<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-gay-and-lesbian-advocates-and-defenders-glad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GLAD Argues One Spouse At A Time Rule Applies to Civil Unions As Well As Marriages</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/10/glad-argues-one-spouse-at-a-time-rule-applies-to-civil-unions-as-well-as-marriages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/10/glad-argues-one-spouse-at-a-time-rule-applies-to-civil-unions-as-well-as-marriages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=130861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.glad.org/current/item/glad-argues-one-spouse-at-a-time-rule-applies-to-civil-unions-as-well-as-ma/">GLAD</a>: In a case involving a man who married in Massachusetts without dissolving his Vermont civil union to a different man, GLAD will argue before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) that the marriage should be considered void.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/10/glad-argues-one-spouse-at-a-time-rule-applies-to-civil-unions-as-well-as-marriages/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/10/glad-argues-one-spouse-at-a-time-rule-applies-to-civil-unions-as-well-as-marriages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS allows medical deduction for treatment of &#8220;gender identity&#8221; disorder</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/08/irs-allows-medical-deduction-for-treatment-of-gender-identity-disorder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/08/irs-allows-medical-deduction-for-treatment-of-gender-identity-disorder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 11:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=118037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.glad.org/current/news-detail/great-news-for-transgender-taxpayers/">GLAD reports</a> on the IRS "<a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-aod/aod201103.pdf">action on decision</a>" in <em>O’Donnabhain v. Commissioner</em>, 134 T.C. 34 (2010) (
T.C. Docket No. 6402-0) <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/08/irs-allows-medical-deduction-for-treatment-of-gender-identity-disorder/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/08/irs-allows-medical-deduction-for-treatment-of-gender-identity-disorder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GLAD: Lawyers should pledge to help homosexual partners undermine child custody rights of natural parents</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/09/glad-lawyers-should-pledge-to-help-homosexual-partners-undermine-child-custody-rights-of-natural-parents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/09/glad-lawyers-should-pledge-to-help-homosexual-partners-undermine-child-custody-rights-of-natural-parents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=113076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.keennewsservice.com/2011/09/08/new-guidelines-for-same-sex-parenting-and-custody/">New guidelines for same-sex parenting and custody &#124; Keen News Service</a>: In several of these cases, notably Miller v. Jenkins, attorneys from conservative legal organizations such as Liberty Counsel and the Alliance Defense Fund have represented the biological mothers. “They are making an industry of it,” Bonauto noted of the groups. &#124; GLAD: <a href="http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/publications/protecting-families-standards-for-lgbt-families.pdf">Standards for LGBT Families</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/09/glad-lawyers-should-pledge-to-help-homosexual-partners-undermine-child-custody-rights-of-natural-parents/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/09/glad-lawyers-should-pledge-to-help-homosexual-partners-undermine-child-custody-rights-of-natural-parents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GLAD: DOJ Backs Away Again From DOMA</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/29/glad-doj-backs-away-again-from-doma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/29/glad-doj-backs-away-again-from-doma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Gill v. Office of Personnel Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Massachusetts v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=99476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.glad.org/current/news-detail/doj-backs-away-again-from-doma/">GLAD</a>: The Department of Justice followed Wednesday’s withdrawal from two DOMA cases in the Second Circuit, including GLAD’s <em>Pedersen v. OPM</em>  by notifying the clerk of the First Circuit that they will also “cease to defend” the two consolidated DOMA cases, <em>Gill v. Office of Personnel Management</em> and <em>Massachusetts v. HHS</em>.  The DOJ has not sent a letter to the Congress declining to defend DOMA in toto in the Gill case, so its determination may only apply to the extent the court determines that heightened scrutiny is the proper standard of review for DOMA’s constitutionality. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/29/glad-doj-backs-away-again-from-doma/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/29/glad-doj-backs-away-again-from-doma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GLAD takes a step-by-step approach on &#8220;gay marriage&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/03/glad-takes-a-step-by-step-approach-on-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/03/glad-takes-a-step-by-step-approach-on-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=97030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-gays-legal-20110303,0,6542175.story?track=rss">LA Times</a>: "Gay &#038; Lesbian Advocates &#038; Defenders, or GLAD, is arguing that it is unconstitutional to discriminate against gay couples who are already legally married. It hopes its incremental approach will lead to a broader ruling by the Supreme Court." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/03/glad-takes-a-step-by-step-approach-on-gay-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/03/glad-takes-a-step-by-step-approach-on-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department to stop defending DOMA, [homosexual] groups respond</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/justice-department-to-stop-defending-doma-homosexual-groups-respond/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/justice-department-to-stop-defending-doma-homosexual-groups-respond/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Center for Lesbian Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Gay and Lesbian Task Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Golinski v. United States Office of Personnel Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Perry v. Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=96429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lisa Keen writes at the<a href="http://www.windycitymediagroup.com/gay/lesbian/news/ARTICLE.php?AID=30701">Windy City Times</a>: It is possible—just as happened in California—that some other entity might attempt to mount its own defense of DOMA in the pending cases. Last October, U.S. Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, filed a motion in the two First Circuit cases, seeking to be named intervenor-defendant. Smith, aided by the right-wing Alliance Defense Fund, said at the time that the Justice Department was providing "no defense at all" for DOMA. He withdrew his motion a few weeks later, without comment. [this report contains a lengthy list of responses from homosexual groups] <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/justice-department-to-stop-defending-doma-homosexual-groups-respond/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/justice-department-to-stop-defending-doma-homosexual-groups-respond/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blog of the Legal Times: DOJ won&#8217;t defend Defense of Marriage Act</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/blog-of-the-legal-times-doj-wont-defend-defense-of-marriage-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/blog-of-the-legal-times-doj-wont-defend-defense-of-marriage-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Gill v. Office of Personnel Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Massachusetts v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=96423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marcia Coyle at the <a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/02/doj-wont-defend-defense-of-marriage-act.html">Blog of the Legal Times</a>: "A spokeswoman for Smith said his lawyers would need to review the cases pending in the 2nd Circuit before making any decision to try to intervene. Representing Smith in the 1st Circuit were three lawyers from the conservative Alliance Defense Fund, including senior counsel Brian Raum, and a solo practitioner from Salem, Mass., Philip Moran. A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), to whom Holder addressed a letter explaining the administration’s decision, did not immediately respond to a request for comment." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/blog-of-the-legal-times-doj-wont-defend-defense-of-marriage-act/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/blog-of-the-legal-times-doj-wont-defend-defense-of-marriage-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GLAD Lawyer Expects Members Of Congress To Defend DOMA In Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/glad-lawyer-expects-members-of-congress-to-defend-doma-in-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/glad-lawyer-expects-members-of-congress-to-defend-doma-in-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Austin R. Nimocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=96421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/02/glad_lawyer_expects_members_of_congress_to_defend_doma_in_court.php">TPM</a>: The Alliance Defense Fund, which asked a federal court for permission for Rep. Smith to serve as an intervenor-defendant in the DOMA cases in the past, issued a statement Wednesday that said it "will not waver in its ongoing defense of marriage nationwide." "Either the House of Representatives or the Senate have the legal authority to intervene in pending lawsuits to defend the federal DOMA statute," Senior Legal Counsel Austin R. Nimocks said in a statement. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/glad-lawyer-expects-members-of-congress-to-defend-doma-in-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/glad-lawyer-expects-members-of-congress-to-defend-doma-in-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NH: Outside groups gird for marriage fight</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/04/nh-outside-groups-gird-for-marriage-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/04/nh-outside-groups-gird-for-marriage-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Cornerstone Policy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Watch International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gill Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Gay and Lesbian Task Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Organization for Marriage (NOM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: New Hampshire Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Stand for Marriage Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=89603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/231898/outside-groups-gird-for-gay-marriage-fight">Concord Monitor</a>: "The Family Research Council in Washington, D.C., has vowed to do 'whatever it takes' to repeal gay marriage in New Hampshire. Gay &#038; Lesbian Advocates &#038; Defenders in Boston is promising to do 'whatever it takes' to stop them." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/04/nh-outside-groups-gird-for-marriage-fight/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/04/nh-outside-groups-gird-for-marriage-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;DOMA taking more hits&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/16/doma-taking-more-hits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/16/doma-taking-more-hits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Windsor v. United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=82375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&#038;sc=&#038;sc2=news&#038;sc3=&#038;id=112804">Edge Boston</a>: "The Defense of Marriage Act faced a two-pronged attack on Nov. 9 as two separate organizations and sets of lawyers, representing different plaintiffs, filed lawsuits in federal court challenging the federal definition of marriage." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/16/doma-taking-more-hits/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/16/doma-taking-more-hits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives defend DOMA amid more lawsuits</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/10/conservatives-defend-doma-amid-more-lawsuits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/10/conservatives-defend-doma-amid-more-lawsuits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Dale Schowengerdt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Windsor v. United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=81388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.christianpost.com/article/20101110/conservatives-defend-doma-amid-more-lawsuits/">Christian Post</a>: "The American Civil Liberties Union and Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders both filed lawsuits Tuesday on behalf of same-sex couples trying to receive federal benefits from their partners. In GLAD's case, the advocate group filed a lawsuit on behalf of five same-sex couples and widowed partner across three states – Connecticut, Vermont and New Hampshire . . . ADF Legal Council [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-dale-schowengerdt-2/">Dale Schowengerdt</a>] explained that GLAD put multiple plaintiffs on the lawsuit because 'their legal arguments are a little bit thin and they focus a lot on the stories of these couples and basically make an emotional appeal.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/10/conservatives-defend-doma-amid-more-lawsuits/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/10/conservatives-defend-doma-amid-more-lawsuits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Texas lawmaker seeks role in appeal of gay marriage ruling&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/12/texas-lawmaker-seeks-role-in-appeal-of-gay-marriage-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/12/texas-lawmaker-seeks-role-in-appeal-of-gay-marriage-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Gill v. Office of Personnel Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=76241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/texas-politics/texas-lawmaker-seeks-role-in-appeal-of-gay-966565.html">Statesman.com</a>: "Tauro has yet to rule on Smith’s motions, filed Oct. 5 by the Alliance Defense Fund, an organization of Christian lawyers active in religious liberty, family and marriage issues."
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/12/texas-lawmaker-seeks-role-in-appeal-of-gay-marriage-ruling/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/12/texas-lawmaker-seeks-role-in-appeal-of-gay-marriage-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACS Convention Panel video: Marriage Equality</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/23/acs-convention-panel-video-marriage-equality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/23/acs-convention-panel-video-marriage-equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=69819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.acslaw.org/node/16391">American Constitution Society Convention panel</a>: "On June 18, at the 2010 ACS National Convention, a panel of experts discussed 'Marriage Equality: An Update and Preview.' The panel featured: Christopher Hayes, Washington, D.C. Editor, The Nation, Moderator; Mary Bonauto, Civil Rights Project Director, Gay &#038; Lesbian Advocates &#038; Defenders; Brian W. Raum, Senior Counsel, Marriage Litigation Center, Alliance Defense Fund; Therese M. Stewart, Chief Deputy City Attorney, City of San Francisco; Camilla B. Taylor, Senior Staff Attorney, Lambda Legal." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/23/acs-convention-panel-video-marriage-equality/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/23/acs-convention-panel-video-marriage-equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New developments in GLAD&#8217;s DOMA challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/new-developments-in-glads-doma-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/new-developments-in-glads-doma-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Gill v. Office of Personnel Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=69684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://newyorklawschool.typepad.com/leonardlink/2010/08/new-developments-in-glads-doma-challenge.html">Leonard Link</a>: "One question that immediately began buzzing around the blogosphere was whether the Obama Administration's Justice Department will appeal these rulings. Others are when will the rulings take effect, and do they have any application outside of Massachusetts? Within the past few days, some answers have begun emerging." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/new-developments-in-glads-doma-challenge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/new-developments-in-glads-doma-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MA: Amended judgment entered in GLAD&#8217;s DOMA challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/19/ma-amended-judgment-entered-in-glads-doma-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/19/ma-amended-judgment-entered-in-glads-doma-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Gill v. Office of Personnel Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=69517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://sdgln.com/causes/2010/08/19/amended-judgment-entered-glad-s-doma-challenge-massachusetts">San Diego Gay and Lesbian News</a>: "An <a href="http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/gill-amended-judgment-8-2010.pdf">amended judgment</a> was entered on Aug. 18 in <em>Gill v. Office of Personnel Management</em>, the <a href="http://www.glad.org/doma">challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act</a> filed by Gay &#38; Lesbian Advocates &#38; Defenders (GLAD). Simultaneously, a <a href="http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/gill-stay-order-8-2010.pdf">stay was issued</a> pending any appeal by the government to the U.S. Court of Appeals for  the First Circuit.  It supersedes a judgment entered by the federal  district court on Aug. 12, 2010." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/19/ma-amended-judgment-entered-in-glads-doma-challenge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/19/ma-amended-judgment-entered-in-glads-doma-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Boies&#8217; remarks at the ABA&#8217;s annual meeting in San Francisco &#8212; Prop 8 ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/09/david-boies-remarks-at-the-abas-annual-meeting-in-san-francisco-prop-8-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/09/david-boies-remarks-at-the-abas-annual-meeting-in-san-francisco-prop-8-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Bar Association (ABA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Perry v. Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=68069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federalist Society's <a href="http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/pubid.1932/pub_detail.asp">Barwatch Bulletin for Sunday, August 8, 2010</a>: "David Boies, who served as lead counsel for Al Gore in the 2000 presidential election challenge, delivered the keynote address at the Opening Assembly on Saturday.  Boies is currently serving on the legal team challenging Proposition 8 in California. He discussed the case in his remarks, which addressed challenges to the rule of law . . . '[T]here is only one area in our society in which there continues to be not merely social discrimination, but state-sponsored, state-enforced discrimination against a group of our citizens. And last Wednesday, the federal district court here in the northern district of California took an important step in eliminating that last official discrimination against our gay and lesbian citizens.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/09/david-boies-remarks-at-the-abas-annual-meeting-in-san-francisco-prop-8-ruling/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/09/david-boies-remarks-at-the-abas-annual-meeting-in-san-francisco-prop-8-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Judge rules Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/08/u-s-judge-rules-defense-of-marriage-act-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/08/u-s-judge-rules-defense-of-marriage-act-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Gill v. Office of Personnel Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/08/u-s-judge-rules-defense-of-marriage-act-unconstitutional/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A U.S. judge in Boston has ruled that a federal gay marriage ban is unconstitutional because it interferes with the right of a state to define marriage." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/08/u-s-judge-rules-defense-of-marriage-act-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/08/u-s-judge-rules-defense-of-marriage-act-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maine Supreme Judicial Court orders new hearing on transsexual&#8217;s name change application</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/29/maine-supreme-judicial-court-orders-new-hearing-on-transsexuals-name-change-application/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/29/maine-supreme-judicial-court-orders-new-hearing-on-transsexuals-name-change-application/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=64580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://newyorklawschool.typepad.com/leonardlink/2010/06/maine-supreme-judicial-court-orders-new-hearing-on-transsexuals-name-change-application.html">Leonard Link</a>: "On June 24, the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, ruling on the appeal in I<em>n re A.M.B.</em>, 2010 ME 54, 2010 WL 2521726, vacated and remanded to the Cumberland County Probate Court a petition by a transsexual man for a name change. Probate Judge Joseph R. Mazziotti had denied the name change petition without a written opinion or any communication of reasons, other than 'judicial discretion.' . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/29/maine-supreme-judicial-court-orders-new-hearing-on-transsexuals-name-change-application/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/29/maine-supreme-judicial-court-orders-new-hearing-on-transsexuals-name-change-application/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Gay marriage fate rests in courts of law, public opinion&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/17/gay-marriage-fate-rests-in-courts-of-law-public-opinion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/17/gay-marriage-fate-rests-in-courts-of-law-public-opinion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jordan Lorence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Perry v. Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=63248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts2627">Yahoo! News</a>: "'The case in Massachusetts is much more incremental and strategic,' said [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-jordan-lorence/">Jordan Lorence</a>], a senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian legal firm helping to defend Prop. 8. 'It's like a rifle shot. The California case is much more massive in its magnitude. More than a rifle shot, it's like a big bomb.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/17/gay-marriage-fate-rests-in-courts-of-law-public-opinion/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/17/gay-marriage-fate-rests-in-courts-of-law-public-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Incarcerated Transgender Woman Can Pursue Case for Medical Care&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/08/incarcerated-transgender-woman-can-pursue-case-for-medical-care/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/08/incarcerated-transgender-woman-can-pursue-case-for-medical-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/08/incarcerated-transgender-woman-can-pursue-case-for-medical-care/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.glad.org/current/news-detail/incarcerated-transgender-woman-can-pursue-case-for-medical-care/">GLAD</a>: "A U.S. district court judge in Massachusetts has denied the government’s request to dismiss the case of Vanessa Adams, a Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) inmate with gender identity disorder (GID). For years, the BOP denied Ms. Adams treatment for her serious medical condition. As a result, Ms. Adams attempted suicide multiple times when prison doctors failed to provide any treatment. She eventually removed her own genitals. &#124; <a href="http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/2009-07-10-adams-first-amended-complaint.pdf">Complaint</a> &#124; <a href="http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/2010-06-07-adams-federal-court-decision.pdf">Court Order</a>" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/08/incarcerated-transgender-woman-can-pursue-case-for-medical-care/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/08/incarcerated-transgender-woman-can-pursue-case-for-medical-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GLAD Files Amended Complaint in DOMA Challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/28/glad-files-amended-complaint-in-doma-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/28/glad-files-amended-complaint-in-doma-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 20:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Gill v. Office of Personnel Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/28/glad-files-amended-complaint-in-doma-challenge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.glad.org/current/news-detail/glad-files-amended-complaint-in-doma-challenge/">GLAD</a>: "GLAD filed an <a title="amended complaint" href="https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.glad.org%2Fuploads%2Fdocs%2Fcases%2Fgill-amended-complaint-5-25-10.pdf"><strong>amended complaint</strong></a> this week in our lawsuit challenging Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), <em>Gill v. OPM</em>. The complaint updates the tax overpayments of three of the plaintiff couples due to their inability to file their federal income tax returns under the status 'married filing jointly.'  Each couple must instead file as either a single individual or head of household when they have dependent children." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/28/glad-files-amended-complaint-in-doma-challenge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/28/glad-files-amended-complaint-in-doma-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case is made vs. US marriage law: Court hears &#8220;gay&#8221; group’s challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/07/case-is-made-vs-us-marriage-law-court-hears-gay-group%e2%80%99s-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/07/case-is-made-vs-us-marriage-law-court-hears-gay-group%e2%80%99s-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 14:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Center for Lesbian Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/07/case-is-made-vs-us-marriage-law-court-hears-gay-group%e2%80%99s-challenge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/05/07/case_is_made_vs_us_marriage_law/">Boston Globe</a>: "'I think the Obama administration, if they believe the statute is unconstitutional — which it clearly is — does not have a duty to defend it. In fact, they have a duty not to defend it,'’ Shannon P. Minter, legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, who took a flight from San Francisco to attend the arguments, said afterward." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/07/case-is-made-vs-us-marriage-law-court-hears-gay-group%e2%80%99s-challenge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/07/case-is-made-vs-us-marriage-law-court-hears-gay-group%e2%80%99s-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religious student group case heads to Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/15/religious-student-group-case-heads-to-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/15/religious-student-group-case-heads-to-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Gregory S. Baylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Association of Christian Schools International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Christian Legal Society v Martinez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=58090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://pewforum.org/news/display.php?NewsID=19964">Pew Forum (RNS)</a>: "The case, Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, pits a campus chapter of a Christian legal group against the Hastings College of the Law and its 20-year-old nondiscrimination policy. 'Our main argument is that Christian student groups shouldn't be forced to deny their faith in order to receive equal treatment on campus,' said [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/2010/03/01/about-gregory-s-baylor/">Gregory Baylor</a>], senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, which is helping represent the CLS chapter before the high court." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/15/religious-student-group-case-heads-to-supreme-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/15/religious-student-group-case-heads-to-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Religion vs. bias back in Supreme Court&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/06/religion-vs-bias-back-in-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/06/religion-vs-bias-back-in-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Boy Scouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Concerned Women for America (CWA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Christian Legal Society v Martinez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=57383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.baywindows.com/index.php?ch=news&#038;sc=glbt&#038;sc2=news&#038;sc3=&#038;id=104258">Bay Windows ("GLBT Newspaper")</a>: "In <em>Christian Legal v. Martinez</em>, a Christian law students’ group contests a decision by the University of California’s Hastings College of Law, headed currently by acting chancellor Leo Martinez. The case also includes a gay student group, Outlaw, at the same school as a party to the defense . . . 'Like every other student group on Hastings’ campus, it too has a choice,' say GLAD and Lambda. 'It can adhere to Hastings’ general nondiscrimination policy or forego school funding.' The federal district court in San Francisco and the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals agreed with that logic and ruled for the university and Outlaw. Christian Legal, with the aid of the right-wing Alliance Defense Fund, has appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. And in agreeing to hear that appeal, at least four justices had to indicate a willingness to consider their arguments." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/06/religion-vs-bias-back-in-supreme-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/06/religion-vs-bias-back-in-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maine: &#8220;Biology-based&#8221; restrooms called &#8220;discrimination&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/02/maine-biology-based-restrooms-called-discrimination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/02/maine-biology-based-restrooms-called-discrimination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Maine Family Policy Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=53917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A lawyer for the Maine Human Rights Commission told members of the state board today that requiring all students to use 'biology-based' restrooms and locker rooms in the state's schools is illegal and cannot be allowed to continue."  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/02/maine-biology-based-restrooms-called-discrimination/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/02/maine-biology-based-restrooms-called-discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Massachusetts case may be key in gay marriage fight&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/31/massachusetts-case-may-be-key-in-gay-marriage-fight-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/31/massachusetts-case-may-be-key-in-gay-marriage-fight-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=34681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202433430922&#38;src=EMC-Email&#38;et=editorial&#38;bu=National%20Law%20Journal&#38;pt=NLJ.com-%20Daily%20Headlines&#38;cn=20090831NLJ&#38;kw=Massachusetts%20case%20may%20be%20key%20in%20gay%20marriage%20fight" target="_blank">The National Law Journal</a>: While the high-profile, Ted Olson- and David Boies-managed legal fight against California's Proposition 8 captures headlines, a carefully planned case quietly underway in Massachusetts federal court could be the gay marriage test with the greatest national impact . . . Although he called the Massachusetts challenges 'well-planned and coordinated,' Brian Raum, senior counsel to the Alliance Defense Fund, which supports the 1996 law, said, 'I think all four suits are serious challenges. We are confident they ultimately will not prevail. The federal law is clearly constitutional.' . . . Outrage then shifted to the law's supporters who felt the procreation argument was a major leg in the law's defense. 'The government has an interest in creating unions that lend themselves to responsible procreation such that kids are raised with their married biological mother and father,' said Raum, whose Alliance Defense Fund is an amicus party in <em>Smelt</em>."

<em>Gill v. Office of Personnel Management</em>

<em>Com monwealth v. U.S. Dept. of Health &#038; Human Services</em> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/31/massachusetts-case-may-be-key-in-gay-marriage-fight-2/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/31/massachusetts-case-may-be-key-in-gay-marriage-fight-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Massachusetts case may be key in gay marriage fight&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/28/massachusetts-case-may-be-key-in-gay-marriage-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/28/massachusetts-case-may-be-key-in-gay-marriage-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=34653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/legaltimes/PubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202433430922&#038;Massachusetts_case_may_be_key_in_gay_marriage_fight">Law.com</a>: "The challenge, Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, is one of four lawsuits in different parts of the country that ask federal courts to strike down all or parts of the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) . . . Although he called the Massachusetts challenges 'well-planned and coordinated,' Brian Raum, senior counsel to the Alliance Defense Fund, which supports the 1996 law, said, 'I think all four suits are serious challenges. We are confident they ultimately will not prevail. The federal law is clearly constitutional.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/28/massachusetts-case-may-be-key-in-gay-marriage-fight/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/28/massachusetts-case-may-be-key-in-gay-marriage-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU: &#8220;LGBT Legal And Advocacy Groups Decry Obama Administration&#8217;s Defense of DOMA&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/12/aclu-lgbt-legal-and-advocacy-groups-decry-obama-administrations-defense-of-doma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/12/aclu-lgbt-legal-and-advocacy-groups-decry-obama-administrations-defense-of-doma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Gay and Lesbian Task Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=26991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.aclu.org/lgbt/relationships/39848prs20090612.html">ACLU</a>: "We are very surprised and deeply disappointed in the manner in which the Obama administration has defended the so-called Defense of Marriage Act in a brief filed today in <em>Smelt v. United States</em>, a lawsuit brought in federal court in California by a married same-sex couple asking the federal government to treat them equally with respect to federal protections and benefits." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/12/aclu-lgbt-legal-and-advocacy-groups-decry-obama-administrations-defense-of-doma/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/12/aclu-lgbt-legal-and-advocacy-groups-decry-obama-administrations-defense-of-doma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADF: Activists filing lawsuit against DOMA want judge to redefine marriage for everyone</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/03/adf-activists-filing-lawsuit-against-doma-want-judge-to-redefine-marriage-for-everyone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/03/adf-activists-filing-lawsuit-against-doma-want-judge-to-redefine-marriage-for-everyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=16941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Public policy should be decided by the public, not by one judge and a very small number of radical activists,” said . . .  Brian Raum. “America continues to overwhelmingly reaffirm that marriage is one man and one woman. Does the democratic process mean anything anymore?” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/03/adf-activists-filing-lawsuit-against-doma-want-judge-to-redefine-marriage-for-everyone/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/03/adf-activists-filing-lawsuit-against-doma-want-judge-to-redefine-marriage-for-everyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suit filed challenging the Federal Defense of Marriage Act</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/03/suit-filed-challenging-the-federal-defense-of-marriage-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/03/suit-filed-challenging-the-federal-defense-of-marriage-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=16937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[". . . the federal Defense of Marriage Act makes them ineligible to file joint tax returns. Now Ritchie, Bush and more than a dozen others are suing the federal government, claiming the act discriminates against . . . and is unconstitutional . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/03/suit-filed-challenging-the-federal-defense-of-marriage-act/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/03/suit-filed-challenging-the-federal-defense-of-marriage-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Equal-Marriage Push Intensifies in New England&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/29/equal-marriage-push-intensifies-in-new-england/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/29/equal-marriage-push-intensifies-in-new-england/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=14020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Womensnews.org: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, the Boston-based legal team known as GLAD, has two marriage-equality victories behind it in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Now it is pursuing a &#8220;6 by 12&#8243; strategy, meaning it hopes to win equal marriage &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/29/equal-marriage-push-intensifies-in-new-england/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/29/equal-marriage-push-intensifies-in-new-england/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same-sex &#8216;marriage&#8217; enthusiasts target New England</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/16/same-sex-marriage-enthusiasts-target-new-england/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/16/same-sex-marriage-enthusiasts-target-new-england/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=12744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OneNewsNow.com reports: New England activist groups are developing a strategy to claim their region for homosexual &#8220;marriage&#8221; in the next three years. Peter Sprigg of Family Research Council notes Connecticut and Massachusetts have already legalized same-sex marriage, leaving four states for &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/16/same-sex-marriage-enthusiasts-target-new-england/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/16/same-sex-marriage-enthusiasts-target-new-england/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADF: Marriage amendment needed in Maine more than ever</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/15/adf-marriage-amendment-needed-in-maine-more-than-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/15/adf-marriage-amendment-needed-in-maine-more-than-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Austin R. Nimocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Concerned Women for America (CWA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Maine Family Policy Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=12605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A marriage amendment is needed more than ever in the state of Maine, according to attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund, as legislators added to their agenda Tuesday a bill that would redefine marriage as a union between two “people.”  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/15/adf-marriage-amendment-needed-in-maine-more-than-ever/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/15/adf-marriage-amendment-needed-in-maine-more-than-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dueling marriage proposals introduced in Maine</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/13/dueling-marriage-bills-introduced-in-maine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/13/dueling-marriage-bills-introduced-in-maine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=12426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State Sen. Dennis Damon is introducing a bill to end the prohibition on gay marriage in Maine. House Republican Josh Tardy, meanwhile, is proposing to bolster the state law restricting marriage to one man and one woman by making it a constitutional amendment . . .  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/13/dueling-marriage-bills-introduced-in-maine/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/13/dueling-marriage-bills-introduced-in-maine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Gay marriage backers target New England&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/05/gay-marriage-backers-target-new-england/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/05/gay-marriage-backers-target-new-england/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=11742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Times reports: Two New England states have already legalized same-sex marriage, and a Boston-based advocacy group wants to see the other four join them. Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, known as GLAD, has launched a first-of-its-kind regional &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/05/gay-marriage-backers-target-new-england/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/05/gay-marriage-backers-target-new-england/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

