<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: Marriage Law Foundation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-marriage-law-foundation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>William Duncan: Same-sex marriage: The tortuous road to the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/18/william-duncan-same-sex-marriage-the-tortuous-road-to-the-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/18/william-duncan-same-sex-marriage-the-tortuous-road-to-the-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=111144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/08/same-sex-marriage-the-tortuous-road-to-the-supreme-court/">SCOTUSblog</a>: The Marriage Law Foundation’s William Duncan describes obstacles to U.S. Supreme Court review of the constitutional claim for same-sex marriage and explores the implications of the way these cases seem likely to be presented to the Court. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/18/william-duncan-same-sex-marriage-the-tortuous-road-to-the-supreme-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/18/william-duncan-same-sex-marriage-the-tortuous-road-to-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“What If Joey Has Two Daddies?”?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/30/%e2%80%9cwhat-if-joey-has-two-daddies%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/30/%e2%80%9cwhat-if-joey-has-two-daddies%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Ruth Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Adar v Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/2010/03/30/%e2%80%9cwhat-if-joey-has-two-daddies%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William C. Duncan writes at the <a href="http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/03/23/louisiana-amends-a-birth-cert-calling-two-men-parents/">Ruth Institute Blog</a>: "A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently issued an opinion ordering the State of Louisiana to issue an amended birth certificate for a child born in Louisiana but listing as the child’s parents two men . . . The implications of these errors are significant. The decision clearly dilutes the crucial constitutional concept of 'interstate pluralism, in Professor Jeffrey Rensberger’s phrase. It allows judges to substitute their judgments of law for the valid actions of legislators and administrative officials charged with making and enforcing a State’s law. It threatens to create a new national standard of parenting whereby a couple can force an unwilling State to participate in their project of acquiring a legally motherless or fatherless child." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/30/%e2%80%9cwhat-if-joey-has-two-daddies%e2%80%9d/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/30/%e2%80%9cwhat-if-joey-has-two-daddies%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>August 2009 Marriage Law Digest Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/03/august-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/03/august-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=35118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The August 2009 Marriage Law Digest, edited by Bill Duncan of the Marriage Law Foundation, is now available online at <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com">http://www.marriagedebate.com</a>.

This month's topics include: 

BOSEMAN V. JARELL, No. COA08-957, North Carolina Court of Appeals, August 18, 2009 (second parent adoption).

Recent Law Review Articles (topics: religion and marriage, interjurisdictional recognition, marriage and procreation, California Supreme Court and marriage) <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/03/august-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/03/august-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marriage Law Digest July 2009 Now Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/17/marriage-law-digest-july-2009-now-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/17/marriage-law-digest-july-2009-now-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=33229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.marriagedebate.com/pdf/MarriageLawDigest.July.2009.pdf" target="_blank">July 2009 Marriage Law Digest</a>, edited by Bill Duncan of the <a href="http://marriagelawfoundation.org/" target="_blank">Marriage Law Foundation</a>, is now available online at <a href="http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102670778264&#38;s=2994&#38;e=0013-tMwBbLTKG48Rf-meCITUL77yVvMjXhT7rWFu7UgakZAUm1FcdIE5NgfGOLr7jtqHaziwC148fkkK1Z_pWZwgFoKo-iwd7bn83M7HZpwyscu0m2VBAAug==" target="_blank">http://www.marriagedebate.com</a>.

This month's topics include:
<ul>
	<li>WISCONSIN V. PRYES, 2009 AP2-CR,      Wisconsin Court of Appeals District II, June 10, 2009 (challenge to      statute distinguishing between married and unmarried sexual relations      involving minors).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>EDVALSON V. DICKSON, Case No. 090901288,      Utah District Court, Salt Lake County, June 20, 2009) (validity of      contract between same-sex partners regarding child visitation).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>SHINEOVICH V. KEMP, A131083,      Oregon Court of Appeals, July 15, 2009 (constitutionality of artificial      insemination paternity presumption as applied to same-sex couple).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>PALAZZOLO V. MIRE, No.      2008-CA-0075, Louisiana Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, January 7, 2009      (visitation dispute involving same-sex couple).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>NICHOLS V. M.J., 2009 SQKB,      S09F0132, Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan, July 17, 2009 (duty of marriage      commissioner to perform same-sex wedding despite religious exemption).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>Recent Law Review Articles      (topics: California's Proposition 8, preferential treatment of marriage,      evangelicals and same-sex marriage, U.S. Supreme Court marriage decisions,      marriage and gay rights, marriage and civil unions).</li>
</ul> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/17/marriage-law-digest-july-2009-now-online/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/17/marriage-law-digest-july-2009-now-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alaska: Revised Sexual Orientation Ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/08/alaska-revised-sexual-orientation-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/08/alaska-revised-sexual-orientation-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=26272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ktva.com/ci_12534512">KTVA.com</a>: "The city is revising its gay rights proposal and clarifying what it would mean if the assembly decides to pass it. The controversial ordinance looks to add sexual orientation to the city's anti-discrimination laws, making it illegal for employers and landlords to discriminate against gays, lesbians and bisexuals." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/08/alaska-revised-sexual-orientation-ordinance/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/08/alaska-revised-sexual-orientation-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Olson/Boies Challenge to California&#8217;s Proposition 8: A High-Risk Effort</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/01/the-olsonboies-challenge-to-californias-proposition-8-a-high-risk-effort/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/01/the-olsonboies-challenge-to-californias-proposition-8-a-high-risk-effort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Perry v. Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=25619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John W. Dean <a href="http://writ.lp.findlaw.com/dean/20090529.html">writes at Findlaw</a>: "It would be wonderful if Olson and Boies were to succeed. It will be a disaster if they fail. While they will go on to their next big case, untold thousands in the LGBT community could be devastated by their failure. Olson and Boies are placing at risk the slow, state-by-state, steady progress that has been moving apace across the nation." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/01/the-olsonboies-challenge-to-californias-proposition-8-a-high-risk-effort/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/01/the-olsonboies-challenge-to-californias-proposition-8-a-high-risk-effort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Poll finds Mainers split on same-sex marriage issue&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/22/poll-finds-mainers-split-on-same-sex-marriage-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/22/poll-finds-mainers-split-on-same-sex-marriage-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Austin R. Nimocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=21901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bangordailynews.com/detail/104321.html">Bangor Daily News</a>: "Two conservative attorneys, William C. Duncan, director of the Marriage Law Foundation in Lehi, Utah, and Austin R. Nimocks, senior legal counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, based in Scottsdale, Ariz., also will testify today against efforts to repeal the Maine Defense of Marriage Act that defines marriage as between a man and a woman." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/22/poll-finds-mainers-split-on-same-sex-marriage-issue/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/04/22/poll-finds-mainers-split-on-same-sex-marriage-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lesbian Couple Seeking Divorce In New Jersey</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/06/lesbian-couple-seeking-divorce-in-new-jersey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/06/lesbian-couple-seeking-divorce-in-new-jersey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=14874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AP: &#8220;A judge is expected to rule Friday on whether a lesbian couple legally married in Canada can be divorced in New Jersey. The state attorney general&#8217;s office opposes the request, which is the first of its kind in the &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/06/lesbian-couple-seeking-divorce-in-new-jersey/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/06/lesbian-couple-seeking-divorce-in-new-jersey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2009 Marriage Law Digest Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/02/january-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/02/january-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=14226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The January 2009 Marriage Law Digest published by the Marriage Law Foundation and Institute for Marriage and Public Policy is now online.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/02/january-2009-marriage-law-digest-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NM: Domestic partnerships battle resumes; clears 1st hurdle</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/29/nm-domestic-partnerships-battle-resumes-clears-1st-hurdle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/29/nm-domestic-partnerships-battle-resumes-clears-1st-hurdle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=14067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carlsbad Current-Argus: Unmarried couples would get the same rights and privileges as their married counterparts under a bill recommended Wednesday by a Senate Committee.The Senate Public Affairs Committee voted 5-4 to recommend passage of Senate Bill 12, also known as &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/29/nm-domestic-partnerships-battle-resumes-clears-1st-hurdle/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/29/nm-domestic-partnerships-battle-resumes-clears-1st-hurdle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marriage Law Digest Online</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/15/marriage-law-digest-online-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/15/marriage-law-digest-online-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=12615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The December 2008 Marriage Law Digest is now available online. It is published by the Marriage Law Foundation and the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy. This issue covers the following: 1) VAN KIPNIS V. VAN KIPNIS, No. 213, New &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/15/marriage-law-digest-online-2/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/01/15/marriage-law-digest-online-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adversarial legal system or not? Undermining the judiciary through rigged social policy</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/05/adversarial-legal-system-or-not-undermining-the-judiciary-through-rigged-social-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/05/adversarial-legal-system-or-not-undermining-the-judiciary-through-rigged-social-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Alliance Alert Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/05/adversarial-legal-system-or-not-undermining-the-judiciary-through-rigged-social-policy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For courts to proceed with litigation and appeals all the way to a final decision under such a lack of a robust adversarial process undermines the legitimacy of the final decision and of the judiciary itself. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/05/adversarial-legal-system-or-not-undermining-the-judiciary-through-rigged-social-policy/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/03/05/adversarial-legal-system-or-not-undermining-the-judiciary-through-rigged-social-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

