<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: Southeastern Legal Foundation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-southeastern-legal-foundation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>High Court seen snubbing religious-expression cases</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/01/high-court-seen-snubbing-religious-expression-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/01/high-court-seen-snubbing-religious-expression-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Rutherford Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Southeastern Legal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Thomas More Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=79431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/11/03/10religion_ep.h30.html?tkn=ZXWFs3uwAON6h1MpD0%2B%2Bf3L/NIEMzL6PFQ7l&#38;cmp=clp-edweek">Education Week</a>: "[A]t least one conservative constituency largely is still waiting for its day in the high court. Over the past two years alone, self-described religious-liberty groups on the right have asked the justices to hear appeals in some half-dozen cases involving religious expression in the public schools. In each case, the Supreme Court has refused . . . Half a dozen or so conservative legal organizations, as part of their advocacy work, regularly take up the cause of student religious expression—and, in some cases, nonreligious expression as well. In addition to Liberty Counsel, others include the Alliance Defense Fund, in Scottsdale, Ariz.; the American Center for Law and Justice, in Washington; the Liberty Institute, in Plano, Texas, which is not affiliated with Liberty Counsel; the Rutherford Institute, in Charlottesville, Va.; the Southeastern Legal Foundation, in Marietta, Ga.; and the Thomas More Law Center, in Ann Arbor, Mich." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/01/high-court-seen-snubbing-religious-expression-cases/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/01/high-court-seen-snubbing-religious-expression-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

