Beaverton Valley Times: “A pair of resolutions introduced to the Oregon Legislature would alter the state constitution to allow local governments to more easily regulate where adult entertainment businesses can locate. Oregon’s Constitution includes a strong protection for freedom of expression — stronger than the federal First Amendment protections — language that has been repeatedly interpreted to protect the rights of adult businesses in zoning fights with cities and counties.”
- Posted: 03/03/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.beavertonvalleytimes.com
- Tags: State: Oregon, Topic: Pornography, Topic: SOB Regulation
Wall Street Journal: “News of the case spread through this state capital, sparking outrage. Yet one subset of the community sprang to the Kozlovs’ defense, holding demonstrations, filling the gallery at court hearings and flooding state officials with letters. Many of these supporters, Russian-born Christians like the Kozlovs themselves, believed the parents were disciplining their children according to Biblical law. In their view, the government was out to ‘destroy the family because of their faith,’ says Tatyana I. Bondarchuk, a counselor who helped brief authorities about the group.”
- Posted: 01/24/2011
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: online.wsj.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, State: Oregon, Topic: Culture, Topic: Parental Rights
Religion Clause: “In McGuire v. Clackamas County Counsel, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5521 (D OR, Jan. 19, 2011), an Oregon federal district court adopted a magistrate’s recommendations (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140026, Nov. 10, 2010), and dismissed a free exercise challenge to the zoning laws of Clackamas County, Oregon.”
- Posted: 01/24/2011
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, State: Oregon, Topic: Churches, Topic: RLUIPA, ZZ: McGuire v. Clackamas County Counsel
The ABA Journal: “A jury agreed and awarded Tubra $355,000 in damages after it found officials falsely accused him of stealing from the International Church of the Foursquare Gospel in Vernonia, Ore.The judge differed with the jurors, though, and threw out the award. Following overwhelming precedent, he ruled that the First Amendment deprived the court of jurisdiction over the church and Tubra’s defamation claim against it.” John Elwood comments at the Volokh Conspiracy on Cook v. Tubra.
- Posted: 11/02/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, State: Oregon, ZZ: Cooke v. Tubra
OregonLive: “Except this entrepreneur was a 7-year-old named Julie Murphy. Her business was a lemonade stand at the Last Thursday monthly art fair in Northeast Portland. The government regulation she violated? Failing to get a $120 temporary restaurant license. . . . Except this entrepreneur was a 7-year-old named Julie Murphy. Her business was a lemonade stand at the Last Thursday monthly art fair in Northeast Portland. The government regulation she violated? Failing to get a $120 temporary restaurant license.”
- Posted: 08/06/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- Tags: State: Oregon
Vatican Radio interviews Jeffrey Lena, the California-based attorney currently representing the Holy See in the Oregon case of Holy See vs John Doe: “What the Supreme Court did was decide that it wasn’t going to address a question which we had wished to bring before it. That was a question that on the substantive law I think we were right. The United States agreed with us, but the Supreme Court simply determined that at this time, it was not interested in hearing the case. The fact that it wasn’t interested in hearing the case, as I say, did not deny immunity and was no comment on the merits of our position.”
- Posted: 07/01/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.radiovaticana.org
- Tags: Category: Global, Global: Religious Freedom, State: Oregon, Topic: Vatican, ZZ: Holy See v. Doe
OneNewsNow: “Alliance Defense Fund has filed a lawsuit over a ban against a pro-life effort in Stayton, Oregon. … ‘He went to the police station and had a long conversation with some police officials there,’ [Jonathan Scruggs] accounts. ‘The police officials basically said, “We don’t allow any signs that are offensive, and your signs with the images of aborted fetuses are offensive. Therefore, we’re going to prevent them from being displayed, and we’re going to prevent your speech.”‘” | ADF News Release
- Posted: 06/30/2010
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Jonathan Scruggs, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Oregon, Topic: Abortion, ZZ: Pearson v. City of Stayton
Catholic News Service: “The U.S. Supreme Court has left standing a lower court ruling that will allow an Oregon man to try to hold the Vatican financially responsible for his sexual abuse by a priest, if he can persuade the court that the priest was an employee of the Vatican. By declining to take Holy See v. John Doe, the court June 28 left intact the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that said because of the way Oregon law defines employment, the Vatican is not protected under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act from potential liability for the actions of a priest who Doe, the unidentified plaintiff, said sexually abused him in the 1960s.” | Related: Charles J. Chaput: Suing the Church
- Posted: 06/28/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.catholicnews.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Category: Religious Liberty, Court: 9th Circuit, Court: U.S. Supreme, Global: Religious Freedom, State: Oregon, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Vatican
ADF Attorney Heather Gebelin Hacker writing at Speak Up Movement / University: “Earlier this year, I posted about a new case we filed against Oregon State University officials because of their censorship of an independent student newspaper on campus. . . . The good news is that after being sued, the university finally relented, changed their policy, and allowed The Liberty to replace their distribution bins on campus, giving them access equal to the other student newspaper on campus. The bad news is that despite the fact that the paper’s distribution bins were banned from most areas of campus for nearly an entire year pursuant to OSU’s policy, the judge found that the students had suffered no constitutional harm and dismissed the case.”
- Posted: 06/18/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: blog.speakupmovement.org
- Tags: ADF: Heather Gebelin Hacker, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, State: Oregon, Topic: Education, ZZ: Oregon State University Students Alliance v Ray
Student Press Law Center: “Lawyers for The Liberty, an independent publication at Oregon State University, filed a motion for reconsideration after a judge ruled in favor of the university in a lawsuit filed by the paper . . . Though lawyers for the Liberty filed a motion for immediate relief, which would have required the university to allow the newspaper to again be distributed on campus, it was withdrawn after the university amended its fixed bin policy and allowed the paper to distribute again, said [Heather Gebelin Hacker], an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund representing the Liberty.”
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.splc.org
- Tags: ADF: Center for Academic Freedom, ADF: Heather Gebelin Hacker, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, State: Oregon, Topic: Education, ZZ: Oregon State University Students Alliance v Ray
What’s the Cost of Living in Oregon These Days? A Fresh Look at the Need for Judicial Protections in the Death With Dignity Act
Andrew R. Page, 22 Regent U. L. Rev. 233 (2010)
“With the rise of the largest senior citizen population in our nation’s history on the horizon, as well as the increased cost of health care for both state and private industries, a judicial review process to oversee the Death with Dignity Act is essential to protect senior citizens against its potential abuses. In order to show the purpose and process of adjudicating Death with Dignity Act procedures, this Note unfolds in four parts. Part I explains the circumstances, both present and future, creating the potential for improper use of the Death with Dignity Act. Part II explains why the Death with Dignity Act, as presently written, does not provide adequate safeguards to protect citizens in light of those circumstances. Part III proposes an adjudicative procedure that a state may enact in order to provide sufficient protection for its citizens. Finally, Part IV provides the method for adjudicating Death with Dignity Act cases by using the example of the judicial bypass procedure for minors seeking an abortion. With a process of judicial review as a check on the procedures of the Death with Dignity Act, a state can confidently ensure the protection of patients, as well as the integrity of health care providers.”
- Posted: 03/17/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Oregon, Topic: Euthanasia, Topic: Legal Periodicals
LifeSiteNews: “That trend, says the pro-life group, is evident in data collected in the past two months since Operation Rescue released a report that showed that over two-thirds of the nation’s abortion clinics have closed in the past 18 years . . . When Project Daniel 5:25 was released last December listing every abortion clinic in the United States, records showed 713 locations. Since then five abortion facilities have closed, although two more have opened, bringing the number down to 710 . . . ”
- Posted: 02/16/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.lifesitenews.com
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Docs: Studies, Group: Operation Rescue, Group: Planned Parenthood, State: Oregon, State: Texas, Topic: Abortion
Death With Dignity’s Emerging Conceit: Could Vacco v. Quill Be Losing Its Appeal?
Arthur G. Svenson, 31 U. La Verne L. Rev. 45 (2009)
“The holding of one Montana judge, who discovered a fundamental right to PAD within enumerated state rights to privacy and dignity, is unlikely to have a parroting effect upon non-Montanan state judges reviewing the constitutional implications of death with dignity issues. After all, Montana’s is only one of five state constitutions that contain substantive enumerations of privacy rights, and for three of those that do, California, Florida, and Alaska, judges have already considered and denied pleadings that state privacy rights shield actions of patients and willing physicians from criminal prosecution for actions amounting to assisted suicide. For the Justices of the Supreme Court, the absence of a ‘careful description of [an] asserted fundamental liberty interest’ in the Bill of Rights that even remotely resembled PAD proved pivotal in convincing them to decline Glucksberg’s invitation to create such a right on their own. Given that reasoning, then, one could quite plausibly imagine that most judges in most states confronting similar state challenges on cognate state constitutional grounds would unhesitatingly follow the High Court’s lead and choose to defer to the prevailing forces at play in the political arena.”
- Posted: 01/20/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Montana, State: Oregon, State: Washington, Topic: Bioethics, Topic: Euthanasia, Topic: Legal Periodicals
KATU: “Teachers wearing turbans, head scarves or any kind of religious dress are currently banned from teaching in Oregon public schools . . . Sava Ahmed, who is Muslim, was one of several people to testify before state lawmakers urging them to repeal the law. Ahmed compared the ban against religious dress to employers requesting teachers to change the color of their skin.”
- Posted: 01/18/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.katu.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, State: Oregon, Topic: Islam
The Oregonian: “A Coquille Indian Tribe law allowing same-sex marriage took effect this week, and two women plan to marry Sunday on the tribe’s Coos Bay reservation. Tribal member Kitzen Branting, 26, and her partner, Jeni Branting, 28, who now live in Edmonds, Wash., will become the first same-sex couple to legally marry in Oregon, though their marriage will be recognized only by the tribe.”
- Posted: 12/31/2009
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.oregonlive.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, State: Oregon, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
|

Latest Posts
-
www.bpnews.net
05/17/2013
Baptist Press: A florist who was told by the state of Washington she must provide her services for a gay wedding is countersuing the state, saying she has served gay customers her entire career and is concerned the state’s position on gay weddings will harm religious freedom.
-
www.nationalreview.com
05/17/2013
National Review: IRS scandal notwithstanding, on Tuesday, the (Republican-dominated) Texas legislature passed S.B. 346, a bill to force non-profit organizations and trade associations to disclose the names of the people who support them financially. The law exempts unions, but covers groups that spend more than $25,000 or more in independent expenditures about political candidates. This applies even if those expenditures are a tiny fraction of the group’s overall spending . . .
-
www.nytimes.com
05/17/2013
NY Times: At the first Congressional hearing into the I.R.S. scandal, J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration, told members of the House Ways and Means Committee that he informed the Treasury’s general counsel of his audit on June 4, and Deputy Treasury Secretary Neal Wolin “shortly thereafter.”

|