<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; State: South Dakota</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/state-south-dakota/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal charges against pro-life advocates dropped in South Dakota</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/criminal-charges-against-pro-life-advocates-dropped-in-south-dakota/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/criminal-charges-against-pro-life-advocates-dropped-in-south-dakota/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=133865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/criminal-charges-against-pro-life-advocates-dropped-in-south-dakota">LifeSiteNews</a>: Last week, a citation for unlawful assembly against the pro-life advocacy group Missionaries to the Preborn was dismissed after legal advocates say a city ordinance was improperly invoked. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/criminal-charges-against-pro-life-advocates-dropped-in-south-dakota/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/criminal-charges-against-pro-life-advocates-dropped-in-south-dakota/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConchie and Harned: Obamacare abortion mandate withers</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/12/mcconchie-and-harned-obamacare-abortion-mandate-withers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/12/mcconchie-and-harned-obamacare-abortion-mandate-withers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Americans United for Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=130968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel McConchie and Mary Harned at the <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/apr/11/obamacare-abortion-mandate-withers/">Washington Times</a>: The administration’s health care law permits a state to opt out of allowing health insurance plans that cover abortions to participate in the new health insurance exchanges within that state and thereby prohibit taxpayer money from subsidizing plans that cover abortions. South Dakota recently became the 15th state to enact such a law.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/12/mcconchie-and-harned-obamacare-abortion-mandate-withers/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/12/mcconchie-and-harned-obamacare-abortion-mandate-withers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SD Senate panel OKs abortion-law modifications</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/23/sd-senate-panel-oks-abortion-law-modifications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/23/sd-senate-panel-oks-abortion-law-modifications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=126694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.necn.com/02/22/12/SD-Senate-panel-OKs-abortion-law-modific/landing_health.html?&#038;apID=27b98f0b8862448783da597f50342955">NECN</a>: South Dakota's year-old abortion law remains tied up in a court challenge, but a state Senate committee endorsed a bill Wednesday that would change some of its counseling requirements for women seeking an abortion. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/23/sd-senate-panel-oks-abortion-law-modifications/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/23/sd-senate-panel-oks-abortion-law-modifications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planned Parenthood: Don’t Tell Women of Abortion-Suicide Link</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/23/planned-parenthood-don%e2%80%99t-tell-women-of-abortion-suicide-link/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/23/planned-parenthood-don%e2%80%99t-tell-women-of-abortion-suicide-link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Americans United for Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=126674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Krystle Weeks at <a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2012/02/23/planned-parenthood-dont-tell-women-of-abortion-suicide-link/">Life News</a>: Clarke Forsythe and Mailee Smith of Americans United for Life recently penned an op-ed in The Washington Times regarding a hearing that will be taking place in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit on Planned Parenthood v. Rounds, a case disputing a South Dakota statute, which was enacted in 2005, that mandates all women receive information of the medical risks of an abortion.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/23/planned-parenthood-don%e2%80%99t-tell-women-of-abortion-suicide-link/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/23/planned-parenthood-don%e2%80%99t-tell-women-of-abortion-suicide-link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Dakota Supreme Court Refuses To Order Church Dissolution Because of Religious Issues Involved</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/30/south-dakota-supreme-court-refuses-to-order-church-dissolution-because-of-religious-issues-involved/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/30/south-dakota-supreme-court-refuses-to-order-church-dissolution-because-of-religious-issues-involved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Wipf v. Hutterville Hutterian Bretheren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=124436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2012/01/south-dakota-supreme-court-refuses-to.html">Religion Clause</a>: <a href="http://www.sdjudicial.com/Uploads/opinions/25877.pdf">Wipf v. Hutterville Hutterian Bretheren, Inc.</a>, (SD Sup. Ct., Jan. 25, 2012) is the South Dakota Supreme Court's second installment in a factional dispute in a South Dakota Hutterite colony, and one of the first cases to cite the U.S. Supreme Court's recent <a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2012/01/supreme-court-upholds-ministerial.html">Hosanna-Tabor decision</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/30/south-dakota-supreme-court-refuses-to-order-church-dissolution-because-of-religious-issues-involved/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/30/south-dakota-supreme-court-refuses-to-order-church-dissolution-because-of-religious-issues-involved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SD: Study of Bible in state&#8217;s schools</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/30/sd-study-of-bible-in-states-schools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/30/sd-study-of-bible-in-states-schools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=124416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Education/Default.aspx?id=1523602">OneNewsNow.com</a>: The South Dakota House has voted to recommend that school districts provide academic instruction on the Bible, brushing off concerns by some critics that the nonbinding resolution seeks to promote religious beliefs. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/30/sd-study-of-bible-in-states-schools/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/30/sd-study-of-bible-in-states-schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alan E. Sears: In South Dakota, Strengthened Legal Efforts to Protect Preborn Children</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/17/alan-e-sears-in-south-dakota-strengthened-legal-efforts-to-protect-preborn-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/17/alan-e-sears-in-south-dakota-strengthened-legal-efforts-to-protect-preborn-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Alan E. Sears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v. Daugaard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 33890]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=123269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ADF President and General Counsel Alan E. Sears at the <a href="http://blog.telladf.org/2012/01/17/in-south-dakota-strengthened-legal-efforts-to-protect-preborn-children/">TellADF Blog</a>: A federal court has granted the motion of an Alliance Defense Fund allied attorney permitting two South Dakota pregnancy centers to intervene in defense of a new state law – already under attack from Planned Parenthood – that would ensure crucial protections for mothers and their preborn children. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/17/alan-e-sears-in-south-dakota-strengthened-legal-efforts-to-protect-preborn-children/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/17/alan-e-sears-in-south-dakota-strengthened-legal-efforts-to-protect-preborn-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crisis pregnancy centers enter suit over state anti-abortion law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/17/crisis-pregnancy-centers-enter-suit-over-state-anti-abortion-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/17/crisis-pregnancy-centers-enter-suit-over-state-anti-abortion-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v. Daugaard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 33890]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=123245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://rapidcityjournal.com/news/crisis-pregnancy-centers-enter-suit-over-state-anti-abortion-law/article_9041b29e-40d7-11e1-8729-0019bb2963f4.html">Rapid City Journal</a>: The lawyer for two South Dakota crisis pregnancy centers said their role in the upcoming legal battle over the state's latest attempt to restrict abortions will be essential to defending an abortion counseling law. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/17/crisis-pregnancy-centers-enter-suit-over-state-anti-abortion-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/17/crisis-pregnancy-centers-enter-suit-over-state-anti-abortion-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Dakota Law Stopping Forced Abortions Gets Legal Help</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/11/south-dakota-law-stopping-forced-abortions-gets-legal-help/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/11/south-dakota-law-stopping-forced-abortions-gets-legal-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v. Daugaard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 33890]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=122680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2012/01/11/south-dakota-law-stopping-forced-abortions-gets-legal-help/">LifeNews.com</a>: Two pregnancy help centers will help defend South Dakota’s law that protects women from being coerced into an abortion. A federal court granted a motion, filed by Alliance Defense Fund allied attorney Harold Cassidy, that allows the two centers to intervene in defense of the law, which is under attack in Planned Parenthood v. Daugaard. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/11/south-dakota-law-stopping-forced-abortions-gets-legal-help/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/11/south-dakota-law-stopping-forced-abortions-gets-legal-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADF: Court says pregnancy help centers can defend SD abortion waiting period law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/09/adf-court-says-pregnancy-help-centers-can-defend-sd-abortion-waiting-period-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/09/adf-court-says-pregnancy-help-centers-can-defend-sd-abortion-waiting-period-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v. Daugaard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 33890]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=122342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two pregnancy help centers will help defend South Dakota’s law that protects women from being coerced into an abortion. A federal court granted a motion, filed by Alliance Defense Fund allied attorney Harold Cassidy . . .  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/09/adf-court-says-pregnancy-help-centers-can-defend-sd-abortion-waiting-period-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/09/adf-court-says-pregnancy-help-centers-can-defend-sd-abortion-waiting-period-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Allows Pregnancy Centers To Intervene In Establishment Clause Challenge To Informed Consent Abortion Law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/03/court-allows-pregnancy-centers-to-intervene-in-establishment-clause-challenge-to-informed-consent-abortion-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/03/court-allows-pregnancy-centers-to-intervene-in-establishment-clause-challenge-to-informed-consent-abortion-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Daugaard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=121859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2011/12/court-allows-pregnancy-centers-to.html">Religion Clause</a>: In <em>Planned Parenthood Minnesota v. Daugaard</em>, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148345 (D SD, Dec. 27, 2011), a South Dakota federal district court permitted two South Dakota crisis pregnancy centers to intervene as defendants in a lawsuit challenging on Establishment Clause and free speech grounds the 2011 changes to South Dakota's informed consent abortion law. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/03/court-allows-pregnancy-centers-to-intervene-in-establishment-clause-challenge-to-informed-consent-abortion-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/03/court-allows-pregnancy-centers-to-intervene-in-establishment-clause-challenge-to-informed-consent-abortion-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 South Dakota casinos sue state Department of Revenue over tax on promotional dollars</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/09/4-south-dakota-casinos-sue-state-department-of-revenue-over-tax-on-promotional-dollars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/09/4-south-dakota-casinos-sue-state-department-of-revenue-over-tax-on-promotional-dollars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/7f1de135c9c44ca5ac1817d30809e073/SD--SD-Casinos-Lawsuit/">The Republic</a>: The promotional dollars are slot machine credits that casinos give away to entice people to play. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/09/4-south-dakota-casinos-sue-state-department-of-revenue-over-tax-on-promotional-dollars/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/09/4-south-dakota-casinos-sue-state-department-of-revenue-over-tax-on-promotional-dollars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So. Dakota&#8217;s &#8216;informed consent&#8217; still under scrutiny</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/09/so-dakotas-informed-consent-still-under-scrutiny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/09/so-dakotas-informed-consent-still-under-scrutiny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 17520]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1493634">One News Now</a>: "A woman's right to make a fully informed choice is more important than Planned Parenthood's bottom line," the attorney argues. "If Planned Parenthood truly cared about the well-being of women, it wouldn't try to prevent them from being informed of the well-documented risks of depression and suicide that accompany abortion." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/09/so-dakotas-informed-consent-still-under-scrutiny/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/09/so-dakotas-informed-consent-still-under-scrutiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Telling Women of Abortion-Suicide Link Back in Court &#124; LifeNews</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/law-telling-women-of-abortion-suicide-link-back-in-court-lifenews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/law-telling-women-of-abortion-suicide-link-back-in-court-lifenews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 17520]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2011/12/08/law-telling-women-of-abortion-suicide-link-back-in-court/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+lifenews%2Fnewsfeed+%28LifeNews.com%29">LifeNews.com</a>: “A woman’s right to make a fully informed choice is more important than Planned Parenthood’s bottom line,” said ADF attorney Steve Aden. “If Planned Parenthood truly cared about the well-being of women, it would not try to prevent them from being informed of the well-documented risk of suicide that accompanies abortion.” “A child’s life is worth more than Planned Parenthood’s bottom line,” Aden said." [more] <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/law-telling-women-of-abortion-suicide-link-back-in-court-lifenews/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/law-telling-women-of-abortion-suicide-link-back-in-court-lifenews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court to decide abortion-suicide links: Planned Parenthood&#8217;s only win in South Dakota fight returns to 8th Circuit &#124; WorldNetDaily</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/court-to-decide-abortion-suicide-links-planned-parenthoods-only-win-in-south-dakota-fight-returns-to-8th-circuit-worldnetdaily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/court-to-decide-abortion-suicide-links-planned-parenthoods-only-win-in-south-dakota-fight-returns-to-8th-circuit-worldnetdaily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 17520]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=375317">WorldNetDaily</a>: "A woman's right to make a fully informed choice is more important than Planned Parenthood's bottom line," said Steven H. Aden, a senior counsel for the ADF. "If Planned Parenthood truly cared about the well-being of women, it would not try to prevent them from being informed of the well-documented risk of suicide that accompanies abortion." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/court-to-decide-abortion-suicide-links-planned-parenthoods-only-win-in-south-dakota-fight-returns-to-8th-circuit-worldnetdaily/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/08/court-to-decide-abortion-suicide-links-planned-parenthoods-only-win-in-south-dakota-fight-returns-to-8th-circuit-worldnetdaily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADF: Planned Parenthood losing grip on S.D. abortion law as 8th Circuit grants another review</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/07/adf-planned-parenthood-losing-grip-on-s-d-abortion-law-as-8th-circuit-grants-another-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/07/adf-planned-parenthood-losing-grip-on-s-d-abortion-law-as-8th-circuit-grants-another-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 17520]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit Monday agreed to review the only remaining provision of South Dakota’s informed consent law that the court has not already upheld in a failing lawsuit filed by Planned Parenthood. The provision requires women to be informed of abortion’s documented risk of suicide. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/07/adf-planned-parenthood-losing-grip-on-s-d-abortion-law-as-8th-circuit-grants-another-review/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/07/adf-planned-parenthood-losing-grip-on-s-d-abortion-law-as-8th-circuit-grants-another-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>En Banc 8th Circuit to hear arguments over SD abortion law in January</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/en-banc-8th-circuit-to-hear-arguments-over-sd-abortion-law-in-january/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/en-banc-8th-circuit-to-hear-arguments-over-sd-abortion-law-in-january/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF:17520]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.argusleader.com/article/20111206/NEWS/312060031/Abortion-issue-appeal-gets-January-hearing">The Argus Leader &#124; argusleader.com</a>: A federal court said Monday it will hear arguments next month concerning a 2005 South Dakota law that requires a doctor to tell a woman seeking an abortion that she would face a higher risk of suicide by going through with the procedure. The hearing will be Jan. 9  . . . <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/en-banc-8th-circuit-to-hear-arguments-over-sd-abortion-law-in-january/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/en-banc-8th-circuit-to-hear-arguments-over-sd-abortion-law-in-january/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Dakota High Court says statute of limitations bars alleged 40 year old clergy abuse</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/02/south-dakota-high-court-says-statute-of-limitations-bars-alleged-40-year-old-clergy-abuse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/02/south-dakota-high-court-says-statute-of-limitations-bars-alleged-40-year-old-clergy-abuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=119843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2011/12/south-dakota-high-court-says-clergy.html">Religion Clause</a>: In <em><a href="http://www.sdjudicial.com/Uploads/opinions/25729.pdf">Iron Wing v. Catholic Diocese of Sioux Falls</a></em>, (SD Sup. Ct., Nov. 30, 2011), the South Dakota Supreme Court held that a lawsuit filed in 2008 by a victim of clergy sexual abuse committed over 40 years earlier is barred by the statute of limitations. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/02/south-dakota-high-court-says-statute-of-limitations-bars-alleged-40-year-old-clergy-abuse/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/02/south-dakota-high-court-says-statute-of-limitations-bars-alleged-40-year-old-clergy-abuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What a woman must know before aborting</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/08/what-a-woman-must-know-before-aborting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/08/what-a-woman-must-know-before-aborting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF:17520]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1427328">OneNewsNow.com</a>: "Planned Parenthood and other proponents of death work diligently to restrict the information mothers have about abortion and the life within them," explains Steven H. Aden, attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF). "It was incredible for the lower court to have determined that the law cannot acknowledge that a pregnant woman has an existing relationship with that unborn human being because some human beings are somehow not persons." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/08/what-a-woman-must-know-before-aborting/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/08/what-a-woman-must-know-before-aborting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals court upholds critical portions of South Dakota informed consent law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/07/appeals-court-upholds-critical-portions-of-south-dakota-informed-consent-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/07/appeals-court-upholds-critical-portions-of-south-dakota-informed-consent-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF:17520]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/appeals-court-upholds-critical-portions-of-south-dakota-informed-consent-la/">LifeSiteNews.com</a>: Harold Cassidy, an attorney affiliated with the Alliance Defense Fund, filed the appeal to the 8th Circuit on behalf of a group of pregnancy centers that successfully intervened in the suit to protect the interest of women . . . ADF Senior Counsel Steven H. Aden said the court was right to uphold informing women of “an undisputed biological fact.” “A child’s life is worth more than Planned Parenthood’s bottom line,” said Aden. “Planned Parenthood and other proponents of death work diligently to restrict the information mothers have about abortion and the life within them.” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/07/appeals-court-upholds-critical-portions-of-south-dakota-informed-consent-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/07/appeals-court-upholds-critical-portions-of-south-dakota-informed-consent-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court: State can tell pregnant women of &#8216;existing relationship&#8217; with baby</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-state-can-tell-pregnant-women-of-existing-relationship-with-baby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-state-can-tell-pregnant-women-of-existing-relationship-with-baby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Care Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=36059&#038;ref=BPNews-RSSFeed0906">Baptist Press</a>: "Planned Parenthood and other proponents of death work diligently to restrict the information mothers have about abortion and the life within them," said Steven Aden, senior counsel of the Alliance Defense Fund, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief backing the state law. "It was incredible for the lower court to have determined that the law cannot acknowledge that a 'pregnant woman has an existing relationship with that unborn human being' because some human beings are somehow not 'persons.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-state-can-tell-pregnant-women-of-existing-relationship-with-baby/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-state-can-tell-pregnant-women-of-existing-relationship-with-baby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Rules in Favor of S.D. Pro-Life Law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-rules-in-favor-of-s-d-pro-life-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-rules-in-favor-of-s-d-pro-life-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/family/8864-court-rules-in-favor-of-south-dakota-pro-life-law">The New American</a>: Steven H. Aden of the Alliance Defense Fund, which had filed a brief in the case on behalf of a number of pro-life groups, noted that a “child’s life is worth more than Planned Parenthood’s bottom line. Planned Parenthood and other proponents of death work diligently to restrict the information mothers have about abortion and the life within them.” He added that it was “incredible for the lower court to have determined that the law cannot acknowledge that a ‘pregnant woman has an existing relationship with that unborn human being’ because some human beings are somehow not ‘persons.’ The 8th Circuit rightly determined that it’s perfectly constitutional to inform women of an undisputed biological fact.” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-rules-in-favor-of-s-d-pro-life-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-rules-in-favor-of-s-d-pro-life-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SD: Abortionists ordered to follow disputed &#8216;informed consent&#8217; law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/sd-abortionists-ordered-to-follow-disputed-informed-consent-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/sd-abortionists-ordered-to-follow-disputed-informed-consent-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Care Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=340785">WorldNetDaily</a>: "A child's life is worth more than Planned Parenthood's bottom line," said Steve H. Aden, senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Family Research Council, CareNet, Heartbeat International and the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates. The key attorney on the case was Harold Cassidy, one of more than 2,000 lawyers in the ADF organization. "Planned Parenthood and other proponents of death work diligently to restrict the information mothers have about abortion and the life within them. It was incredible for the lower court to have determined that the law cannot acknowledge that a 'pregnant woman has an existing relationship with that unborn human being' because some human beings are somehow not 'persons.' The 8th Circuit rightly determined that it's perfectly constitutional to inform women of an undisputed biological fact," Aden said.



Read more: Abortionists ordered to follow disputed 'informed consent' law http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=340785#ixzz1XBbIehIW <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/sd-abortionists-ordered-to-follow-disputed-informed-consent-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/sd-abortionists-ordered-to-follow-disputed-informed-consent-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court: South Dakota Law Telling Women Abortion Risks OK</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-south-dakota-law-telling-women-abortion-risks-ok/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-south-dakota-law-telling-women-abortion-risks-ok/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2011/09/02/court-south-dakota-law-telling-women-abortion-risks-ok/">LifeNews.com</a>: “A child’s life is worth more than Planned Parenthood’s bottom line,” said ADF Senior Counsel Steven H. Aden. “Planned Parenthood and other proponents of death work diligently to restrict the information mothers have about abortion and the life within them. It was incredible for the lower court to have determined that the law cannot acknowledge that a ‘pregnant woman has an existing relationship with that unborn human being’ because some human beings are somehow not ‘persons.’ The 8th Circuit rightly determined that it’s perfectly constitutional to inform women of an undisputed biological fact.” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-south-dakota-law-telling-women-abortion-risks-ok/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/court-south-dakota-law-telling-women-abortion-risks-ok/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADF: 8th Circuit upholds critical portions of South Dakota informed consent law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/02/adf-8th-circuit-upholds-critical-portions-of-south-dakota-informed-consent-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/02/adf-8th-circuit-upholds-critical-portions-of-south-dakota-informed-consent-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood v Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF:17520]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Court reverses district judge, says women can be informed they have ‘an existing relationship’ with an ‘unborn human being’ <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/02/adf-8th-circuit-upholds-critical-portions-of-south-dakota-informed-consent-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/02/adf-8th-circuit-upholds-critical-portions-of-south-dakota-informed-consent-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit rules on South Dakota abortion informed consent laws</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/02/8th-circuit-rules-on-south-dakota-informed-abortion-consent-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/02/8th-circuit-rules-on-south-dakota-informed-abortion-consent-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Rounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For these reasons we reverse the judgment of the district court striking down the relationship advisories; affirm its ruling upholding the human being advisory approved in Rounds; and affirm its rulings upholding the general risk advisory and striking down the suicide advisory. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/02/8th-circuit-rules-on-south-dakota-informed-abortion-consent-laws/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/02/8th-circuit-rules-on-south-dakota-informed-abortion-consent-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Dakota Will Fight for 72-Hour Abortion Wait Law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/south-dakota-will-fight-for-72-hour-abortion-wait-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/south-dakota-will-fight-for-72-hour-abortion-wait-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Daugaard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2011/07/26/south-dakota-will-fight-for-72-hour-abortion-wait-law/">LifeNews.com</a>: South Dakota officials have decided not to fight the injunction a judge put in place against a new pro-life law the legislature approved. Instead, they will fight a Planned Parenthood lawsuit on the law itself. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/south-dakota-will-fight-for-72-hour-abortion-wait-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/south-dakota-will-fight-for-72-hour-abortion-wait-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SD to decide next move in abortion litigation</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/sd-to-decide-next-move-in-abortion-litigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/sd-to-decide-next-move-in-abortion-litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SOUTH_DAKOTA_ABORTION?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2011-07-01-04-33-30">AP</a>: South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley said the state must decide whether to appeal the preliminary injunction, continue to argue the merits of the case, discuss a potential settlement or do nothing. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/sd-to-decide-next-move-in-abortion-litigation/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/sd-to-decide-next-move-in-abortion-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Dakota Judge Halts 72-Hour Abortion Waiting Period Law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/south-dakota-judge-halts-72-hour-abortion-waiting-period-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/south-dakota-judge-halts-72-hour-abortion-waiting-period-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 06:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Daugaard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A judge in South Dakota issued a temporary injunction to halt enforcement of a new pro-life law in South Dakota that was scheduled to take effect tomorrow had it not been for a Planned Parenthood lawsuit. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/south-dakota-judge-halts-72-hour-abortion-waiting-period-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/01/south-dakota-judge-halts-72-hour-abortion-waiting-period-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP: &#8220;In SD, abortion counseling meant to discourage&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/ap-in-sd-abortion-counseling-meant-to-discourage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/ap-in-sd-abortion-counseling-meant-to-discourage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Daugaard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chet Brokaw at <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SOUTH_DAKOTA_ABORTION?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2011-06-26-15-20-51">AP</a>: The small sign outside the Alpha Center in Sioux Falls quietly announces a roster of available services: "Free pregnancy tests, abortion information, STD testing." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/ap-in-sd-abortion-counseling-meant-to-discourage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/27/ap-in-sd-abortion-counseling-meant-to-discourage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More South Dakota couples choosing to live together outside of marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/13/more-south-dakota-couples-choosing-to-live-together-outside-of-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/13/more-south-dakota-couples-choosing-to-live-together-outside-of-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=106158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/news/article_af16ef76-9570-11e0-9cf1-001cc4c03286.html">Rapid City Journal</a>: The Rapid Valley couple joins a growing number of South Dakotans staying away from a marriage license. Over a 30-year period, the number of marriages in South Dakota dropped by 33 percent from 8,800 marriages in 1980 to 5,887 marriages in 2009. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/13/more-south-dakota-couples-choosing-to-live-together-outside-of-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/13/more-south-dakota-couples-choosing-to-live-together-outside-of-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planned Parenthood and ACLU sue to stop new SD abortion counseling law and waiting period</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/27/planned-parenthood-and-aclu-sue-to-stop-new-sd-abortion-counseling-law-and-waiting-period/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/27/planned-parenthood-and-aclu-sue-to-stop-new-sd-abortion-counseling-law-and-waiting-period/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Daugaard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=104922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.aclu.org/reproductive-freedom/planned-parenthood-and-aclu-file-lawsuit-south-dakota-protect-women-s-health-an"></a>: The lawsuit charges that HB 1217, which passed the South Dakota legislature in March and is scheduled to go into effect on July 1, is unconstitutional because it requires a woman who is seeking an abortion to first prove that she has received so-called “counseling” from an unlicensed, unaccredited and unregulated crisis pregnancy center. Further, it imposes a 72-hour mandatory delay for an abortion after a woman’s initial consultation with her doctor and requires her doctor to obtain written proof from her that she sought counseling at a crisis pregnancy center. &#124; Complaint <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/27/planned-parenthood-and-aclu-sue-to-stop-new-sd-abortion-counseling-law-and-waiting-period/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/27/planned-parenthood-and-aclu-sue-to-stop-new-sd-abortion-counseling-law-and-waiting-period/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Dakota&#8217;s new 72-hour-wait-before-an-abortion law now waiting for pregnancy center support</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/05/south-dakotas-new-72-hour-wait-before-an-abortion-law-now-waiting-for-pregnancy-center-support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/05/south-dakotas-new-72-hour-wait-before-an-abortion-law-now-waiting-for-pregnancy-center-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 18:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=102890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700132831/South-Dakotas-new-72-hour-wait-before-an-abortion-law-now-waiting-for-pregnancy-center-support.html">Deseret News</a>: Although the country's longest wait bill was signed nearly two months ago, none of the state's pregnancy centers have stepped forward to register with the state as required by the law. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/05/south-dakotas-new-72-hour-wait-before-an-abortion-law-now-waiting-for-pregnancy-center-support/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/05/south-dakotas-new-72-hour-wait-before-an-abortion-law-now-waiting-for-pregnancy-center-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NLRB will sue Ariz., SD over union laws</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/26/nlrb-will-sue-ariz-sd-over-union-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/26/nlrb-will-sue-ariz-sd-over-union-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=101936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_UNIONS_SECRET_BALLOTS?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2011-04-25-22-17-36">AP</a>: "The National Labor Relations Board says it will move ahead with lawsuits seeking to invalidate state constitutional amendments in Arizona and South Dakota that require workers to hold secret ballot elections before a company can be unionized." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/26/nlrb-will-sue-ariz-sd-over-union-laws/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/26/nlrb-will-sue-ariz-sd-over-union-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP: &#8220;Wave of anti-abortion bills advance in the states&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/23/ap-wave-of-anti-abortion-bills-advance-in-the-states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/23/ap-wave-of-anti-abortion-bills-advance-in-the-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Right to Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=98971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["What's different this year is not the raw number of anti-abortion bills, but the fact that many of the toughest, most substantive measures have a good chance of passage due to gains by conservative Republicans in last year's legislative and gubernatorial elections."  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/23/ap-wave-of-anti-abortion-bills-advance-in-the-states/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/23/ap-wave-of-anti-abortion-bills-advance-in-the-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

