-to-hand-legal-victory-to-transgender-woman-%c2%a0-atlanta-j-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Timing of Supreme Court Review of Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/15/the-timing-of-supreme-court-review-of-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/15/the-timing-of-supreme-court-review-of-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Florida v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Thomas More Law Center v. Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=110770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/08/monday-round-up-89/">SCOTUSblog</a> links to coverage and offers some insights. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/15/the-timing-of-supreme-court-review-of-obamacare/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/15/the-timing-of-supreme-court-review-of-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eleventh Circuit Decision A Devastating Blow to Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/15/eleventh-circuit-decision-a-devastating-blow-to-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/15/eleventh-circuit-decision-a-devastating-blow-to-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Florida v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=110751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/15/morning-bell-a-devastating-blow-to-obamacare/?utm_source=Newsletter&#038;utm_medium=Email&#038;utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell">Heritage Foundation</a>: Obamacare has suffered a devastating blow. On Friday, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the individual mandate in President Barack Obama’s signature health care legislation is unconstitutional. With its ruling, the court affirmed the principle that the Constitution means what it says—Congress does not have unfettered power to force the American people to comply with any and all dictates it creates. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/15/eleventh-circuit-decision-a-devastating-blow-to-obamacare/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/15/eleventh-circuit-decision-a-devastating-blow-to-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit strikes Obamacare individual mandate</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/12/11th-circuit-strikes-obamacare-individual-mandate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/12/11th-circuit-strikes-obamacare-individual-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Florida v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=110670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A divided three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday struck down the so-called individual mandate, siding with 26 states that had sued to block the law. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/12/11th-circuit-strikes-obamacare-individual-mandate/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/12/11th-circuit-strikes-obamacare-individual-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House: President Obama Nominates Judge Adalberto José Jordán to the United States Court of Appeals</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/03/white-house-president-obama-nominates-judge-adalberto-jose-jordan-to-the-united-states-court-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/03/white-house-president-obama-nominates-judge-adalberto-jose-jordan-to-the-united-states-court-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 11:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/08/02/president-obama-nominates-judge-adalberto-jos-jord-n-united-states-court">The White House</a>: Today, President Obama nominated Judge Adalberto José Jordánto the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/03/white-house-president-obama-nominates-judge-adalberto-jose-jordan-to-the-united-states-court-of-appeals/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/03/white-house-president-obama-nominates-judge-adalberto-jose-jordan-to-the-united-states-court-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ken Klukowski: Last stop for Obamacare before Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/08/ken-klukowski-last-stop-for-obamacare-before-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/08/ken-klukowski-last-stop-for-obamacare-before-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=105808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ken Klukowski at <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2011/06/last-stop-obamacare-supreme-court">The Washington Examiner</a>: Obamacare is likely facing its last stop before it heads to the Supreme Court in 2012. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Atlanta will hear arguments Wednesday in the biggest Obamacare case in the country.
This is the Obama administration's appeal in <em>Florida v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</em>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/08/ken-klukowski-last-stop-for-obamacare-before-supreme-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/08/ken-klukowski-last-stop-for-obamacare-before-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard A. Epstein and Mario Loyola: ObamaCare&#8217;s Next Constitutional Challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/07/richard-a-epstein-and-mario-loyola-obamacares-next-constitutional-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/07/richard-a-epstein-and-mario-loyola-obamacares-next-constitutional-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Florida v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=105666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard A. Epstein and Mario Loyola at <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304474804576367690213892556.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h"> WSJ.com</a>: The constitutional battle over ObamaCare has largely focused on the constitutionality of the individual mandate. Namely, does forcing individuals to buy health insurance violate the commerce clause? But as the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals prepares to hear Florida v. United States, a second issue is of equal importance: Was District Court Judge Roger Vinson correct to rule that the federal government can force states to expand their Medicaid programs as a precondition for continuing to receive matching federal funds for the program? <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/07/richard-a-epstein-and-mario-loyola-obamacares-next-constitutional-challenge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/07/richard-a-epstein-and-mario-loyola-obamacares-next-constitutional-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit appeals court authorizes recordings of Obamacare oral arguments so they can be sold</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/31/11th-circuit-appeals-court-authorizes-recordings-of-obamacare-oral-arguments-so-they-can-be-sold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/31/11th-circuit-appeals-court-authorizes-recordings-of-obamacare-oral-arguments-so-they-can-be-sold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 21:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=105117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/11th-circuit-appeals-court-authorizes-recordings-of-oral-arguments-about-health-care-overhaul/2011/05/31/AGAEndFH_story.html?wprss=rss_national">The Washington Post</a>: A federal appeals court in Atlanta says it will allow high-profile arguments over the Obama administration’s health care overhaul law to be recorded so they can be sold to the public. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/31/11th-circuit-appeals-court-authorizes-recordings-of-obamacare-oral-arguments-so-they-can-be-sold/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/31/11th-circuit-appeals-court-authorizes-recordings-of-obamacare-oral-arguments-so-they-can-be-sold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Identity of 11th Circuit panel in Obamacare challenge revealed</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/25/identity-of-11th-circuit-panel-in-obamacare-challenge-revealed-how-appealing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/25/identity-of-11th-circuit-panel-in-obamacare-challenge-revealed-how-appealing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 18:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=104672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://howappealing.law.com/052511.html#041756">How Appealing</a>: An anonymous source reports that the three-judge panel will consist of Chief Judge Joel F. Dubina and Circuit Judges Frank M. Hull and Stanley Marcus. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/25/identity-of-11th-circuit-panel-in-obamacare-challenge-revealed-how-appealing/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/25/identity-of-11th-circuit-panel-in-obamacare-challenge-revealed-how-appealing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit: States ask US court to overturn health overhaul</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/04/11th-circuit-states-ask-us-court-to-overturn-health-overhaul/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/04/11th-circuit-states-ask-us-court-to-overturn-health-overhaul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 21:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Florida v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=102799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_HEALTH_OVERHAUL_LAWSUIT?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2011-05-04-17-01-29">AP</a>: More than two dozen states challenging the health care overhaul urged a U.S. appeals court on Wednesday to strike down the Obama administration's landmark law, arguing it far exceeds the federal government's powers. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/04/11th-circuit-states-ask-us-court-to-overturn-health-overhaul/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/04/11th-circuit-states-ask-us-court-to-overturn-health-overhaul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit panel to hear Obamacare challenge, en banc review denied</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/31/11th-circuit-panel-to-hear-obamacare-challenge-en-banc-review-denied/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/31/11th-circuit-panel-to-hear-obamacare-challenge-en-banc-review-denied/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Florida v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=99794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/03/en-banc-denied-on-health-care/">SCOTUS Blog</a>: The challengers on March 10 had requested initial en banc review of the case of Florida, et al., v. U.S. Health and Human Services Department, et al., (docket 11-11021) and for a hearing June 6.  It would have taken the votes of at least six members of the ten regular judges to grant that request.
The briefing in the case will start next Monday and is to be completed by May 25.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/31/11th-circuit-panel-to-hear-obamacare-challenge-en-banc-review-denied/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/31/11th-circuit-panel-to-hear-obamacare-challenge-en-banc-review-denied/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADF attorney argues before 11th Circuit: Ga. counselor wrongly fired for following conscience</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/30/adf-attorney-argues-before-11th-circuit-ga-counselor-wrongly-fired-for-following-conscience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/30/adf-attorney-argues-before-11th-circuit-ga-counselor-wrongly-fired-for-following-conscience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Walden v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=99562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ADF attorney available to media after defending Christian counselor who referred client seeking advice on same-sex relationship to colleague <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/30/adf-attorney-argues-before-11th-circuit-ga-counselor-wrongly-fired-for-following-conscience/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/30/adf-attorney-argues-before-11th-circuit-ga-counselor-wrongly-fired-for-following-conscience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit Obamacare challenge fast tracked</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/14/11th-circuit-obamacare-challenge-fast-tracked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/14/11th-circuit-obamacare-challenge-fast-tracked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=97877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/03/faster-health-care-appeal-asked/">SCOTUS Blog</a>: The Eleventh Circuit Court <a href="http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/11th-CA-briefing-order-on-health-care-3-11-11.pdf">agreed Friday</a> to put the health care case on a fast track, and issued a briefing schedule, but said it would keep open for now the question of whether the appeal will be heard initially by the full Court or by a three-judge panel.  The Court said the briefing schedule it had laid out would not be affected by what it decides for or against <em>en banc </em>review.  The briefing will begin April 4 and will be completed on May 25.  That schedule could still allow for an <em>en banc </em>oral argument on June 6, as the challengers requested. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/14/11th-circuit-obamacare-challenge-fast-tracked/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/14/11th-circuit-obamacare-challenge-fast-tracked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Cir. Panel: Minor girls in &#8216;Wild&#8217; video to remain anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/01/11th-cir-panel-minor-girls-in-wild-video-to-remain-anonymous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/01/11th-cir-panel-minor-girls-in-wild-video-to-remain-anonymous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Plaintiff B v. Francis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=94329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_GIRLS_GONE_WILD?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">AP</a>: "A federal appeals court has ruled that two underage girls can keep their names under wraps in their lawsuit against "Girls Gone Wild" producer Joe Francis." &#124; <a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010664.pdf"><em>Plaintiff B v. Francis</em></a>, No. 10-10664 (11th Cir. Feb. 1, 2011) <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/01/11th-cir-panel-minor-girls-in-wild-video-to-remain-anonymous/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/01/11th-cir-panel-minor-girls-in-wild-video-to-remain-anonymous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit upholds Manatee County, Fla. SOB ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/01/11th-circuit-upholds-manatee-county-fla-sob-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/01/11th-circuit-upholds-manatee-county-fla-sob-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: SOB Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Peek-a-Boo Lounge of Bradenton v. Manatee County Fla.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=94320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peek-a-Boo Lounge of Bradenton v. Manatee County, Fla, No. 09-16438., 2011 WL 182819 (11th Cir. Jan. 21, 2011) <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/01/11th-circuit-upholds-manatee-county-fla-sob-ordinance/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/01/11th-circuit-upholds-manatee-county-fla-sob-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court rules that case of employees fired for being &#8220;too religious&#8221; should go to jury</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/14/court-rules-that-case-of-employees-fired-for-being-too-religious-should-go-to-jury/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/14/court-rules-that-case-of-employees-fired-for-being-too-religious-should-go-to-jury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Case Filings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Dixon v. Hallmark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=86451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lc.org/index.cfm?PID=14100&#38;PRID=1013">Liberty Counsel</a>: "A federal court of appeals <a href="http://www.liberty.edu/media/9980/attachments/appeal_dixon_120910.pdf">has ruled</a> that the case of two employees who were fired for being 'too religious' should go to a jury." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/14/court-rules-that-case-of-employees-fired-for-being-too-religious-should-go-to-jury/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/14/court-rules-that-case-of-employees-fired-for-being-too-religious-should-go-to-jury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA: Employees fired and evicted for being &#8220;too religious&#8221; should get day in court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/28/ga-employees-fired-and-evicted-for-being-too-religious-should-get-day-in-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/28/ga-employees-fired-and-evicted-for-being-too-religious-should-get-day-in-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=79043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lc.org/index.cfm?PID=14100&#038;PRID=992">Liberty Counsel</a>: "Today Liberty Counsel will present oral arguments at the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, requesting that a trial court’s summary judgment be reversed in an employment and housing discrimination case. Daniel and Sharon Dixon were fired by The Hallmark Companies from managing an apartment complex and evicted from their apartment for being 'too religious,' because they displayed, in the rental office, stained glass artwork with flowers and the phrase 'Consider the lilies... Matthew 6:28.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/28/ga-employees-fired-and-evicted-for-being-too-religious-should-get-day-in-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/28/ga-employees-fired-and-evicted-for-being-too-religious-should-get-day-in-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;US federal appeals panel orders review of gay Serbian&#8217;s asylum request&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/29/us-federal-appeals-panel-orders-review-of-gay-serbians-asylum-request/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/29/us-federal-appeals-panel-orders-review-of-gay-serbians-asylum-request/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Serbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=74251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/world/breakingnews/us-federal-appeals-panel-orders-review-of-gay-serbians-asylum-request-103943729.html">Winnipeg Free Press (AP)</a>: "The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday ordered the Board of Immigration Appeals to review Mladen Zeljko Todorovic's case again. The board had ruled that Todorovic's testimony could not be used because he wasn't a 'credible witness.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/29/us-federal-appeals-panel-orders-review-of-gay-serbians-asylum-request/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/29/us-federal-appeals-panel-orders-review-of-gay-serbians-asylum-request/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberty Counsel files brief on behalf of Santa Rosa County teachers and staff</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/21/liberty-counsel-files-brief-on-behalf-of-santa-rosa-county-teachers-and-staff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/21/liberty-counsel-files-brief-on-behalf-of-santa-rosa-county-teachers-and-staff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Educators Association International (CEAI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Doe v. School Board for Santa Rosa County Florida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=73134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lc.org/index.cfm?PID=14100&#038;PRID=977">Liberty Counsel</a>: "Liberty Counsel filed its Initial Brief  at the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta, Georgia, on behalf of the Christian Educators Association International ('CEAI'). CEAI sought to intervene in a federal trial court to defend the rights of the faculty and staff of the Santa Rosa County School District, but the court refused the request and refused to dismiss the case brought by the ACLU, even though the case had become moot following the graduation of the two high school seniors who brought the suit under the pseudonym of 'Doe.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/21/liberty-counsel-files-brief-on-behalf-of-santa-rosa-county-teachers-and-staff/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/21/liberty-counsel-files-brief-on-behalf-of-santa-rosa-county-teachers-and-staff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>En Banc Review Granted In Challenge To Orlando&#8217;s Park Feeding Ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/01/en-banc-review-granted-in-challenge-to-orlandos-park-feeding-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/01/en-banc-review-granted-in-challenge-to-orlandos-park-feeding-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: First Vagabonds Church of God v. City of Orlando Florida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/01/en-banc-review-granted-in-challenge-to-orlandos-park-feeding-ordinance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/09/en-banc-review-granted-in-challenge-to.html">Religion Clause Blog</a>: "The 3-judge panel in the case, in a 2-1 decision rejected free exercise, free expression and other challenges to Orlando's Large Group Feeding Ordinance that requires a permit to feed more than 25 people in any downtown park, and limits a group to 2 permits per year in any park." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/01/en-banc-review-granted-in-challenge-to-orlandos-park-feeding-ordinance/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/01/en-banc-review-granted-in-challenge-to-orlandos-park-feeding-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit rejects challenge to federal immigration restrictions on marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/27/11th-circuit-rejects-challenge-to-federal-immigration-restrictions-on-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/27/11th-circuit-rejects-challenge-to-federal-immigration-restrictions-on-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: U.S. v. Di Petro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=70610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200913726.pdf"><em>US v Di Pietro</em></a>, No. 09-13726 (11th Cir. Aug. 27, 2010) &#124; <a href="https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200913726.pdf&#38;pli=1">Google Viewer</a>

"This case requires us to address de novo two constitutional challenges to § 1325(c) U.S.C. § 1325(c), ['which imposes criminal liability on any individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of evading federal immigration laws'] in evaluating whether the district court properly denied Ms. Di Pietro’s motion to dismiss her indictment. Specifically, Ms. Di Pietro argues that § 1325(c) is so vague that it violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. She also contends that the statute unconstitutionally preempts Florida’s marriage laws, which purportedly recognize the validity of marriages entered into for any purpose. After thorough review and oral argument, we agree with the district court that Ms. Di Pietro’s constitutional challenges do not pass muster. We therefore affirm the district court’s ruling and sustain her conviction under the statute." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/27/11th-circuit-rejects-challenge-to-federal-immigration-restrictions-on-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/27/11th-circuit-rejects-challenge-to-federal-immigration-restrictions-on-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Split en banc Eleventh Circuit rules child molester&#8217;s 17½-year sentence substantively unreasonable</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/02/split-en-banc-eleventh-circuit-rules-child-molesters-17%c2%bd-year-sentence-substantively-unreasonable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/02/split-en-banc-eleventh-circuit-rules-child-molesters-17%c2%bd-year-sentence-substantively-unreasonable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: United States v. Irey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=67101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://sdfla.blogspot.com/2010/07/255-pages-of-en-banc-fun.html">Southern District of Florida Blog</a>: "The 11th Circuit issued <a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200810997op2.pdf"><em>United States v. Irey</em></a> today, with 255 pages of opinions, which are a must read for any criminal practitioner in this Circuit. The question presented is whether a lengthy variance (from 30 years to 17) was reasonable in a horrific case involving multiple acts of child rape. The majority, written by Carnes and joined by Dubina, Black, Hull, Marcus, Wilson and Pryor, found the variance substantively unreasonable." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/02/split-en-banc-eleventh-circuit-rules-child-molesters-17%c2%bd-year-sentence-substantively-unreasonable/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/02/split-en-banc-eleventh-circuit-rules-child-molesters-17%c2%bd-year-sentence-substantively-unreasonable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

