<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-national-institute-of-family-and-life-advocates-nifla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Court: State can tell pregnant women of &#8216;existing relationship&#8217; with baby</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-state-can-tell-pregnant-women-of-existing-relationship-with-baby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-state-can-tell-pregnant-women-of-existing-relationship-with-baby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Care Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=36059&#038;ref=BPNews-RSSFeed0906">Baptist Press</a>: "Planned Parenthood and other proponents of death work diligently to restrict the information mothers have about abortion and the life within them," said Steven Aden, senior counsel of the Alliance Defense Fund, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief backing the state law. "It was incredible for the lower court to have determined that the law cannot acknowledge that a 'pregnant woman has an existing relationship with that unborn human being' because some human beings are somehow not 'persons.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-state-can-tell-pregnant-women-of-existing-relationship-with-baby/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-state-can-tell-pregnant-women-of-existing-relationship-with-baby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SD: Abortionists ordered to follow disputed &#8216;informed consent&#8217; law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/sd-abortionists-ordered-to-follow-disputed-informed-consent-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/sd-abortionists-ordered-to-follow-disputed-informed-consent-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Care Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=340785">WorldNetDaily</a>: "A child's life is worth more than Planned Parenthood's bottom line," said Steve H. Aden, senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Family Research Council, CareNet, Heartbeat International and the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates. The key attorney on the case was Harold Cassidy, one of more than 2,000 lawyers in the ADF organization. "Planned Parenthood and other proponents of death work diligently to restrict the information mothers have about abortion and the life within them. It was incredible for the lower court to have determined that the law cannot acknowledge that a 'pregnant woman has an existing relationship with that unborn human being' because some human beings are somehow not 'persons.' The 8th Circuit rightly determined that it's perfectly constitutional to inform women of an undisputed biological fact," Aden said.



Read more: Abortionists ordered to follow disputed 'informed consent' law http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=340785#ixzz1XBbIehIW <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/sd-abortionists-ordered-to-follow-disputed-informed-consent-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/sd-abortionists-ordered-to-follow-disputed-informed-consent-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The lazy slander of the pro-life cause</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/17/the-lazy-slander-of-the-pro-life-cause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/17/the-lazy-slander-of-the-pro-life-cause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Care Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Heartbeat International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: NARAL Pro-Choice America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=91686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Helen Alvaré, Greg Pfundstein, Matthew Schmitz and Ryan T. Anderson <a href="http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2011/01/2380">writing at The Public Discourse</a>: "One of the most frequently repeated canards of the abortion debate is that pro-lifers really don’t care about life . . . This lazy slander is as common as it is untrue . . . pro-lifers have taken the lead in offering vital services to mothers and infants in need . . .  It’s time the media takes notice . . . No major pro-abortion group or institution has taken on a comparable commitment to vulnerable Americans." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/17/the-lazy-slander-of-the-pro-life-cause/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/17/the-lazy-slander-of-the-pro-life-cause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

