<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: Wisconsin Family Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-wisconsin-family-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WI: Capitol nativity scene draws criticism, opposing display planned</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/12/wi-capitol-nativity-scene-draws-criticism-opposing-display-planned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/12/wi-capitol-nativity-scene-draws-criticism-opposing-display-planned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Freedom from Religion Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Christmas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/on-politics-capitol-nativity-scene-draws-criticism-opposing-display-planned/article_6f437626-24d6-11e1-b26b-001871e3ce6c.html">WI State Journal</a>: The conservative group Wisconsin Family Action set up the manger scene on Sunday, and its president Julaine Appling said they plan to display it through the end of the month. But the move angered the Madison-based Freedom from Religion Foundation, <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/12/wi-capitol-nativity-scene-draws-criticism-opposing-display-planned/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/12/wi-capitol-nativity-scene-draws-criticism-opposing-display-planned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battling a &#8216;marriage imitation&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/battling-a-marriage-imitation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/battling-a-marriage-imitation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Austin R. Nimocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Appling v Doyle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1377996">OneNewsNow.com</a> (6/25): ADF attorney Austin R. Nimocks says the law flies in the face of Wisconsin voters. “Marriage provides a strong foundation for a thriving society,” says Nimocks. “That's why they approved a constitutional amendment that specifically protects marriage from all imitators. Politicians and activist groups should not be allowed to get around that -- and we will appeal this decision because this domestic partnership scheme is precisely the type of marriage imitation that the voters intended to prevent.” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/battling-a-marriage-imitation/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/battling-a-marriage-imitation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Baby Step Forward, An Olympic Long Jump Back</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/20/a-baby-step-forward-an-olympic-long-jump-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/20/a-baby-step-forward-an-olympic-long-jump-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 17:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=104238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heather Rayne Geyer at <a href="http://mountpleasant.patch.com/articles/a-baby-step-forward-an-olympic-long-jump-back">Patch.com</a>: July 23, 2009 – Wisconsin Family Action and The Alliance Defense Fund filed an action with the Wisconsin Supreme Court arguing that the registry is not in compliance with the State Constitution. Governor Doyle appointed Lester Pines to defend the registry against this action. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/20/a-baby-step-forward-an-olympic-long-jump-back/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/20/a-baby-step-forward-an-olympic-long-jump-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same-sex partner arms race</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/25/same-sex-partner-arms-race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/25/same-sex-partner-arms-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=99136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.milwaukeenewsbuzz.com/?p=532387">Milwaukee News Buzz</a>: Meanwhile, Wisconsin Family Action is getting legal help from the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian legal organization based in Arizona. It’s fielding three staff attorneys and two in Wisconsin that it has described in press releases as “ADF-allied,” Michael Dean of Waukesha and Taylor Samuel of Kenosha.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/25/same-sex-partner-arms-race/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/25/same-sex-partner-arms-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Bay City Council to consider support for WI Family Action&#8217;s suit against domestic partner registry</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/29/green-bay-city-council-to-consider-support-for-wi-family-actions-suit-against-domestic-partner-registry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/29/green-bay-city-council-to-consider-support-for-wi-family-actions-suit-against-domestic-partner-registry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=79329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20101028/GPG0101/10280724/City-worker-s-bid-for-domestic-partner-benefits-backfires">Green Bay Press Gazette</a>: "The City Council on Wednesday will consider a proposal to support Wisconsin Family Action in its lawsuit challenging the state's domestic partner registry. Approved by state lawmakers and enacted in 2009, the registry allows same-sex couples to qualify for certain employment benefits, including family leave for medical emergencies." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/29/green-bay-city-council-to-consider-support-for-wi-family-actions-suit-against-domestic-partner-registry/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/29/green-bay-city-council-to-consider-support-for-wi-family-actions-suit-against-domestic-partner-registry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Gay couples seek to defend Wisconsin domestic partner law&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/01/gay-couples-seek-to-defend-wisconsin-domestic-partner-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/01/gay-couples-seek-to-defend-wisconsin-domestic-partner-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=74595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.startribune.com/local/104152958.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUZ">Minneapolis Star-Tribune (AP)</a>: "A gay rights group and five gay couples are hoping to defend Wisconsin's domestic partner registry against a legal challenge. Fair Wisconsin and the couples filed a motion Friday asking to intervene in the lawsuit brought by Wisconsin Family Action in August." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/01/gay-couples-seek-to-defend-wisconsin-domestic-partner-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/01/gay-couples-seek-to-defend-wisconsin-domestic-partner-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The race is on in Wisconsin to determine abortion policy agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/30/the-race-is-on-in-wisconsin-to-determine-abortion-policy-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/30/the-race-is-on-in-wisconsin-to-determine-abortion-policy-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=74312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wifamilyaction.org/RT_092710">Wisconsin Family Action</a>: "This state-level targeting is a relatively new political strategy employed by liberal activists–called the Colorado Model–and outlined in detail in the book <em>The Blueprint: How the Democrats Won Colorado (And Why Republicans Everywhere Should Care)</em> . . . We know that the outcome of this election determines the policy agenda of the state of Wisconsin for the next two years. Planned Parenthood and Fair Wisconsin are worried they may lose pro-abortion, pro-same-sex marriage votes this November so they’re doing everything they can to ensure that things stay the way they were this last session, when they passed just about every item on their respective legislative agendas." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/30/the-race-is-on-in-wisconsin-to-determine-abortion-policy-agenda/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/30/the-race-is-on-in-wisconsin-to-determine-abortion-policy-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WI: State violating voter-approved amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/24/wi-state-violating-voter-approved-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/24/wi-state-violating-voter-approved-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=69924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1132804">OneNewsNow</a>: "Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) is representing Wisconsin Family Action in a lawsuit against the state over the definition of marriage . . . 'Even though the people of Wisconsin clearly defined marriage in their state constitution as the union of one man and one woman, the state legislature has implemented a "domestic partnership" scheme that seeks to undermine that marriage amendment,' explains ADF attorney [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-jim-campbell/">Jim Campbell</a>]." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/24/wi-state-violating-voter-approved-amendment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/24/wi-state-violating-voter-approved-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domestic partnership registry challenged again</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/23/domestic-partnership-registry-challenged-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/23/domestic-partnership-registry-challenged-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=69746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/101009139.html">Milwaukee Journal Sentinel</a>: "Supporters of Wisconsin's ban on same-sex marriage and civil unions are seeking for the second time to have the state's domestic partnership registry declared unconstitutional . . . The plaintiffs, who are being represented by the Alliance Defense Fund, argue that they're harmed by the registry because it costs taxpayer money to administer." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/23/domestic-partnership-registry-challenged-again/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/23/domestic-partnership-registry-challenged-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WI: Lawsuit challenges state&#8217;s domestic partner registry</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/wi-lawsuit-challenges-states-domestic-partner-registry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/wi-lawsuit-challenges-states-domestic-partner-registry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=69652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://lacrossetribune.com/news/state-and-regional/wi/article_cbb1018a-ab0b-11df-8d15-001cc4c002e0.html">LaCrosse Tribune</a>: "A social conservative group filed a lawsuit Wednesday challenging Wisconsin’s domestic partner registry, arguing it is a violation of the state’s constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. The lawsuit filed in Dane County Circuit Court by members of Wisconsin Family Action contends the registry creates a legal status substantially similar to that of marriage." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/wi-lawsuit-challenges-states-domestic-partner-registry/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/wi-lawsuit-challenges-states-domestic-partner-registry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Gay rights foes argue Wisconsin&#8217;s partnership law like marriage&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/gay-rights-foes-argue-wisconsins-partnership-law-like-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/gay-rights-foes-argue-wisconsins-partnership-law-like-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=69576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://ontopmag.com/article.aspx?id=6252&#038;MediaType=1&#038;Category=26">On Top Mag</a>: "In filing its challenge to Wisconsin's domestic partnership law, a group opposed to gay rights claims it's too similar to marriage . . . WFA had also supported passage of the anti-gay marriage amendment as the Family Research Institute. It is being represented by the Christian-based Alliance Defense Fund (ADF). ADF lawyers are also defending California's gay marriage ban, Proposition 8, in federal court." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/gay-rights-foes-argue-wisconsins-partnership-law-like-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/gay-rights-foes-argue-wisconsins-partnership-law-like-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

