<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: Freedom to Marry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-freedom-to-marry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;NH gay advocate resigns, citing no funding&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/nh-gay-advocate-resigns-citing-no-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/nh-gay-advocate-resigns-citing-no-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=117631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2011/11/02/apnewsbreak_gay_advocate_resigns_no_funding/">Boston.com (AP)</a>: The executive director of the driving force behind New Hampshire's gay marriage law announced Wednesday she is resigning due to insufficient funding drawn partly through the group's national organization. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/nh-gay-advocate-resigns-citing-no-funding/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/nh-gay-advocate-resigns-citing-no-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;New York Gay Marriage Vote Alters Political Battle Lines&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/new-york-gay-marriage-vote-alters-political-battle-lines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/new-york-gay-marriage-vote-alters-political-battle-lines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Marriage Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geoffrey A. Fowler and Carol E. Lee at <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303627104576409841813335926.html">WSJ.com</a>: Opponents point to a May Alliance Defense Fund poll which claimed a 2.53% margin of error found that 62% of Americans think marriage should be defined "only as a union between one man and one woman." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/new-york-gay-marriage-vote-alters-political-battle-lines/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/new-york-gay-marriage-vote-alters-political-battle-lines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP: &#8220;N.Y. legalizes gay marriage&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/n-y-legalizes-gay-marriage-usa-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/n-y-legalizes-gay-marriage-usa-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-06-24-gay-marriage-new-york_n.htm">USATODAY.com</a> (6/24): "The opposition has created an illusion of momentum but not a real base of support or track record of victory in the courts," said Brian Raum, senior counsel with the conservative Alliance Defense Fund. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/n-y-legalizes-gay-marriage-usa-today/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/n-y-legalizes-gay-marriage-usa-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Some gay-rights foes claim they now are bullied&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/08/some-gay-rights-foes-claim-they-now-are-bullied/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/08/some-gay-rights-foes-claim-they-now-are-bullied/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=105772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20110608/NEWS04/110608030/Some-gay-rights-foes-claim-they-now-bullied-?odyssey=mod%7Cnewswell%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE%7Cs">Burlington Free Press</a>: "They're advocating for a lot of changes in the name of tolerance," said Jim Campbell, an attorney with the conservative Alliance Defense Fund. "Yet ironically the tolerance is not returned, for people of faith who don't agree with their agenda." . . . [Evan Wolfson]  added: "There's been a shift in the moral understanding of people — that exclusion from marriage and anti-gay prejudice is wrong. Positions that wouldn't have been questioned in the past are now being held up to the light." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/08/some-gay-rights-foes-claim-they-now-are-bullied/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/08/some-gay-rights-foes-claim-they-now-are-bullied/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Gay marriage could move forward in some U.S. states&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/26/gay-marriage-could-move-forward-in-some-u-s-states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/26/gay-marriage-could-move-forward-in-some-u-s-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=93499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE70L29520110122?pageNumber=1">Reuters</a>: "A handful of U.S. states are poised to take up the issue of gay marriage afresh, due largely to incoming lawmakers who may tip the balance in favor of the controversial measure. In Maryland, New York and Rhode Island in particular, the legalization of same-sex marriages is moving ahead, organizers and supporters say." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/26/gay-marriage-could-move-forward-in-some-u-s-states/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/26/gay-marriage-could-move-forward-in-some-u-s-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic leader in Iowa Senate vows to block marriage vote</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/04/democratic-leader-in-iowa-senate-vows-to-block-marriage-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/04/democratic-leader-in-iowa-senate-vows-to-block-marriage-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Iowa Family Policy Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=80298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Senate Minority Leader Paul McKinley, R-Chariton, hopes public pressure might eventually compel Gronstal to allow a vote, but Gronstal said Wednesday that will never happen." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/04/democratic-leader-in-iowa-senate-vows-to-block-marriage-vote/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/04/democratic-leader-in-iowa-senate-vows-to-block-marriage-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Libresco: When debates go sour &#8211; Gallagher v. Wolfson marriage debate at Yale</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/14/libresco-when-debates-go-sour-gallagher-v-wolfson-marriage-debate-at-yale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/14/libresco-when-debates-go-sour-gallagher-v-wolfson-marriage-debate-at-yale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Organization for Women (NOW)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=76610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leah Libresco writes at <a href="http://www.yaledailynews.com/news/2010/oct/08/libresco-when-debates-go-sour/">Yale Daily News</a>: "While checking Facebook during the Yale Political Union debate between Evan Wolfson, head of Freedom to Marry, and Maggie Gallagher, a leader from the National Organization for Marriage, I was pleased to see a steady stream of debate-related statuses. As the night went on, the tenor of the statuses from my mostly liberal friends began to shift. The people who referred to Ms. Gallagher as evil earlier in the night ended up with 'I think I enjoyed talking to [Gallagher] … What’s wrong with us?' <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/14/libresco-when-debates-go-sour-gallagher-v-wolfson-marriage-debate-at-yale/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/14/libresco-when-debates-go-sour-gallagher-v-wolfson-marriage-debate-at-yale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Gay marriage fate rests in courts of law, public opinion&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/17/gay-marriage-fate-rests-in-courts-of-law-public-opinion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/17/gay-marriage-fate-rests-in-courts-of-law-public-opinion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jordan Lorence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Perry v. Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=63248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts2627">Yahoo! News</a>: "'The case in Massachusetts is much more incremental and strategic,' said [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-jordan-lorence/">Jordan Lorence</a>], a senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian legal firm helping to defend Prop. 8. 'It's like a rifle shot. The California case is much more massive in its magnitude. More than a rifle shot, it's like a big bomb.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/17/gay-marriage-fate-rests-in-courts-of-law-public-opinion/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/17/gay-marriage-fate-rests-in-courts-of-law-public-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Group wants same military benefits for gay spouses&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/11/group-wants-same-military-benefits-for-gay-spouses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/11/group-wants-same-military-benefits-for-gay-spouses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Austin R. Nimocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=55002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/08/group-wants-same-military-benefits-for-gay-spouses/?page=2">Washington Times</a>: "'Gay people serving in the military, defending our country, should have the same rules and same opportunities as any other Americans, no more and no less,' Evan Wolfson, executive director of Freedom to Marry, told The Washington Times . . . Austin R. Nimocks, a lawyer with the Alliance Defense Fund, said he thinks DOMA prevents the military from giving benefits to gay spouses . . . 'It's most likely under the current scenario that the military would follow DOMA because the marriage license held by a same-sex couple is a state-conferred right and not a federal-conferred right.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/11/group-wants-same-military-benefits-for-gay-spouses/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/11/group-wants-same-military-benefits-for-gay-spouses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Will gay military spouses receive benefits after repeal?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/11/will-gay-military-spouses-receive-benefits-after-repeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/11/will-gay-military-spouses-receive-benefits-after-repeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Austin R. Nimocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=55000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://lezgetreal.com/?p=28132">LezGetReal</a>: "Austin R. Nimocks, a lawyer with the Alliance Defense Fund, told The Washington Times,  'It’s most likely under the current scenario that the military would follow DOMA because the marriage license held by a same-sex couple is a state-conferred right and not a federal-conferred right. And so there is no requirement that the federal government acknowledge that state-conferred right in that regard. I think that federal DOMA would necessarily constrict the ability of the military to provide some sort of recognition to a marriage license held by a same-sex couple.' . . . The top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee . . . asked Secretary Gates if he will recommend that Congress repeal DOMA . . . A spokesman for Gates declined to comment." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/11/will-gay-military-spouses-receive-benefits-after-repeal/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/11/will-gay-military-spouses-receive-benefits-after-repeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At heart of Prop. 8 trial, a fight over nurturing kids</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/01/at-heart-of-prop-8-trial-a-fight-over-nurturing-kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/01/at-heart-of-prop-8-trial-a-fight-over-nurturing-kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Austin R. Nimocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Perry v. Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=50380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.sacbee.com/topstories/story/2500983.html">Sacramento Bee</a>: "Austin Nimocks, a Proposition 8 attorney from the Alliance Defense Fund, which specializes in defense of religious rights, said Blankenhorn made the case that same-sex marriage could cause 'further debasement' of marriage as an institution. Gay marriage shouldn't be allowed, Nimocks said, because 'it intentionally deprives children of a father and a mother.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/01/at-heart-of-prop-8-trial-a-fight-over-nurturing-kids/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/01/at-heart-of-prop-8-trial-a-fight-over-nurturing-kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Gay marriage&#8217;s &#8216;inevitability&#8217; in doubt&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/09/gay-marriages-inevitability-in-doubt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/09/gay-marriages-inevitability-in-doubt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=44641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The same-sex marriage movement appears likely to end a banner year with a string of stinging defeats that opponents say have undermined a core proposition of the movement - that the acceptance of gay marriage is, sooner or later, inevitable." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/09/gay-marriages-inevitability-in-doubt/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/09/gay-marriages-inevitability-in-doubt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin: Day off for Good Friday draws fire from FFRF</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/14/wisconsin-day-off-for-good-friday-draws-fire-from-ffrf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/14/wisconsin-day-off-for-good-friday-draws-fire-from-ffrf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom from Religion Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=21190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Warning: Language. Sean Kittridge <a href="http://badgerherald.com/oped/2009/04/13/day_off_draws_fire_f.php">writes at The Badger Herald</a>: "But not everybody is laughing at what seems to be an innocuous day off, as the Freedom From Religion Foundation, Madison’s grumpiest constitutional watchdog, is readying a lawsuit . . . Before we dive into how the FFRF isn’t really about 'freedom,' let’s lay out the facts of the matter. Kids at MATC got Friday off." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/14/wisconsin-day-off-for-good-friday-draws-fire-from-ffrf/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/14/wisconsin-day-off-for-good-friday-draws-fire-from-ffrf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Iowa same-sex marriage ruling spurs activists”</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/06/%e2%80%9ciowa-same-sex-marriage-ruling-spurs-activists%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/06/%e2%80%9ciowa-same-sex-marriage-ruling-spurs-activists%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Douglas Napier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Iowa Family Policy Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=20287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.globegazette.com/articles/2009/04/04/news/latest/doc49d7e5e5792a7148960288.txt">The Globe Gazette (AP) reports</a>: Rather than agreeing same-sex marriage is inevitable, opponents said the Iowa court decision would be a warning to other states that haven’t enacted constitutional amendments. “This (ruling) will catapult all of those states forward in the marriage amendment process,” said Douglas Napier, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative legal group based in Scottsdale, Ariz. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/06/%e2%80%9ciowa-same-sex-marriage-ruling-spurs-activists%e2%80%9d/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/06/%e2%80%9ciowa-same-sex-marriage-ruling-spurs-activists%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Semantics rule gay marriage debate&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/02/semantics-rule-gay-marriage-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/02/semantics-rule-gay-marriage-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=20085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Gram <a href="http://www.benningtonbanner.com/ci_12053122">reports in the AP</a>: "The Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative legal group based in Scottsdale, Ariz., issued a news release this week in which it put quotation marks around the word marriage in the phrase "same-sex 'marriage'." It does the same with civil unions, questioning the legitimacy of the state's existing system of legal recognition for same-sex couples." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/02/semantics-rule-gay-marriage-debate/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/02/semantics-rule-gay-marriage-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lesbian Couple Seeking Divorce In New Jersey</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/06/lesbian-couple-seeking-divorce-in-new-jersey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/06/lesbian-couple-seeking-divorce-in-new-jersey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=14874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AP: &#8220;A judge is expected to rule Friday on whether a lesbian couple legally married in Canada can be divorced in New Jersey. The state attorney general&#8217;s office opposes the request, which is the first of its kind in the &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/06/lesbian-couple-seeking-divorce-in-new-jersey/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/06/lesbian-couple-seeking-divorce-in-new-jersey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Tell-Three campaign proselytizes for same sex &#8220;marriage&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/04/new-tell-three-campaign-proselytizes-for-same-sex-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/04/new-tell-three-campaign-proselytizes-for-same-sex-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Gay and Lesbian Task Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Parents Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=14540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ACLU has issued this press release: New Web Campaign, Tell-Three.org, Encourages People to Talk About What it Means to be LGBT Join the Impact has partnered with other national LGBT groups to develop a web based public education campaign, &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/04/new-tell-three-campaign-proselytizes-for-same-sex-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/04/new-tell-three-campaign-proselytizes-for-same-sex-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Unions a Minefield for Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/30/civil-unions-a-minefield-for-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/30/civil-unions-a-minefield-for-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=14161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Activists following the Obama proposal said it could become controversial within the gay community if Congress refuses to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, but moves ahead with legislation providing marriage-related rights only for civil unions and domestic partnerships . . ." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/30/civil-unions-a-minefield-for-obama/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/30/civil-unions-a-minefield-for-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

