<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Court: 2nd Circuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/court-2nd-circuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court Rules N.Y. Town’s Prayers Too Christian &#124; The New American</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/federal-court-rules-n-y-town%e2%80%99s-prayers-too-christian-the-new-american/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/federal-court-rules-n-y-town%e2%80%99s-prayers-too-christian-the-new-american/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 22:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Joel Oster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Galloway v. Town of Greece]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New American: Oster pointed out that the U.S. Constitution “has never required any local government to engage in such gymnastics to have prayer, as is clearly seen by the prayers of America’s Founding Fathers. Prayer-givers have a right protected &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/federal-court-rules-n-y-town%e2%80%99s-prayers-too-christian-the-new-american/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/federal-court-rules-n-y-town%e2%80%99s-prayers-too-christian-the-new-american/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court rules NY town&#8217;s prayer violated Constitution &#124; Fox News</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/court-rules-ny-towns-prayer-violated-constitution-fox-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/court-rules-ny-towns-prayer-violated-constitution-fox-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Joel Oster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Galloway v. Town of Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 21305]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/05/17/court-rules-ny-town-prayer-violated-constitution/">Fox News</a>: The Alliance Defense Fund, an Arizona-based group that presses faith-based cases in courts nationwide, represented the town in court. It said it will appeal the ruling.
Joel Oster, senior counsel for ADF who argued the town's case, called the ruling "highly inconsistent" with what the Supreme Court has said on the issue and said it means towns will have to "complete an obstacle course" before they can qualify to say a prayer before a meeting. "The town has no obligation to go outside of its borders as if it's an affirmative action program," he said.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/court-rules-ny-towns-prayer-violated-constitution-fox-news/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/court-rules-ny-towns-prayer-violated-constitution-fox-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greece Needs a New Prayer Policy &#124; Findlaw</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/greece-needs-a-new-prayer-policy-findlaw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/greece-needs-a-new-prayer-policy-findlaw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Joel Oster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Galloway v. Town of Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 21305]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/second_circuit/2012/05/greece-needs-a-new-prayer-policy.html?DCMP=NWL-pro_top">Findlaw</a>: "The court wants the town to be prayer monitors, to determine how many prayers in Jesus' name are too many," which would violate the Establishment Clause, the Alliance Defense Fund's Joel Oster told Thomson Reuters News &#038; Insight.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/greece-needs-a-new-prayer-policy-findlaw/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/greece-needs-a-new-prayer-policy-findlaw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court diluting Christian prayer &#124; One News Now</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/court-diluting-christian-prayer-one-news-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/court-diluting-christian-prayer-one-news-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Joel Oster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Galloway v. Town of Greece]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1600248">One News Now</a>: . . .  ADF attorney Joel Oster tells OneNewsNow prayers have been offered according to the "conscience of the speaker." "There is no legal reason why a town cannot engage in this practice today with people from within its own community," he asserts. "The district court rightly affirmed the constitutionality of the town's policy, and we will appeal the Second Circuit's decision. Secularist groups cannot be allowed to force local governments to engage in strange hoops and hurdles that effectively eliminate prayers by making them too difficult to take place." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/court-diluting-christian-prayer-one-news-now/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/court-diluting-christian-prayer-one-news-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court rules NY town&#8217;s prayer violated Constitution &#124; Federal News Radio</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/court-rules-ny-towns-prayer-violated-constitution-federal-news-radio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/court-rules-ny-towns-prayer-violated-constitution-federal-news-radio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Joel Oster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Galloway v. Town of Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 21305]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.federalnewsradio.com/615/2868897/Court-rules-NY-towns-prayer-violated-Constitution-">Federal News Radio</a>: The Alliance Defense Fund, an Arizona-based group that presses faith-based cases in courts nationwide, represented the town in court. It said it will appeal the ruling. Joel Oster, senior counsel for ADF who argued the town's case, called the ruling "highly inconsistent" with what the Supreme Court has said on the issue and said it means towns will have to "complete an obstacle course" before they can qualify to say a prayer before a meeting. "The town has no obligation to go outside of its borders as if it's an affirmative action program," he said. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/court-rules-ny-towns-prayer-violated-constitution-federal-news-radio/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/18/court-rules-ny-towns-prayer-violated-constitution-federal-news-radio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADF to appeal strange ruling against NY town’s prayer policy</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/17/adf-to-appeal-strange-ruling-against-ny-town%e2%80%99s-prayer-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/17/adf-to-appeal-strange-ruling-against-ny-town%e2%80%99s-prayer-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Galloway v. Town of Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 21305]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=133974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2nd Circuit says town should go outside its borders to search for non-Christians <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/17/adf-to-appeal-strange-ruling-against-ny-town%e2%80%99s-prayer-policy/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/17/adf-to-appeal-strange-ruling-against-ny-town%e2%80%99s-prayer-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit finds NY town prayers unconstitutional &#8211; too many Christian prayers</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/17/2nd-circuit-finds-ny-town-prayers-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/17/2nd-circuit-finds-ny-town-prayers-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Joel Oster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Galloway v. Town of Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 21305]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=133964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2012/05_-_May/2nd_Circuit_finds_NY_town_prayers_unconstitutional/">Reuters</a>: Joel Oster of the Alliance Defense Fund, which represents Greece, said the town was prepared to appeal the case as far as the Supreme Court. "The court wants the town to be prayer monitors, to determine how many prayers in Jesus' name are too many," he said. That outcome violates the Establishment Clause, he said. Oster pointed to a 2008 ruling by the 11th Circuit in Pelphrey v. Cobb County, Georgia, upholding a county commission's opening prayer policy.&#124; <a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/1b72f939-2aa1-4dd7-8a00-f8982b898812/1/doc/10-3635_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/1b72f939-2aa1-4dd7-8a00-f8982b898812/1/hilite/">Galloway v. Town of Greece</a>, No. 10-3635-cv <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/17/2nd-circuit-finds-ny-town-prayers-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/17/2nd-circuit-finds-ny-town-prayers-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Droney Sworn In By Lieberman As U.S. Appeals Court Judge for the Second Circuit</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/13/droney-sworn-in-by-lieberman-as-u-s-appeals-court-judge-for-the-second-circuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/13/droney-sworn-in-by-lieberman-as-u-s-appeals-court-judge-for-the-second-circuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=128455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://courantblogs.com/capitol-watch/droney-sworn-in-by-lieberman-as-u-s-appeals-court-judge/">Hartford Courant</a>: Former U.S. Attorney and District Court Judge Christopher F. Droney officially became a member the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Monday during an induction ceremony that took place in Hartford before an crowd of luminaries from the bar, the judiciary, politics and law enforcement. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/13/droney-sworn-in-by-lieberman-as-u-s-appeals-court-judge-for-the-second-circuit/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/13/droney-sworn-in-by-lieberman-as-u-s-appeals-court-judge-for-the-second-circuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit: TRO On Church Use of Schools Only Applies To One Church</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/20/2nd-circuit-tro-on-church-use-of-schools-only-applies-to-one-church/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/20/2nd-circuit-tro-on-church-use-of-schools-only-applies-to-one-church/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Bronx Household of Faith v Board of Education of the City of New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 4013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=126209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2012/02/2nd-circuit-tro-on-church-use-of.html">Religion Clause</a>: Yesterday, the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order (<a href="http://www.nylj.com/nylawyer/adgifs/decisions/022112household.pdf">full text</a>) in the case, clarifying that the TRO applies only to evicting Bronx Household of Faith, and does not apply to protect other churches that are not parties to the litigation. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/20/2nd-circuit-tro-on-church-use-of-schools-only-applies-to-one-church/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/20/2nd-circuit-tro-on-church-use-of-schools-only-applies-to-one-church/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Connecticut High Court Adopts 2nd Circuit&#8217;s Version of Ministerial Exception Doctrine</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/connecticut-high-court-adopts-2nd-circuits-version-of-ministerial-exception-doctrine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/connecticut-high-court-adopts-2nd-circuits-version-of-ministerial-exception-doctrine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Title VII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Dayner v. Archdiocese of Hartford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2011/07/connecticut-high-court-adopts-2nd.html">Religion Clause</a>: In <em>Dayner v. Archdiocese of Hartford</em>, (CT Sup. Ct., release date 8/2/2011), the Connecticut Supreme Court adopted the Second Circuit's version of the "ministerial exception" doctrine and dismissed claims by the principal of a Catholic school that she she was wrongfully terminated from her position. In reaching this conclusion the court focused on a split among circuits . . . <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/connecticut-high-court-adopts-2nd-circuits-version-of-ministerial-exception-doctrine/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/connecticut-high-court-adopts-2nd-circuits-version-of-ministerial-exception-doctrine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. District Judge Christopher Droney Gets Unanimous Approval From Senate Judiciary Committee For Nomination To Federal Appeals Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/25/u-s-district-judge-christopher-droney-gets-unanimous-approval-from-senate-judiciary-committee-for-nomination-to-federal-appeals-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/25/u-s-district-judge-christopher-droney-gets-unanimous-approval-from-senate-judiciary-committee-for-nomination-to-federal-appeals-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.courant.com/community/west-hartford/hc-droney-senate-0722-20110721,0,2544273.story">Courant.com</a>: The U.S. Senate's Judiciary Committee approved U.S. District Judge Christopher Droney's nomination to the federal appeals court by a unanimous voice vote Thursday morning, sending the appointment to almost certain approval in the full Senate. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/25/u-s-district-judge-christopher-droney-gets-unanimous-approval-from-senate-judiciary-committee-for-nomination-to-federal-appeals-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/25/u-s-district-judge-christopher-droney-gets-unanimous-approval-from-senate-judiciary-committee-for-nomination-to-federal-appeals-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit: U.S. cannnot condition AIDS funding on anti-prostitution pledge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/2nd-circuit-u-s-cannnot-condition-aids-funding-on-anti-prostitution-pledge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/2nd-circuit-u-s-cannnot-condition-aids-funding-on-anti-prostitution-pledge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Alliance for Open Society International v. U.S. Agency for International Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal appeals court has ruled that the United States cannot force partners in its international fight against AIDS to denounce prostitution as a condition for receiving funding. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/2nd-circuit-u-s-cannnot-condition-aids-funding-on-anti-prostitution-pledge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/2nd-circuit-u-s-cannnot-condition-aids-funding-on-anti-prostitution-pledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jordan Lorence: Bronx Household of Faith Case Appealed En Banc To All Second Circuit Judges</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/20/jordan-lorence-bronx-household-of-faith-case-appealed-en-banc-to-all-second-circuit-judges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/20/jordan-lorence-bronx-household-of-faith-case-appealed-en-banc-to-all-second-circuit-judges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jordan Lorence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Bronx Household of Faith v Board of Education of the City of New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=106810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ADF attorney Jordan Lorence at the <a href="http://blog.speakupmovement.org/church/equal-access/bronx-household-of-faith-case-appealed-en-banc-to-all-second-circuit-judges/">Speak Up Movement Church Blog</a>:  The Alliance Defense Fund has petitioned the Second Circuit to rehear the Bronx Household of Faith case en banc, which means that all eleven judges will decide whether to rehear the case. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/20/jordan-lorence-bronx-household-of-faith-case-appealed-en-banc-to-all-second-circuit-judges/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/20/jordan-lorence-bronx-household-of-faith-case-appealed-en-banc-to-all-second-circuit-judges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADF appeals Bronx ruling to keep churches meeting in NYC public schools</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/16/adf-appeals-bronx-ruling-to-keep-churches-meeting-in-nyc-public-schools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/16/adf-appeals-bronx-ruling-to-keep-churches-meeting-in-nyc-public-schools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jordan Lorence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Bronx Household of Faith v Board of Education of the City of New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=106580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund attorneys filed a petition with the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit Thursday in an effort to ensure that churches and other religious groups can continue to meet at New York City public schools. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/16/adf-appeals-bronx-ruling-to-keep-churches-meeting-in-nyc-public-schools/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/16/adf-appeals-bronx-ruling-to-keep-churches-meeting-in-nyc-public-schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jordan Lorence on KFUO with Roland Lettner: 2nd Cir. says churches can’t rent NYC school facilities, but other groups can &#8211; Bronx Household</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/09/jordan-lorence-on-kfuo-with-roland-lettner-2nd-cir-says-churches-can%e2%80%99t-rent-nyc-school-facilities-but-other-groups-can-bronx-household/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/09/jordan-lorence-on-kfuo-with-roland-lettner-2nd-cir-says-churches-can%e2%80%99t-rent-nyc-school-facilities-but-other-groups-can-bronx-household/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jordan Lorence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Bronx Household of Faith v Board of Education of the City of New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=105938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ADF attorney <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-jordan-lorence/">Jordan Lorence</a> on <a href="http://www.kfuo.org/">KFUO with Roland Lettner</a> to discuss the <a href="http://adfmedia.org/News/PRDetail/?CID=26749">Bronx Household ruling</a>. &#124; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/2011060901.mp3">MP3 audio 9:57 mins</a> &#124; See Jordan's commentary at Baptist Press:  <a href="http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/BPFirstPerson.asp?ID=35482">Church is like a rodeo? A court ruling says it is</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/09/jordan-lorence-on-kfuo-with-roland-lettner-2nd-cir-says-churches-can%e2%80%99t-rent-nyc-school-facilities-but-other-groups-can-bronx-household/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/09/jordan-lorence-on-kfuo-with-roland-lettner-2nd-cir-says-churches-can%e2%80%99t-rent-nyc-school-facilities-but-other-groups-can-bronx-household/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/2011060901.mp3" length="2391538" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit: NY can block school worship service &#8211; Bronx Household of Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/02/2nd-circuit-ny-can-block-school-worship-service-bronx-household-of-faith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/02/2nd-circuit-ny-can-block-school-worship-service-bronx-household-of-faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Bronx Household of Faith v Board of Education of the City of New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=105279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal appeals court has ruled that the city of New York can enforce a rule prohibiting outside groups from using public school facilities after hours for religious worship services. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/02/2nd-circuit-ny-can-block-school-worship-service-bronx-household-of-faith/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/02/2nd-circuit-ny-can-block-school-worship-service-bronx-household-of-faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit upholds school&#8217;s restriction on sexually suggestive student cartoon</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/18/2nd-circuit-upholds-schools-restriction-on-sexually-suggestive-student-cartoon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/18/2nd-circuit-upholds-schools-restriction-on-sexually-suggestive-student-cartoon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 18:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: R.O. v. Ithaca City School District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=103956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://howappealing.law.com/051811.html#041670">How Appealing links</a> to the ruling and earlier coverage in <em><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/85e09df7-e1aa-47e0-8f99-e88e5f14cb88/1/doc/09-1651-cv_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/85e09df7-e1aa-47e0-8f99-e88e5f14cb88/1/hilite/">R.O. v. Ithaca City School District</a></em>, No. 09-1651 (2nd Cir. May 18, 2011) <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/18/2nd-circuit-upholds-schools-restriction-on-sexually-suggestive-student-cartoon/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/18/2nd-circuit-upholds-schools-restriction-on-sexually-suggestive-student-cartoon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carney confirmed to the 2nd Circuit</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/17/carney-confirmed-to-the-2nd-circuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/17/carney-confirmed-to-the-2nd-circuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 21:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=103894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/05/senators-debate-whether-gcs-can-be-judges.html">Blog of the Legal Times</a>: Yale University's deputy general counsel, Susan Carney, will join the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, after the Senate put aside concerns about her lack of recent litigation work and voted today for her confirmation. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/17/carney-confirmed-to-the-2nd-circuit/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/17/carney-confirmed-to-the-2nd-circuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Nominates Droney For Appeals Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/04/obama-nominates-droney-for-appeals-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/04/obama-nominates-droney-for-appeals-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 20:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=102787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-obama-picks-droney-0505-20110504,0,1539438.story">Harford Courant</a>: President Obamaon Wednesday nominated federal district court Judge Christopher F. Droney to the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, a source involved in the appointment process said. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/04/obama-nominates-droney-for-appeals-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/04/obama-nominates-droney-for-appeals-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vermont: &#8220;JN36TN&#8221; OK with DMV</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/24/vermont-jn36tn-ok-with-dmv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/24/vermont-jn36tn-ok-with-dmv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jeremy Tedesco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: License Plates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Byrne v. Rutledge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=93024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1278708">OneNewsNow</a>: "'The state said, "No -- we don't allow religion or a deity on our vanity plates" and denied the request,' recaps Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) attorney [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-jeremy-tedesco/">Jeremy Tedesco</a>]. 'So we litigated the case, and after five years, we won at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. After the district court ruled against us, the Second Circuit said that Mr. Byrne needs to be granted equal access to the vanity plate forum for his religious speech.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/24/vermont-jn36tn-ok-with-dmv/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/24/vermont-jn36tn-ok-with-dmv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vt. won&#8217;t appeal religious vanity plate decision</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/17/vt-wont-appeal-religious-vanity-plate-decision-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/17/vt-wont-appeal-religious-vanity-plate-decision-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jeremy Tedesco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: License Plates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Byrne v. Rutledge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=91667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/news/nation/2011/01/vt-wont-appeal-religious-vanity-plate-decision">Washington Examiner (AP)</a>: "The state of Vermont has ended a years-long legal dispute with a man who has been fighting for the right to display a reference to one of the Bible's most famous passages on a vanity plate . . . 'This really is a great victory for free speech,' said [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-jeremy-tedesco/">Jeremy Tedesco</a>], the general council for the Arizona-based Alliance Defense Fund, which represented Byrne." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/17/vt-wont-appeal-religious-vanity-plate-decision-2/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/17/vt-wont-appeal-religious-vanity-plate-decision-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vt. won&#8217;t appeal religious vanity plate decision</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/14/vt-wont-appeal-religious-vanity-plate-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/14/vt-wont-appeal-religious-vanity-plate-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: License Plates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Byrne v. Rutledge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=91495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_RELIGIOUS_PLATES?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2011-01-14-12-44-21">Associated Press</a>: "A Vermont man will be able to get a license plate that refers to a famous passage from the Bible's New Testament." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/14/vt-wont-appeal-religious-vanity-plate-decision/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/14/vt-wont-appeal-religious-vanity-plate-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Judge defies prosecutors on pornography sentence</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/14/ny-judge-defies-prosecutors-on-pornography-sentence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/14/ny-judge-defies-prosecutors-on-pornography-sentence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: U.S. v. Polouizzi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=91444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/14/nyregion/14weinstein.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss">New York Times</a>: "A man whose conviction on child pornography charges won him an unusual champion — the trial judge, Jack B. Weinstein — was sentenced on Thursday to five years in prison, the minimum sentence required by law. Even then, Judge Weinstein, of Federal District Court in Brooklyn, was compassionate toward the defendant, allowing him to remain free for two more months, and dismissive of the government’s efforts to get a longer sentence." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/14/ny-judge-defies-prosecutors-on-pornography-sentence/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/14/ny-judge-defies-prosecutors-on-pornography-sentence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matthew Sharp: Vermont had no license to censor vanity plates</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/12/matthew-sharp-vermont-had-no-license-to-censor-vanity-plates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/12/matthew-sharp-vermont-had-no-license-to-censor-vanity-plates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Matt Sharp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: License Plates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Byrne v. Rutledge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=90962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ADF attorney <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/01/about-matt-sharp/">Matthew Sharp</a> writing at <a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/MatthewSharp/2011/01/11/vermont_had_no_license_to_censor_vanity_plates/page/full/">Townhall</a>: "[T]he recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in <em>Byrne v. Rutledge</em>, a lawsuit wrapped up Monday, assures us that no matter how short the message or the viewpoint it expresses, it is protected by the First Amendment . . . Shawn Byrne applied to the Vermont DMV for the tag 'JN36TN,' a creative reference to the popular Bible verse, John 3:16. But Vermont denied his request, citing a state law prohibiting vanity plates that reference religion or deity." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/12/matthew-sharp-vermont-had-no-license-to-censor-vanity-plates/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/12/matthew-sharp-vermont-had-no-license-to-censor-vanity-plates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit ruling opens the door to more nudity</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/10/2nd-circuit-ruling-opens-the-door-to-more-nudity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/10/2nd-circuit-ruling-opens-the-door-to-more-nudity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: ABC v. FCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=90541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/tv/bottoms_up_TVD8XC31Te6v2kQTNAWc0J#ixzz1AM2dCtnY">New York Post</a>: "The US Second Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated the $1.21 million worth of fines that the FCC levied against ABC after alleging that the network violated broadcast indecency standards for daring to show actress Charlotte Ross' naked behind during a 2003 episode of 'NYPD Blue.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/10/2nd-circuit-ruling-opens-the-door-to-more-nudity/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/10/2nd-circuit-ruling-opens-the-door-to-more-nudity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit: TV can&#8217;t be fined for &#8216;NYPD Blue&#8217; nude shot</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/04/2nd-circuit-tv-cant-be-fined-for-nypd-blue-nude-shot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/04/2nd-circuit-tv-cant-be-fined-for-nypd-blue-nude-shot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: ABC v. FCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=89667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A federal appeals court says the Federal Communications Commission cannot fine broadcasters for showing a woman's nude buttocks on a 2003 episode of 'NYPD Blue.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/04/2nd-circuit-tv-cant-be-fined-for-nypd-blue-nude-shot/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/04/2nd-circuit-tv-cant-be-fined-for-nypd-blue-nude-shot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nineteen judicial nominees confirmed in the last week</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/28/nineteen-judicial-nominees-confirmed-in-the-last-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/28/nineteen-judicial-nominees-confirmed-in-the-last-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 10th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 4th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: Federal Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=88516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Orin Kerr <a href="http://volokh.com/2010/12/23/nineteen-judicial-nominees-confirmed-in-the-last-week/">writing at The Volokh Conspiracy</a>: "<a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/255892/senator-mcconnell-judicial-confirmations-ed-whelan">Nineteen judicial nominees</a> have been confirmed in the last week. By my count, those nineteen confirmations include five circuit court confirmations: 1) Mary Murguia for the Ninth Circuit; 2) Scott Matheson Jr. for the Tenth Circuit; 3) Kathleen O’Malley for the Federal Circuit; 4) Raymond Lohier Jr. for the Second Circuit; and 5) Albert Diaz for the Fourth Circuit." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/28/nineteen-judicial-nominees-confirmed-in-the-last-week/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/28/nineteen-judicial-nominees-confirmed-in-the-last-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit is back in Democrats&#8217; hands</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/2nd-circuit-is-back-in-democrats-hands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/2nd-circuit-is-back-in-democrats-hands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=87978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2010/12/2nd-circuit-is-back-in-democrats-hands.html">Blog of LegalTimes</a>: "The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit again has a majority of active judges appointed by Democratic presidents, after the Senate confirmed Raymond Lohier Jr. on Sunday." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/2nd-circuit-is-back-in-democrats-hands/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/2nd-circuit-is-back-in-democrats-hands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court says &#8220;no&#8221; to nurse&#8217;s conscience rights</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/court-says-no-to-nurses-conscience-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/court-says-no-to-nurses-conscience-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Cenzon-DeCarlo v The Mount Sinai Hospital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=87860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1257162">OneNewsNow</a>: "A New York nurse has lost her appeal of a court decision involving a work incident that she believes violated her conscience rights . . . 'Unfortunately, the Obama administration has now taken the position that it will not enforce rights under the Church Amendment and has tried to set aside regulations passed in the Bush administration to give the Church Amendments more teeth and to protect pro-life healthcare workers,' [ADF Attorney <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-steven-h-aden/">Steve Aden</a>] laments." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/court-says-no-to-nurses-conscience-rights/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/court-says-no-to-nurses-conscience-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have US conscience clause protections been eviscerated?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/have-us-conscience-clause-protections-been-eviscerated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/have-us-conscience-clause-protections-been-eviscerated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Cenzon-DeCarlo v The Mount Sinai Hospital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=84625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James S. Cole <a href="http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/have_us_conscience_clause_protections_been_eviscerated/">writing at MercatorNet</a>: "As a result of the federal courts’ jurisprudence and the current Administration’s unwillingness to enforce the Church Amendment, federal conscience clause protections are dead letters . . . Until the new Congress enacts specific legislation to allow individuals to vindicate the conscience rights Congress has given them (and overrides a Presidential veto), or until a new Administration is inaugurated that will live up to its duty of enforcing the laws on the books, federal conscience clause protections might as well not exist." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/have-us-conscience-clause-protections-been-eviscerated/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/have-us-conscience-clause-protections-been-eviscerated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catholic nurse can&#8217;t sue hospital that forced her to assist abortion: court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/24/catholic-nurse-cant-sue-hospital-that-forced-her-to-assist-abortion-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/24/catholic-nurse-cant-sue-hospital-that-forced-her-to-assist-abortion-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Americans United for Life (AUL)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Cenzon-DeCarlo v The Mount Sinai Hospital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=83889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/catholic-nurse-cant-sue-hospital-that-forced-her-to-assist-abortion-court/">LifeSiteNews</a>: "Today the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a Catholic nurse who was forced by a New York hospital to participate in an abortion does not have the right to sue her employer . . . Alliance Defence Fund (ADF) attorneys had filed two suits in the case – one federal, filed in July 2009, and another state, filed earlier this year. "

<a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/2d1434d5-91d7-4482-a862-b1a3c100413a/3/doc/10-556_op%20%28PC%29.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/2d1434d5-91d7-4482-a862-b1a3c100413a/3/hilite/"><em>Cenzon-DeCarlo v. The Mount Sinai Hospital</em></a>, No. 10-0556 (2nd Cir. Nov. 23, 2010) <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/24/catholic-nurse-cant-sue-hospital-that-forced-her-to-assist-abortion-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/24/catholic-nurse-cant-sue-hospital-that-forced-her-to-assist-abortion-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit: Nurse can&#8217;t sue hospital that forced her to do abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/23/2nd-circuit-nurse-cant-sue-hospital-that-forced-her-to-do-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/23/2nd-circuit-nurse-cant-sue-hospital-that-forced-her-to-do-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Matthew S. Bowman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Americans United for Life (AUL)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Cenzon-DeCarlo v The Mount Sinai Hospital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=83744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Today, the Second Circuit ruled that a private individual does not have a right to sue her employer after being forced to participate in an abortion." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/23/2nd-circuit-nurse-cant-sue-hospital-that-forced-her-to-do-abortion/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/23/2nd-circuit-nurse-cant-sue-hospital-that-forced-her-to-do-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CWA: A vote for Robert Chatigny is a vote against women</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/18/cwa-a-vote-for-robert-chatigny-is-a-vote-against-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/18/cwa-a-vote-for-robert-chatigny-is-a-vote-against-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Concerned Women for America (CWA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=82920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cwfa.org/content.asp?ID=19666">CWA</a>: "Today, the Senate Judiciary Committee will meet and vote on Robert Chatigny’s nomination to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals. Concerned Women for America strongly opposes his nomination." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/18/cwa-a-vote-for-robert-chatigny-is-a-vote-against-women/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/18/cwa-a-vote-for-robert-chatigny-is-a-vote-against-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats plan votes on controversial nominees, Senator says</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/17/democrats-plan-votes-on-controversial-nominees-senator-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/17/democrats-plan-votes-on-controversial-nominees-senator-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 22:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=82769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) said today that Democrats could move soon to end debate on the nominees. He said that Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) was lining up support this morning for what’s known as a cloture petition — the necessary paperwork before holding a vote to end debate." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/17/democrats-plan-votes-on-controversial-nominees-senator-says/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/17/democrats-plan-votes-on-controversial-nominees-senator-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 2nd Circuit wrongly holds that public-school officials can constitutionally prohibit a student&#8217;s attempt to clear his name</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/21/the-2nd-circuit-wrongly-holds-that-public-school-officials-can-constitutionally-prohibit-a-students-attempt-to-clear-his-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/21/the-2nd-circuit-wrongly-holds-that-public-school-officials-can-constitutionally-prohibit-a-students-attempt-to-clear-his-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: DeFabio v. East Hampton Union Free School Dist.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=77703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julie Hilden <a href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hilden/20101021.html?DCMP=NWL-pro_top">writing at FindLaw</a>: "The case was <em><a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1540977.html">DeFabio v. East Hampton Union Free School Dist.</a></em>, and the student, Daniel DeFabio, had sued the school and individual school officials -- including the Principal and Superintendent -- under a federal statute that allows civil suits to be brought for damages caused by violations of constitutional rights (including First Amendment rights) . . . In dismissing the suit, the appellate panel allowed public-school students to be effectively rendered unable to timely defend themselves against allegations made by their classmates -- even when those very allegations are causing their classmates and others in the community to contemplate violence against them." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/21/the-2nd-circuit-wrongly-holds-that-public-school-officials-can-constitutionally-prohibit-a-students-attempt-to-clear-his-name/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/21/the-2nd-circuit-wrongly-holds-that-public-school-officials-can-constitutionally-prohibit-a-students-attempt-to-clear-his-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

