<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Court: 8th Circuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/court-8th-circuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit rejects Jewish prisoner&#8217;s claims regarding use of succah</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/8th-circuit-rejects-jewish-prisoners-claims-regarding-use-of-succah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/8th-circuit-rejects-jewish-prisoners-claims-regarding-use-of-succah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: RLUIPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sisney v. Reisch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=129031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sisney v. Reisch, No. 10-3003 (8th Cir. March 19, 2012) Charles E. Sisney is incarcerated in the South Dakota State Penitentiary (“SDSP”), where he practices the Jewish faith. In 2003, Sisney filed suit claiming certain SDSP Officials violated his First &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/8th-circuit-rejects-jewish-prisoners-claims-regarding-use-of-succah/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/8th-circuit-rejects-jewish-prisoners-claims-regarding-use-of-succah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So. Dakota&#8217;s &#8216;informed consent&#8217; still under scrutiny</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/09/so-dakotas-informed-consent-still-under-scrutiny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/09/so-dakotas-informed-consent-still-under-scrutiny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 17520]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1493634">One News Now</a>: "A woman's right to make a fully informed choice is more important than Planned Parenthood's bottom line," the attorney argues. "If Planned Parenthood truly cared about the well-being of women, it wouldn't try to prevent them from being informed of the well-documented risks of depression and suicide that accompany abortion." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/09/so-dakotas-informed-consent-still-under-scrutiny/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/09/so-dakotas-informed-consent-still-under-scrutiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Telling Women of Abortion-Suicide Link Back in Court &#124; LifeNews</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/law-telling-women-of-abortion-suicide-link-back-in-court-lifenews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/law-telling-women-of-abortion-suicide-link-back-in-court-lifenews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 17520]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2011/12/08/law-telling-women-of-abortion-suicide-link-back-in-court/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+lifenews%2Fnewsfeed+%28LifeNews.com%29">LifeNews.com</a>: “A woman’s right to make a fully informed choice is more important than Planned Parenthood’s bottom line,” said ADF attorney Steve Aden. “If Planned Parenthood truly cared about the well-being of women, it would not try to prevent them from being informed of the well-documented risk of suicide that accompanies abortion.” “A child’s life is worth more than Planned Parenthood’s bottom line,” Aden said." [more] <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/law-telling-women-of-abortion-suicide-link-back-in-court-lifenews/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/law-telling-women-of-abortion-suicide-link-back-in-court-lifenews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit to revisit funeral protests</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/8th-circuit-to-revisit-funeral-protests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/8th-circuit-to-revisit-funeral-protests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 13:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Nebraska]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://journalstar.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/federal-appeals-court-to-revisit-funeral-protests/article_3b41532e-b83a-59a8-9440-4fb38b72fd79.html">JournalStar.com</a>: federal appeals court on Wednesday agreed to review its decision in a Missouri case that could decide the constitutionality of Nebraska's funeral picketing law. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/8th-circuit-to-revisit-funeral-protests/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/8th-circuit-to-revisit-funeral-protests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court to decide abortion-suicide links: Planned Parenthood&#8217;s only win in South Dakota fight returns to 8th Circuit &#124; WorldNetDaily</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/court-to-decide-abortion-suicide-links-planned-parenthoods-only-win-in-south-dakota-fight-returns-to-8th-circuit-worldnetdaily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/court-to-decide-abortion-suicide-links-planned-parenthoods-only-win-in-south-dakota-fight-returns-to-8th-circuit-worldnetdaily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 17520]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=375317">WorldNetDaily</a>: "A woman's right to make a fully informed choice is more important than Planned Parenthood's bottom line," said Steven H. Aden, a senior counsel for the ADF. "If Planned Parenthood truly cared about the well-being of women, it would not try to prevent them from being informed of the well-documented risk of suicide that accompanies abortion." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/court-to-decide-abortion-suicide-links-planned-parenthoods-only-win-in-south-dakota-fight-returns-to-8th-circuit-worldnetdaily/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/court-to-decide-abortion-suicide-links-planned-parenthoods-only-win-in-south-dakota-fight-returns-to-8th-circuit-worldnetdaily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADF: Planned Parenthood losing grip on S.D. abortion law as 8th Circuit grants another review</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/07/adf-planned-parenthood-losing-grip-on-s-d-abortion-law-as-8th-circuit-grants-another-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/07/adf-planned-parenthood-losing-grip-on-s-d-abortion-law-as-8th-circuit-grants-another-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 17520]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit Monday agreed to review the only remaining provision of South Dakota’s informed consent law that the court has not already upheld in a failing lawsuit filed by Planned Parenthood. The provision requires women to be informed of abortion’s documented risk of suicide. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/07/adf-planned-parenthood-losing-grip-on-s-d-abortion-law-as-8th-circuit-grants-another-review/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/07/adf-planned-parenthood-losing-grip-on-s-d-abortion-law-as-8th-circuit-grants-another-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>En Banc 8th Circuit to hear arguments over SD abortion law in January</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/en-banc-8th-circuit-to-hear-arguments-over-sd-abortion-law-in-january/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/en-banc-8th-circuit-to-hear-arguments-over-sd-abortion-law-in-january/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF:17520]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.argusleader.com/article/20111206/NEWS/312060031/Abortion-issue-appeal-gets-January-hearing">The Argus Leader &#124; argusleader.com</a>: A federal court said Monday it will hear arguments next month concerning a 2005 South Dakota law that requires a doctor to tell a woman seeking an abortion that she would face a higher risk of suicide by going through with the procedure. The hearing will be Jan. 9  . . . <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/en-banc-8th-circuit-to-hear-arguments-over-sd-abortion-law-in-january/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/en-banc-8th-circuit-to-hear-arguments-over-sd-abortion-law-in-january/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judges: Key appeals court nominee faces test vote today &#8211; Caitlin Halligan</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/judges-key-appeals-court-nominee-faces-test-vote-today-caitlin-halligan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/judges-key-appeals-court-nominee-faces-test-vote-today-caitlin-halligan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 12:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.eenews.net/public/EEDaily/2011/12/06/6">EENEWS.net</a>: A lawyer President Obama nominated to serve on the appeals court that handles most of the legal challenges to environmental regulations faces a make-or-break procedural vote in the Senate today. The nomination of Caitlin Halligan . . . <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/judges-key-appeals-court-nominee-faces-test-vote-today-caitlin-halligan/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/judges-key-appeals-court-nominee-faces-test-vote-today-caitlin-halligan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit:  Manchester, Missouri funeral protest ordinance violates First Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/05/8th-circuit-upholds-order-enjoining-manchester-missouris-funeral-protest-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/05/8th-circuit-upholds-order-enjoining-manchester-missouris-funeral-protest-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Missouri]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=115448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shirley and Megan Phelps-Roper brought this First Amendment challenge to a Manchester, Missouri ordinance that regulates protests near funerals.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/05/8th-circuit-upholds-order-enjoining-manchester-missouris-funeral-protest-ordinance/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/05/8th-circuit-upholds-order-enjoining-manchester-missouris-funeral-protest-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court: State can tell pregnant women of &#8216;existing relationship&#8217; with baby</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-state-can-tell-pregnant-women-of-existing-relationship-with-baby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-state-can-tell-pregnant-women-of-existing-relationship-with-baby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Care Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=36059&#038;ref=BPNews-RSSFeed0906">Baptist Press</a>: "Planned Parenthood and other proponents of death work diligently to restrict the information mothers have about abortion and the life within them," said Steven Aden, senior counsel of the Alliance Defense Fund, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief backing the state law. "It was incredible for the lower court to have determined that the law cannot acknowledge that a 'pregnant woman has an existing relationship with that unborn human being' because some human beings are somehow not 'persons.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-state-can-tell-pregnant-women-of-existing-relationship-with-baby/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-state-can-tell-pregnant-women-of-existing-relationship-with-baby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Rules in Favor of S.D. Pro-Life Law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-rules-in-favor-of-s-d-pro-life-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-rules-in-favor-of-s-d-pro-life-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/family/8864-court-rules-in-favor-of-south-dakota-pro-life-law">The New American</a>: Steven H. Aden of the Alliance Defense Fund, which had filed a brief in the case on behalf of a number of pro-life groups, noted that a “child’s life is worth more than Planned Parenthood’s bottom line. Planned Parenthood and other proponents of death work diligently to restrict the information mothers have about abortion and the life within them.” He added that it was “incredible for the lower court to have determined that the law cannot acknowledge that a ‘pregnant woman has an existing relationship with that unborn human being’ because some human beings are somehow not ‘persons.’ The 8th Circuit rightly determined that it’s perfectly constitutional to inform women of an undisputed biological fact.” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-rules-in-favor-of-s-d-pro-life-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-rules-in-favor-of-s-d-pro-life-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SD: Abortionists ordered to follow disputed &#8216;informed consent&#8217; law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/sd-abortionists-ordered-to-follow-disputed-informed-consent-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/sd-abortionists-ordered-to-follow-disputed-informed-consent-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Care Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=340785">WorldNetDaily</a>: "A child's life is worth more than Planned Parenthood's bottom line," said Steve H. Aden, senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Family Research Council, CareNet, Heartbeat International and the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates. The key attorney on the case was Harold Cassidy, one of more than 2,000 lawyers in the ADF organization. "Planned Parenthood and other proponents of death work diligently to restrict the information mothers have about abortion and the life within them. It was incredible for the lower court to have determined that the law cannot acknowledge that a 'pregnant woman has an existing relationship with that unborn human being' because some human beings are somehow not 'persons.' The 8th Circuit rightly determined that it's perfectly constitutional to inform women of an undisputed biological fact," Aden said.



Read more: Abortionists ordered to follow disputed 'informed consent' law http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=340785#ixzz1XBbIehIW <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/sd-abortionists-ordered-to-follow-disputed-informed-consent-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/sd-abortionists-ordered-to-follow-disputed-informed-consent-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit rules on South Dakota abortion informed consent laws</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/02/8th-circuit-rules-on-south-dakota-informed-abortion-consent-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/02/8th-circuit-rules-on-south-dakota-informed-abortion-consent-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For these reasons we reverse the judgment of the district court striking down the relationship advisories; affirm its ruling upholding the human being advisory approved in Rounds; and affirm its rulings upholding the general risk advisory and striking down the suicide advisory. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/02/8th-circuit-rules-on-south-dakota-informed-abortion-consent-laws/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/02/8th-circuit-rules-on-south-dakota-informed-abortion-consent-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit: Child conceived through artificial insemination more than a year after her father’s death not entitled to SSA benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/29/8th-circuit-child-conceived-through-artificial-insemination-more-than-a-year-after-her-father%e2%80%99s-death-not-entitled-to-ssa-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/29/8th-circuit-child-conceived-through-artificial-insemination-more-than-a-year-after-her-father%e2%80%99s-death-not-entitled-to-ssa-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Beeler v. Astrue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Social Security Act authorizes the payment of benefits to the dependent children of deceased workers.  This case requires us to determine whether a child conceived through artificial insemination more than a year after her father’s death qualifies  for  benefits  under  the  Act.   <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/29/8th-circuit-child-conceived-through-artificial-insemination-more-than-a-year-after-her-father%e2%80%99s-death-not-entitled-to-ssa-benefits/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/29/8th-circuit-child-conceived-through-artificial-insemination-more-than-a-year-after-her-father%e2%80%99s-death-not-entitled-to-ssa-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit To Re-hear Challenge to Minnesota’s Ban On Corporate Contributions, IEs</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/28/8th-circuit-to-re-hear-challenge-to-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-contributions-ies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/28/8th-circuit-to-re-hear-challenge-to-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-contributions-ies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life (MCCL)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: MCCL v. Swanson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life is an association of citizens that wants to support candidates who agree with the pro-life position. And The Taxpayers League of Minnesota is an association of citizens that wants to support candidates that favor limited taxes. Both groups want to make general-fund contributions to their chosen candidates. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/28/8th-circuit-to-re-hear-challenge-to-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-contributions-ies/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/28/8th-circuit-to-re-hear-challenge-to-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-contributions-ies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eighth Circuit Strikes Down Content-Based Sign Restriction</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/15/eighth-circuit-strikes-down-content-based-sign-restriction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/15/eighth-circuit-strikes-down-content-based-sign-restriction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=108280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://volokh.com/2011/07/13/eighth-circuit-strikes-down-content-based-sign-restriction/">The Volokh Conspiracy </a>: The case is today’s <em><a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/11/07/101937P.pdf">Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. v. City of St. Louis</a></em>, litigated by the Institute for Justice. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/15/eighth-circuit-strikes-down-content-based-sign-restriction/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/15/eighth-circuit-strikes-down-content-based-sign-restriction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit Grants Rehearing on Minnesota’s Ban on Corporate IEs, Contributions</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/13/8th-circuit-grants-rehearing-on-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-ies-contributions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/13/8th-circuit-grants-rehearing-on-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-ies-contributions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: MCCL v. Swanson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=108077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated its decision upholding Minnesota’s ban on corporate independent expenditures and contributions to candidates and ordered a new hearing to determine the constitutionality of the laws. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/13/8th-circuit-grants-rehearing-on-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-ies-contributions/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/13/8th-circuit-grants-rehearing-on-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-ies-contributions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Cir. upholds MN on direct corp. contributions</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/16/8th-cir-upholds-mn-on-direct-corp-contributions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/16/8th-cir-upholds-mn-on-direct-corp-contributions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 17:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life v. Swanson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=103715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://electionlawblog.org/archives/019498.html">Election Law Blog</a>: In <em><a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/11/05/103126P.pdf">Minnesota Citizens Converned for Life, Inc. v. Swanson</a></em>, the Eighth Circuit unanimously upheld a district court's decision not to preliminarily enjoin Minnesota's ban on direct corporate contributions <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/16/8th-cir-upholds-mn-on-direct-corp-contributions/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/16/8th-cir-upholds-mn-on-direct-corp-contributions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit: Coach&#8217;s secret videotaping of weigh in by nude minors is &#8220;sexual exploitation&#8221; not &#8220;mere nudity&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/05/8th-circuit-coachs-secret-videotaping-of-weigh-in-by-nude-minors-is-sexual-exploitation-not-mere-nudity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/05/8th-circuit-coachs-secret-videotaping-of-weigh-in-by-nude-minors-is-sexual-exploitation-not-mere-nudity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: U.S. v. Johnson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=100195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury verdict, we conclude that the Government offered sufficient evidence such that a reasonable jury could (and did) find that Johnson attempted to use the minors to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of that conduct. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/05/8th-circuit-coachs-secret-videotaping-of-weigh-in-by-nude-minors-is-sexual-exploitation-not-mere-nudity/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/05/8th-circuit-coachs-secret-videotaping-of-weigh-in-by-nude-minors-is-sexual-exploitation-not-mere-nudity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit: Title VII Does Not Require Saturdays Off For Postal Worker</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/8th-circuit-title-vii-does-not-require-saturdays-off-for-postal-worker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/8th-circuit-title-vii-does-not-require-saturdays-off-for-postal-worker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sabbath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Title VII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Harrell v. Donahue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=99977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2011/04/8th-circuit-title-vii-does-not-require.html">Religion Clause Blog</a>: In <em><a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/11/03/101694P.pdf">Harrell v. Donahue</a>,</em> (8th Cir., March 31, 2011), the 8th Circuit held that the U.S. Postal Service was not required to accommodate a Seventh Day Adventist letter carrier's request to have every Saturday off. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/8th-circuit-title-vii-does-not-require-saturdays-off-for-postal-worker/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/8th-circuit-title-vii-does-not-require-saturdays-off-for-postal-worker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit gives Minn. judge candidates campaign leeway</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/29/8th-circuit-gives-minn-judge-candidates-campaign-leeway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/29/8th-circuit-gives-minn-judge-candidates-campaign-leeway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/29/8th-circuit-gives-minn-judge-candidates-campaign-leeway/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.startribune.com/local/99549299.html">Minneapolis Star-Tribune</a>: "A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that Minnesota's restrictions on fundraising and endorsements by judicial candidates violated their free speech rights, overturning parts of the state code of judicial conduct. A sharp dissent warned that the change could threaten public trust in impartial courts." &#124; <a href="http://howappealing.law.com/072910.html#038633">See How Appealing for more information</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/29/8th-circuit-gives-minn-judge-candidates-campaign-leeway/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/29/8th-circuit-gives-minn-judge-candidates-campaign-leeway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit: Blanket prohibition on nude pics for sex offender stricken as probation condition</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/21/8th-circuit-blanket-prohibition-on-nude-pics-for-sex-offender-stricken-as-probation-condition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/21/8th-circuit-blanket-prohibition-on-nude-pics-for-sex-offender-stricken-as-probation-condition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: U.S. v. Simons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=66253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_NUDITY_APPEAL?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2010-07-21-16-21-59">Associated Press</a>: "A convicted sex offender can possess material depicting nudity upon his release from prison after the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld part of an appeal of his sentence." &#124; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/2010072101.pdf"><em>U.S. v. Simons</em></a>, No. 09-2142 (8th Cir. July 21, 2010) &#124; <a href="http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alliancealert.org%2F2010%2F2010072101.pdf">View opinion in Google Viewer</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/21/8th-circuit-blanket-prohibition-on-nude-pics-for-sex-offender-stricken-as-probation-condition/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/21/8th-circuit-blanket-prohibition-on-nude-pics-for-sex-offender-stricken-as-probation-condition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divided 8th Circuit upholds 121 month sentence for North Dakota mom who killed her day old infant</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/26/divided-8th-circuit-upholds-121-month-sentence-for-north-dakota-mom-who-killed-her-day-old-infant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/26/divided-8th-circuit-upholds-121-month-sentence-for-north-dakota-mom-who-killed-her-day-old-infant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 17:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/26/divided-8th-circuit-upholds-121-month-sentence-for-north-dakota-mom-who-killed-her-day-old-infant/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["This case concerns the crime of neonaticide, which is the killing of a newborn child on the first day of life. This crime is practically unknown in the federal courts. Neonaticide is a crime relating to family and domestic concerns and, thus, federal courts do not generally deal with these crimes."  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/26/divided-8th-circuit-upholds-121-month-sentence-for-north-dakota-mom-who-killed-her-day-old-infant/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/26/divided-8th-circuit-upholds-121-month-sentence-for-north-dakota-mom-who-killed-her-day-old-infant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity To Officials Who Conspired Against Faith-Based School</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/09/8th-circuit-denies-qualified-immunity-to-officials-who-conspired-against-faith-based-school/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/09/8th-circuit-denies-qualified-immunity-to-officials-who-conspired-against-faith-based-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=51371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/02/8th-circuit-denies-qualified-immunity.html">Religion Clause Blog</a>:  In <em><a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/10/02/083723P.pdf">Heartland Academy Community Church v. Waddle</a></em>, (8th Cir., Feb. 8, 2010), the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of appeals refused to dismiss on qualified immunity grounds a civil rights action for damages against various Missouri officials who conspired in 2001 to remove 115 students from a Christian faith-based boarding school for children with behavioral and substance abuse problems . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/09/8th-circuit-denies-qualified-immunity-to-officials-who-conspired-against-faith-based-school/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/09/8th-circuit-denies-qualified-immunity-to-officials-who-conspired-against-faith-based-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Planned Parenthood lacks standing in abortion case&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/27/planned-parenthood-lacks-standing-in-abortion-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/27/planned-parenthood-lacks-standing-in-abortion-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=49836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=123190">WorldNetDaily</a>: "The friend-of-the-court brief has been filed by Alliance Defense Fund in a case in which Planned Parenthood originally challenged a newly adopted South Dakota law requiring disclosure of accurate information to mothers-to-be seeking abortions . . . 'A child's life is worth more than Planned Parenthood's bottom line,' said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Steven H. Aden." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/27/planned-parenthood-lacks-standing-in-abortion-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/27/planned-parenthood-lacks-standing-in-abortion-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADF files brief asking court to affirm personhood of preborn children</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/26/adf-files-brief-asking-court-to-affirm-personhood-of-preborn-children-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/26/adf-files-brief-asking-court-to-affirm-personhood-of-preborn-children-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=49649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.crnewswire.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=siteContent.default&#038;objectID=20163">The Church Report</a>: "Attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund filed a friend-of-the-court brief Friday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit asking the court to reject Planned Parenthood’s attempt to block portions of South Dakota’s informed consent law . . . 'A child’s life is worth more than Planned Parenthood’s bottom line,' said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Steven H. Aden." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/26/adf-files-brief-asking-court-to-affirm-personhood-of-preborn-children-2/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/26/adf-files-brief-asking-court-to-affirm-personhood-of-preborn-children-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Dakota Right to Know abortion bill gets backing from pro-life legal group</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/25/south-dakota-right-to-know-abortion-bill-gets-backing-from-pro-life-legal-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/25/south-dakota-right-to-know-abortion-bill-gets-backing-from-pro-life-legal-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=49573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/state4750.html">LifeNews</a>: "A pro-life legal group filed a friend-of-the-court brief Friday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit asking the court to reject Planned Parenthood’s attempt to block a South Dakota law. The informed consent law is designed to help persuade women to consider positive alternatives to abortion . . . 'A child’s life is worth more than Planned Parenthood’s bottom line,' said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Steven H. Aden. He continued . . . '" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/25/south-dakota-right-to-know-abortion-bill-gets-backing-from-pro-life-legal-group/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/25/south-dakota-right-to-know-abortion-bill-gets-backing-from-pro-life-legal-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADF files brief asking court to affirm personhood of preborn children</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/25/adf-files-brief-asking-court-to-affirm-personhood-of-preborn-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/25/adf-files-brief-asking-court-to-affirm-personhood-of-preborn-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=49498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund filed a friend-of-the-court brief Friday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit asking the court to reject Planned Parenthood’s attempt to block portions of South Dakota’s informed consent law. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/25/adf-files-brief-asking-court-to-affirm-personhood-of-preborn-children/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/25/adf-files-brief-asking-court-to-affirm-personhood-of-preborn-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans United for Life Files Brief Detailing Abortion&#8217;s Suicide Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/22/americans-united-for-life-files-brief-detailing-abortions-suicide-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/22/americans-united-for-life-files-brief-detailing-abortions-suicide-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Americans United for Life (AUL)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=46147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/americans-united-for-life-files-brief-detailing-abortions-suicide-risk-79928017.html">PRNewswire</a>: "Today, Americans United for Life (AUL) filed an amicus brief in the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, detailing the links between abortion and the increased risk of depression and suicide. The brief seeks to overturn a lower court's decision that abortion providers in South Dakota are not required to inform women of these risks . . . AUL's brief in Planned Parenthood v. Rounds is available at <a href="http://blog.aul.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/PP-v-Rounds-AUL-amicus-brief.pdf">http://blog.aul.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/PP-v-Rounds-AUL-amicus-brief.pdf</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/22/americans-united-for-life-files-brief-detailing-abortions-suicide-risk/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/22/americans-united-for-life-files-brief-detailing-abortions-suicide-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>S.D., counseling centers appeal informed consent law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/02/s-d-counseling-centers-appeal-informed-consent-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/02/s-d-counseling-centers-appeal-informed-consent-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=37970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/news/article_67d9e043-0096-5e8b-bb12-da1392cae415.html">Sioux City Journal (AP)</a>: "Two South Dakota pregnancy counseling centers have joined the state in appealing a ruling that struck down two provisions of a 2005 law requiring informed consent to abortion . . . Harold Cassidy, an attorney for the groups intervening, said they also appealed to the full court because it has already heard the case and ruled on parts of it, and the issue is significant." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/02/s-d-counseling-centers-appeal-informed-consent-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/02/s-d-counseling-centers-appeal-informed-consent-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit Says No Damage Claims Against States Under RLUIPA Prisoner Provisions</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/14/8th-circuit-says-no-damage-claims-against-states-under-rluipa-prisoner-provisions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/14/8th-circuit-says-no-damage-claims-against-states-under-rluipa-prisoner-provisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: RLUIPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=35979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2009/09/8th-circuit-says-no-damage-claims.html">Religion Clause Blog reports</a>: ". . . The U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals has joined the 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th Circuits in holding that while RLUIPA's prisoner provisions are an appropriate use of Congress' spending power, states do not waive their sovereign immunity from damage claims under the Act by accepting federal prison funds. The 11th Circuit has taken the opposite position. In <a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/09/09/081409P.pdf">Van Wyhe v. Reisch</a>, (8th Cir., Sept. 10, 2009) . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/14/8th-circuit-says-no-damage-claims-against-states-under-rluipa-prisoner-provisions/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/14/8th-circuit-says-no-damage-claims-against-states-under-rluipa-prisoner-provisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit:  Rules on prisoner&#8217;s RLUIPA claims for a succah and other items</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/10/8th-circuit-rules-on-prisoners-rluipa-claims-for-a-succah-and-other-items/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/10/8th-circuit-rules-on-prisoners-rluipa-claims-for-a-succah-and-other-items/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: RLUIPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=35662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/09/09/081409P.pdf">Van Wyhe v. Reisch</a></em>, No. 08-1413 (8th Cir. Sept. 10, 2009) . . . "Sisney, a SDSP inmate who practices the Jewish faith, brought suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and RLUIPA for the violation of his free exercise of religion rights . . . Sisney claimed that the prison officials violated his right to the free exercise of religion under RLUIPA and the First Amendment by denying (among other things not relevant to this appeal) his request to possess and use a succah, his request to have a tape player in his cell to study the Hebrew language, and his request for additional group religious and language study time . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/10/8th-circuit-rules-on-prisoners-rluipa-claims-for-a-succah-and-other-items/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/10/8th-circuit-rules-on-prisoners-rluipa-claims-for-a-succah-and-other-items/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU Applauds Decision Ending Bible Distribution to Public School Students</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/16/aclu-applauds-decision-ending-bible-distribution-to-public-school-students/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/16/aclu-applauds-decision-ending-bible-distribution-to-public-school-students/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=30322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a href="http://www.aclu.org/religion/schools/40352prs20090716.html" target="_blank">ACLU</a>:  "The American Civil Liberties Union of Eastern Missouri applauded the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit that upheld a permanent injunction ending the practice of Bible distribution in the public school of a rural Missouri county." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/16/aclu-applauds-decision-ending-bible-distribution-to-public-school-students/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/16/aclu-applauds-decision-ending-bible-distribution-to-public-school-students/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans United Commends Appellate Court Decision Against Bible Distribution In Mo. Public School</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/16/americans-united-commends-appellate-court-decision-against-bible-distribution-in-mo-public-school/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/16/americans-united-commends-appellate-court-decision-against-bible-distribution-in-mo-public-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Missouri]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=30288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.au.org/media/press-releases/archives/2009/07/au-commends-appellate-court.html">Americans United for Separation of Church and State</a>: "Americans United for Separation of Church and State today praised a federal appeals court decision barring Bible distribution in a Missouri public school district. The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that the South Iron R-1 School District may not allow distribution of Bibles to children in elementary school." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/16/americans-united-commends-appellate-court-decision-against-bible-distribution-in-mo-public-school/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/16/americans-united-commends-appellate-court-decision-against-bible-distribution-in-mo-public-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court Rules for School Policy Allowing Distribution of Secular and Religious Material</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/16/federal-court-rules-for-school-policy-allowing-distribution-of-secular-and-religious-material/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/16/federal-court-rules-for-school-policy-allowing-distribution-of-secular-and-religious-material/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Missouri]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=30232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lc.org/index.cfm?PID=14100&#038;PRID=834">Liberty Counsel</a>: "Today the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals <a href="http://lc.org/media/9980/attachments/opinion_8thcir_southiron0709.pdf">ruled in favor of the South Iron School District</a> and upheld the right of the district to establish an open forum for distribution of materials on school property. The Court of Appeals reversed the District Court and held that the District’s new policy should not have been declared unconstitutional by the lower court judge. Under the district’s policy, secular and religious material can be distributed by any group, including the Gideons . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/16/federal-court-rules-for-school-policy-allowing-distribution-of-secular-and-religious-material/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/16/federal-court-rules-for-school-policy-allowing-distribution-of-secular-and-religious-material/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

