<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: Christian Legal Fellowship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-christian-legal-fellowship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court says Quebec ethics course is ‘neutral’ on religion, but Vatican disagrees</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/22/supreme-court-says-quebec-ethics-course-is-%e2%80%98neutral%e2%80%99-on-religion-but-vatican-disagrees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/22/supreme-court-says-quebec-ethics-course-is-%e2%80%98neutral%e2%80%99-on-religion-but-vatican-disagrees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Indoctrination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: S.L. v. Commission scolare des Chenes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=126548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/supreme-court-says-quebec-ethics-course-is-neutral-on-religion-but-vatican">LifeSiteNews</a>: However, in a May 2009 letter, entered into evidence at the family’s trial in the same year, the Vatican’s Congregation for Catholic Education wrote that this type of “neutral” presentation of differing religions is relativistic in and of itself and so undermines a parent’s effort to pass along the faith. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/22/supreme-court-says-quebec-ethics-course-is-%e2%80%98neutral%e2%80%99-on-religion-but-vatican-disagrees/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/22/supreme-court-says-quebec-ethics-course-is-%e2%80%98neutral%e2%80%99-on-religion-but-vatican-disagrees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada’s Supreme Court denies exemption from Quebec relativism course</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/17/canada%e2%80%99s-supreme-court-denies-exemption-from-quebec-relativism-course/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/17/canada%e2%80%99s-supreme-court-denies-exemption-from-quebec-relativism-course/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Indoctrination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: S.L. v. Commission scolare des Chenes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=126096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-canadas-supreme-court-denies-exemption-from-quebec-relativism-cour">LifeSiteNews.com</a>: In what’s sure to come down as a devastating blow to parental freedom, the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously rejected this morning the pleas of a Christian family to have their child exempted from the Quebec government’s mandatory ethics and religious culture course. &#124; Christian Legal Fellowship press release <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/17/canadian-supreme-court-dismisses-parental-religious-challenge-to-school-curriculum/">here</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/17/canada%e2%80%99s-supreme-court-denies-exemption-from-quebec-relativism-course/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/17/canada%e2%80%99s-supreme-court-denies-exemption-from-quebec-relativism-course/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian Supreme Court dismisses parental religious challenge to school curriculum</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/17/canadian-supreme-court-dismisses-parental-religious-challenge-to-school-curriculum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/17/canadian-supreme-court-dismisses-parental-religious-challenge-to-school-curriculum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Indoctrination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: S.L. v. Commission scolare des Chenes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=126092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision in S.L., et al. v. Commission scolaire des Chênes, et al., a case originating in Québec, dealing with the question of parental rights with respect to religious instruction.   <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/17/canadian-supreme-court-dismisses-parental-religious-challenge-to-school-curriculum/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/17/canadian-supreme-court-dismisses-parental-religious-challenge-to-school-curriculum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada: Christian Legal Fellowship arguments in Carter euthanasia case</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/13/canada-christian-legal-fellowship-arguments-in-carter-euthanasia-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/13/canada-christian-legal-fellowship-arguments-in-carter-euthanasia-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Euthanasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: R. v. Rodriguez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Christian Legal Fellowship (CLF) will present its written and oral arguments on December 14, 2011 in the Carter euthanasia and physician assisted suicide case before the Supreme Court of British Columbia. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/13/canada-christian-legal-fellowship-arguments-in-carter-euthanasia-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/13/canada-christian-legal-fellowship-arguments-in-carter-euthanasia-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADF: Polygamy, polyamory fail at B.C. Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/23/adf-polygamy-polyamory-fail-at-b-c-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/23/adf-polygamy-polyamory-fail-at-b-c-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Austin R. Nimocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: In the matter of the Constitutional Question Act RSBC 1986 c. 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 29199]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=119440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court of British Columbia has ruled that the government of Canada may continue to prohibit polygamy and polyamory--a decision that rejects an approach that could have had far-reaching effects on marriage throughout Canada and other countries. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/23/adf-polygamy-polyamory-fail-at-b-c-supreme-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/23/adf-polygamy-polyamory-fail-at-b-c-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Sister Wives&#8221; beware: BC Supreme Court rules &#8220;there is no such thing as so-called &#8216;good polygamy&#8217;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/23/bc-supreme-court-upholds-prohibitions-on-polygamy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/23/bc-supreme-court-upholds-prohibitions-on-polygamy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: In the matter of the Constitutional Question Act RSBC 1986 c. 68]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=119438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a 335-page decision released on Wednesday, Chief Justice Robert Bauman ruled in favour of the section of the Criminal Code outlawing polygamous unions. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/23/bc-supreme-court-upholds-prohibitions-on-polygamy/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/23/bc-supreme-court-upholds-prohibitions-on-polygamy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>B.C. Supreme Court&#8217;s polygamy ruling expected tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/22/b-c-supreme-courts-polygamy-ruling-expected-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/22/b-c-supreme-courts-polygamy-ruling-expected-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: In the matter of the Constitutional Question Act RSBC 1986 c. 68]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=119301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow, November 23, Chief Justice Bauman of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, will render his decision in the Constitutional Reference on Polygamy. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/22/b-c-supreme-courts-polygamy-ruling-expected-tomorrow/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/22/b-c-supreme-courts-polygamy-ruling-expected-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLF Granted Intervener Status &#8211; BC court to revisit constitutionality of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/26/clf-granted-intervener-status-bc-court-to-revisit-constitutionality-of-euthanasia-and-physician-assisted-suicide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/26/clf-granted-intervener-status-bc-court-to-revisit-constitutionality-of-euthanasia-and-physician-assisted-suicide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: R. v. Rodriguez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=116928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In November 2011, the British Columbia Supreme Court will be asked to strike down the Criminal Code provisions against euthanasia and assisted suicide, revisiting a 1993 judgment by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Rodriguez. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/26/clf-granted-intervener-status-bc-court-to-revisit-constitutionality-of-euthanasia-and-physician-assisted-suicide/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/26/clf-granted-intervener-status-bc-court-to-revisit-constitutionality-of-euthanasia-and-physician-assisted-suicide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christian Youth Encouraged to Dialogue during Day of Silence</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/15/christian-youth-encouraged-to-dialogue-during-day-of-silence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/15/christian-youth-encouraged-to-dialogue-during-day-of-silence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Matt Sharp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Pacific Justice Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Day of Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=101181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-youth-encouraged-to-dialogue-during-day-of-silence-49842/">Christian Post</a>: ADF Litigation Staff Counsel Matt Sharp also agrees that Christian students should express their opinions. In a blog he wrote, “Christians who oppose the blatant promotion of the homosexual agenda are often labeled as bullies. But respectfully speaking the truth is never an act of bullying. In fact, speaking the truth is the greatest act of love we can show to others.” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/15/christian-youth-encouraged-to-dialogue-during-day-of-silence/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/15/christian-youth-encouraged-to-dialogue-during-day-of-silence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada: Christian Legal Fellowship to Show Law Against Polygamy/Polyamory Consistent with Charter</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/31/canada-christian-legal-fellowship-to-show-law-against-polygamypolyamory-consistent-with-charter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/31/canada-christian-legal-fellowship-to-show-law-against-polygamypolyamory-consistent-with-charter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: In the matter of the Constitutional Question Act RSBC 1986 c. 68]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=99783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Christian Legal Fellowship will present its closing statement in the Constitutional Reference on Polygamy tomorrow before the Supreme Court of British Columbia at or around 10am pst in courtroom 55; interested individuals may view the closing statements via live webcast . . .  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/31/canada-christian-legal-fellowship-to-show-law-against-polygamypolyamory-consistent-with-charter/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/31/canada-christian-legal-fellowship-to-show-law-against-polygamypolyamory-consistent-with-charter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AUL calls on states to regulate RU-486 now, offers model legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/16/aul-calls-on-states-to-regulate-ru-486-now-offers-model-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/16/aul-calls-on-states-to-regulate-ru-486-now-offers-model-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Americans United for Life (AUL)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=95680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.aul.org/2011/02/the-time-to-regulate-ru-486-is-now/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-time-to-regulate-ru-486-is-now">Americans U. for Life</a>: “Telemed abortions” have made headlines in the last year, and with that attention AUL has received numerous requests from state legislators and policy groups seeking to curb the practice. While this issue is so “hot,” states have the perfect opportunity to protect women by regulating the provision of abortion-inducing drugs. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/16/aul-calls-on-states-to-regulate-ru-486-now-offers-model-legislation/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/16/aul-calls-on-states-to-regulate-ru-486-now-offers-model-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saskatchewan unlikely to appeal court ruling on &#8220;gay marriage&#8221; refusal law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/11/saskatchewan-unlikely-to-appeal-court-ruling-on-gay-marriage-refusal-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/11/saskatchewan-unlikely-to-appeal-court-ruling-on-gay-marriage-refusal-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: In the Matter of Marriage Commissioners . . .]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=90873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/breakingnews/court-rules-saskatchewan-gay-marriage-refusal-law-unconstitutional--113205849.html">Winnipeg Free Press</a>: Lawyer Tom Schuck, who intervened on behalf of the Christian Legal Fellowship, said the ruling discriminates against Christian people. "There's a lot more sympathy for people with same-sex attractions than there is for the Christians that get fired because they won't do what they consider is immoral," said Schuck. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/11/saskatchewan-unlikely-to-appeal-court-ruling-on-gay-marriage-refusal-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/11/saskatchewan-unlikely-to-appeal-court-ruling-on-gay-marriage-refusal-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;We may not like polygamy, but decriminalization makes sense&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/16/we-may-not-like-polygamy-but-decriminalization-makes-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/16/we-may-not-like-polygamy-but-decriminalization-makes-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: In the matter of the Constitutional Question Act RSBC 1986 c. 68]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=87274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marina Adshade, economist at Dalhousie University, <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economy-lab/the-economists/we-may-not-like-polygamy-but-decriminalization-makes-sense/article1840290/">writing in the Globe and Mail</a>: "In the economic sense a policy is not optimal if someone can be made better off without making others worse off. If this is the criterion, then it has to be that criminalization of polygamy not be an optimal policy. If we allow everyone to act in their own best interests when making marriage choices, and assume that parents act in the best interest of their children, then surely those who chose to live in a polygamous household are better off than they would be in a monogamous household. They have to be because that is the arrangement they have chosen." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/16/we-may-not-like-polygamy-but-decriminalization-makes-sense/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/16/we-may-not-like-polygamy-but-decriminalization-makes-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will British Columbia legalize polygamy?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/13/will-british-columbia-legalize-polygamy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/13/will-british-columbia-legalize-polygamy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Austin R. Nimocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: In the matter of the Constitutional Question Act RSBC 1986 c. 68]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=86079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://cwnewz.com/content/view/1980/32/">Christian Web News</a>: "'No government should experiment with a practice that has been clearly demonstrated as harmful to women, children, and societies around the world,' said ADF Senior Legal Counsel [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-austin-r-nimocks/">Austin R. Nimocks</a>] . . . Gerald Chipeur, one of more than 1,800 attorneys in the ADF alliance, examined Dr. Shoshana Grossbard before the court Tuesday." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/13/will-british-columbia-legalize-polygamy/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/13/will-british-columbia-legalize-polygamy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christian Groups Intensify Efforts Against U.N. Defamation Resolution</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/15/christian-groups-intensify-efforts-against-u-n-defamation-resolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/15/christian-groups-intensify-efforts-against-u-n-defamation-resolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=76698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.christianpost.com/article/20101014/christian-groups-intensify-efforts-against-un-anti-defamation-resolution/">Christian Post</a>: Late last month, several Christian groups submitted a consultation paper to the U.N. Human Rights Council, urging it to protect religious expression, interpret “incitement” in a manner that protects religious minorities from “actual, imminent harm,” and reject the call for vague “hate speech” codes that penalize speech that merely makes the listener uncomfortable. The groups – which included Alliance Defense Fund, Christian Legal Fellowship, Jubilee Campaign, World Evangelical Alliance, and Advocates International . . . . Open Doors USA Advocacy Director Lindsay Vessey said it is "dangerous and alarming that a U.N. resolution provides legitimacy to national blasphemy laws that are used to persecute Christians and other minority faith groups . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/15/christian-groups-intensify-efforts-against-u-n-defamation-resolution/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/15/christian-groups-intensify-efforts-against-u-n-defamation-resolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religious, women&#8217;s groups allowed to back prostitution laws</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/23/religious-womens-groups-allowed-to-back-prostitution-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/23/religious-womens-groups-allowed-to-back-prostitution-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prostitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=36790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The groups were the Christian Legal Fellowship, REAL Women of Canada and the Catholic Civil Rights League." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/23/religious-womens-groups-allowed-to-back-prostitution-laws/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/23/religious-womens-groups-allowed-to-back-prostitution-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

