Gary Palmer of the Alabama Policy Institute writes: “Activists such as Elena Kagan have an agenda to restrict our natural rights and force us to conform to the dictates of the government. Whether it is gun control, political speech or our right to decide about our own health care, activist federal judges and justices will take these rights from us when they can get a majority of Supreme Court justices who will go along. When Elena Kagan is confirmed, Americans will be just one Supreme Court justice away from losing some fundamental rights. Many voters are paying close attention to the Kagan confirmation process to see if the Republicans will have the will to fight or whether they will be the same party they tossed out of power in the last two elections.”
- Posted: 07/09/2010
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: campaign.constantcontact.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Court: U.S. Supreme, Group: Alabama Policy Institute, Topic: Nominations
Gary Palmer and Harold See write at the Alabama Policy Institute: “This past week, Congress passed a health care act that both supporters and opponents say will put control of important aspects of our lives in the hands of the federal government. It is a mistake to think the uproar is merely about a health care act. Congress has diminished the states, making them in many ways mere instruments of its will, diminishing local freedom to experiment, and producing near fiscal bankruptcy, both to the states and the nation. At least 36 states have introduced legislation against the implementation of the act. These actions, known as nullification, fail to address the major problem and have limited chance of success. Nullification is designed to persuade Congress to alter its action; this Congress appears immune to persuasion. Other states have sued, claiming that the act is unconstitutional. These efforts will likely be futile because of the federal courts’ expansive reading of federal power. Even if they are successful, repealing one act does little to address Congress’s habitual overreaching . . . Patrick Henry wrote, ‘If there be a real check intended to be left on Congress, it must be left in the State Governments.’ A state-initiated constitutional amendment, backed by grassroots support, should be directed at restraining the abuses of the national government, thereby restoring the kind of self government intended by the Constitution.
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.alabamapolicy.org
- Tags: Group: Alabama Policy Institute
Gary Palmer writes at The Alabama Policy Institute: “The survey consisted of sixty questions covering the basics of American history, government, foreign affairs, and economics. In the 2006 report, the average scores for the freshmen were 51.7 percent and the seniors were 53.2 percent . . . Given these dismal findings, it is little wonder that so many Americans do not understand how much of the current national crisis is the result of our government functioning outside the limits prescribed by the Constitution . . . Among its major findings, the new study reports that among those age 18 to 24, only 51 percent believe America’s founding documents remain relevant.”
Web Site: ISI
- Posted: 02/05/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.alabamapolicy.org
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Alabama Policy Institute, Topic: Education, Topic: Studies
Gary Palmer, president of the Alabama Policy Institute: “U.S. District Judge Lynwood Smith, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in December 1995, has issued a ruling that could help bring some clarity to the issue of bingo operations in Alabama . . . The limitations on ‘charity bingo’ outlined in Judge Smith’s opinion should encourage local officials to enforce Alabama’s laws and will hopefully encourage the Alabama State Supreme Court to rule on this issue. Smith’s ruling should also give pause to those pushing for ‘charity bingo casinos’ in other areas of the state who have predictably responded that Smith’s ruling does not apply to them.”
- Posted: 10/08/2009
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.alabamapolicy.org
- Tags: Group: Alabama Policy Institute, State: Alabama, Topic: Gambling
Gary Palmer writes at the Alabama Policy Institute: “In addition to trying to convince the American public that our health care system is bad, Democrats have also promoted the false argument that our choices for reform are limited to keeping the system the way it is now or dumping the system we have entirely and adopting a government-run health care system. Yes, I am aware that the liberal media and some of the Democrats are saying that the public option is not a government takeover of the health care system. But the truth is they all know the government plan will eventually put insurance companies out of business and everyone will eventually be in the government-run system. These are not our only options for reform.”
- Posted: 10/02/2009
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.alabamapolicy.org
- Tags: Group: Alabama Policy Institute, State: Alabama, Topic: Insurance
Gary Palmer, president of the Alabama Policy Institute, writes: “Just as the Constitution gives the President the power to nominate, it gives the U.S. Senate the responsibility to fully and publicly evaluate each nominee’s fitness for appointment as a federal judge before voting either for or against the nominee. In Sotomayor’s case, as with any federal judge or Supreme Court nominee, what Senators are expressing with their votes is their view on issues such as those above.”
- Posted: 07/20/2009
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.alabamapolicy.org
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Group: Alabama Policy Institute, State: Alabama, Topic: Congress, Topic: Nominations, Topic: Politics, Topic: White House
KEY PROVISIONS OF BILL: The bill requires that anyone sitting on State Supreme Court, courts of civil or criminal appeals be a licensed lawyer for at least 10 years. Circuit court judges will now need five years law license and District court three years law license. The legislation takes effect during the 2010 Alabama election cycle. Current incumbent judges will be exempted.
- Posted: 05/13/2009
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Group: Alabama Policy Institute, State: Alabama
|
Latest Posts
-
hosted.ap.org
02/09/2012
News from The Associated Press: The Virginia state Senate passed legislation Thursday allowing private adoption agencies to deny placements that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs, including opposition to homosexuality.
-
www.lifenews.com
02/09/2012
LifeNews.com: The liberal women on The View, Wednesday, shrieked at the “totalitarian” decision by a Texas judge to uphold a law requiring women to look at an ultrasound before having an abortion.
-
balkin.blogspot.com
02/09/2012
Jason Mazzone at Balkinization: By finding Proposition 8 to violate the Equal Protection Clause solely on the ground that it withdrew the right of marriage that gays and lesbians previously possessed in California (as a result the earlier state supreme court’s decision), Perry v. Brown produces a curious result. It appears to leave Proposition 8 partially intact.

|