<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-institute-for-marriage-and-public-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Effort to Repeal Defense of Marriage Act is Another Attack on Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/senate-effort-to-repeal-defense-of-marriage-act-is-another-attack-on-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/senate-effort-to-repeal-defense-of-marriage-act-is-another-attack-on-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Austin R. Nimocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=117620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/02/yet-another-attack-on-marriage/">Heritage Fundation</a>: Austin Nimocks, senior legal counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, explained at the hearing that “children are the product of sexual relationships between men and women” and that “men and women each bring something important and unique to the table of parenting.” Therefore, Nimocks argued, “this government maintains a compelling interest in protecting and preserving the institution of marriage as the union of one man and one woman.” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/senate-effort-to-repeal-defense-of-marriage-act-is-another-attack-on-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/senate-effort-to-repeal-defense-of-marriage-act-is-another-attack-on-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IMAPP Research Brief: &#8220;International Courts on Marriage: Is Gay Marriage a Fundamental Right?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/10/imapp-research-brief-international-courts-on-marriage-is-gay-marriage-a-fundamental-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/10/imapp-research-brief-international-courts-on-marriage-is-gay-marriage-a-fundamental-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=106017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William C. Duncan has authored this <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/pdf/iMAPP.June2011-International-Courts.pdf">Institute for Marriage and Public Policy Research Brief</a>: In court cases challenging the definition of marriage in the United States, a prominent claim is that same‐sex marriage is a fundamental right. This brief provides excerpts from cases from non‐U.S. jurisdictions that have weighed in on this claim and found that there is no right to same‐sex marriage in the relevant legal charters the courts were assessing. It also notes court decisions that have relied on the organic law of the nation to mandate a redefinition of marriage. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/10/imapp-research-brief-international-courts-on-marriage-is-gay-marriage-a-fundamental-right/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/10/imapp-research-brief-international-courts-on-marriage-is-gay-marriage-a-fundamental-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Times: &#8220;A Tipping Point for Gay Marriage?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/02/ny-times-a-tipping-point-for-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/02/ny-times-a-tipping-point-for-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 16:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Witherspoon Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=102461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adam Liptak at the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/01/weekinreview/01gay.html?pagewanted=all">NY Times</a>: or many gay rights advocates, the decision amounts to a turning point in the debate — the moment at which opposition to same-sex marriage came to look like bigotry, similar to racial discrimination and the subordination of women. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/02/ny-times-a-tipping-point-for-gay-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/02/ny-times-a-tipping-point-for-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IMAPP: February 2011 Marriage Law Digest Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/11/imapp-february-2011-marriage-law-digest-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/11/imapp-february-2011-marriage-law-digest-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=97868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The February 2011 Marriage Law Digest, edited by Bill Duncan of the Marriage Law Foundation, is now available <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/pdf/MarriageLawDigest.Feb.2011.pdf" target="_blank">here</a> [pdf]. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/11/imapp-february-2011-marriage-law-digest-online/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/11/imapp-february-2011-marriage-law-digest-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Despite media hype, most courts and voters have rejected so-called &#8220;right to same sex marriage&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/11/despite-media-hype-most-courts-and-voters-have-rejected-so-called-right-to-same-sex-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/11/despite-media-hype-most-courts-and-voters-have-rejected-so-called-right-to-same-sex-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=95207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The majority of courts to consider the issue, as well as the majority of people voting on it, have rejected a right to same-sex marriage. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/11/despite-media-hype-most-courts-and-voters-have-rejected-so-called-right-to-same-sex-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/11/despite-media-hype-most-courts-and-voters-have-rejected-so-called-right-to-same-sex-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IMAPP: April 2010 Marriage Law Digest now online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/11/imapp-april-2010-marriage-law-digest-no-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/11/imapp-april-2010-marriage-law-digest-no-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/11/imapp-april-2010-marriage-law-digest-no-online/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/">Institute for Marriage and Public Policy</a>: "The April 2010 Marriage Law Digest, edited by Bill Duncan of the Marriage Law Foundation, is now available <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/pdf/MarriageLawDigest.Apr.2009.pdf">here</a>."
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/11/imapp-april-2010-marriage-law-digest-no-online/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/11/imapp-april-2010-marriage-law-digest-no-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IMAPP: March 2010 Marriage Law Digest Now Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/08/imapp-march-2010-marriage-law-digest-now-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/08/imapp-march-2010-marriage-law-digest-now-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/2010/04/08/imapp-march-2010-marriage-law-digest-now-online/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can access the most recent <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/pdf/MarriageLawDigest.Mar.2010.pdf">issue here</a>.

<a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/">Institute for Marriage and Public Policy</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/08/imapp-march-2010-marriage-law-digest-now-online/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/08/imapp-march-2010-marriage-law-digest-now-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IMAPP: Marriage Law Digest Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/04/46836/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/04/46836/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=46836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[he <a href="http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.marriagedebate.com/pdf/MarriageLawDigest.Dec.2009.pdf">December 2009 Marriage Law Digest</a>, edited by Bill Duncan of the Marriage Law Foundation, is now available online at <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com">http://www.marriagedebate.com</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/04/46836/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/04/46836/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The November 2009 Marriage Law Digest Now Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/07/the-november-2009-marriage-law-digest-now-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/07/the-november-2009-marriage-law-digest-now-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=44257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/pdf/MarriageLawDigest.Nov.2009.pdf">The November 2009 Marriage Law Digest</a>, edited by Bill Duncan of the <a href="http://marriagelawfoundation.org/" target="_blank">Marriage Law Foundation</a>, is now at the <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/">Institute for Marriage and Public Policy website</a>.

This month's topics include:
<ul>
	<li>DAVIS V. DAVIS, D24407, New York Appellate Division, Second Department, November 17, 2009 (meaning of abandonment in divorce law).</li>
	<li>GODFREY V. SPANO, No. 147, New York Court of Appeals, November 19, 2009) (recognition of same-sex marriages contracted in other states).</li>
	<li>Recent Law Review Articles (topics: economic analysis of marriage debate, divorce disputes over frozen embryos, constitutional analysis of marriage laws, religious liberty and marriage, taxes and same-sex couples).</li>
	<li>News Stories (topics: same-sex couple adoption; babysitter custody).</li>
</ul> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/07/the-november-2009-marriage-law-digest-now-online/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/07/the-november-2009-marriage-law-digest-now-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Albert Mohler Audio: The Marriage Index &#8211; An Idea Whose Time Has Come</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/30/albert-mohler-audio-the-marriage-index-an-idea-whose-time-has-come/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/30/albert-mohler-audio-the-marriage-index-an-idea-whose-time-has-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=43750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The audio is available <a href="http://www.albertmohler.com/2009/11/26/the-marriage-index-—-an-idea-whose-time-has-come-2/">here</a>. The first portion of the program is about Thanksgiving.  In the second half, Maggie Gallagher of <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.org">The Institute for Marriage and Public Policy (IMAPP)</a> joins Dr. Mohler to discuss marriage. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/30/albert-mohler-audio-the-marriage-index-an-idea-whose-time-has-come/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/30/albert-mohler-audio-the-marriage-index-an-idea-whose-time-has-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IMAPP Marriage Law Digest Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/13/imapp-marriage-law-digest-online-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/13/imapp-marriage-law-digest-online-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=42163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/" target="_blank">The Institute for Marriage and Public Policy</a> October 2009 <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/pdf/MarriageLawDigest.Oct.2009.pdf" target="_blank">Marriage Law Digest</a> is now available online. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/13/imapp-marriage-law-digest-online-2/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/13/imapp-marriage-law-digest-online-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>August 2009 Marriage Law Digest Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/03/august-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/03/august-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=35118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The August 2009 Marriage Law Digest, edited by Bill Duncan of the Marriage Law Foundation, is now available online at <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com">http://www.marriagedebate.com</a>.

This month's topics include: 

BOSEMAN V. JARELL, No. COA08-957, North Carolina Court of Appeals, August 18, 2009 (second parent adoption).

Recent Law Review Articles (topics: religion and marriage, interjurisdictional recognition, marriage and procreation, California Supreme Court and marriage) <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/03/august-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/03/august-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marriage Law Digest July 2009 Now Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/17/marriage-law-digest-july-2009-now-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/17/marriage-law-digest-july-2009-now-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=33229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/pdf/MarriageLawDigest.July.2009.pdf" target="_blank">July 2009 Marriage Law Digest</a>, edited by Bill Duncan of the <a href="http://marriagelawfoundation.org/" target="_blank">Marriage Law Foundation</a>, is now available online at <a href="http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102670778264&#38;s=2994&#38;e=0013-tMwBbLTKG48Rf-meCITUL77yVvMjXhT7rWFu7UgakZAUm1FcdIE5NgfGOLr7jtqHaziwC148fkkK1Z_pWZwgFoKo-iwd7bn83M7HZpwyscu0m2VBAAug==" target="_blank">http://www.marriagedebate.com</a>.

This month's topics include:
<ul>
	<li>WISCONSIN V. PRYES, 2009 AP2-CR,      Wisconsin Court of Appeals District II, June 10, 2009 (challenge to      statute distinguishing between married and unmarried sexual relations      involving minors).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>EDVALSON V. DICKSON, Case No. 090901288,      Utah District Court, Salt Lake County, June 20, 2009) (validity of      contract between same-sex partners regarding child visitation).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>SHINEOVICH V. KEMP, A131083,      Oregon Court of Appeals, July 15, 2009 (constitutionality of artificial      insemination paternity presumption as applied to same-sex couple).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>PALAZZOLO V. MIRE, No.      2008-CA-0075, Louisiana Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, January 7, 2009      (visitation dispute involving same-sex couple).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>NICHOLS V. M.J., 2009 SQKB,      S09F0132, Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan, July 17, 2009 (duty of marriage      commissioner to perform same-sex wedding despite religious exemption).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>Recent Law Review Articles      (topics: California's Proposition 8, preferential treatment of marriage,      evangelicals and same-sex marriage, U.S. Supreme Court marriage decisions,      marriage and gay rights, marriage and civil unions).</li>
</ul> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/17/marriage-law-digest-july-2009-now-online/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/17/marriage-law-digest-july-2009-now-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marriage Law Digest May 2009 Now Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/03/marriage-law-digest-may-2009-now-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/03/marriage-law-digest-may-2009-now-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=25853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/pdf/MarriageLawDigest.May.2009.pdf">May 2009 Marriage Law Digest</a> published by the <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/">Institute for Marriage and Public Policy</a> is now online.  It covers these cases: 

EMBRY V. RYAN, Case No. 2D08-1323, District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, May 13, 2009 (interstate recognition of same-sex couple adoption)

STRAUSS V. HORTON, S168047, California Supreme Court, May 26, 2009 (validity and meaning of Proposition 8, California's marriage amendment)

MATTER OF H.M. V. E.T., 2009 Slip Op 04240, New York Appellate Division, Second Department, May 26, 2009 (family court authority to order former same-sex partner to pay child support)

Recent Law Review Articles (topics: polygamy, divorce, same-sex adoption, marriage). <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/03/marriage-law-digest-may-2009-now-online/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/03/marriage-law-digest-may-2009-now-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Marriage is Natural, Why is Defending It So Hard?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/05/12/if-marriage-is-natural-why-is-defending-it-so-hard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/05/12/if-marriage-is-natural-why-is-defending-it-so-hard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=23958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is the current marriage crisis: contemporary societies still need marriage and family, but this need is no longer intuitively obvious to the individual or the community . . .  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/05/12/if-marriage-is-natural-why-is-defending-it-so-hard/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/05/12/if-marriage-is-natural-why-is-defending-it-so-hard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maggie Gallagher leading charge against same-sex &#8220;marriage&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/30/maggie-gallagher-leading-charge-against-same-sex-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/30/maggie-gallagher-leading-charge-against-same-sex-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Organization for Marriage (NOM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=22842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keith Eddings <a href="http://www.lohud.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090429/NEWS01/904290347">interviews Maggie Gallagher in <em>The Journal News.</em></a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/30/maggie-gallagher-leading-charge-against-same-sex-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/30/maggie-gallagher-leading-charge-against-same-sex-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;American Courts on Marriage: Is Marriage Discriminatory&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/11/nine-of-ten-american-courts-have-held-that-marriage-is-not-unconstitutionally-discriminatory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/11/nine-of-ten-american-courts-have-held-that-marriage-is-not-unconstitutionally-discriminatory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=17847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past ten years, at least nine other state and federal courts (excluding cases still pending on appeal) have ruled that marriage laws are not discriminatory, but have a rational basis in “responsible procreation.” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/11/nine-of-ten-american-courts-have-held-that-marriage-is-not-unconstitutionally-discriminatory/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/11/nine-of-ten-american-courts-have-held-that-marriage-is-not-unconstitutionally-discriminatory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February Marriage Law Digest Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/10/february-marriage-law-digest-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/10/february-marriage-law-digest-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=17637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Institute for Marriage and Public Policy has posted the latest edition of its Marriage Law Digest edited by William C. Duncan.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/03/10/february-marriage-law-digest-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;2 Kids + 0 Husbands = Family&#8221; or &#8220;Secondhand Children&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/06/2-kids-0-husbands-family/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/06/2-kids-0-husbands-family/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=14823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[. . . IN 1960, UNMARRIED MOTHERS accounted for about 5 percent of births in the United States. Now they are having almost 40 percent of the country’s babies . . . Increasingly, instead of giving their children a father, they give them a sibling . . .  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/06/2-kids-0-husbands-family/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/06/2-kids-0-husbands-family/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2009 Marriage Law Digest Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/02/january-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/02/january-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=14226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The January 2009 Marriage Law Digest published by the Marriage Law Foundation and Institute for Marriage and Public Policy is now online.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/02/january-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marriage Law Digest Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/15/marriage-law-digest-online-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/15/marriage-law-digest-online-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=12615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The December 2008 Marriage Law Digest is now available online. It is published by the Marriage Law Foundation and the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy. This issue covers the following: 1) VAN KIPNIS V. VAN KIPNIS, No. 213, New &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/15/marriage-law-digest-online-2/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/15/marriage-law-digest-online-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Student fees and student organizations after Southworth</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/12/17/student-fees-and-student-organizations-after-southworth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/12/17/student-fees-and-student-organizations-after-southworth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=10668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mandatory student fees imposed by colleges and universities for the support of student organizations, student newspapers, and student governments have long been a source of controversy and litigation. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/12/17/student-fees-and-student-organizations-after-southworth/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/12/17/student-fees-and-student-organizations-after-southworth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Puerto Rico: Scholars call for gender ideology to be removed from public education</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/12/15/puerto-rico-scholars-call-for-gender-ideology-to-be-removed-from-public-education/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/12/15/puerto-rico-scholars-call-for-gender-ideology-to-be-removed-from-public-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Puerto Rico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=10509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[    The president of the Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico, Marcelina Velez de Santiago, together with other academic scholars, is supporting a request from various organizations that the government revoke a memo that obliges public schools to include the controversial gender ideology in their curricula. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/12/15/puerto-rico-scholars-call-for-gender-ideology-to-be-removed-from-public-education/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/12/15/puerto-rico-scholars-call-for-gender-ideology-to-be-removed-from-public-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maggie Gallagher: Imposing San Francisco Values On First-Graders</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/15/maggie-gallagher-imposing-san-francisco-values-on-first-graders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/15/maggie-gallagher-imposing-san-francisco-values-on-first-graders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=8500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Right. What do gay marriage advocates think public schools should teach about marriage if gay marriage is the law of the land? Could we have a reasonably honest discussion please about what you have in store for California's first-graders?" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/15/maggie-gallagher-imposing-san-francisco-values-on-first-graders/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/15/maggie-gallagher-imposing-san-francisco-values-on-first-graders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil unions: The recipe to redefine marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/10/civil-unions-the-recipe-to-redefine-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/10/civil-unions-the-recipe-to-redefine-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=8345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ADF warned that civil unions would be used to undermine marriage several years ago. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/10/civil-unions-the-recipe-to-redefine-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/10/10/civil-unions-the-recipe-to-redefine-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IMAPP: Marriage Law Digest Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/09/10/imapp-marriage-law-digest-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/09/10/imapp-marriage-law-digest-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=7391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Institute for Marriage and Public Policy has published its latest Marriage Law Digest summarizing recent decisions related to marriage. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/09/10/imapp-marriage-law-digest-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspaper reactions to California Marriage Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/06/18/newspaper-reactions-to-california-marriage-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/06/18/newspaper-reactions-to-california-marriage-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=5183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joshua Baker at the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy has written this paper (pdf) discussing media reaction to California&#8217;s marriage ruling. He writes: The major fear voiced by newspapers opposing the ruling is that the undemocratic imposition of same-sex &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/06/18/newspaper-reactions-to-california-marriage-cases/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/06/18/newspaper-reactions-to-california-marriage-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maggie Gallagher: California&#8217;s Epic Battle for Marriage and Religious Liberty</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/21/maggie-gallagher-californias-epic-battle-for-marriage-and-religious-liberty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/21/maggie-gallagher-californias-epic-battle-for-marriage-and-religious-liberty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=3885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maggie Gallagher has this commentary on Townhall. She writes: They say we are tired of culture wars. Tell that to the California Supreme Court, which didn&#8217;t sound tired at all when it lobbed a big, fat hand grenade into the &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/21/maggie-gallagher-californias-epic-battle-for-marriage-and-religious-liberty/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/21/maggie-gallagher-californias-epic-battle-for-marriage-and-religious-liberty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: American Courts on Marriage?  Is Marriage Discriminatory</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/15/report-american-courts-on-marriage-is-marriage-discriminatory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/15/report-american-courts-on-marriage-is-marriage-discriminatory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=3609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joshua Baker of the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy has prepared this six page abstracts report reviewing American marriage decisions.  IMAPP&#8217;s home page summarizes the report as follows: On May 15, 2008 the California Supreme Court overruled Proposition 22 &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/15/report-american-courts-on-marriage-is-marriage-discriminatory/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/15/report-american-courts-on-marriage-is-marriage-discriminatory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divorce, unwed parenting costs taxpayers $112 billion per year</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/04/15/divorce-unwed-parenting-costs-taxpayers-112-billion-per-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/04/15/divorce-unwed-parenting-costs-taxpayers-112-billion-per-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Families Northwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Focus on the Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Georgia Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for American Values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/04/15/divorce-unwed-parenting-costs-taxpayers-112-billion-per-year/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Divorce and out-of-wedlock childbearing cost U.S. taxpayers more than $112 billion a year, according to a study commissioned by four groups advocating more government action to bolster marriages . . .  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/04/15/divorce-unwed-parenting-costs-taxpayers-112-billion-per-year/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/04/15/divorce-unwed-parenting-costs-taxpayers-112-billion-per-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Believe in traditional marriage? You Bigot</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/04/believe-in-traditional-marriage-you-bigot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/04/believe-in-traditional-marriage-you-bigot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/04/believe-in-traditional-marriage-you-bigot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["What does that mean down the road, if the idea that our ideas about marriage and about sexual morality generally make us the exact equivalent of biots?" [Maggie Gallagher] . . . asked. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/04/believe-in-traditional-marriage-you-bigot/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/04/believe-in-traditional-marriage-you-bigot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alarmed yet? sharia law, taxpayer-subsidized polygamy, cousin marriage . . .</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/02/22/alarmed-yet-sharia-in-britain-taxpayer-subsidized-polygamy-cousin-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/02/22/alarmed-yet-sharia-in-britain-taxpayer-subsidized-polygamy-cousin-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/adf.php/2008/02/22/alarmed-yet-sharia-in-britain-taxpayer-subsidized-polygamy-cousin-marriage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the face of sharia law, polygamy, cousin marriage etc. . . "What does it take to alarm us?"   <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/02/22/alarmed-yet-sharia-in-britain-taxpayer-subsidized-polygamy-cousin-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/02/22/alarmed-yet-sharia-in-britain-taxpayer-subsidized-polygamy-cousin-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IMAPP Study Finds No Fault Laws Increase Divorce Rate</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2007/07/15/imapp-study-finds-no-fault-laws-increase-divorce-rate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2007/07/15/imapp-study-finds-no-fault-laws-increase-divorce-rate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/adf.php/2007/07/15/imapp-study-finds-no-fault-laws-increase-divorce-rate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newsweek has the story IMAPP website.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2007/07/15/imapp-study-finds-no-fault-laws-increase-divorce-rate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

