<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-james-madison-center-for-free-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Judge Strikes Down Montana Campaign Regulations</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/22/federal-judge-strikes-down-montana-campaign-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/22/federal-judge-strikes-down-montana-campaign-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Montana Right to Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Lair v. Murry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In September of 2011, a coalition of plaintiffs made up of Montana residents, corporations, political committees and a candidate for the Montana House filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of various Montana laws that regulate political campaigns. In February, federal judge Charles Lovell preliminarily enjoined enforcement of several of the challenged laws, holding that those regulations are likely unconstitutional under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
On Wednesday, Judge Lovell permanently struck down three Montana laws, while upholding one. 
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/22/federal-judge-strikes-down-montana-campaign-regulations/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/22/federal-judge-strikes-down-montana-campaign-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alan E. Sears: El Paso City Leaders Declare War on Civil Liberties of Christians</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/03/alan-e-sears-el-paso-city-leaders-declare-war-on-civil-liberties-of-christians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/03/alan-e-sears-el-paso-city-leaders-declare-war-on-civil-liberties-of-christians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Alan E. Sears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Joel Oster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 34933]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=130301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-alan-e-sears/">Alan E. Sears</a> at the <a href="http://blog.telladf.org/2012/04/03/el-paso-city-leaders-declare-war-on-civil-liberties-of-christians/">ADF Blog</a>: The penalty for opposing the policies of El Paso mayor John Cook are getting stiffer – maybe as stiff as “sign a petition, go to jail.” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/03/alan-e-sears-el-paso-city-leaders-declare-war-on-civil-liberties-of-christians/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/03/alan-e-sears-el-paso-city-leaders-declare-war-on-civil-liberties-of-christians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court Asked to Review Montana Rejection of Citizens United</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/27/u-s-supreme-court-asked-to-review-montana-rejection-of-citizens-united/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/27/u-s-supreme-court-asked-to-review-montana-rejection-of-citizens-united/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Western Tradition Partnership v. Attorney General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=129621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today three corporations asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Montana Supreme Court’s holding that corporations in Montana may be banned from making independent political expenditures by expressly advocate the election or defeat of state candidates. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/27/u-s-supreme-court-asked-to-review-montana-rejection-of-citizens-united/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/27/u-s-supreme-court-asked-to-review-montana-rejection-of-citizens-united/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recall draws national conservative groups into legal fight &#124; El Paso Times</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/recall-draws-national-conservative-groups-into-legal-fight-el-paso-times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/recall-draws-national-conservative-groups-into-legal-fight-el-paso-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Hoyt v. City of El Paso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 36052]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=128962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.elpasotimes.com/news/ci_20200201/recall-draws-national-conservative-groups-into-legal-fight?source=most_viewed">El Paso Times</a>: Bopp, who also is mentioned in the article, said the purpose of the James Madison Center is not to help get Republicans elected, and McConnell "was not involved in (the center's) day-to-day operations." Instead, the James Madison Center became involved in the case at the behest of the Alliance Defense Fund, Bopp said. "This case has revealed that your Texas campaign-finance laws have some bad features," he said . . . The Liberty Legal Institute didn't respond last week to questions for this story. The Alliance Defense Fund, a national organization that had already joined the recall fight, also says in its mission statement that it fights for constitutional freedoms. "ADF is a legal alliance defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through . . . " [more]
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/recall-draws-national-conservative-groups-into-legal-fight-el-paso-times/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/recall-draws-national-conservative-groups-into-legal-fight-el-paso-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeal Filed to Defend Texans’ Right to Speak About Recall Election &#124; James Madison Ctr for Free Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/13/appeal-filed-to-defend-texans%e2%80%99-right-to-speak-about-recall-election-james-madison-ctr-for-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/13/appeal-filed-to-defend-texans%e2%80%99-right-to-speak-about-recall-election-james-madison-ctr-for-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 34933]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=128401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attorneys for the Alliance Defense Fund, The James Madison Center for Free Speech and other have filed an Appeal in the Texas Supreme Court, seeking to protect the First Amendment rights of Texans to speak about a recall election.
  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/13/appeal-filed-to-defend-texans%e2%80%99-right-to-speak-about-recall-election-james-madison-ctr-for-free-speech/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/13/appeal-filed-to-defend-texans%e2%80%99-right-to-speak-about-recall-election-james-madison-ctr-for-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Montana Corporations Ask United States Supreme Court  to Reverse Montana State Court Ruling Upholding  Ban on Corporate Independent Expenditures Despite Citizens United</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/10/montana-corporations-ask-united-states-supreme-court-to-reverse-montana-state-court-ruling-upholding-ban-on-corporate-independent-expenditures-despite-citizens-united/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/10/montana-corporations-ask-united-states-supreme-court-to-reverse-montana-state-court-ruling-upholding-ban-on-corporate-independent-expenditures-despite-citizens-united/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Western Tradition Partnership v. Attorney General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=125330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the political advocacy group American Tradition Partnership, along with two other corporate plaintiffs, Champion Painting and the Montana Shooting Sports Association, have asked Justice Anthony Kennedy of the United States Supreme Court to put on hold and then the Supreme Court to reverse a decision by the Montana Supreme Court, which upheld its law prohibiting corporate independent expenditures despite the decision in Citizens United v. FEC which held such bans unconstitutional. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/10/montana-corporations-ask-united-states-supreme-court-to-reverse-montana-state-court-ruling-upholding-ban-on-corporate-independent-expenditures-despite-citizens-united/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/10/montana-corporations-ask-united-states-supreme-court-to-reverse-montana-state-court-ruling-upholding-ban-on-corporate-independent-expenditures-despite-citizens-united/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal District Court Rules Wisconsin Campaign Finance Law is Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/20/federal-district-court-rules-wisconsin-campaign-finance-law-is-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/20/federal-district-court-rules-wisconsin-campaign-finance-law-is-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Hatchett v. Barland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=114079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On September 14, the court ruled that Charles G. Hatchett, a resident of Whitewater, cannot be made to register with the state and include a disclaimer on post cards and flyers urging his fellow residents to vote against a referendum <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/20/federal-district-court-rules-wisconsin-campaign-finance-law-is-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/20/federal-district-court-rules-wisconsin-campaign-finance-law-is-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit To Re-hear Challenge to Minnesota’s Ban On Corporate Contributions, IEs</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/28/8th-circuit-to-re-hear-challenge-to-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-contributions-ies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/28/8th-circuit-to-re-hear-challenge-to-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-contributions-ies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life (MCCL)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: MCCL v. Swanson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life is an association of citizens that wants to support candidates who agree with the pro-life position. And The Taxpayers League of Minnesota is an association of citizens that wants to support candidates that favor limited taxes. Both groups want to make general-fund contributions to their chosen candidates. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/28/8th-circuit-to-re-hear-challenge-to-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-contributions-ies/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/28/8th-circuit-to-re-hear-challenge-to-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-contributions-ies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-Market Group Victorious in Albuquerque Public Funding Challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/27/pro-market-group-victorious-in-albuquerque-public-funding-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/27/pro-market-group-victorious-in-albuquerque-public-funding-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: New Mexico Turn Around v. City of Albuquerque]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Late Tuesday a federal district court in New Mexico declared unconstitutional a provision of Albuquerque’s system of public funding for elections that provides taxpayer funding to legislative candidates based on opposition speech.   
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/27/pro-market-group-victorious-in-albuquerque-public-funding-challenge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/27/pro-market-group-victorious-in-albuquerque-public-funding-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Strikes Down Express Advocacy and Electioneering Communication Definitions</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/20/court-strikes-down-express-advocacy-and-electioneering-communication-definitions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/20/court-strikes-down-express-advocacy-and-electioneering-communication-definitions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: West Virginians for Life Inc. v. Tennant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=108559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal district court has struck down unconstitutional definitions of express advocacy and electioneering communications in West Virginia. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/20/court-strikes-down-express-advocacy-and-electioneering-communication-definitions/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/20/court-strikes-down-express-advocacy-and-electioneering-communication-definitions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit Grants Rehearing on Minnesota’s Ban on Corporate IEs, Contributions</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/13/8th-circuit-grants-rehearing-on-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-ies-contributions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/13/8th-circuit-grants-rehearing-on-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-ies-contributions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: MCCL v. Swanson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=108077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated its decision upholding Minnesota’s ban on corporate independent expenditures and contributions to candidates and ordered a new hearing to determine the constitutionality of the laws. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/13/8th-circuit-grants-rehearing-on-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-ies-contributions/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/13/8th-circuit-grants-rehearing-on-minnesota%e2%80%99s-ban-on-corporate-ies-contributions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WA: &#8220;Citizens to Federal Court: Do Not Allow Government to Release Petition Names&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/wa-citizens-to-federal-court-do-not-allow-government-to-release-petition-names/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/wa-citizens-to-federal-court-do-not-allow-government-to-release-petition-names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Doe #1 v. Reed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, a citizen coalition led by Protect Marriage Washington asked a federal court to prevent Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed from publishing the names and addresses of thousands of citizens who signed a controversial referendum petition in 2009. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/wa-citizens-to-federal-court-do-not-allow-government-to-release-petition-names/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/wa-citizens-to-federal-court-do-not-allow-government-to-release-petition-names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Rules Federal Ban On Corporate Contributions Is Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/08/court-rules-federal-ban-on-corporate-contributions-is-unconstitutiona/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/08/court-rules-federal-ban-on-corporate-contributions-is-unconstitutiona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=105802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal court in Virginia issued a ruling yesterday upholding its earlier decision that the federal ban on direct corporate contributions to candidates violates the First Amendment. The James Madison Center for Free Speech filed a brief with the court urging this result. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/08/court-rules-federal-ban-on-corporate-contributions-is-unconstitutiona/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/08/court-rules-federal-ban-on-corporate-contributions-is-unconstitutiona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Group Asks Court to Declare California Ballot Initiative Laws Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/03/california-group-asks-court-to-declare-california-ballot-initiative-laws-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/03/california-group-asks-court-to-declare-california-ballot-initiative-laws-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=105493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, a coalition of plaintiffs filed a motion asking a federal court to declare unconstitutional several state laws governing the ballot initiative process in the city of Chula Vista. First, they challenged the Natural Person Requirement, which requires that those who propose ballot initiatives must be “natural persons.” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/03/california-group-asks-court-to-declare-california-ballot-initiative-laws-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/03/california-group-asks-court-to-declare-california-ballot-initiative-laws-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madison Center Brief Argues Federal Ban on Corporate Contributions Is Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/02/madison-center-brief-argues-federal-ban-on-corporate-contributions-is-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/02/madison-center-brief-argues-federal-ban-on-corporate-contributions-is-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=105316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday the James Madison Center for Free Speech filed a brief in federal court supporting its decision that the federal ban on direct corporate contributions is unconstitutional. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/02/madison-center-brief-argues-federal-ban-on-corporate-contributions-is-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/02/madison-center-brief-argues-federal-ban-on-corporate-contributions-is-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to Consider Two Important Campaign Finance Cases Friday</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/17/supreme-court-to-consider-two-important-campaign-finance-cases-friday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/17/supreme-court-to-consider-two-important-campaign-finance-cases-friday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=95812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court will decide on Friday whether to hear two campaign finance cases filed by the James Madison Center for Free Speech to protect vital First Amendment rights.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/17/supreme-court-to-consider-two-important-campaign-finance-cases-friday/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/17/supreme-court-to-consider-two-important-campaign-finance-cases-friday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advocacy Groups Seek To Halt Public Funding For 2011 Supreme Court Race</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/08/advocacy-groups-seek-to-halt-public-funding-for-2011-supreme-court-race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/08/advocacy-groups-seek-to-halt-public-funding-for-2011-supreme-court-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Wisconsin Right to Life v Brennan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=94954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Wisconsin Right to Life Political Action Committee asked a federal court to prevent Wisconsin’s public funding scheme from being implemented for Wisconsin Supreme Court candidates, asserting it is an unconstitutional infringement of their First Amendment free speech rights. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/08/advocacy-groups-seek-to-halt-public-funding-for-2011-supreme-court-race/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/08/advocacy-groups-seek-to-halt-public-funding-for-2011-supreme-court-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former FEC Commissioners Argue Matching Funds Unconstitutionally Limit Campaign Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/26/former-fec-commissioners-argue-matching-funds-unconstitutionally-limit-campaign-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/26/former-fec-commissioners-argue-matching-funds-unconstitutionally-limit-campaign-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=93432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four former Federal Election Commission Chairmen and a former Federal Election Commissioner filed a brief with the United States Supreme Court last Thursday arguing that Arizona’s campaign matching funds scheme violates the First Amendment. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/26/former-fec-commissioners-argue-matching-funds-unconstitutionally-limit-campaign-speech/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/26/former-fec-commissioners-argue-matching-funds-unconstitutionally-limit-campaign-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa: Case made for changes in justice selection</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/07/iowa-case-made-for-changes-in-justice-selection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/07/iowa-case-made-for-changes-in-justice-selection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=90466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20110107/NEWS/101070331/Case-made-for-changes-in-justice-selection">Des Moines Register</a>: "A conservative group that wants to change the way Iowa Supreme Court justices are selected argued Thursday that seven lawyer members on the panel that picks finalists should be directly elected by voters." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/07/iowa-case-made-for-changes-in-justice-selection/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/07/iowa-case-made-for-changes-in-justice-selection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU submits brief to fight Iowa lawsuit that would derail judicial appointments</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/aclu-submits-brief-to-fight-iowa-lawsuit-that-would-derail-judicial-appointments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/aclu-submits-brief-to-fight-iowa-lawsuit-that-would-derail-judicial-appointments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Carlson v. Cady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=87939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["On December 9, the Bopp law firm of Indiana filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court on behalf of four Iowa residents, arguing that Iowa's current 'Missouri Plan' method of selecting judges is unconstitutional because citizens are not allowed to directly vote for the judges." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/aclu-submits-brief-to-fight-iowa-lawsuit-that-would-derail-judicial-appointments/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/aclu-submits-brief-to-fight-iowa-lawsuit-that-would-derail-judicial-appointments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuit: Change panel for selecting Iowa justices</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/15/lawsuit-change-panel-for-selecting-iowa-justices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/15/lawsuit-change-panel-for-selecting-iowa-justices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Carlson v. Cady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=86714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2010/12/13/lawsuit-change-panel-for-selecting-iowa-justices/">Missouri Lawyers Media [AP]</a>: "Four Iowa residents filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday that notes since they are not attorneys they have no role in selecting the seven commissioners, who are lawyers elected through the Iowa State Bar Association. The lawsuit claims the selection system gives lawyers too much influence and is unconstitutional as a result."

<a href="http://www.jamesmadisoncenter.org/">James Madison Center for Free Speech</a> press release can be found <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/09/iowa-voters-challenge-process-for-filling-supreme-court-spots/">here</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/15/lawsuit-change-panel-for-selecting-iowa-justices/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/15/lawsuit-change-panel-for-selecting-iowa-justices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC asks Supreme Court to ease restrictions on political party speech</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/10/rnc-asks-supreme-court-to-ease-restrictions-on-political-party-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/10/rnc-asks-supreme-court-to-ease-restrictions-on-political-party-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=85932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican National Committee and Congressman Anh “Joseph” Cao today asked the Supreme Court of the United States today to consider their constitutional challenge to the laws that limit the amount of money political parties can spend in coordination with candidates to the extent that those expenditures constitute the party’s speech. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/10/rnc-asks-supreme-court-to-ease-restrictions-on-political-party-speech/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/10/rnc-asks-supreme-court-to-ease-restrictions-on-political-party-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commission Dismisses Complaint Against Montana Tea Party Group</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/09/commission-dismisses-complaint-against-montana-tea-party-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/09/commission-dismisses-complaint-against-montana-tea-party-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=85752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2009, a father and daughter concerned with runaway government spending started a group called Montana Shrugged. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/09/commission-dismisses-complaint-against-montana-tea-party-group/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/09/commission-dismisses-complaint-against-montana-tea-party-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa Voters Challenge Process for Filling Supreme Court Spots</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/09/iowa-voters-challenge-process-for-filling-supreme-court-spots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/09/iowa-voters-challenge-process-for-filling-supreme-court-spots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Carlson v. Cady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=85575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four Iowa voters filed suit yesterday in federal court to stop the dominating influence of attorneys over the system for selecting state judges in Iowa, arguing that this influence denies ordinary Iowa voters an equal voice in selecting justices for the Iowa Supreme Court.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/09/iowa-voters-challenge-process-for-filling-supreme-court-spots/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/09/iowa-voters-challenge-process-for-filling-supreme-court-spots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TX: Vote watchers fight back against Dem lawsuit with Soros links</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/16/tx-vote-watchers-fight-back-against-dem-lawsuit-with-soros-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/16/tx-vote-watchers-fight-back-against-dem-lawsuit-with-soros-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=82406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=228833">WorldNetDaily</a>: "The situation in Houston erupted after workers with a volunteer organization called True the Vote investigated the work of a Houston Votes group and found that of the 25,000 voter registrations submitted, only 7,193 apparently were actually valid." James Bopp, Jr. of the James Madison Center for Free Speech and Kelly Shackelford of the Liberty Institute are quoted.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/16/tx-vote-watchers-fight-back-against-dem-lawsuit-with-soros-links/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/16/tx-vote-watchers-fight-back-against-dem-lawsuit-with-soros-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court refuses to stop MN corporate political spending disclosure law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/29/court-refuses-to-stop-mn-corporate-political-spending-disclosure-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/29/court-refuses-to-stop-mn-corporate-political-spending-disclosure-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=79403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/29/AR2010102904949.html">Washington Post (AP)</a>: "The high court without comment turned away a request for an injunction from Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/29/court-refuses-to-stop-mn-corporate-political-spending-disclosure-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/29/court-refuses-to-stop-mn-corporate-political-spending-disclosure-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VA: Tea Party Candidate to Appeals Court: Let Me Circulate My Own Petitions</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/27/va-tea-party-candidate-to-appeals-court-let-me-circulate-my-own-petitions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/27/va-tea-party-candidate-to-appeals-court-let-me-circulate-my-own-petitions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Lux v. Rodrigues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=78881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virginia law requires congressional candidates to collect 1,000 signatures before they can appear on the ballot. Even though Lux collected over 1,200 signatures, he was refused a place on the ballot because he witnessed most of the signatures himself. Under Virginia law, candidates may witness their own signatures, and a candidate may run for Congress without residing in a given congressional district. However, only residents of a congressional district can gather signatures and Lux does not reside in the congressional district where he is running.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/27/va-tea-party-candidate-to-appeals-court-let-me-circulate-my-own-petitions/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/27/va-tea-party-candidate-to-appeals-court-let-me-circulate-my-own-petitions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-Life Group Asks Federal Court To Stop The Ohio “Speech Police”</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/19/pro-life-group-asks-federal-court-to-stop-the-ohio-%e2%80%9cspeech-police%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/19/pro-life-group-asks-federal-court-to-stop-the-ohio-%e2%80%9cspeech-police%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: SBA List v. Driehaus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=77285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Susan B. Anthony List (“SBA”) filed a federal lawsuit yesterday asking the court to stop Ohio’s investigation of whether it made a “false statement” about a candidate for Congress until the court can decide whether the law they were charged under is constitutional.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/19/pro-life-group-asks-federal-court-to-stop-the-ohio-%e2%80%9cspeech-police%e2%80%9d/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/19/pro-life-group-asks-federal-court-to-stop-the-ohio-%e2%80%9cspeech-police%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Kennedy Orders Response on Request to Halt Maine Public Funding Scheme</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/19/justice-kennedy-orders-response-on-request-to-halt-maine-public-funding-scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/19/justice-kennedy-orders-response-on-request-to-halt-maine-public-funding-scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Cushing v. McKee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=77262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy today ordered responsive briefing on an emergency request to halt unconstitutional aspects of Maine’s public funding scheme for state candidates.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/19/justice-kennedy-orders-response-on-request-to-halt-maine-public-funding-scheme/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/19/justice-kennedy-orders-response-on-request-to-halt-maine-public-funding-scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long battle by foes of campaign finance rules shifts landscape</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/19/long-battle-by-foes-of-campaign-finance-rules-shifts-landscape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/19/long-battle-by-foes-of-campaign-finance-rules-shifts-landscape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=77180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/16/us/politics/16donate.html?pagewanted=all">New York Times</a>: "Beyond that, conservatives say they are guided by less partisan motives: the fervent belief, shared by some liberal groups like the A.C.L.U., that the First Amendment should prevent the government from enacting campaign finance restrictions that can chill free speech, even if it means giving anonymity to donors and rights to corporations." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/19/long-battle-by-foes-of-campaign-finance-rules-shifts-landscape/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/19/long-battle-by-foes-of-campaign-finance-rules-shifts-landscape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hawaii Federal Court Enjoins Limit on Contributions Received By Political Committees Doing Only Independent Spending</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/12/hawaii-federal-court-enjoins-limit-on-contributions-received-by-political-committees-doing-only-independent-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/12/hawaii-federal-court-enjoins-limit-on-contributions-received-by-political-committees-doing-only-independent-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Yamada v. Kuramoto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=76320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal court in Hawaii has stopped the Hawaii Campaign Spending Commission from enforcing a limit on contributions received by political committees doing only independent spending for political speech. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/12/hawaii-federal-court-enjoins-limit-on-contributions-received-by-political-committees-doing-only-independent-spending/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/12/hawaii-federal-court-enjoins-limit-on-contributions-received-by-political-committees-doing-only-independent-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Asked to Protect Campaign Speech in Final Days Before Election</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/08/supreme-court-asked-to-protect-campaign-speech-in-final-days-before-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/08/supreme-court-asked-to-protect-campaign-speech-in-final-days-before-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Cushing v. McKee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Family PAC v. McKenna]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=75976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ “I feel like my client is Goldilocks,” said James Bopp, Jr., general counsel for the Madison Center, “its always too early or too late to protect my client’s right to speak. But when the First Amendment is involved, the time is always just right for the court to step in to protect them. The courts must do more to protect First Amendment rights from government encroachment.” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/08/supreme-court-asked-to-protect-campaign-speech-in-final-days-before-election/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/08/supreme-court-asked-to-protect-campaign-speech-in-final-days-before-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Asked to Review Laws Banning Campaign Speech for Judges</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/supreme-court-asked-to-review-laws-banning-campaign-speech-for-judges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/supreme-court-asked-to-review-laws-banning-campaign-speech-for-judges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Bauer v. Shepard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Siefert v. Alexander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/supreme-court-asked-to-review-laws-banning-campaign-speech-for-judges/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A collection of judges, judicial candidates, and advocacy groups from two states are seeking Supreme Court review of state regulations that place limits on the ability of judicial candidates to campaign for judicial office.
  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/supreme-court-asked-to-review-laws-banning-campaign-speech-for-judges/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/supreme-court-asked-to-review-laws-banning-campaign-speech-for-judges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NOM Challenges Florida&#8217;s New &#8220;Wolf in Sheep&#8217;s Clothing&#8221; Rules on Campaign Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/nom-challenges-floridas-new-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing-rules-on-campaign-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/nom-challenges-floridas-new-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing-rules-on-campaign-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Organization for Marriage (NOM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: National Organization for Marriage v. Roberts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/nom-challenges-floridas-new-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing-rules-on-campaign-speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[     National Organization for Marriage ("NOM") has filed suit in federal court challenging Florida's restrictions on ads and mailings that reference candidates positions on issues. NOM wants to run radio and television ads, send mail directly to Florida residents, and post copies of these items on its web page. These items all address the issue of marriage. In particular, the items focus on candidates  positions concerning traditional and gay marriage, including civil unions. NOM simply wishes to exercise its Freedom of Speech rights under the First Amendment, rights recognized and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/nom-challenges-floridas-new-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing-rules-on-campaign-speech/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/nom-challenges-floridas-new-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing-rules-on-campaign-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Organization for Marriage Puts Rhode Island&#8217;s Election Laws to the Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/national-organization-for-marriage-puts-rhode-islands-election-laws-to-the-fire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/national-organization-for-marriage-puts-rhode-islands-election-laws-to-the-fire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Organization for Marriage (NOM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: National Organization for Marriage v. Daluz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/national-organization-for-marriage-puts-rhode-islands-election-laws-to-the-fire/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Rhode Island, NOM wants to communicate with citizens and spend money to support the advancement of current issues by placing ads on the radio and TV and by posting content to its website. Rhode Island, however, through a series of laws, restricts the ability of groups such as NOM to act as a voice even though the Freedom of Speech clause in the Constitution guarantees this right. NOM knows that such activity is essential to help citizens effectively make correct and informed decisions on these important issues. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/national-organization-for-marriage-puts-rhode-islands-election-laws-to-the-fire/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/national-organization-for-marriage-puts-rhode-islands-election-laws-to-the-fire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

