<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: Center for Reproductive Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-center-for-reproductive-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion groups pressure Honduran Congress on abortion pill restrictions</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/abortion-groups-pressure-honduran-congress-on-abortion-pill-restrictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/abortion-groups-pressure-honduran-congress-on-abortion-pill-restrictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Honduras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Contraception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=133874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Center for Reproductive Rights has issued this press release: <a href="http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/over-700000-petitioners-demand-honduran-congress-reject-law-criminalizing-emergency-contr">Over 700,000 Petitioners Demand Honduran Congress Reject Law Criminalizing Emergency Contraception: Advocates, lawyers, and citizens gathered today in protest on steps of Honduran Congress</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/abortion-groups-pressure-honduran-congress-on-abortion-pill-restrictions/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/abortion-groups-pressure-honduran-congress-on-abortion-pill-restrictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge overturns Oklahoma abortion drug law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/14/judge-overturns-oklahoma-abortion-drug-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/14/judge-overturns-oklahoma-abortion-drug-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 22:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice v. Cline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=133620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.necn.com/05/14/12/Judge-overturns-Oklahoma-abortion-drug-l/landing_health.html?&#038;apID=2ce23ae373ad4607aa7835797b801db9">NECN</a>: An Oklahoma law restricting the use of certain abortion-inducing drugs has been ruled unconstitutional by a district court judge, who said it violates "the fundamental rights of women to privacy and bodily integrity." &#124; <a href="http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/judge-permanently-blocks-oklahomas-ban-on-medication-abortion-and-treatment-of-ectopic-pr">Center for Reproductive Rights</a> press release <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/14/judge-overturns-oklahoma-abortion-drug-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/14/judge-overturns-oklahoma-abortion-drug-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oklahoma Supreme Court rules ‘personhood’ amendment is unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/30/oklahoma-supreme-court-rules-%e2%80%98personhood%e2%80%99-amendment-is-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/30/oklahoma-supreme-court-rules-%e2%80%98personhood%e2%80%99-amendment-is-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: In Re: Initiative Petition No. 395 State Question No. 761]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=132532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hill: The personhood proposal in Oklahoma is “clearly unconstitutional,” the state supreme court said in a unanimous ruling Monday. Abortion-rights supporters hailed the decision. &#124; Center for Reproductive Rights press release &#124; In re Initiative Petition No. 395 State &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/30/oklahoma-supreme-court-rules-%e2%80%98personhood%e2%80%99-amendment-is-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/30/oklahoma-supreme-court-rules-%e2%80%98personhood%e2%80%99-amendment-is-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal judge throws out Louisiana&#8217;s abortion provider liability law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/30/federal-judge-throws-out-louisianas-abortion-provider-liability-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/30/federal-judge-throws-out-louisianas-abortion-provider-liability-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Hope Medical Group for Women v. LeBlanc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=130034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://arklatexhomepage.com/fulltext?nxd_id=241952">ArkLaTexHomePage.com</a>: The strict liability law allowed legal action against doctors who performed abortions  -  regardless of whether they committed any fault or negligence in the abortion procedure

Center for Reproductive Rights <a href="http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/federal-judge-overturns-louisiana%E2%80%99s-strict-liability-law-denial-of-malpractice-coverage-f">press release</a.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/30/federal-judge-throws-out-louisianas-abortion-provider-liability-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/30/federal-judge-throws-out-louisianas-abortion-provider-liability-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All heat and no light: The contraception kerfuffle &#124; The Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/06/all-heat-and-no-light-the-contraception-kerfuffle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/06/all-heat-and-no-light-the-contraception-kerfuffle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Becket Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=127729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laura MacCleery of the Center for Reproductive Rights at <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/214225-all-heat-and-no-light-the-contraception-kerfuffle">the Hill</a>: Moreover, the lawsuits brought by the Becket Fund and the Alliance Defense Fund are premature, and will very likely be dismissed until a new rule is completed.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/06/all-heat-and-no-light-the-contraception-kerfuffle/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/06/all-heat-and-no-light-the-contraception-kerfuffle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5th Circuit no en banc rehearing on TX sonogram law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/10/5th-circuit-no-en-banc-rehearing-on-tx-sonogram-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/10/5th-circuit-no-en-banc-rehearing-on-tx-sonogram-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Texas Medical Services v. Lakey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=125397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_TEXAS_ABORTION_RULES?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2012-02-10-11-53-25">News from The Associated Press</a>: A federal appeals court has denied a request to reconsider a lawsuit challenging a Texas law that requires doctors to perform a sonogram before an abortion. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/10/5th-circuit-no-en-banc-rehearing-on-tx-sonogram-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/10/5th-circuit-no-en-banc-rehearing-on-tx-sonogram-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Eastern Europe&#8217;s Conservative Crackdown on Reproductive Freedom&#8221; &#124; Huffington Post</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/09/eastern-europes-conservative-crackdown-on-reproductive-freedom-huffington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/09/eastern-europes-conservative-crackdown-on-reproductive-freedom-huffington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=125282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Janke Blumgart at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jake-blumgart/eastern-europes-contraceptives_b_1263286.html">The Huffington Post</a>: There is a very strong pronatalist [anti-choice] current in Central and Eastern Europe and that goes along with nationalist tendencies in many of these countries," says Johanna Westeson, European regional director for the Center for Reproductive Rights. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/09/eastern-europes-conservative-crackdown-on-reproductive-freedom-huffington-post/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/09/eastern-europes-conservative-crackdown-on-reproductive-freedom-huffington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Center for Reproductive Rights Reopens Lawsuit Against FDA Restrictions on Emergency Contraception</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/09/center-for-reproductive-rights-reopens-lawsuit-against-fda-restrictions-on-emergency-contraception/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/09/center-for-reproductive-rights-reopens-lawsuit-against-fda-restrictions-on-emergency-contraception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Tummino v. Hamburg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=125265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/center-for-reproductive-rights-reopens-lawsuit-against-fda-restrictions-on-emergency-cont">Center for Reproductive Rights</a>: Seeking immediate relief that would allow emergency contraception over-the-counter access for women of all ages, today the Center for Reproductive Rights asked a federal court to reopen the Center’s 2005 lawsuit against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for imposing unnecessary age restrictions on the drugs, also known as the “morning-after pill.”		&#124; <em>Tummino v. Hamburg</em> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/09/center-for-reproductive-rights-reopens-lawsuit-against-fda-restrictions-on-emergency-contraception/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/09/center-for-reproductive-rights-reopens-lawsuit-against-fda-restrictions-on-emergency-contraception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Center for Reproductive Rights appeals Texas Sonogram ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/26/center-for-reproductive-rights-appeals-texas-sonogram-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/26/center-for-reproductive-rights-appeals-texas-sonogram-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. LakeyEdit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=124090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.chron.com/news/article/Group-files-appeal-against-sonogram-requirement-2685432.php">AP on Houston Chronicle</a>: The Center for Reproductive Rights is asking for a rehearing of its argument that a law requiring a sonogram before an abortion is unconstitutional. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/26/center-for-reproductive-rights-appeals-texas-sonogram-ruling/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/26/center-for-reproductive-rights-appeals-texas-sonogram-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US court hears arguments over Texas abortion law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/05/us-court-hears-arguments-over-texas-abortion-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/05/us-court-hears-arguments-over-texas-abortion-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=122172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.chron.com/news/article/US-court-hears-arguments-over-Texas-abortion-law-2440050.php">Houston Chronicle</a>:  A federal judge abused his discretion when he blocked the state of Texas from enforcing a law requiring doctors to show sonograms to patients and describe the images before an abortion, a lawyer for the state told an appeals court Wednesday. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/05/us-court-hears-arguments-over-texas-abortion-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/05/us-court-hears-arguments-over-texas-abortion-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plan B denial could be challenged by New York suit</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/19/plan-b-denial-could-be-challenged-by-new-york-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/19/plan-b-denial-could-be-challenged-by-new-york-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Contraception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=121225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/19/us-planb-challenge-idUSTRE7BI11720111219">Reuters</a>: As reproductive rights advocates regroup after a U.S. directive denying girls under 17 over-the-counter access to the morning-after pill, their best legal recourse may lie in a dormant 6-year-old lawsuit in federal court in Brooklyn, New York. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/19/plan-b-denial-could-be-challenged-by-new-york-suit/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/19/plan-b-denial-could-be-challenged-by-new-york-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge’s ruling not an end to Plan B debate: FDA won&#8217;t be held in contempt</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/15/judge%e2%80%99s-ruling-not-an-end-to-plan-b-debate-fda-wont-be-held-in-contempt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/15/judge%e2%80%99s-ruling-not-an-end-to-plan-b-debate-fda-wont-be-held-in-contempt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge Tuesday said that a last-minute Food and Drug Administration response to a citizen petition seeking to relax FDA rules regarding a birth-control product rendered moot a complaint to hold the agency in contempt of court. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/15/judge%e2%80%99s-ruling-not-an-end-to-plan-b-debate-fda-wont-be-held-in-contempt/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/15/judge%e2%80%99s-ruling-not-an-end-to-plan-b-debate-fda-wont-be-held-in-contempt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media touts financial costs of defending pro-life laws</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/13/media-touts-financial-costs-of-defending-pro-life-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/13/media-touts-financial-costs-of-defending-pro-life-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Kansans for Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Ohio Right to Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think Progress: <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2011/12/13/388335/south-dakota-governor-asks-for-another-1-million-to-defend-anti-abortion-law-in-court/">South Dakota Governor Asks For Another $1 Million To Defend Anti-Abortion Law In Court</a>

Mary Wisniewski and Jo Ingle at Reuters: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/13/us-abortion-states-costs-idUSTRE7BC1SQ20111213">Reality check: States tough on abortion face legal costs</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/13/media-touts-financial-costs-of-defending-pro-life-laws/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/13/media-touts-financial-costs-of-defending-pro-life-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY federal court showdown set over pregnancy pill</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/13/ny-federal-court-showdown-set-over-pregnancy-pill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/13/ny-federal-court-showdown-set-over-pregnancy-pill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Tummino v. Hamburg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_MORNING_AFTER_PILL?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2011-12-13-06-44-20">News from The Associated Press</a>: A federal judge in Brooklyn is poised to hear arguments Tuesday over whether the federal government is acting constitutionally in its decisions over the access teenage girls are given to morning-after contraceptive pills. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/13/ny-federal-court-showdown-set-over-pregnancy-pill/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/13/ny-federal-court-showdown-set-over-pregnancy-pill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Center for Reproductive Rights: &#8220;Harmful Anti-Abortion Licensing Scheme Blocked By Kansas Judge&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/center-for-reproductive-rights-harmful-anti-abortion-licensing-scheme-blocked-by-kansas-judge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/center-for-reproductive-rights-harmful-anti-abortion-licensing-scheme-blocked-by-kansas-judge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Hodes and Nauser v. Moser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/harmful-anti-abortion-licensing-scheme-blocked-by-kansas-judge">Center for Reproductive Rights</a>: A Kansas state judge has blocked enforcement of a recently enacted state licensing statute and regulations that reproductive rights advocates say would cut off women's access to constitutionally protected medical services, including abortion and other important OB-GYN care. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/center-for-reproductive-rights-harmful-anti-abortion-licensing-scheme-blocked-by-kansas-judge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/center-for-reproductive-rights-harmful-anti-abortion-licensing-scheme-blocked-by-kansas-judge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN Committee Tells Peru to Compensate Girl Denied an Abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/10/un-committee-tells-peru-to-compensate-girl-denied-an-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/10/un-committee-tells-peru-to-compensate-girl-denied-an-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: L.C. v. Peru]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=118379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.c-fam.org/fridayfax/volume-14/un-committee-tells-peru-to-compensate-girl-denied-an-abortion.html">C-Fam Friday Fax</a>: he Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), a New York-based pro-abortion law firm, reported on the conclusion of a proceeding under the optional protocol of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), even though the official decision has not yet been published by the CEDAW committee. It involves the case of L.C. v. Peru, brought before the CEDAW committee by CRR. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/10/un-committee-tells-peru-to-compensate-girl-denied-an-abortion/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/10/un-committee-tells-peru-to-compensate-girl-denied-an-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;U.N. Rules that Peru Must Relax Restrictions on Abortion&#8221; &#124; Center for Reproductive Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/08/u-n-rules-that-peru-must-relax-restrictions-on-abortion-center-for-reproductive-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/08/u-n-rules-that-peru-must-relax-restrictions-on-abortion-center-for-reproductive-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 11:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: L.C. v. Peru]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=118035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/un-rules-that-peru-must-relax-restrictions-on-abortion">Center for Reproductive Rights</a>: Today, an international human rights body condemned Peru for violating the human rights of a young woman seeking legal abortion services in the country and ruled that the government must ease its restrictions on abortion.
In a groundbreaking decision issued in <em>L.C. v. Peru</em> . . . <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/08/u-n-rules-that-peru-must-relax-restrictions-on-abortion-center-for-reproductive-rights/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/08/u-n-rules-that-peru-must-relax-restrictions-on-abortion-center-for-reproductive-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Land urges &#8216;yes&#8217; for Miss. personhood amend.</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/04/land-urges-yes-for-miss-personhood-amend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/04/land-urges-yes-for-miss-personhood-amend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=117854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=36489&#038;ref=BPNews-RSSFeed1104">Baptist Press</a>: Southern Baptist ethics leader Richard Land has urged Mississippi voters to support an amendment to their state constitution that will protect human life from the moment of conception. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/04/land-urges-yes-for-miss-personhood-amend/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/04/land-urges-yes-for-miss-personhood-amend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Group to sue over new Kan. abortion clinic rules</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/27/group-to-sue-over-new-kan-abortion-clinic-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/27/group-to-sue-over-new-kan-abortion-clinic-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=117074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A national abortion rights group announced Thursday that it will sue over revised regulations for abortion providers in Kansas . . . <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/27/group-to-sue-over-new-kan-abortion-clinic-rules/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/27/group-to-sue-over-new-kan-abortion-clinic-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ultrasound viewing part of NC abortion law blocked</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/25/ultrasound-viewing-part-of-nc-abortion-law-blocked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/25/ultrasound-viewing-part-of-nc-abortion-law-blocked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Stuart v. Huff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=116798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge has blocked a portion of North Carolina's new abortion law that required a medical worker to offer to display an ultrasound image of a fetus to a pregnant woman, describe it and offer her the chance to listen to the heartbeat. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/25/ultrasound-viewing-part-of-nc-abortion-law-blocked/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/25/ultrasound-viewing-part-of-nc-abortion-law-blocked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oklahoma: Abortion drug law challenged</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/06/oklahoma-abortion-drug-law-challenged/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/06/oklahoma-abortion-drug-law-challenged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=115608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reproductive Services in Tulsa and the Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice filed a legal challenge late Wednesday to a state law that restricts the use of abortion-inducing drugs. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/06/oklahoma-abortion-drug-law-challenged/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/06/oklahoma-abortion-drug-law-challenged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuit in N.C. seeks to undo abortion law requiring ultrasound</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/03/lawsuit-in-n-c-seeks-to-undo-abortion-law-requiring-ultrasound/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/03/lawsuit-in-n-c-seeks-to-undo-abortion-law-requiring-ultrasound/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=115289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/2/lawsuit-in-nc-seeks-to-undo-abortion-law-requiring/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&#038;utm_medium=RSS">Washington Times</a>: A group of abortion clinics, doctors and pro-choice groups are suing to block a North Carolina law that would require a pregnant woman to have an ultrasound and receive information about her fetus before she can obtain an abortion. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/03/lawsuit-in-n-c-seeks-to-undo-abortion-law-requiring-ultrasound/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/03/lawsuit-in-n-c-seeks-to-undo-abortion-law-requiring-ultrasound/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;U.N. Committee against Torture: Ireland Must Ensure Access to Lawful Abortion&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/20/u-n-committee-against-torture-ireland-must-ensure-access-to-lawful-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/20/u-n-committee-against-torture-ireland-must-ensure-access-to-lawful-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: A B and C v Ireland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=114094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/un-committee-against-torture-ireland-must-ensure-access-to-lawful-abortion">Center for Reproductive Rights</a>: In May, the U.N. Committee against Torture reviewed the Republic of Ireland’s initial periodic report. The Committee’s concluding observations reiterated the European Court for Human Rights’ concerns expressed in its judgment in the case of A, B, and C v. Ireland , to which the Center for Reproductive Rights, and their partner, submitted a friend-of-the-court brief. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/20/u-n-committee-against-torture-ireland-must-ensure-access-to-lawful-abortion/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/20/u-n-committee-against-torture-ireland-must-ensure-access-to-lawful-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kan. works on abortion rules despite challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/kan-works-on-abortion-rules-despite-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/kan-works-on-abortion-rules-despite-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.chron.com/news/article/Kan-works-on-abortion-rules-despite-challenge-2157536.php">Houston Chronicle</a>:  Kansas health officials moved ahead Tuesday with work designed to preserve new regulations for abortion providers despite a legal challenge in federal court that so far has blocked their enforcement. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/kan-works-on-abortion-rules-despite-challenge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/kan-works-on-abortion-rules-despite-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ID: Pro-Lifers Welcome First Fetal Pain Abortion Ban Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/01/id-pro-lifers-welcome-first-fetal-pain-abortion-ban-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/01/id-pro-lifers-welcome-first-fetal-pain-abortion-ban-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Right to Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2011/09/01/pro-lifers-welcome-first-fetal-pain-abortion-ban-lawsuit/">LifeNews.com</a>: A leading pro-life organization that is behind the innovative 20-week abortion ban based on the scientific evidence showing that unborn children feel pain during an abortion is welcoming the first lawsuit against it. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/01/id-pro-lifers-welcome-first-fetal-pain-abortion-ban-lawsuit/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/01/id-pro-lifers-welcome-first-fetal-pain-abortion-ban-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TX: Sonogram, other laws take effect this week</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/29/tx-sonogram-other-laws-take-effect-this-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/29/tx-sonogram-other-laws-take-effect-this-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/politics/texas_legislature/article/Sonogram-other-laws-take-effect-this-week-2145333.php">San Antonio Express-News</a>: Federal Judge Sam Sparks is expected to rule before Thursday on a challenge to the law by the Center for Reproductive Rights. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/29/tx-sonogram-other-laws-take-effect-this-week/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/29/tx-sonogram-other-laws-take-effect-this-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planned Parenthood Stops Abortions at Seven Arizona Locations</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/19/planned-parenthood-stops-abortions-at-seven-arizona-locations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/19/planned-parenthood-stops-abortions-at-seven-arizona-locations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Arizona Catholic Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Arizona Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=111259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2011/08/18/planned-parenthood-stops-abortions-at-seven-arizona-locations/">LifeNews.com</a>: “If Planned Parenthood truly cared about what’s best for women, they wouldn’t be repeatedly going to court around the nation to stop laws that allow women to make fully informed choices,” said ADF Senior Counsel Steven H. Aden, who argued before the Court of Appeals on June 14. “The court ruled rightly in this case in rejecting the arguments of the nation’s largest purveyor of abortion.  The protection of women is not unconstitutional.” . . . “Everyone deserves full and accurate information before undergoing any medical procedure,” said Center for Arizona Policy Legal Counsel Deborah Sheasby, co-counsel and one of more than 2,000 attorneys in the ADF alliance. [more] <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/19/planned-parenthood-stops-abortions-at-seven-arizona-locations/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/19/planned-parenthood-stops-abortions-at-seven-arizona-locations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ctr. for Reproductive Rights: Historic U.N. Ruling Finds Brazil Violates Woman’s Human Rights in Maternal Death Case</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/17/ctr-for-reproductive-rights-historic-u-n-ruling-finds-brazil-violates-woman%e2%80%99s-human-rights-in-maternal-death-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/17/ctr-for-reproductive-rights-historic-u-n-ruling-finds-brazil-violates-woman%e2%80%99s-human-rights-in-maternal-death-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=111125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Center for Reproductive Rights: In the first-ever maternal death case to be decided by an international human rights body, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women established that governments have a human rights obligation to guarantee &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/17/ctr-for-reproductive-rights-historic-u-n-ruling-finds-brazil-violates-woman%e2%80%99s-human-rights-in-maternal-death-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/17/ctr-for-reproductive-rights-historic-u-n-ruling-finds-brazil-violates-woman%e2%80%99s-human-rights-in-maternal-death-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Rep. Lowey Introduces Bill to Stem Efforts to Gag Overseas Groups on Abortion&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/rep-lowey-introduces-bill-to-stem-efforts-to-gag-overseas-groups-on-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/rep-lowey-introduces-bill-to-stem-efforts-to-gag-overseas-groups-on-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/rep-lowey-introduces-bill-to-stem-efforts-to-gag-overseas-groups-on-abortion">Center for Reproductive Rights</a>: Pushing back against recent efforts by opponents of reproductive rights to reimpose the Global Gag Rule, Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY) has introduced a bill in the House of Representatives that the Center for Reproductive Rights says will protect U.S.-supported family planning groups overseas against politicized attacks. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/rep-lowey-introduces-bill-to-stem-efforts-to-gag-overseas-groups-on-abortion/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/rep-lowey-introduces-bill-to-stem-efforts-to-gag-overseas-groups-on-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge puts hold on ND law on medication abortions</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/21/judge-puts-hold-on-nd-law-on-medication-abortions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/21/judge-puts-hold-on-nd-law-on-medication-abortions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: MKB Management Corp. v. Burdick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=108721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Judge-puts-hold-on-ND-law-on-medication-abortions-1528737.php">CTPost</a>: A Fargo judge on Thursday put the brakes on a new state law that some believe could stop North Dakota's only abortion clinic from using medicines to induce abortions.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/21/judge-puts-hold-on-nd-law-on-medication-abortions/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/21/judge-puts-hold-on-nd-law-on-medication-abortions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Center for Reproductive Rights files lawsuit against Kansas abortion clinic regulations</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/center-for-reproductive-rights-files-lawsuit-against-kansas-abortion-clinic-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/center-for-reproductive-rights-files-lawsuit-against-kansas-abortion-clinic-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 14:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/center-for-reproductive-rights-files-lawsuit-against-kansas-abortion-clinic-regulations">Center for Reproductive Rights</a> (6/28): Today, the Center for Reproductive Rights filed a federal lawsuit challenging new licensing regulations for abortion providers . . . <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/center-for-reproductive-rights-files-lawsuit-against-kansas-abortion-clinic-regulations/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/center-for-reproductive-rights-files-lawsuit-against-kansas-abortion-clinic-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Ultrasound Law Helping Women Faces Pro-Abortion Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/texas-ultrasound-law-helping-women-faces-pro-abortion-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/texas-ultrasound-law-helping-women-faces-pro-abortion-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 14:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2011/07/01/texas-ultrasound-law-helping-women-faces-pro-abortion-lawsuit/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+lifenews%2Fnewsfeed+%28LifeNews.com%29">LifeNews.com</a>: A New York City-based pro-abortion law firm has filed a lawsuit challenging a new pro-life law Gov. Rick Perry signed that allows women a chance to view an ultrasound of their unborn children before an abortion. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/texas-ultrasound-law-helping-women-faces-pro-abortion-lawsuit/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/texas-ultrasound-law-helping-women-faces-pro-abortion-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ctr. for Reproductive Rights Files Lawsuit Challenging Texas Abortion Sonogram Law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/13/ctr-for-reproductive-rights-files-lawsuit-challenging-texas-abortion-sonogram-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/13/ctr-for-reproductive-rights-files-lawsuit-challenging-texas-abortion-sonogram-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=106201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/crr-files-lawsuit-challenging-texas-abortion-sonogram-law">Center for Reproductive Rights</a>: Today, the Center for Reproductive Rights filed a class action lawsuit against Texas’ new abortion ultrasound law on behalf of Texas medical providers performing abortions and their patients. The law prohibits a woman from getting an abortion unless the doctor providing the abortion performs an ultrasound on the woman, takes steps to show and describe the ultrasound images to her, and plays the sound of the fetal heart. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/13/ctr-for-reproductive-rights-files-lawsuit-challenging-texas-abortion-sonogram-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/13/ctr-for-reproductive-rights-files-lawsuit-challenging-texas-abortion-sonogram-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MS: Pro-choice forces seek to prevent referendum</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/07/ms-pro-choice-forces-seek-to-prevent-referendum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/07/ms-pro-choice-forces-seek-to-prevent-referendum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=105726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/6/pro-choice-forces-seek-to-prevent-referendum/">Washington Times</a>: Stepping into a growing national debate over abortion rights, the Mississippi Supreme Court heard arguments Monday about whether to allow a “personhood” amendment to remain on the ballot this fall. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/07/ms-pro-choice-forces-seek-to-prevent-referendum/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/07/ms-pro-choice-forces-seek-to-prevent-referendum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TX: Rick Perry Signs Mandatory Sonogram Bill, Center for Reproductive Rights Retaliates</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/25/tx-rick-perry-signs-mandatory-sonogram-bill-center-for-reproductive-rights-retaliates-huffington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/25/tx-rick-perry-signs-mandatory-sonogram-bill-center-for-reproductive-rights-retaliates-huffington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 20:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=104692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/25/rick-perry-sonogram-bill-center-for-reproductive-rights-retaliates_n_866811.html">Huffington Post</a>: CRR is fighting against similar legislation in Oklahoma. The group was granted a preliminary injunction to block the law there, and Anderson says it is in the beginning stages of preparing a challenge to the Texas law. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/25/tx-rick-perry-signs-mandatory-sonogram-bill-center-for-reproductive-rights-retaliates-huffington-post/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/25/tx-rick-perry-signs-mandatory-sonogram-bill-center-for-reproductive-rights-retaliates-huffington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

