ADF Attorney David Hacker writing at the Academic Freedom File: “The University of California System is considering a new speech code in the wake of a few unfortunate speech incidents on its campuses . . . The proposed speech code, which has surfaced from the UC Students Association, will prohibit ‘hanging a noose, burning a cross, or placing a symbol, such as a swastika, without authorization, on university property or at official university functions.’ The restrictions seem benign at first glance. No one should be allowed to encourage criminal activity on campus or incite violence, and for this reason much of the restriction might pass constitutional review. But the restriction on ‘placing a symbol,’ runs afoul of the First Amendment. Vague? Overbroad? Prior restraint? You bet!”
- Posted: 04/05/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: speakupmovement.wordpress.com
- Tags: ADF: David Hacker, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: California, Topic: Education
California Family Council: “[SB 906] (Leno, D-San Francisco) makes several unnecessary changes to the state Family Code related to the definition of marriage by replacing the term ‘marriage’ with the phrase ‘civil marriage,’ attempting to create a new class of marriage. The bill includes language that sponsors assert will clarify that religious institutions would not be required to perform marriages that violate their religious tenets. However, despite Senator Leno’s and supporters’ claims, SB 906 is actually a direct assault against the more than 7 million voters that supported Proposition 8. Supporters have repeatedly stated that this bill is necessary to assist in their efforts to repeal Proposition 8 in a future election.”
- Posted: 04/05/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.californiafamilycouncil.org
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: California Family Council, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legislation, Topic: Marriage
Christian Examiner: “The U.S. Supreme Court—which will review a religious discrimination case brought by a Christian legal society from San Francisco college of law—has received nearly two dozen legal briefs supporting the student club . . . ‘Just as all student groups have the right to associate with people who share common beliefs and interests, Christian student groups have the right to be Christian student groups,’ said [Gregory S. Baylor], senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. ‘Requiring leaders of a Christian club to live by a Christian code of conduct is no different than an environmentalist club requiring its leaders not to be lumberjacks.’” | For more information on the case see the ADF Alliance Alert case tag: http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/tag/zz-christian-legal-society-v-martinez/
- Posted: 04/01/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.christianexaminer.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: Advocates International, Group: American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), Group: Association of Christian Schools International, Group: Boy Scouts, Group: Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, Group: Christian Legal Society, Group: Christian Medical and Dental Associations, Group: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), Group: Liberty Counsel, Group: Pacific Justice Institute, Group: Rutherford Institute, State: California, State: Washington, Topic: Education, ZZ: Christian Legal Society v Martinez
USA Today: “Larry Stickney speaks passionately as he tries to explain why the names of people who signed a 2009 Washington state ballot measure against gay rights should be kept secret. ‘I had been in the political game for 16 years, but we had no idea the viciousness that we would come under,’ . . . ‘Every angry homosexual in the world, I am telling you, was sending hate mail’ . . . The ACLU, a strong supporter of free speech, is siding with Hastings, echoing the school’s interest in prohibiting discrimination . . . Many of the groups siding with the conservative speakers represent conservative religious interests, such as the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops in the Hastings case and Alliance Defense Fund, in the Washington state case . . . ”
- Posted: 03/30/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.usatoday.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: California, State: Washington, Topic: Education, ZZ: Christian Legal Society v Martinez, ZZ: Citizens United v Federal Election Commission
The MetroWest Daily News: “Have you ever thought of having a Bible study in your home? If so, don’t plan on moving to either San Diego, California or Gilbert, Arizona. It seems there are regulations, which forbid you to hold a ‘religious assembly’ in your home . . . The ADF argues ‘that such bans violate the Constitution’s free-exercise clause, and even the state’s Free Exercise of Religion Act protects such meetings.’”
- Posted: 03/23/2010
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.metrowestdailynews.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: American Family Association (AFA), State: Arizona, State: California, Topic: RLUIPA
Fresno Bee: “Fresno City College officials said they plan to take action against an instructor accused of presenting religious-based and anti-gay views as fact in a health class. But school officials declined to say what action they will take. In a March 8 letter to three students who complained, the school said its investigation found that instructor Bradley Lopez violated district policy and engaged in conduct that could create a hostile learning environment. The students were part of a complaint filed by the American Civil Liberties Union in February.”
- Posted: 03/18/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.fresnobee.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, State: California, Topic: Education, Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Mike McKee writes at the Recorder: “A law professor’s long-proposed study about affirmative action’s effect on bar exams’ pass rates has encountered another obstacle. In a tentative opinion released last week, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Curtis Karnow deflated UCLA School of Law professor Richard Sander’s plans by finding that the documents he seeks — California State Bar historical data on past bar exams — don’t fall within the scope of documents traditionally subject to public disclosure.”
- Posted: 03/18/2010
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.law.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, State: California, Topic: Education
Spartan Daily: “Jim Campbell, a lawyer with the Alliance Defense Fund, an organization fighting to uphold Proposition 8, said the argument isn’t valid because gays have yet to be proven as a suspect class in federal court . . . ‘It’s a very unworkable standard to set that as a suspect classification,’ he said. ‘Most suspect classifications we deal with in the law, such as race, are very cut and dried, not as something as complex and debated, as unclear and undefined as sexual orientation is.’”
- Posted: 03/12/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- Tags: ADF: Jim Campbell, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, State: California, Topic: Education, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
Pacific Justice Institute: “Castro Valley High School sparked controversy last year by hosting several questionable presenters, including Rev. Arlene K Nehring, a lesbian minister who talked to students in math and science classes about her gay wedding, encouraged them to ‘come out’ to God, their families and themselves, and invited them to a gay prom at her church. Because of the religious overtones in past and pending presentations, students in the Revelation Club were surprised when the school rejected their request to host Christopher Yuan because of ‘separation of church and state.’”
- Posted: 03/10/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.pacificjustice.org
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Group: Pacific Justice Institute, State: California, Topic: Education, Topic: Homosexual Agenda
OneNewsNow: “A Christian student in the Los Angeles Community College District is carrying his free-speech case to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals . . . Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) attorney David Hacker tells OneNewsNow that Lopez chose to speak about his Christian beliefs. ‘And during that speech, when he mentioned that marriage is between a man and a woman according to his Christian beliefs, the professor called him this horrible name, refused to let him finish the assignment, and told other students in the class, “If you’re offended, you can leave,”‘ Hacker explains.”
- Posted: 03/09/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: David Hacker, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Court: 9th Circuit, State: California, Topic: Education, ZZ: Lopez v Candaele
The Marriage Cases—Reversing the Burden of Inertia in a Pluralist Constitutional Democracy
William N. Eskridge, 97 Cal. L. Rev. 1785 (2010)
“This Foreword will examine the court’s opinion and the many doctrinal issues it raises through the lens of California’s pluralist-constitutional democracy. That voters can override the court through a constitutional amendment like Proposition 8 makes California’s constitution self-evidently democratic– indeed, more so than the U.S. Constitution. This feature has played a pivotal role in the state’s politics of gay marriage. An equally important feature of the California Constitution is its commitment to pluralism: the idea that a key role of the State is to serve as a peaceful forum in which rival social and economic groups bargain, compete, and deliberate. An institutional challenge in a pluralist democracy is to keep rival groups engaged in politics, to direct their efforts toward the public good, and to avoid feuds and other mutually destructive conflicts. This challenge is especially difficult because the pluralist balance changes, often radically, over the course of a generation. New groups, clamoring for public recognition, will emerge, upsetting a balance of alliances that worked well only ten years prior. Few groups reflect this phenomenon better than sexual and gender minorities; reviled as outlaws two generations ago, they are now part of the political process in California. Given the state’s role as harbinger for the nation, this is a significant advance for these minorities.”
- Posted: 03/09/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.californialawreview.org
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
San Francisco Chronicle: “With businesses and trial lawyers pouring money into state judicial races around the nation, California Chief Justice Ronald George appointed a Commission for Impartial Courts in 2007 to study judicial elections in California and decide whether changes were needed to promote judicial independence and public confidence in the courts. The commission’s chairman, state Supreme Court Justice Ming Chin, spoke to Chronicle reporter Bob Egelko about some of the proposals that the commission is recommending.”
- Posted: 03/08/2010
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.sfgate.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, State: California, Topic: Elections
SDNN.com: “Educators and community activists in the Los Angeles area have established a new school aimed at preventing cases such as King’s. The new charter school provides LGBT and LGBT-friendly youth the opportunity to earn their high school diploma in a safe environment, free from persecution.
The first of its kind in Southern California, the new school is a collaboration between Opportunities for Learning (OFL) and the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center program LifeWorks . . . ”
- Posted: 02/25/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.sdnn.com
- Tags: State: California, Topic: Charter Schools, Topic: Education, Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Mike Adams writes at Townhall: “Muslim students are not always cowards. But the Muslim Student Union (MSU) is often the least tolerant and most cowardly student group on a given college campus. The gulf between the speech they prevent and what they practice with administrators’ consent is enormous. What follows is a summary of a recent, and increasingly typical, incident. I have included links to video of the incident for verification. I have also included the chancellor’s complete contact information so that ‘infidels’ can express disgust with unchecked Muslim bigotry and intolerance on our nation’s campuses . . . Readers of this column need to watch this five-minute video . . . ”
- Posted: 02/16/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, State: California, Topic: Education, Topic: Islam
|
Latest Posts
-
05/24/2012
The ADF Alliance Alert will not be published on Friday, May 25th and Monday, May 28th.
-
www.huffingtonpost.com
05/24/2012
Huffington Post: A measure allowing same-sex civil unions passed its first legislative step in Brazil’s Congress, where it has lingered for 16 years.
-
www.christianpost.com
05/24/2012
Christian Post: “There has to be a wall institutionally between the government and the church or religious groups,” he said. “But many have taken that law of separation to think that it means separating religion from politics, which is precisely the opposite of what the Founding Fathers wanted.”
|