<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: Rutherford Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-rutherford-institute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>John W. Whitehead: &#8220;There Is Nothing Constitutional About State-Mandated Transvaginal Ultrasounds&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/24/john-w-whitehead-there-is-nothing-constitutional-about-state-mandated-transvaginal-ultrasounds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/24/john-w-whitehead-there-is-nothing-constitutional-about-state-mandated-transvaginal-ultrasounds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=126811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John W. Whitehead at the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-w-whitehead/transvaginal-ultrasounds_b_1293645.html">Huffington Post</a>: From disputes over whether the federal health care mandate should cover contraception and abortion to state-led efforts to undermine abortion by, among other things, requiring that women seeking to have abortions be subjected to invasive transvaginal ultrasounds without their consent, these highly partisan issues keep us divided and distracted, and incapable of doing anything to prevent the steady erosion of our rights by the powers that be. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/24/john-w-whitehead-there-is-nothing-constitutional-about-state-mandated-transvaginal-ultrasounds/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/24/john-w-whitehead-there-is-nothing-constitutional-about-state-mandated-transvaginal-ultrasounds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VA correcting a wrong re: home schoolers</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/13/va-correcting-a-wrong-re-home-schoolers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/13/va-correcting-a-wrong-re-home-schoolers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Home School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=125484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Education/Default.aspx?id=1533786">OneNewsNow.com</a>: The Virginia Senate is considering a bill that would give home-schooled students access to participate in sports at public schools, and one attorney thinks the proposal is a good idea. H.B. 947 . . . <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/13/va-correcting-a-wrong-re-home-schoolers/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/13/va-correcting-a-wrong-re-home-schoolers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nativity scene at GCT Primary continues to stir controversy &#124; ParaGouldDailyPress.com</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/16/nativity-scene-at-gct-primary-continues-to-stir-controversy-paragoulddailypress-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/16/nativity-scene-at-gct-primary-continues-to-stir-controversy-paragoulddailypress-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Americans United for Separation of Church and State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=123054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.paragoulddailypress.com/articles/2012/01/15/top_story/doc4f10c45694473196509936.txt">ParagouldDailyPress.com</a>: Noble said he had not responded to the letters pending legal advice. He said the Rutherford Institute and Liberty Counsel had volunteered to help the school district in the matter and the Alliance Defense Fund had sent a list of court cases that might be applicable to the situation. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/16/nativity-scene-at-gct-primary-continues-to-stir-controversy-paragoulddailypress-com/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/16/nativity-scene-at-gct-primary-continues-to-stir-controversy-paragoulddailypress-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constitutional experts: pro-life ‘terrorists’ could be permanently detained without trial under law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/04/constitutional-experts-pro-life-%e2%80%98terrorists%e2%80%99-could-be-permanently-detained-without-trial-under-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/04/constitutional-experts-pro-life-%e2%80%98terrorists%e2%80%99-could-be-permanently-detained-without-trial-under-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Feminists for Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Life Legal Defense Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Right to Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: USCCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=121946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Constitutional experts warn a new law that allows the president to permanently detain U.S. citizens without trial could be used against pro-life activists, who have already been defined as potential terrorists in documents by some government agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/04/constitutional-experts-pro-life-%e2%80%98terrorists%e2%80%99-could-be-permanently-detained-without-trial-under-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/04/constitutional-experts-pro-life-%e2%80%98terrorists%e2%80%99-could-be-permanently-detained-without-trial-under-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>He &#8216;dared to question&#8217; evolution</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/07/he-dared-to-question-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/07/he-dared-to-question-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Freshwater v. Mount Vernon City School District Board of Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=115733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1452620">OneNewsNow.com</a>: The Rutherford Institute is preparing to appeal a recent court decision against an Ohio science teacher who tried to teach his student to think critically about evolution <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/07/he-dared-to-question-evolution/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/07/he-dared-to-question-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OK: Suit Seeks Religious Exemption From Drivers License Biometric Photo</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/23/ok-suit-seeks-religious-exemption-from-drivers-license-biometric-photo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/23/ok-suit-seeks-religious-exemption-from-drivers-license-biometric-photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Beach v. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=114415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2011/09/suit-seeks-religious-exemption-from.html">Religion Clause</a>: In Cleveland County, Oklahoma, a woman has filed suit is state court seeking a religious accommodation that would allow her to obtain a driver's license with a low resolution photograph instead of the state-required high-resolution photo that captures biometric data.  The complaint (<a href="http://www.rutherford.org/pdf/2011/09-20-2011_Petition_Beach-v-ODoPS.pdf">full text</a>) in <em>Beach v. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety</em>, (OK Dist. Ct., Sept. 21, 2011) <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/23/ok-suit-seeks-religious-exemption-from-drivers-license-biometric-photo/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/23/ok-suit-seeks-religious-exemption-from-drivers-license-biometric-photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Whitehead: Constitution Day: Is the Constitution on Life Support?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/13/john-whitehead-constitution-day-is-the-constitution-on-life-support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/13/john-whitehead-constitution-day-is-the-constitution-on-life-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=113342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Whitehead at <a href="http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=729">The Rutherford Institute</a>: We can pretend that the Constitution, which was written to hold the government accountable, is still our governing document. However, the reality we must come to terms with is that in the America we live in today, the government does whatever it wants. And the few of us who actively fight to preserve the rights enshrined in the Constitution (a group whose numbers continue to shrink) do so knowing that in the long run, we may be fighting a losing battle. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/13/john-whitehead-constitution-day-is-the-constitution-on-life-support/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/13/john-whitehead-constitution-day-is-the-constitution-on-life-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suppression of free speech &#8216;all over the country&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/suppression-of-free-speech-all-over-the-country/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/suppression-of-free-speech-all-over-the-country/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1424226">OneNewsNow.com</a>: A Virginia street preacher's "noise" equals constitutionally free speech, according to a legal group. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/suppression-of-free-speech-all-over-the-country/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/suppression-of-free-speech-all-over-the-country/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MA: Mother outraged after middle school children forced to take &#8216;oral sex&#8217; survey</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/17/ma-mother-outraged-after-middle-school-children-forced-to-take-oral-sex-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/17/ma-mother-outraged-after-middle-school-children-forced-to-take-oral-sex-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Indoctrination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=106709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-2004256/Mother-outraged-middle-school-children-forced-oral-sex-survey.html?printingPage=true">Daily Mail Online</a>: A Massachusetts middle school has sparked outrage after forcing students to answer questions about oral sex. Parent Arlene Tessitore made an official complaint after her seventh and eighth grade daughters were forced to take the Youth Risk Behaviour Study at Memorial Middle School. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/17/ma-mother-outraged-after-middle-school-children-forced-to-take-oral-sex-survey/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/17/ma-mother-outraged-after-middle-school-children-forced-to-take-oral-sex-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Trial Lawyers Use Lawsuits to Protect Free Speech, Religious Freedom, &amp; Property Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/10/conservative-trial-lawyers-use-lawsuits-to-protect-free-speech-religious-freedom-property-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/10/conservative-trial-lawyers-use-lawsuits-to-protect-free-speech-religious-freedom-property-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 16:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Pacific Justice Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: RLUIPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=103210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://voices.injuryboard.com/medical-malpractice/conservative-trial-lawyers-use-lawsuits-to-protect-free-speech-religious-freedom-property-rights.aspx?googleid=290514">Injury Board Blog Network</a>:  There are scores of other cases like these every year, filed by these groups and others, such as the Alliance Defense Fund, the Rutherford Institute, and many others... just as the Founders intended. The "tort reform" movement will eventually reach harm cases, through restrictions on the filing of any lawsuit, Americans don't recognize the universality of the rights protected in our Constitution and Bill of Rights. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/10/conservative-trial-lawyers-use-lawsuits-to-protect-free-speech-religious-freedom-property-rights/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/10/conservative-trial-lawyers-use-lawsuits-to-protect-free-speech-religious-freedom-property-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VA: Challenge To Zoning Denial By Interfaith Retreat Center Can Move Ahead</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/02/va-challenge-to-zoning-denial-by-interfaith-retreat-center-can-move-ahead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/02/va-challenge-to-zoning-denial-by-interfaith-retreat-center-can-move-ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 16:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: RLUIPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Oracle Institute v. Board of Supervisors of Grayson County]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=102452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2011/04/challenge-to-zoning-denial-by.html">Religion Clause Blog</a>: In a letter ruling in <em><a href="http://www.rutherford.org/PDF/2011/04-26-2011_Letter_Oracle-Institute.pdf">Oracle Institute v. Board of Supervisors of Grayson County</a>,</em> (VA Cir. Ct., April 26, 2011), a Virginia state trial judge rejected a number of defenses to a suit brought by an interfaith spiritual retreat center challenging the denial of a special use permit for property which it wished to develop. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/02/va-challenge-to-zoning-denial-by-interfaith-retreat-center-can-move-ahead/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/02/va-challenge-to-zoning-denial-by-interfaith-retreat-center-can-move-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religious material a no-no on school playgrounds</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/28/religious-material-a-no-no-on-school-playgrounds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/28/religious-material-a-no-no-on-school-playgrounds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=99325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Education/Default.aspx?id=1318304">One News Now</a>: "Pennsylvania third-grader is getting legal help after being told by school officials that she can't hand out Christian tracts on the playground." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/28/religious-material-a-no-no-on-school-playgrounds/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/28/religious-material-a-no-no-on-school-playgrounds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parents Under Siege in Global Battle Against State Control of Children</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/07/parents-under-siege-in-global-battle-against-state-control-of-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/07/parents-under-siege-in-global-battle-against-state-control-of-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Roger Kiska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Indoctrination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Wiens v. Germany]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=97259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/culture/family/6586-parents-under-siege-in-global-battle-against-state-control-of-children">New American</a>: “Parents, not the government, are the ones ultimately responsible for making educational choices for their children, and jailing them for standing on this universal right is simply unconscionable,” declared ADF attorney Roger Kiska. “Irene Wiens was well within her rights under the European Convention on Human Rights to opt to teach her children a view of sexuality that is in accord with her own religious beliefs, instead of sending them to four days of classes and an interactive play that she found to be objectionable.” Kiska noted that the ADF is defending four similar case . . . [more] <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/07/parents-under-siege-in-global-battle-against-state-control-of-children/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/07/parents-under-siege-in-global-battle-against-state-control-of-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rutherford Institute sues Dept. of Homeland Security and TSA over scanners</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/16/rutherford-institute-sues-dept-of-homeland-security-and-tsa-over-scanners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/16/rutherford-institute-sues-dept-of-homeland-security-and-tsa-over-scanners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Roberts v. Napolitano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=82504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=865">The Rutherford Institute</a>: (links to the complaint) "In a case involving the continuing encroachment of modern technology upon personal privacy, The Rutherford Institute has filed a Fourth Amendment lawsuit in federal court against Janet Napolitano, secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and John Pistole, administrator of the Transportation Security Agency (TSA), on behalf of two airline pilots who refused to submit to airport security screening which relies on advanced imaging technology that exposes intimate details of a person’s body to government agents." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/16/rutherford-institute-sues-dept-of-homeland-security-and-tsa-over-scanners/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/16/rutherford-institute-sues-dept-of-homeland-security-and-tsa-over-scanners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VA: Evangelist sues challenging city&#8217;s noise ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/04/va-evangelist-sues-challenging-citys-noise-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/04/va-evangelist-sues-challenging-citys-noise-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Marcavage v. City of Winchester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=80311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=862">The Rutherford Institute</a>: "The Rutherford institute has filed a First Amendment lawsuit in federal court against the City of Winchester, its police chief and another police officer, charging that the City’s noise ordinance, which prohibits sounds that 'annoy' or 'disturb' others, is unconstitutional. The case arose out of events that transpired during the 2010 Apple Blossom Festival in which a Christian street preacher was prevented from preaching about his religious beliefs on a public sidewalk after a passerby complained that he felt 'uncomfortable' with the message." &#124; For more information, including text of the complaint, <a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/11/evangelist-sues-challenging-citys-noise.html">see Religion Clause</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/04/va-evangelist-sues-challenging-citys-noise-ordinance/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/04/va-evangelist-sues-challenging-citys-noise-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court seen snubbing religious-expression cases</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/01/high-court-seen-snubbing-religious-expression-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/01/high-court-seen-snubbing-religious-expression-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Southeastern Legal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Thomas More Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=79431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/11/03/10religion_ep.h30.html?tkn=ZXWFs3uwAON6h1MpD0%2B%2Bf3L/NIEMzL6PFQ7l&#38;cmp=clp-edweek">Education Week</a>: "[A]t least one conservative constituency largely is still waiting for its day in the high court. Over the past two years alone, self-described religious-liberty groups on the right have asked the justices to hear appeals in some half-dozen cases involving religious expression in the public schools. In each case, the Supreme Court has refused . . . Half a dozen or so conservative legal organizations, as part of their advocacy work, regularly take up the cause of student religious expression—and, in some cases, nonreligious expression as well. In addition to Liberty Counsel, others include the Alliance Defense Fund, in Scottsdale, Ariz.; the American Center for Law and Justice, in Washington; the Liberty Institute, in Plano, Texas, which is not affiliated with Liberty Counsel; the Rutherford Institute, in Charlottesville, Va.; the Southeastern Legal Foundation, in Marietta, Ga.; and the Thomas More Law Center, in Ann Arbor, Mich." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/01/high-court-seen-snubbing-religious-expression-cases/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/01/high-court-seen-snubbing-religious-expression-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rutherford Institute to represent pilot who refused virtual strip search</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/21/the-rutherford-institute-to-represent-pilot-who-refused-virtual-strip-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/21/the-rutherford-institute-to-represent-pilot-who-refused-virtual-strip-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=77799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/2156015291.html">ChristianNewsWire</a>: "In a case involving the continuing encroachment of modern technology upon personal privacy, The Rutherford Institute has come to the defense of an airline pilot who refused to submit to airport security screening that exposes intimate details of a person's body to government agents." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/21/the-rutherford-institute-to-represent-pilot-who-refused-virtual-strip-search/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/21/the-rutherford-institute-to-represent-pilot-who-refused-virtual-strip-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC: Suit Says County Sign Control Ordinance Is Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/11/sc-suit-says-county-sign-control-ordinance-is-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/11/sc-suit-says-county-sign-control-ordinance-is-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Moultrie v. Berkeley County SC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=76079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/10/suit-says-county-sign-control-ordinance.html">Religion Clause Blog</a>: "The complaint (<a href="http://www.rutherford.org/pdf/2010/10-05-2010_Moultrie.pdf">full text</a>) in <em>Moultrie v. Berkeley County, South Carolina</em>, (D SC, filed 10/5/2010), argues that by providing exemptions for political signs (as well as for "for sale" and "for lease" signs) but not for signs expressing religious messages . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/11/sc-suit-says-county-sign-control-ordinance-is-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/11/sc-suit-says-county-sign-control-ordinance-is-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VA: Rutherford Institute warns middle school principal against creating hostile workplace environment towards religion, FCA club</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/va-rutherford-institute-warns-middle-school-principal-against-creating-hostile-workplace-environment-towards-religion-fca-club/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/va-rutherford-institute-warns-middle-school-principal-against-creating-hostile-workplace-environment-towards-religion-fca-club/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=71064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=846">Rutherford Institute</a>: "In a letter to Don Curtis, the principal of Wilson Middle School in Fishersville, Va., John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, warns the school administrator against creating a hostile workplace environment towards religion and discriminating against religious student groups such as the Fellowship of Christian Athletes (FCA). Several members of the community asked the Institute to intervene after Curtis emailed teachers advising them that they could be subject to termination proceedings should they assist students in forming an FCA club at their school." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/va-rutherford-institute-warns-middle-school-principal-against-creating-hostile-workplace-environment-towards-religion-fca-club/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/va-rutherford-institute-warns-middle-school-principal-against-creating-hostile-workplace-environment-towards-religion-fca-club/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scholars: Westboro message at Marine&#8217;s funeral offensive, but protected</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/19/scholars-westboro-message-at-marines-funeral-offensive-but-protected/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/19/scholars-westboro-message-at-marines-funeral-offensive-but-protected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Snyder v. Phelps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=65820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ydr.com/religion/ci_15540424">York Daily Record</a>: "The writers of all seven amicus briefs filed this week with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the Westboro Baptist Church noted two things: The protest by the Rev. Fred Phelps and members of his family was terribly offensive and presented a worldview with which they disagreed greatly. And, despite that, all seven said the court must rule in favor of the Kansas-based church when it hears the appeal by Spring Garden Township's Albert Snyder in October." &#124; <a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/07/amicus-briefs-in-snyder-v-phelps-now.html">Via Religion Clause</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/19/scholars-westboro-message-at-marines-funeral-offensive-but-protected/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/19/scholars-westboro-message-at-marines-funeral-offensive-but-protected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groups support Forsyth in prayer appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/09/groups-support-forsyth-in-prayer-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/09/groups-support-forsyth-in-prayer-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Americans United for Life (AUL)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Foundation of Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Policy Council of West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Foundation for Moral Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Independence Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Legal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: North Carolina Family Policy Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: North Carolina Partnership for Religious Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Palmetto Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Retired Judges of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Joyner v Forsyth Co North Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=62545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www2.journalnow.com/content/2010/jun/09/groups-support-forsyth-in-prayer-appeal/news-regional/">Winston-Salem Journal</a>: "A number of foundations and other nonprofit groups have filed statements of support for Forsyth County as it appeals a federal judge's decision in May to ban prayers that mention Jesus or make other sectarian references at county meetings . . . The county is being represented by the Alliance Defense Fund, a group that supports public expressions of Christianity. Many of the groups filing friend-of-the-court briefs have similar goals." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/09/groups-support-forsyth-in-prayer-appeal/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/09/groups-support-forsyth-in-prayer-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rutherford argues council prayers constitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/26/rutherford-argues-council-prayers-constitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/26/rutherford-argues-council-prayers-constitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 22:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 4th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Joyner v Forsyth Co North Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/26/rutherford-argues-council-prayers-constitutional/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Printer.aspx?id=1022404">One News Now</a>: "The Rutherford Institute is urging the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to affirm legislative prayers in Forsyth County, North Carolina, as constitutional."
  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/26/rutherford-argues-council-prayers-constitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/05/26/rutherford-argues-council-prayers-constitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free religious speech for students in school?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/13/free-religious-speech-for-students-in-school/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/13/free-religious-speech-for-students-in-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: McComb v Crehan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Nurre v. Whitehead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/2010/04/13/free-religious-speech-for-students-in-school/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dddnews.com/story/1625954.html">Daily Dunkin Democrat</a>: "Like Jefferson and Madison, I strongly believe in separation of church and state. And if a principal were to mandate school-directed prayer in classrooms, then that would be a violation of that separation. However, if at commencement, a valedictorian speaks of what God and Christ have meant to her life, that is her First Amendment right to free speech! The Roberts Supreme Court does not appear to agree . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/13/free-religious-speech-for-students-in-school/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/13/free-religious-speech-for-students-in-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court will consider First Amendment rights of Christian club</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/01/u-s-supreme-court-will-consider-first-amendment-rights-of-christian-club/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/01/u-s-supreme-court-will-consider-first-amendment-rights-of-christian-club/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Advocates International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Association of Christian Schools International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Boy Scouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Medical and Dental Associations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Pacific Justice Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Christian Legal Society v Martinez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=57145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.christianexaminer.com/Articles/Articles%20Apr10/Art_Apr10_10.html">Christian Examiner</a>: "The U.S. Supreme Court—which will review a religious discrimination case brought by a Christian legal society from San Francisco college of law—has received nearly two dozen legal briefs supporting the student club . . . 'Just as all student groups have the right to associate with people who share common beliefs and interests, Christian student groups have the right to be Christian student groups,' said [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/2010/03/01/about-gregory-s-baylor/">Gregory S. Baylor</a>], senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. 'Requiring leaders of a Christian club to live by a Christian code of conduct is no different than an environmentalist club requiring its leaders not to be lumberjacks.'" &#124; For more information on the case see the ADF Alliance Alert case tag: <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/tag/zz-christian-legal-society-v-martinez/">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/tag/zz-christian-legal-society-v-martinez/</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/01/u-s-supreme-court-will-consider-first-amendment-rights-of-christian-club/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/01/u-s-supreme-court-will-consider-first-amendment-rights-of-christian-club/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TN: Cheatham County seminar will focus on teachers&#8217; religious rights</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/31/tn-cheatham-county-seminar-will-focus-on-teachers-religious-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/31/tn-cheatham-county-seminar-will-focus-on-teachers-religious-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Action Council of Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=57023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.tennessean.com/article/20100331/ASHLANDCITY01/100330021/2142/Seminar+will+focus+on+teachers%E2%80%99+religious+rights">The Ashland City Times</a>: "Cheatham County educators are invited to attend a teleconference that organizers say will focus on the constitutional rights of religious persons in public schools . . . The Cheatham County Ministerial Alliance, Family Action Council of Tennessee and Alliance Defense Fund are sponsoring the conference." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/31/tn-cheatham-county-seminar-will-focus-on-teachers-religious-rights/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/31/tn-cheatham-county-seminar-will-focus-on-teachers-religious-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Whitehead: &#8220;The Right Not To Be Offended: The Supreme Court And Religion&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/22/john-whitehead-the-right-not-to-be-offended-the-supreme-court-and-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/22/john-whitehead-the-right-not-to-be-offended-the-supreme-court-and-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Nurre v. Whitehead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/2010/03/22/john-whitehead-the-right-not-to-be-offended-the-supreme-court-and-religion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-w-whitehead/the-right-not-to-be-offen_b_508513.html">writes at the Huffington Post</a>: "The First Amendment right to free speech is on life support. And with its recent refusal to review the case of Nurre v. Whitehead, the Supreme Court may have pulled the plug." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/22/john-whitehead-the-right-not-to-be-offended-the-supreme-court-and-religion/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/22/john-whitehead-the-right-not-to-be-offended-the-supreme-court-and-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delaware: Ruling in prayer suit could have wide reach</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/23/delaware-ruling-in-prayer-suit-could-have-wide-reach/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/23/delaware-ruling-in-prayer-suit-could-have-wide-reach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=53023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A federal judge in Delaware ruled Monday that it is constitutional for the Indian River School Board to open its meetings with Christian prayers . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/23/delaware-ruling-in-prayer-suit-could-have-wide-reach/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/23/delaware-ruling-in-prayer-suit-could-have-wide-reach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rutherford Institute urges Supreme Court to restore Christian student group&#8217;s access to university campus</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/15/rutherford-institute-urges-supreme-court-to-restore-christian-student-groups-access-to-university-campus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/15/rutherford-institute-urges-supreme-court-to-restore-christian-student-groups-access-to-university-campus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Case Filings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Christian Legal Society v Martinez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=52071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=810">Rutherford Institute</a>: "The Rutherford Institute has filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in <em>Christian Legal Society v. Martinez</em> in defense of the right of a Christian university student group to be able to freely associate with fellow believers who subscribe to their religious beliefs about sexual conduct outside of marriage." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/15/rutherford-institute-urges-supreme-court-to-restore-christian-student-groups-access-to-university-campus/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/15/rutherford-institute-urges-supreme-court-to-restore-christian-student-groups-access-to-university-campus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Va. lawmaker targets police prayer policy</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/29/va-lawmaker-targets-police-prayer-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/29/va-lawmaker-targets-police-prayer-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=46559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dailypress.com/news/virginia/dp-va--policeprayers1229dec29,0,7486339.story">Associated Press</a>: "A state legislator is renewing his effort to undo an administrative order requiring Virginia State Police chaplains to deliver non-denominational prayers at official events. Del. Charles W. Carrico, a retired state trooper, claims the 2008 directive from State Police Superintendent W. Steven Flaherty violates the chaplains' constitutional right to free exercise of religion." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/29/va-lawmaker-targets-police-prayer-policy/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/29/va-lawmaker-targets-police-prayer-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rutherford Institute asks U.S. Supreme Court to Protect student artistic expression, reverse ban on instrumental performance of &#8220;Ave Maria&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/08/rutherford-institute-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-protect-student-artistic-expression-reverse-ban-on-instrumental-performance-of-ave-maria/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/08/rutherford-institute-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-protect-student-artistic-expression-reverse-ban-on-instrumental-performance-of-ave-maria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=44522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=798">Rutherford Institute Press Release</a>: "Voicing the concern that arts education in the public schools is in danger of being sanitized of any art with remotely religious themes or inspiration, The Rutherford Institute has asked the U.S Supreme Court to weigh in on a case in which public school officials banned the performance of an instrumental arrangement of Franz Biebl's 'Ave Maria' at a high school graduation simply because the superintendent feared it might be religious." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/08/rutherford-institute-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-protect-student-artistic-expression-reverse-ban-on-instrumental-performance-of-ave-maria/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/12/08/rutherford-institute-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-protect-student-artistic-expression-reverse-ban-on-instrumental-performance-of-ave-maria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calling for Common Sense About Christmas, Rutherford Institute Issues Legal Guidelines for Celebrating Christmas in Public, at School or Work</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/19/calling-for-common-sense-about-christmas-rutherford-institute-issues-legal-guidelines-for-celebrating-christmas-in-public-at-school-or-work-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/19/calling-for-common-sense-about-christmas-rutherford-institute-issues-legal-guidelines-for-celebrating-christmas-in-public-at-school-or-work-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Holidays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=42874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=796">Christian Newswire</a>: "Hoping to alleviate any confusion over the do's and don'ts of celebrating Christmas in schools, workplaces and elsewhere, The Rutherford Institute has issued its 'Twelve Rules of Christmas' guidelines, which are available <a href="http://www.rutherford.org/resources/legal-12rules.asp">here</a>." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/19/calling-for-common-sense-about-christmas-rutherford-institute-issues-legal-guidelines-for-celebrating-christmas-in-public-at-school-or-work-2/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/19/calling-for-common-sense-about-christmas-rutherford-institute-issues-legal-guidelines-for-celebrating-christmas-in-public-at-school-or-work-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John W. Whitehead Calls For Sweeping Changes To The U.S. Supreme Court And Far-Reaching Revisions To The Confirmation Process</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/16/john-w-whitehead-calls-for-sweeping-changes-to-the-u-s-supreme-court-and-far-reaching-revisions-to-the-confirmation-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/16/john-w-whitehead-calls-for-sweeping-changes-to-the-u-s-supreme-court-and-far-reaching-revisions-to-the-confirmation-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=42438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=794">Rutherford Institute</a>: "The time has surely come for an independent judicial appointments commission to be established ... to take Supreme Court appointments out of the hands of politicians and beyond the reach of the political process..."--John W. Whitehead &#038; John M. Beckett <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/16/john-w-whitehead-calls-for-sweeping-changes-to-the-u-s-supreme-court-and-far-reaching-revisions-to-the-confirmation-process/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/16/john-w-whitehead-calls-for-sweeping-changes-to-the-u-s-supreme-court-and-far-reaching-revisions-to-the-confirmation-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Horrors of Sexual Trafficking, American-Style</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/11/the-horrors-of-sexual-trafficking-american-style/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/11/the-horrors-of-sexual-trafficking-american-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Trafficking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=35874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John W. Whitehead writes at the <a href="http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=611">Rutherford Institute</a>: "The only way to truly combat sex trafficking is to expose its seedy underbelly, harshly punish perpetrators and bring justice to the victims. Yes, as collective communities and as a nation, we must make sexual trafficking a priority. The future of our country hangs in the balance." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/11/the-horrors-of-sexual-trafficking-american-style/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/11/the-horrors-of-sexual-trafficking-american-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rutherford Institute, others: Virginia Jail Ban On Biblical Passages Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/10/rutherford-institute-others-virginia-jail-ban-on-biblical-passages-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/10/rutherford-institute-others-virginia-jail-ban-on-biblical-passages-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Becket Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: RLUIPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=29789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=778">Rutherford Institute</a>: "The Rutherford Institute, in conjunction with the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Virginia, the Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy, Prison Fellowship, the Friends Committee on National Legislation and the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, has demanded that officials at the Rappahannock Regional Jail immediately end their illegal practice of censoring religious material sent to detainees."  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/10/rutherford-institute-others-virginia-jail-ban-on-biblical-passages-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/10/rutherford-institute-others-virginia-jail-ban-on-biblical-passages-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rutherford Institute Urges U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Free Speech Case of High School Valedictorian Censored, Silenced for Referencing Christ</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/19/rutherford-institute-urges-us-supreme-court-to-hear-free-speech-case-of-high-school-valedictorian-censored-silenced-for-referencing-christ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/19/rutherford-institute-urges-us-supreme-court-to-hear-free-speech-case-of-high-school-valedictorian-censored-silenced-for-referencing-christ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=27742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=776" target="_blank">Rutherford Institute</a>: "Attorneys for The Rutherford Institute have asked the United States Supreme Court to hear the case of a high school valedictorian whose microphone was turned off by school officials after she began speaking about the part her religious beliefs played in her success in life . . .
A copy of the brief is available <a href="http://www.rutherford.org/pdf/2009/McComb_v_Crehan-PetitionForWrit.pdf">here</a> . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/19/rutherford-institute-urges-us-supreme-court-to-hear-free-speech-case-of-high-school-valedictorian-censored-silenced-for-referencing-christ/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/06/19/rutherford-institute-urges-us-supreme-court-to-hear-free-speech-case-of-high-school-valedictorian-censored-silenced-for-referencing-christ/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

