<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: Institute for Justice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-institute-for-justice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>George F. Will: When the looter is the government</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/george-f-will-when-the-looter-is-the-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/george-f-will-when-the-looter-is-the-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George F. Will at the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/when-government-is-the-looter/2012/05/18/gIQAUIKVZU_story.html">Washington Post</a>: In the lawsuit titled <em>United States of America v. 434 Main Street, Tewksbury, Massachusetts</em>, the government is suing an inanimate object, the motel Caswell’s father built in 1955 . . . Since 1994, about 30 motel customers have been arrested on drug-dealing charges . . . Yet this is the government’s excuse for impoverishing the Caswells by seizing this property, which is their only significant source of income and all of their retirement security. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/george-f-will-when-the-looter-is-the-government/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/george-f-will-when-the-looter-is-the-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denver Judge Asked To Block School Vouchers</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/02/denver-judge-asked-to-block-school-vouchers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/02/denver-judge-asked-to-block-school-vouchers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Americans United for Separation of Church and State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/28738675/detail.html"> KMGH Denver</a>: Judge Michael Martinez is holding a three-day hearing starting Tuesday to consider whether the Choice Scholarship Pilot Program violates the state constitution. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/02/denver-judge-asked-to-block-school-vouchers/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/02/denver-judge-asked-to-block-school-vouchers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>School choice battle in Indiana</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/school-choice-battle-in-indiana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/school-choice-battle-in-indiana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: School Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1398318">OneNewsNow.com</a>: The Institute for Justice has announced it will defend the Indiana school choice program in court against groups that feel their monopoly over public education is threatened. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/school-choice-battle-in-indiana/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/school-choice-battle-in-indiana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eighth Circuit Strikes Down Content-Based Sign Restriction</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/15/eighth-circuit-strikes-down-content-based-sign-restriction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/15/eighth-circuit-strikes-down-content-based-sign-restriction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=108280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://volokh.com/2011/07/13/eighth-circuit-strikes-down-content-based-sign-restriction/">The Volokh Conspiracy </a>: The case is today’s <em><a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/11/07/101937P.pdf">Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. v. City of St. Louis</a></em>, litigated by the Institute for Justice. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/15/eighth-circuit-strikes-down-content-based-sign-restriction/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/15/eighth-circuit-strikes-down-content-based-sign-restriction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defending school choice in Colorado</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/defending-school-choice-in-colorado/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/defending-school-choice-in-colorado/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: School Choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1381368">OneNewsNow.com</a>: The Institute for Justice has filed an intervention on behalf of Colorado school board to defend their school-choice program. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/defending-school-choice-in-colorado/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/defending-school-choice-in-colorado/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Trial Lawyers Use Lawsuits to Protect Free Speech, Religious Freedom, &amp; Property Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/10/conservative-trial-lawyers-use-lawsuits-to-protect-free-speech-religious-freedom-property-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/10/conservative-trial-lawyers-use-lawsuits-to-protect-free-speech-religious-freedom-property-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 16:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Pacific Justice Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: RLUIPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=103210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://voices.injuryboard.com/medical-malpractice/conservative-trial-lawyers-use-lawsuits-to-protect-free-speech-religious-freedom-property-rights.aspx?googleid=290514">Injury Board Blog Network</a>:  There are scores of other cases like these every year, filed by these groups and others, such as the Alliance Defense Fund, the Rutherford Institute, and many others... just as the Founders intended. The "tort reform" movement will eventually reach harm cases, through restrictions on the filing of any lawsuit, Americans don't recognize the universality of the rights protected in our Constitution and Bill of Rights. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/10/conservative-trial-lawyers-use-lawsuits-to-protect-free-speech-religious-freedom-property-rights/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/10/conservative-trial-lawyers-use-lawsuits-to-protect-free-speech-religious-freedom-property-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Federation for Children (AFC) Applauds U.S. Supreme Court Ruling on Arizona Tax Credits</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/american-federation-for-children-afc-applauds-u-s-supreme-court-ruling-on-arizona-tax-credits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/american-federation-for-children-afc-applauds-u-s-supreme-court-ruling-on-arizona-tax-credits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: David Cortman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Federation for Children (AFC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: School Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=100027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.virtualpressoffice.com/publicsiteContentFileAccess?fileContentId=481901&#038;fromOtherPageToDisableHistory=Y&#038;menuName=News&#038;sId=&#038;sInfo=">AFC</a>: The effort to review the Ninth Circuit's decision was led by the Institute for Justice and the Alliance Defense Fund <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/american-federation-for-children-afc-applauds-u-s-supreme-court-ruling-on-arizona-tax-credits/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/american-federation-for-children-afc-applauds-u-s-supreme-court-ruling-on-arizona-tax-credits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entrepreneurs under attack</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/09/entrepreneurs-under-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/09/entrepreneurs-under-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=71623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Stossel <a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=38896">writing at Human Events</a>: "Every day, federal, state and local governments stifle small businesses to privilege well-connected incumbent companies. It's a system of protectionism for influential insiders who don't want competition. Every locality has its share of business moguls who are cozy with politicians. Together, they use the power of government to keep competition down and prices high." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/09/entrepreneurs-under-attack/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/09/entrepreneurs-under-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What makes Arizona such a hotbed of high court action?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/19/what-makes-arizona-such-a-hotbed-of-high-court-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/19/what-makes-arizona-such-a-hotbed-of-high-court-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Goldwater Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Garriott v. Winn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=69430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202470232253&#38;slreturn=1&#38;hbxlogin=1">Law.com</a>: "' . . . 'I think there are two explanations, and one is dominant,' Bolick suggested for the influx of Arizona cases. 'Arizona is taking the concept of states being the laboratories of democracy very seriously on multiple fronts . . . We have a legislature that is risk-taking and innovative . . . The second "less significant reason, but nonetheless still very significant reason" is that Arizona resides in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, said Bolick.' . . . The Institute, which has an Arizona affiliate, is representing not only the Arizona Freedom Club PAC in the campaign finance case, but also is involved in the school choice tax credit case — <em>Arizona Christian Tuition Organization v. Winn</em> (combined with <em>Garriott v. Winn</em>)." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/19/what-makes-arizona-such-a-hotbed-of-high-court-action/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/19/what-makes-arizona-such-a-hotbed-of-high-court-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benedictine monks suing state over casket sales</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/12/benedictine-monks-suing-state-over-casket-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/12/benedictine-monks-suing-state-over-casket-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Louisiana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=68540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.klfy.com/Global/story.asp?S=12969053">KLFY (AP)</a>: "An order of Benedictine monks sued Louisiana regulators Thursday for blocking them from selling handmade caskets because the monks are not licensed funeral directors." &#124; <a href="http://www.ij.org/about/3456">Institute for Justice Web Release</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NxtGzsGtJc">video</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/12/benedictine-monks-suing-state-over-casket-sales/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/12/benedictine-monks-suing-state-over-casket-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court case seeking protection for signers of pro-marriage petition</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/28/court-case-seeking-protection-for-signers-of-pro-marriage-petition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/28/court-case-seeking-protection-for-signers-of-pro-marriage-petition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Cato Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Concerned Women for America (CWA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Doe v Reed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=64275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=171137">WorldNetDaily</a>: "Arguing death threats have a significant 'chilling' effect on free speech, an attorney representing supporters of Washington state's traditional-marriage referendum says he's confident a lower court will decide to protect their names and addresses. ... The U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week it would not issue a blanket ban on the release of signatures on petition documents. The high court, however, explained its decision did not prevent the Washington state petition signers from gaining an exemption from public disclosure at the lower court. ... [CWA] was one of many [organizations] that filed friend-of-the-court briefs in the Washington state case. Other groups included Liberty Counsel, Cato Institute, Institute for Justice, Alliance Defense Fund, American Center for Law and Justice and the Justice and Freedom Fund." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/28/court-case-seeking-protection-for-signers-of-pro-marriage-petition/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/28/court-case-seeking-protection-for-signers-of-pro-marriage-petition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to decide tuition appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/25/supreme-court-to-decide-tuition-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/25/supreme-court-to-decide-tuition-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: David Cortman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: School Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Garriott v. Winn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=61498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.yumasun.com/news/tuition-61216-appeal-court.html">Yuma Sun</a>: "The nation's high court will decide whether Arizonans can divert money they owe the state to help students attend private and parochial schools . . . Supporters of the tuition tax-credit program say the tax money does not go directly to private and religious schools. Instead, donors can contribute to a variety of private-school-tuition organizations, including some secular ones, and parents decide which schools their child attends, said [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-jeremy-tedesco/">Jeremy Tedesco</a>] . . ." &#124; <a href="http://www.adfmedia.org/News/PRDetail/3782">ADF News Release</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/25/supreme-court-to-decide-tuition-appeal/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/25/supreme-court-to-decide-tuition-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Ariz. school choice suit</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/24/u-s-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-ariz-school-choice-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/24/u-s-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-ariz-school-choice-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 21:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: David Cortman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: School Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Garriott v. Winn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/24/u-s-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-ariz-school-choice-suit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund attorneys will defend Arizona’s tuition tax credit program in the U.S. Supreme Court, the second time the matter has reached the high court in a lawsuit backed by the American Civil Liberties Union seeking to strike down the program. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/24/u-s-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-ariz-school-choice-suit/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/24/u-s-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-ariz-school-choice-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not an endorsement of religion: Court should uphold tax-credit program for donors to scholarships of their choice.</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/11/not-an-endorsement-of-religion-court-should-uphold-tax-credit-program-for-donors-to-scholarships-of-their-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/11/not-an-endorsement-of-religion-court-should-uphold-tax-credit-program-for-donors-to-scholarships-of-their-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Winn v. Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=54989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["How can giving taxpayers a choice evince a governmental motive to advance religion?" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/11/not-an-endorsement-of-religion-court-should-uphold-tax-credit-program-for-donors-to-scholarships-of-their-choice/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/11/not-an-endorsement-of-religion-court-should-uphold-tax-credit-program-for-donors-to-scholarships-of-their-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Campaign-finance fights not over: High court&#8217;s ruling on spending limits was just one case</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/28/campaign-finance-fights-not-over-high-courts-ruling-on-spending-limits-was-just-one-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/28/campaign-finance-fights-not-over-high-courts-ruling-on-spending-limits-was-just-one-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=50066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20100127/campaigncash27_st.art.htm">USA Today</a>: "'Opponents of campaign-finance laws have teed up a series of cases to push the court ever further toward deregulation,' said Richard Hasen, an expert on election law at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. 'It is paying off.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/28/campaign-finance-fights-not-over-high-courts-ruling-on-spending-limits-was-just-one-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/28/campaign-finance-fights-not-over-high-courts-ruling-on-spending-limits-was-just-one-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorneys to ask high court to review Ariz. tuition tax credits</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/22/attorneys-to-ask-high-court-to-review-ariz-tuition-tax-credits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/22/attorneys-to-ask-high-court-to-review-ariz-tuition-tax-credits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: School Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Winn v. Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=39928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2009/10/21/20091021sto-lawsuit1022.html">Arizona Republic</a>: "Attorneys will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review an Arizona program that diverts tax revenue into private-school tuition scholarships." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/22/attorneys-to-ask-high-court-to-review-ariz-tuition-tax-credits/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/22/attorneys-to-ask-high-court-to-review-ariz-tuition-tax-credits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Staff Attorney Opening with Institute for Justice Arizona Office</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/01/staff-attorney-opening-with-institute-for-justice-arizona-office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/01/staff-attorney-opening-with-institute-for-justice-arizona-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=34907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://icarizona.blogspot.com/2009/09/staff-attorney-opening-with-institute.html">IC Arizona</a> has posted the announcement.

<a href="http://www.ij.org/">Institute for Justice website</a>

<a href="http://www.ij.org/index.php?option=com_content&#38;task=view&#38;id=550&#38;Itemid=223">IJ's Merry Band of Litigators</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/01/staff-attorney-opening-with-institute-for-justice-arizona-office/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/01/staff-attorney-opening-with-institute-for-justice-arizona-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Court fails to decide on anti-Hillary movie&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/29/court-fails-to-decide-on-anti-hillary-movie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/29/court-fails-to-decide-on-anti-hillary-movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=28520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Supreme Court has failed to decide on whether a scathing documentary about Hillary Rodham Clinton that was shown during the presidential race should be regulated as if it were a campaign ad." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/29/court-fails-to-decide-on-anti-hillary-movie/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/29/court-fails-to-decide-on-anti-hillary-movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Arizona ruling puts school tax credits in jeopardy&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/27/arizona-ruling-puts-school-tax-credits-in-jeopardy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/27/arizona-ruling-puts-school-tax-credits-in-jeopardy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jeremy Tedesco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: School Choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=22368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/138358">East Valley Tribune</a>: "Jeremy Tedesco of the Alliance Defense Fund, representing the Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization, said there is no state coercion of any sort. He said individuals, not the state, decide to which tuition organization they want to donate, and parents decide from which group to seek scholarships." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/27/arizona-ruling-puts-school-tax-credits-in-jeopardy/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/27/arizona-ruling-puts-school-tax-credits-in-jeopardy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ninth Circuit revives constitutional challenge to school tuition law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/22/ninth-circuit-revives-constitutional-challenge-to-school-tuition-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/22/ninth-circuit-revives-constitutional-challenge-to-school-tuition-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: School Choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=21947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.metnews.com/articles/2009/winn042209.htm">Metropolitan News-Enterprise</a>: "On remand, U.S. District Judge Earl H. Carroll allowed two large STOs—one which gives religious school scholarships only and one which gives both religious and secular school scholarships—and two parents of STO scholarship recipients to intervene in defense of the program. The intervenors are represented by two national conservative advocacy groups, the Institute for Justice and the Alliance Defense Fund." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/22/ninth-circuit-revives-constitutional-challenge-to-school-tuition-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/22/ninth-circuit-revives-constitutional-challenge-to-school-tuition-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona Supreme Court:  Special Needs Scholarship  Programs Violate State Blaine Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/25/arizona-supreme-court-special-needs-scholarship-programs-violate-state-blaine-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/25/arizona-supreme-court-special-needs-scholarship-programs-violate-state-blaine-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: School Choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=19418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ij.org/index.php?option=com_content&#38;task=view&#38;id=2650&#38;Itemid=165" target="_blank">The Institute for Justice has issued this press release</a> that reports: 
“The Arizona Supreme Court’s decision is wrong on both the law and on the facts,” continued Keller.  “For decades the Arizona Supreme Court has said that neutral programs based on parental choice are constitutional.  School choice programs aid families and children by empowering parents to choose from a broad range of private schools.  They do not aid schools.  The programs should therefore pass constitutional muster.”
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/25/arizona-supreme-court-special-needs-scholarship-programs-violate-state-blaine-amendment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/25/arizona-supreme-court-special-needs-scholarship-programs-violate-state-blaine-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona court upholds private school tax credit</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/12/arizona-court-upholds-private-school-tax-credit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/12/arizona-court-upholds-private-school-tax-credit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Alliance for School Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: School Choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=18073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Arizona Court of Appeals on Thursday handed school-choice supporters a win, upholding the constitutionality of a state tax break for businesses' donations to help pay for tuition grants for students attending private schools." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/12/arizona-court-upholds-private-school-tax-credit/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/12/arizona-court-upholds-private-school-tax-credit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dec. 9th rally for school choice at the Arizona Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/12/04/dec-9th-rally-for-school-choice-at-the-arizona-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/12/04/dec-9th-rally-for-school-choice-at-the-arizona-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Arizona Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: School Choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=9986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Institute for Justice has published this announcement indicating: Tuesday, December 9th, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. on the steps of the AZ Supreme Court located on 1501 West Washington Street in Phoenix, AZ. Hundreds of families participate in AZ&#8217;s voucher &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/12/04/dec-9th-rally-for-school-choice-at-the-arizona-supreme-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/12/04/dec-9th-rally-for-school-choice-at-the-arizona-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona Supreme Court Will Review School Voucher Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/30/arizona-supreme-court-will-review-school-voucher-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/30/arizona-supreme-court-will-review-school-voucher-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: School Choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=8981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Religion Clause Blog reports that the Arizona Supreme Court will review a challenge to private school vouchers pending in Cain v. Horne, (Case No. CV-08-0189-PR). The East Valley Tribune reports: &#8220;The Arizona Supreme Court will decide whether parents can &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/30/arizona-supreme-court-will-review-school-voucher-decision/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/30/arizona-supreme-court-will-review-school-voucher-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

