NBCPhiladelphia.com: Mark my words, there will be litigation over this,” said Douglas Napier, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative religious rights organization.
- Posted: 05/13/2011
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.nbcphiladelphia.com
- Tags: ADF: Douglas Napier, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Marriage and Family, State: Delaware, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legislation, Topic: Marriage
Delaware Online: Douglas Napier, senior attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund, which advocates for traditional marriage, was among those who spoke against the Delaware bill in Dover. He does not see strong protections for employees who do not want to be part of civil unions. ”It is forcing clerks in the state to violate their religious liberties and conscience to perform civil-union ceremonies if they are asked,” Napier said. “Constitutionally protected freedoms should never be threatened by politicians who are doing the bidding of a very small group of activists — and this is exactly what happened when the Legislature imposed this counterfeit marriage bill on Delaware.”
- Posted: 04/27/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.delawareonline.com
- Tags: ADF: Douglas Napier, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Delaware, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
South Florida Gay News: “Mark my words, there will be litigation over this,” said Douglas Napier, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative religious rights organization.
- Posted: 04/19/2011
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.southfloridagaynews.com
- Tags: ADF: Douglas Napier, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Marriage and Family, State: Delaware, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legislation, Topic: Marriage
Delmarva Now: Majority Democrats on a state Senate committee agreed Wednesday to release a bill offering legal recognition to same-sex couples in Delaware . . . But Austin Nimocks, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative religious rights organization, said supporters are pursuing the legislation with the ultimate goal of legalizing same-sex marriage. “Nothing in Delaware prevents people living as they want or having intimate relationships with whom they want,” Nimocks said.
- Posted: 03/31/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.delmarvanow.com
- Tags: ADF: Austin R. Nimocks, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, State: Delaware, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legislation, Topic: Marriage
“Five states allow same-sex marriage. By year’s end, that number could grow. However, several states are working to protect the definition of marriage.”
- Posted: 01/13/2011
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.citizenlink.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, State: Delaware, State: Indiana, State: Iowa, State: Maryland, State: Minnesota, State: New Hampshire, State: Pennsylvania, State: Rhode Island, State: West Virginia, State: Wyoming, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
The News Journal: “At the center are scars from a bitter Senate primary between Christine O’Donnell and Mike Castle that thrust Delaware politics into the national spotlight . . . But in the wreckage of Nov. 2, party members are divided about what they need to do to compete with Democrats, who have 110,000 more registered voters. The division mainly pits the more conservative voters of Sussex, Kent and southern New Castle counties against moderates in the more populous north.”
- Posted: 11/15/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.delawareonline.com
- Tags: State: Delaware, Topic: Politics
Politico: “Delaware GOP Senate nominee Christine O’Donnell questioned on Tuesday whether the Constitution provides for the separation of church and state.” Similarly, the AP files this report. The Washington Post also carries this report that includes video of the debate.
John R. Guardiano writing at The American Spectator: “[W]hile O’Donnell may not have been as articulate as she should have been, she’s nonetheless right: The phrase ‘separation of church and state’ appears nowhere in the Constitution . . . The First Amendment had been designed to protect religion from governmental interference and obstruction. Today, by contrast, the courts seem intent on protecting the people from religion . . . So while the elites cluck in disapproval at what they believe is O’Donnell’s faux pas, the reality is she knows and understands the Constitution better than they do.”
- Posted: 10/19/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, State: Delaware, Topic: Congress, Topic: Elections
AFA / Rightly Concerned: “Christine O’Donnell started a fund-raising push after winning the GOP nomination on Tuesday. Her goal: $50,000. When I checked Wednesday morning, she already had 210% of that goal, according to a nifty graphic on her website. So, like any smart campaign, O’Donnell and co. raised the ante to $200,000…then $350,000…$500,000…$750,000…and now she’s going for a cool million.” Guardian: Christine O’Donnell’s shock Tea Party win puts $1m in war chest
- Posted: 09/17/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- Tags: State: Delaware, Topic: Elections, Topic: Politics
LifeNews: “‘Christine O’Donnell’s win, combined with the successes of Carly Fiorina and Sharron Angle, continues building momentum for 2010 to be remembered as the “Year of the Pro-life Woman,”‘ SBA List president Marjorie Dannenfelser told LifeNews.com. ‘Christine O’Donnell’s come-from-behind victory is evidence that voters across America are hungry for conservative pro-life candidates.’ Meanwhile, in the New Hampshire Republican Senate primary, two pro-life candidates are separated by less than one percent in their bid to keep the seat of Republican Sen. Judd Gregg, who is pro-life.”
- Posted: 09/15/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.lifenews.com
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Susan B. Anthony List, State: Delaware, State: New Hampshire, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Elections, Topic: Politics
Greg Gutfeld writing at Big Hollywood: “On the CBS Early Show, Nancy Cordes portrayed O’Donnell as weird, because she quote, ‘crusaded for abstinence and against porn.’ Christine also wrote that ‘when a married person uses pornography, it compromises the spouse’s purity’ . . . is it really that fringy to say porn screws up relationships? Look, everyone over 30 knows that. You don’t need ANY religion to make that conclusion. And if you believe that porn is harmless, then clearly you’ve only dabbled in it.”
- Posted: 09/15/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: bighollywood.breitbart.com
- Tags: State: Delaware, Topic: Elections, Topic: Media, Topic: Politics, Topic: Pornography
George Stephanopoulos writing at ABC News: “The Republican nominee for the Delaware Senate seat fired back at Karl Rove today for what she called ‘un-factual’ accusations about her record. ‘Everything that he is saying is un-factual. And it’s a shame because he is the same so-called political guru that predicted I wasn’t going to win. And we won and we won big,’ Christine O’Donnell told me this morning. ‘So I think, again, he is eating some humble pie and he is just trying to restore his reputation.’”
- Posted: 09/15/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: blogs.abcnews.com
- Tags: State: Delaware, Topic: Congress, Topic: Elections, Topic: Politics
|
Latest Posts
-
hosted.ap.org
02/09/2012
News from The Associated Press: The Virginia state Senate passed legislation Thursday allowing private adoption agencies to deny placements that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs, including opposition to homosexuality.
-
www.lifenews.com
02/09/2012
LifeNews.com: The liberal women on The View, Wednesday, shrieked at the “totalitarian” decision by a Texas judge to uphold a law requiring women to look at an ultrasound before having an abortion.
-
balkin.blogspot.com
02/09/2012
Jason Mazzone at Balkinization: By finding Proposition 8 to violate the Equal Protection Clause solely on the ground that it withdrew the right of marriage that gays and lesbians previously possessed in California (as a result the earlier state supreme court’s decision), Perry v. Brown produces a curious result. It appears to leave Proposition 8 partially intact.

|