Houston Chronicle: Settling a controversial prayer lawsuit, the Medina Valley Independent School District has agreed that its teachers, administrators and other employees will not pray with students, elicit prayer, proselytize, or display religious artifacts.
- Posted: 02/09/2012
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.chron.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Group: Americans United for Separation of Church and State, State: Texas, Topic: Education, Topic: Prayer, ZZ: Schultz v. Medina Valley Independent School District
Religion Clause: Yet another decision has been handed down in the 7-year litigation over Plano, Texas Independent School District rules that, among other things, prevented a student from handing out candy canes with attached religious messages. In Morgan v. Plano Independent School District, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12875 (ED TX, Feb. 1, 2012), a Texas federal magistrate judge summarized the prior history of the case . . .
- Posted: 02/07/2012
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Education, ZZ: Morgan v. Plano Independent Unified School District
LifeNews.com: Attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund are also part of the lawsuit. “Pregnancy centers, which offer real help and hope to women, shouldn’t be punished by political allies of the abortion industry,” said ADF Legal Counsel Matt Bowman. “Attacks such as this ordinance are an ideologically motivated attempt to distract from the growing national scandals in the abortion industry. For years, abortionists have preyed on women and girls to generate profits. Now, pro-abortion politicians are trying to give women fewer choices.”
- Posted: 01/30/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.lifenews.com
- Tags: ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Jubilee Law of Life Campaign, State: Texas, Topic: Abortion
OneNewsNow.com: Alliance Defense Fund attorney Joel Oster was back in court this week to take on the cited law. “The appeals court in Texas heard our case about whether or not a church can speak out on local political matters. The case went really well,” he accounts. “The argument was well presented, and the court, I believe, understands that even a church has free-speech rights and has a right to petition their government for the redress of grievances.”
- Posted: 01/27/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Church Project, ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, ZZADF: 34933
Christian Newswire: On behalf of their client, Austin LifeCare, a pregnancy resource center that has been well serving pregnant women in Texas since 1984, civil rights attorneys for the Jubilee Campaign’s Law of Life Project, the Texas Center for the Defense of Life and the Alliance Defense Fund will urge the City Council of Austin at their meeting tomorrow to repeal Austin City Code 10-9, currently being challenged in Court, as recommended by their Law Department and not to enact Austin City Code 10-10 being proposed by two City councilmen that also unconstitutionally abridges Austin Life Care’s rights to freedom of speech, association and religious free exercise.
- Posted: 01/25/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.christiannewswire.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Jubilee Campaign, Group: Jubilee Law of Life Project, State: Texas, Tags: Alliance Defense Fund, Topic: Abortion, ZZ: Austin LifeCare v. City of Austin, ZZADF: 30693
Edge Boston: “She sat down and looked at me, and her first question was, ’Are you a lesbian?’” Garatie said in a personal statement written that was published by the Dallas Voice. “Her second question to me was, ’Have you asked God into your heart? Have you been saved by Jesus Christ?’”
Dallas Observer: “Nurse at Center of Furor Over Homophobic Remarks Made to Marine Has Left Dallas VA”
Lincy Pandithurai, who allegedly told her, among other things, “The reason you are so upset is because you feel the darkness surrounding you, and you feel guilty about being a homosexual and living in sin. I’m going to prescribe you some anti-depressants, maybe they’ll help, but I’m not saying that you aren’t going to continue to want to kill yourself.”
- Posted: 01/20/2012
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Military
ADF Attorney Steven Aden at Townhall Conservative: The basic components of a choice are easiest understood as a selection of one option out of the two or more options that are presented at any given time. Often choices are simple: vanilla or rocky road, for example. But sometimes they are difficult, especially if the choice in view carries life-altering—and perhaps even life-ending—consequences. One thing, however, is for sure—when only one avenue or one side is presented there is no real choice to be made.
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Steven H. Aden, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Texas, Topic: Abortion, ZZ: Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey
KIVA.com ABC 7: Brown’s lawyers said there’s a more practical explanation. “It was late in the day (when we got the subpoena), and it said that we had to produce all of these documents the very next morning. This is like an 18-paragraph request for documents. There was not enough time to file all of these documents, so we filed a motion for a protective order. Under Texas law, when you file a protective order, you don’t have to produce the documents unless the court says you have to produce the documents. Once the court said to produce the documents, we produced the documents. Where’s the controversy?” said Brown’s Alliance Defense Fund lawyer, Joel Oster.
- Posted: 12/15/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.kvia.com
- Tags: ADF: Church Project, ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, ZZADF: 34933
El Paso Times: Brown’s attorney, Joel Oster, said the document released by Walker on Monday is unimportant, calling it “a non-issue.” . . . But Oster, one of Brown’s attorneys, downplayed the document’s significance. “The minutes that you refer to are a non-issue,” Oster said in an email. “They were properly given to the other side pursuant to the subpoena and the court’s instructions. They don’t state that the church itself was involved. “In any event, the court already stated that it believes that the church circulated the petitions. … What the court held, however, was that First Amendment rights were at stake and it would not stop the election.”
- Posted: 12/13/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.elpasotimes.com
- Tags: ADF: Church Project, ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, ZZADF: 34933
ADF Attorney Nate Kellum at Townhall: And while it sounds like the FFRF is about to get a lesson in what “Don’t mess with Texas” means, Athens and other towns around the country need to remember that they can respond to a letter from the FFRF with a phone call, an e-mail, or a mailed request to the Alliance Defense Fund.ADF exists to defend religious liberty free of charge, and part of that liberty consists in the freedom to celebrate the birth of Christ at Christmas.
- Posted: 12/12/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Nate Kellum, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: Freedom from Religion Foundation, State: Texas, Topic: Christmas
The Texas Tribune: Forget everything. The candidate announcements, the relocations, the decisions not to run again, the who vs. who vs. who and the campaign finance. Poof! With a one-paragraph order on Friday night, the U.S. Supreme Court froze the Texas congressional and legislative elections and replaced pre-holiday candidate filings, politicking and fundraising with uncertainty and chaos.
- Posted: 12/12/2011
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.texastribune.org
- Tags: Court: U.S. Supreme, State: Texas, Topic: Politics
ADF Attorney Steven Aden at Townhall: And what better time to celebrate death, blood money, and political cronyism than Christmas? At least that seems to be the view of Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, the River Oaks Area Democratic Women, the Texas Democratic Women of Harris County, and the Bay Area Association of Democratic Women, all of whom are throwing a Dec. 8 Christmas Party at a huge abortion complex Planned Parenthood now runs in Houston, TX.
- Posted: 12/07/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Steven H. Aden, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Planned Parenthood, State: Texas, Topic: Christmas
ADF Attorney Joel Oster appeared on the Bott Radio Network to discuss this case. | MP3 audio 22 mins
- Posted: 12/01/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- Tags: ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Elections, Topic: Politics, ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, ZZADF: 34933
Examiner.com: “Churches and ministries shouldn’t live in fear of being punished by the government for exercising their constitutionally protected right to free speech,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Joel Oster, who argued before the court on behalf of the parties sued by Cook. “The mayor is seeking to silence those who oppose his policies because he doesn’t like their views, but that’s neither legal nor constitutional. The recall petitions were circulated and submitted in full accordance with the law, and he cannot stop the election just because he doesn’t like the fact that some groups participated in a legitimate effort that he doesn’t favor.”
- Posted: 12/01/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.examiner.com
- Tags: ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Hoyt v. City of El Paso, ZZADF: 36052
El Paso Times: Joel Oster is senior counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, a group dedicated to ending any limits on churches’ political activities. He came from Kansas to defend the recall group. Oster argues that it’s not a violation of Texas law for corporations to help circulate recall petitions. He also says that if it is, then that law violates the First Amendment. “This case is about stopping an election,” Oster said, later adding, “This is absolutely a free-speech case. It’s nothing more than a free-speech case.”
- Posted: 11/28/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.elpasotimes.com
- Tags: ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Hoyt v. City of El Paso, ZZADF: 36052
OneNewsNow.com: So, ADF is challenging the constitutionality of the measure, and attorney Joel Oster further explains the objection. “Pastors and churches shouldn’t live in fear of being punished by the government for exercising their constitutionally protected right to free speech,” he contends. “No law or government official can rob a faith group of its constitutionally protected rights just because that official would prefer not to be removed from office.”
- Posted: 11/22/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Hoyt v. City of El Paso, ZZADF: 36052
WorldNetDaily: “Pastors and churches shouldn’t live in fear of being punished by the government for exercising their constitutionally protected right to free speech,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Joel Oster in a statement. “No law or government official can rob a faith group of its constitutionally protected rights just because that official would prefer not to be removed from office.”
- Posted: 11/21/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.wnd.com
- Tags: ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Elections, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Hoyt v. City of El Paso, ZZADF: 36052
Christian Newswire: Austin LifeCare, through its attorneys from the Texas Center for the Defense of Life (TCDL), the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), and the Jubilee Campaign’s Law of Life Project (JC-LOLP) expressed thanks Thursday to the City of Austin for temporarily agreeing in Court today, through their legal counsel, that Austin LifeCare may take down the sign the City required them to post while the City takes a closer look at the constitutionality of the City’s law that singles out Austin’s pregnancy resource centers
- Posted: 11/14/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.christiannewswire.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Jubilee Campaign Law of Life Project, State: Texas
|
Latest Posts
-
hosted.ap.org
02/09/2012
News from The Associated Press: The Virginia state Senate passed legislation Thursday allowing private adoption agencies to deny placements that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs, including opposition to homosexuality.
-
www.lifenews.com
02/09/2012
LifeNews.com: The liberal women on The View, Wednesday, shrieked at the “totalitarian” decision by a Texas judge to uphold a law requiring women to look at an ultrasound before having an abortion.
-
balkin.blogspot.com
02/09/2012
Jason Mazzone at Balkinization: By finding Proposition 8 to violate the Equal Protection Clause solely on the ground that it withdrew the right of marriage that gays and lesbians previously possessed in California (as a result the earlier state supreme court’s decision), Perry v. Brown produces a curious result. It appears to leave Proposition 8 partially intact.

|