FIRE – The Moral Liberal: Under the new policies, which were put into place after pressure from the Alliance Defense Fund, students may still reserve the table in the free speech zone, but may also speak elsewhere on campus spontaneously and without prior approval. The college also eliminated a speech code that banned “offensive” or “derogatory” speech.
- Posted: 02/01/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.themoralliberal.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Oregon, Topic: Colleges, Topic: Education, ZZADF: 32618
Sally Satel at WSJ.com (full access via Google): In October of 2009, Kumud Majumder, the father of an 11-year-old son with advanced leukemia, joined a lawsuit challenging the federal ban on compensating bone-marrow donors. He wanted to save his son’s life. Last week Mr. Majumder and his co-plaintiffs enjoyed a victory. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the majority of bone-marrow donors may lawfully be compensated.
- Posted: 12/06/2011
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Oregon, ZZ: Flynn v. Holder
Beaverton Valley Times: “A pair of resolutions introduced to the Oregon Legislature would alter the state constitution to allow local governments to more easily regulate where adult entertainment businesses can locate. Oregon’s Constitution includes a strong protection for freedom of expression — stronger than the federal First Amendment protections — language that has been repeatedly interpreted to protect the rights of adult businesses in zoning fights with cities and counties.”
- Posted: 03/03/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.beavertonvalleytimes.com
- Tags: State: Oregon, Topic: Pornography, Topic: SOB Regulation
Wall Street Journal: “News of the case spread through this state capital, sparking outrage. Yet one subset of the community sprang to the Kozlovs’ defense, holding demonstrations, filling the gallery at court hearings and flooding state officials with letters. Many of these supporters, Russian-born Christians like the Kozlovs themselves, believed the parents were disciplining their children according to Biblical law. In their view, the government was out to ‘destroy the family because of their faith,’ says Tatyana I. Bondarchuk, a counselor who helped brief authorities about the group.”
- Posted: 01/24/2011
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: online.wsj.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, State: Oregon, Topic: Culture, Topic: Parental Rights
Religion Clause: “In McGuire v. Clackamas County Counsel, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5521 (D OR, Jan. 19, 2011), an Oregon federal district court adopted a magistrate’s recommendations (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140026, Nov. 10, 2010), and dismissed a free exercise challenge to the zoning laws of Clackamas County, Oregon.”
- Posted: 01/24/2011
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, State: Oregon, Topic: Churches, Topic: RLUIPA, ZZ: McGuire v. Clackamas County Counsel
The ABA Journal: “A jury agreed and awarded Tubra $355,000 in damages after it found officials falsely accused him of stealing from the International Church of the Foursquare Gospel in Vernonia, Ore.The judge differed with the jurors, though, and threw out the award. Following overwhelming precedent, he ruled that the First Amendment deprived the court of jurisdiction over the church and Tubra’s defamation claim against it.” John Elwood comments at the Volokh Conspiracy on Cook v. Tubra.
- Posted: 11/02/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, State: Oregon, ZZ: Cooke v. Tubra
OregonLive: “Except this entrepreneur was a 7-year-old named Julie Murphy. Her business was a lemonade stand at the Last Thursday monthly art fair in Northeast Portland. The government regulation she violated? Failing to get a $120 temporary restaurant license. . . . Except this entrepreneur was a 7-year-old named Julie Murphy. Her business was a lemonade stand at the Last Thursday monthly art fair in Northeast Portland. The government regulation she violated? Failing to get a $120 temporary restaurant license.”
- Posted: 08/06/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- Tags: State: Oregon
Vatican Radio interviews Jeffrey Lena, the California-based attorney currently representing the Holy See in the Oregon case of Holy See vs John Doe: “What the Supreme Court did was decide that it wasn’t going to address a question which we had wished to bring before it. That was a question that on the substantive law I think we were right. The United States agreed with us, but the Supreme Court simply determined that at this time, it was not interested in hearing the case. The fact that it wasn’t interested in hearing the case, as I say, did not deny immunity and was no comment on the merits of our position.”
- Posted: 07/01/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.radiovaticana.org
- Tags: Category: Global, Global: Religious Freedom, State: Oregon, Topic: Vatican, ZZ: Holy See v. Doe
OneNewsNow: “Alliance Defense Fund has filed a lawsuit over a ban against a pro-life effort in Stayton, Oregon. … ‘He went to the police station and had a long conversation with some police officials there,’ [Jonathan Scruggs] accounts. ‘The police officials basically said, “We don’t allow any signs that are offensive, and your signs with the images of aborted fetuses are offensive. Therefore, we’re going to prevent them from being displayed, and we’re going to prevent your speech.”‘” | ADF News Release
- Posted: 06/30/2010
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Jonathan Scruggs, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Oregon, Topic: Abortion, ZZ: Pearson v. City of Stayton
Catholic News Service: “The U.S. Supreme Court has left standing a lower court ruling that will allow an Oregon man to try to hold the Vatican financially responsible for his sexual abuse by a priest, if he can persuade the court that the priest was an employee of the Vatican. By declining to take Holy See v. John Doe, the court June 28 left intact the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that said because of the way Oregon law defines employment, the Vatican is not protected under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act from potential liability for the actions of a priest who Doe, the unidentified plaintiff, said sexually abused him in the 1960s.” | Related: Charles J. Chaput: Suing the Church
- Posted: 06/28/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.catholicnews.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Category: Religious Freedom, Court: 9th Circuit, Court: U.S. Supreme, Global: Religious Freedom, State: Oregon, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Vatican
|
Latest Posts
-
hosted.ap.org
02/09/2012
News from The Associated Press: The Virginia state Senate passed legislation Thursday allowing private adoption agencies to deny placements that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs, including opposition to homosexuality.
-
www.lifenews.com
02/09/2012
LifeNews.com: The liberal women on The View, Wednesday, shrieked at the “totalitarian” decision by a Texas judge to uphold a law requiring women to look at an ultrasound before having an abortion.
-
balkin.blogspot.com
02/09/2012
Jason Mazzone at Balkinization: By finding Proposition 8 to violate the Equal Protection Clause solely on the ground that it withdrew the right of marriage that gays and lesbians previously possessed in California (as a result the earlier state supreme court’s decision), Perry v. Brown produces a curious result. It appears to leave Proposition 8 partially intact.

|