<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: First Freedoms Foundation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-first-freedoms-foundation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Constitutionality of same-sex marriage registry plan questioned</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/14/constitutionality-of-same-sex-marriage-registry-plan-questioned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/14/constitutionality-of-same-sex-marriage-registry-plan-questioned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: First Freedoms Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=21182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.winonadailynews.com/articles/2009/04/13/news/03registry13.txt">Winona Daily News</a>: "Gov. Jim Doyle’s proposal to create a statewide domestic partner registry for same-sex couples would be unique in the nation if it becomes law and survives an expected legal challenge, experts and advocates said. That’s because no state that both bans gay marriage and prohibits other legal recognition of same-sex relationships, as Wisconsin does, allows domestic partnerships or civil unions." 

 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/14/constitutionality-of-same-sex-marriage-registry-plan-questioned/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/14/constitutionality-of-same-sex-marriage-registry-plan-questioned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court cert petition: Parents challenge Wisconsin social workers&#8217; private school intrusion</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/09/us-supreme-court-cert-petition-parents-challenge-wisconsin-social-workers-intrusion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/09/us-supreme-court-cert-petition-parents-challenge-wisconsin-social-workers-intrusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: First Freedoms Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=8267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The First Freedoms Foundation has issued a press release (Oct. 2nd) that reports: First Freedoms case Michael C. v. Gresbach has gone to the United States Supreme Court. Attorneys Michael Dean and Stephen Crampton represent Michael and Cherita C. and &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/09/us-supreme-court-cert-petition-parents-challenge-wisconsin-social-workers-intrusion/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/09/us-supreme-court-cert-petition-parents-challenge-wisconsin-social-workers-intrusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Milwaukee Bureau of Child Welfare Violates Rights of Private School Parents and Students &#8212; Again</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/20/milwaukee-bureau-of-child-welfare-violates-rights-of-private-school-parents-and-students-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/20/milwaukee-bureau-of-child-welfare-violates-rights-of-private-school-parents-and-students-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 22:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 7th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: First Freedoms Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=3827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The decision upholds a lower court ruling that Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare case worker Dana Gresbach violated the Fourth Amendment rights of a brother and sister when she partially disrobed and viewed them at the private school where they were enrolled in the third grade.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/20/milwaukee-bureau-of-child-welfare-violates-rights-of-private-school-parents-and-students-again/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/20/milwaukee-bureau-of-child-welfare-violates-rights-of-private-school-parents-and-students-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative wins nasty Wisconsin Supreme Court race</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/04/03/conservative-prevails-in-nasty-wisconsin-supreme-court-race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/04/03/conservative-prevails-in-nasty-wisconsin-supreme-court-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: First Freedoms Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/04/03/conservative-prevails-in-nasty-wisconsin-supreme-court-race/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bare-knuckles race is regrettable because it sends the message that courts are political prizes rather deliberative institutions responsible for objective justice, but they have, in fact, become political prizes . . .  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/04/03/conservative-prevails-in-nasty-wisconsin-supreme-court-race/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/04/03/conservative-prevails-in-nasty-wisconsin-supreme-court-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael D. Dean: What&#8217;s at stake in the battle for the Wisconsin Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/14/michael-d-dean-whats-at-stake-in-the-battle-for-the-wisconsin-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/14/michael-d-dean-whats-at-stake-in-the-battle-for-the-wisconsin-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: First Freedoms Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/14/michael-d-dean-whats-at-stake-in-the-battle-for-the-wisconsin-supreme-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Dean of the First Freedoms Foundation offers an analysis in this four page white paper.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/14/michael-d-dean-whats-at-stake-in-the-battle-for-the-wisconsin-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin Supreme Court denies intervention in domestic partner suit</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/02/07/wisconsin-supreme-court-denies-intervention-in-domestic-partner-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/02/07/wisconsin-supreme-court-denies-intervention-in-domestic-partner-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: First Freedoms Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/adf.php/2008/02/07/wisconsin-supreme-court-denies-intervention-in-domestic-partner-suit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The suit claims that under the Wisconsin constitution, the partners should receive health care benefits under Department of Employee Trust Fund benefit plans because the partners are “similarly situated” to the “spouses” of state employees who receive benefits under those plans. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/02/07/wisconsin-supreme-court-denies-intervention-in-domestic-partner-suit/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/02/07/wisconsin-supreme-court-denies-intervention-in-domestic-partner-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

