WorldNetDaily: “I’m not a ‘birther,’” Hawaii State Sen. Sam Slom told Jeff Katz of WXKS Radio in Boston, “and I followed this from the very beginning. At first I followed it with amusement, and then I got really concerned about it, because the question was if it was not just the birth certificate, but other records as well – school records, academic records, work records – why would anyone spend millions of dollars in legal fees, particularly someone in public office, particularly someone in the highest public office, to not make that information public?”
- Posted: 04/07/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.wnd.com
- Tags: State: Hawaii, Topic: White House
CNN: “He spent $2 million in legal fees trying on to get away from this issue, and if it weren’t an issue, why wouldn’t he just solve it?” he said. “I wish he would because if he doesn’t, it’s one of the greatest scams in the history of politics and in the history, period. You are not allowed to be a president if you’re not born in this country. Right now, I have real doubts.”
- Posted: 04/07/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com
- Tags: State: Hawaii, Topic: Politics, Topic: White House
Spokane Conservative Examiner: “[Brett Harvey] is an attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund, an organization of Christian lawyers defending free faith speech. ‘They (the ACLU) continue to threaten governments with lawsuits to try to force them into capitulating to their view of society,’ Harvey said, adding, ‘Governments should take a stand for this cherished historical practice.’”
- Posted: 01/24/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.examiner.com
- Tags: ADF: Brett Harvey, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), State: Hawaii, Topic: Politics, Topic: Prayer
MySanAntonio.com (AP): “The Hawaii Senate on Thursday silenced prayers previously offered before each of the chamber’s lawmaking sessions . . . ‘[The ACLU. et al.] continue to threaten governments with lawsuits to try to force them into capitulating to their view of society,’ said [Brett Harvey], an attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund, made up of Christian lawyers to defend free faith speech. ‘Governments should take a stand for this cherished historical practice.’”
- Posted: 01/21/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.mysanantonio.com
- Tags: ADF: Brett Harvey, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), State: Hawaii, Topic: Politics, Topic: Prayer
WSJ: “The ruling earlier this month by San Francisco federal judge Vaughn Walker declaring Proposition 8 unconstitutional might well be overturned by the Ninth Circuit . . . But for now, it seems it’s providing a bit of inspiration to gays and lesbians in Hawaii, who last month sued Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle after she vetoed legislation approved last year that would have allowed same-sex civil unions. According to this LAT story, backers of the suit hope Judge Walker’s Aug. 4 ruling will become the legal precedent that other courts in the country eventually will follow.”
- Posted: 08/30/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: blogs.wsj.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Lambda Legal, State: California, State: Hawaii, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legislation, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
|
Latest Posts
-
hosted.ap.org
02/09/2012
News from The Associated Press: The Virginia state Senate passed legislation Thursday allowing private adoption agencies to deny placements that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs, including opposition to homosexuality.
-
www.lifenews.com
02/09/2012
LifeNews.com: The liberal women on The View, Wednesday, shrieked at the “totalitarian” decision by a Texas judge to uphold a law requiring women to look at an ultrasound before having an abortion.
-
balkin.blogspot.com
02/09/2012
Jason Mazzone at Balkinization: By finding Proposition 8 to violate the Equal Protection Clause solely on the ground that it withdrew the right of marriage that gays and lesbians previously possessed in California (as a result the earlier state supreme court’s decision), Perry v. Brown produces a curious result. It appears to leave Proposition 8 partially intact.

|