Raw Story: Two LGBT rights groups, the Human Rights Campaign and OutServe-SLDN, have launched a campaign to get Laurie removed as the headline speaker for the Pentagon’s Day of Prayer event on May 2. In a press release, the HRC noted that Laurie had a history of disparaging LGBT people and their relationships.
- Posted: 04/29/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Group: Outserve-SLDN, Topic: Culture, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Media, Topic: National Day of Prayer, Topic: Prayer
WTKR.com: The Human Rights Campaign Facebook page asked people to wear red and to make their Facebook profiles red to show support for marriage equality . . . “Our most fundamental right in this country is the right to vote and the right to participate in the political process,” said Austin Nimocks of the Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian advocacy group.
“We don’t need the Supreme Court to take that right away from Americans of good faith on both sides of this issue and impose its judicial solution,” Nimocks said. “We need to leave this debate to the democratic process, which is working.”
- Posted: 03/27/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: wtkr.com
- Tags: ADF: Austin R. Nimocks, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), State: California, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 26561, ZZADF: 33121
CNN’s Responses to Obama’s marriage announcement includes this: Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus: “Because our children’s future is best preserved within the traditional understanding of marriage, we call for a constitutional amendment that fully protects marriage as a union …
- Posted: 05/09/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Group: American Values, Group: Family Research Council (FRC), Group: Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Group: National Organization for Marriage (NOM), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Politics, Topic: White House
MetroWeekly: Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.) plans to introduce an amendment on Wednesday to the National Defense Authorization Act in a mark-up of the bill before the House Armed Services Committee that is aimed at creating “a conscience protection clause” for military chaplains in the wake of the end of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” . . . Among the advocates included in the planning for the amendments being offered and from whom Johnson was seeking input were Elaine Donnelly of the Center for Military Readiness; Brian Duggan, a lobbyist for the National Organization for Marriage; Austin Nimocks and Daniel Blomberg, lawyers with the Alliance Defense Fund . . .
- Posted: 05/09/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Center for Military Readiness, Group: Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty, Group: Family Research Council (FRC), Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Group: National Organization for Marriage (NOM), Group: Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN), Group: Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Topic: Congress, Topic: Homosexual Agenda
ADF Attorney Gary McCaleb at The American Thinker: Foley & Lardner, LLP is a large and successful law firm. Focused on serving business clients, it has more than 1,000 attorneys in over 60 offices throughout the United States and across the globe. And although a firm that large is necessarily diverse, we recently found that diversity is not enough when the Human Rights Campaign is looking over your shoulder.
- Posted: 11/23/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.americanthinker.com
- Tags: ADF: Gary McCaleb, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Bench and Bar, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
SeattlePI.com: Calling itself Washington United for Marriage, the coalition is also comprised of Equal Rights Washington, Human Rights Campaign, Legal Voice, and Planned Parenthood Votes Northwest. It includes unions and such major faith groups as the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle.
- Posted: 11/14/2011
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: blog.seattlepi.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Group: Planned Parenthood, State: Washington, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Politics
The Washington Post: Daniel Blomberg, an attorney for the conservative Alliance Defense Fund, denounced the administration’s decision. “Our perspective is that it’s not only incorrect, but deeply disappointing, to have a politician claim support for marriage between one man and one woman on the campaign trail, then actively undermine that once in office,” said Blomberg, whose organization will testify in support of DOMA during Wednesday’s Senate hearing. “We are confident Congress will make the right decision here.”
- Posted: 07/20/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.washingtonpost.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House
AZ Republic (6/25): Attorneys at the Alliance Defense Fund, a Scottsdale-based alliance of attorneys representing conservative Christian issues, said it was disappointing that legislators did not represent their constituents on the issue. “It’s not a circumstance where the expertise of legislators is required,” said Austin Nimocks, ADF senior legal counsel. “People know marriage. They live it and understand it, and they don’t need legislators to dictate to them the definition of marriage.”
- Posted: 06/27/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.azcentral.com
- Tags: ADF: Austin R. Nimocks, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Center for Arizona Policy, Group: Equality Arizona, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), State: Arizona, State: New York, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
Greg Scott writes at the Speak Up Movement Church Blog: Things that make you go hmmmmmmm… NWI reports: Marriage amendment debate pits social conservatives against businesses . . . …Jill Cook, vice president of human resources for Cummins Inc., said her company, which employs 5,500 workers at its Columbus, Ind., headquarters, would think twice about expanding if the amendment is approved . . . So why now would Cummins, which boasts of its “top rating” by the radical Human Rights Campaign, publicly gnash its teeth over a proposed marriage amendment in one state after just months ago heralding their expansion into a state that already had a powerful amendment in place?
- Posted: 03/17/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: blog.speakupmovement.org
- Tags: ADF: Greg Scott, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), State: Indiana, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Media
USA Today: The Alliance Defense Fund brands its coverage with a headline: “The Homosexual Agenda: The Principal Threat to Your Religious Freedom” – Their strategy is twofold: dilute moral values so that homosexual behavior is thought to be normal, natural, and good, while suppressing the religious and free speech rights of those who disagree…
- Posted: 02/24/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: content.usatoday.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Group: National Organization for Marriage (NOM), Group: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
Lisa Keen writes at theWindy City Times: It is possible—just as happened in California—that some other entity might attempt to mount its own defense of DOMA in the pending cases. Last October, U.S. Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, filed a motion in the two First Circuit cases, seeking to be named intervenor-defendant. Smith, aided by the right-wing Alliance Defense Fund, said at the time that the Justice Department was providing “no defense at all” for DOMA. He withdrew his motion a few weeks later, without comment. [this report contains a lengthy list of responses from homosexual groups]
- Posted: 02/24/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.windycitymediagroup.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD), Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Group: Lambda Legal, Group: National Center for Lesbian Rights, Group: National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House, ZZ: Golinski v. United States Office of Personnel Management, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZ: Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management
Pink Paper: “‘For almost two years, the National Organisation for Marriage and the Alliance Defense Fund, along with Bishop Harry Jackson, have fought a losing battle to shamelessly harm gay and lesbian couples in D.C. who seek nothing more than to share in the rights and responsibilities of marriage,’ said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese.”
- Posted: 01/25/2011
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: news.pinkpaper.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Category: Marriage and Family, Court: U.S. Supreme, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Topic: District of Columbia, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Jackson v District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics
LGBTQ Nation: “The nation’s largest LGBT legal group –- Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund — took in $17 million in its most recent fiscal year, 2009, compared to $677,360 in 1987 and $26 million in 2008. By comparison, the right-wing’s largest political group -– Focus on the Family — expected $100 million in 2010 and the largest right-wing legal group – the Alliance Defense Fund — has an annual budget of $32.7 million in 2009, according to its website.”
- Posted: 01/24/2011
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Group: National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Topic: Federal DOMA, Topic: Hate Crimes, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Military, Topic: Polls, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry
Human Rights Campaign press release: “‘Today’s action by the Supreme Court makes abundantly clear that D.C.’s human rights protections are strong enough to withstand the hateful efforts of outside anti-LGBT groups to put people’s basic civil rights on the ballot,’ said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. ‘For almost two years, the National Organization for Marriage and the Alliance Defense Fund, along with Bishop Harry Jackson, have fought a losing battle to shamelessly harm gay and lesbian couples in D.C. who seek nothing more than to share in the rights and responsibilities of marriage. The D.C. Council and Mayor courageously made marriage equality a reality last year, and the courts have since upheld the rights of D.C. residents to govern ourselves and take the necessary steps to eliminate discrimination in our community.’”
- Posted: 01/19/2011
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.hrc.org
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Category: Marriage and Family, Court: U.S. Supreme, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Topic: District of Columbia, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Jackson v District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics
SDLGN: “‘For almost two years, the National Organization for Marriage and the Alliance Defense Fund, along with Bishop Harry Jackson, have fought a losing battle to shamelessly harm gay and lesbian couples in D.C. who seek nothing more than to share in the rights and responsibilities of marriage. The D.C. Council and mayor courageously made marriage equality a reality last year, and the courts have since upheld the rights of D.C. residents to govern ourselves and take the necessary steps to eliminate discrimination in our community.’”
- Posted: 01/18/2011
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Category: Marriage and Family, Court: U.S. Supreme, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Topic: District of Columbia, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Jackson v District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics
Politico: “Gay groups are furious with a Justice Department brief defending — though in quite narrow terms — the Defense of Marriage Act, which candidate Obama, unlike even his Democratic rivals, had pledged to repeal in full.”
- Posted: 01/14/2011
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.politico.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Equality Matters, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Federal DOMA, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Politics, Topic: White House
Concord Monitor: “The Family Research Council in Washington, D.C., has vowed to do ‘whatever it takes’ to repeal gay marriage in New Hampshire. Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders in Boston is promising to do ‘whatever it takes’ to stop them.”
- Posted: 01/04/2011
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.concordmonitor.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Group: Cornerstone Policy Research, Group: Family Research Council (FRC), Group: Family Watch International, Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD), Group: Gill Foundation, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Group: National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Group: National Organization for Marriage (NOM), Group: New Hampshire Freedom to Marry, Group: Stand for Marriage Maine, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
National Catholic Register: “‘We will be closely monitoring the repealed law’s replacement with new regulations that will prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual harassment,’ [ADF Attorney Daniel Blomberg] said the day before Obama signed the bill. ‘Such regulations [in civilian life] have been shown to be applied quite broadly, and used to squelch the free expression of one’s religious liberty. We expect this to be especially problematic in the military, which forges the closest of all relationships between the government and a “private citizen,” who really isn’t a private citizen [but swears an oath to obey the president and his military superiors]. There’s no comparable vocation in American life.’”
- Posted: 12/28/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.ncregister.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Military, Topic: White House
Human Rights Campaign: “Today the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, praised the bipartisan proposal under the leadership of Sens. Lieberman and Collins that emerged this evening to pass repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ as a stand-alone piece of legislation. The news comes from a bipartisan group of Senators after today’s failed vote to proceed to debate on the National Defense Authorization Act.”
- Posted: 12/09/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Topic: Congress, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legislation, Topic: Military
Washington Post / Federal Eye: “On Monday, three groups that support lifting the gay ban — the Palm Center at the University of California Santa Barbara, OutServe and Knights Out — said they want lawmakers to pass the [defense authorization bill] whether or not it includes language ending ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ . . . It’s a risky political calculation that puts them in direct conflict with four larger groups more directly involved with lobbying efforts to end the ban: the Human Rights Campaign, the Center for American Progress, Servicemembers United and Servicemembers Legal Defense Network.”
- Posted: 11/15/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: voices.washingtonpost.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Center for American Progress, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Group: Knights Out, Group: OutServe, Group: Palm Center, Group: Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN), Group: Servicemembers United, Topic: Congress, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Military, Topic: Politics
Human Rights Campaign: “Senator Lisa Murkowski has the opportunity to prove once again that she represents all Alaskans. In 2009, she voted for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which included the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act. Now, she can again vote for that same bill which funds our military and will also repeal DADT. That’s why I’m here on the ground in Alaska. . . ”
- Posted: 11/10/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), State: Alaska, Topic: Congress, Topic: Elections, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Military, Topic: Politics
|

Latest Posts
-
05/23/2013
Sadly, the Boy Scouts Executive National Council’s decision disregards not only the nearly 19,000 Americans who signed a petition urging BSA to ‘uphold the values that have defined the organization for over 100 years,’ but also the millions of Americans who have supported the program. Those promoting the agenda to change what the Boy Scouts have always been won’t rest until there is complete acceptance of any sexual preference for both leaders and members.
-
www.washingtonpost.com
05/23/2013
Washington Post: Jewish leaders in the media are in large part responsible for American acceptance of gay marriage, Vice President Biden said Tuesday night.
-
www.nationalreview.com
05/23/2013
Ed Whelan at National Review: There are two good reasons why the DOJ attorney’s argument that vindicating the RFRA rights of the business owners would violate the Establishment Clause was an “unexpected twist.” First, DOJ never made that argument in either of its Seventh Circuit briefs in the two cases. Second, there is good reason that it didn’t, for the argument is inane.

|