Ilya Somin at The Volokh Conspiracy: Brooklyn resident Levy Itzhak Rosenbaum recently became the first person convicted of brokering the sale of kidneys in the United States [HT: George Mason law student Michael Mortorano]. The real tragedy here is not what Rosenbaum did, but the fact that organ sales are illegal to begin with. Legalizing them would save thousands of lives every year by increasing the supply of kidneys available to those suffering from organ failure.
- Posted: 11/07/2011
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: volokh.com
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Bioethics
LiveScience: A team of South Korean scientists led by the Hwang Woo-suk – who made headlines in 2005 for falsely claiming to have extracted stem cells from cloned human embryos – has just announced that they have successfully cloned coyotes for the first time. Here are some answers to a few questions you may have about reproductive cloning.
- Posted: 10/18/2011
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.livescience.com
- Tags: Topic: Bioethics, Topic: Cloning
ZENIT:
ZENIT: What are the most important subjects in bioethics today?
Haas: From my point of view it is the de-personalization and de-humanization of health services. Human beings are being regarded as lacking rights. Organ donation has become an international business. The same happens with in vitro fertilization that, in the United States, moves close to $5 million every year. Men and women are not being regarded as human beings, but as material to use for scientific experiments, even on some occasions for experiments that, on the surface, have the very good intention of helping others.
- Posted: 09/02/2011
- |
- Category: Global: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.zenit.org
- Tags: Global: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Bioethics
O. Carter Snead at Public Discourse: Public officials—especially the President—are obligated to protect the intrinsic equal dignity of all human beings, regardless not only of sex and race, but also without regard to age, size, condition of dependency, vulnerability, or the esteem of others. Abortion and embryo-destructive research are profound and lethal violations of this principle of equality to which the law (and the President) must respond.
- Posted: 08/22/2011
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.thepublicdiscourse.com
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Bioethics, Topic: Culture, Topic: Elections, Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Topic: Euthanasia, Topic: Politics, Topic: White House
The New American: James Sherley, one of the plaintiffs in the suit, who uses adult stem cells in his research, was set to file an appeal of the verdict, with the aid of the Alliance Defense Fund, which represented him and Theresa Deisher in the lawsuit. “Americans should not be forced to pay for experiments that destroy human life, have produced no real-world treatments, and violate federal law,” ADF senior counsel Steven Aden said after the verdict. “The law is clear, and we intend to review all of our options for appeal of this decision.”
- Posted: 08/01/2011
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.thenewamerican.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Steven H. Aden, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Bioethics, Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research, ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius
Christian Newswire (6/24): Today, on behalf of the adult stem researchers it represents, the Jubilee Campaign’s Law of Life Project and their co-counsel at the Alliance Defense Fund and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, following a second remand from the United States Court of Appeals, filed its “supplemental brief” asking the United States District Court to provide summary judgment on each of their clients’ claims based on the National Institute of Health’s clear violation of two separate laws: (1) the Dickey-Wicker Amendment that bars federal funding of any “research in which” human embryos are “knowingly subjected to risk of injury or death;” and, (2) the Administrative Procedure Act that prohibits a government agency, from patently ignoring or prejudging public comments submitted in opposition to unlawful agency action, like NIH has been and is doing in this case. [numerous hyperlinks available at the Christian Newswire site]
- Posted: 06/27/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.earnedmedia.org
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Bioethics, Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research, ZZ: Jubilee Campaign, ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius
LifeNews: TThomas G. Hungar, one of the lawyers for the plaintiffs, which includes the Alliance Defense Fund and the Christian Medical Association, said in 2009 when the lawsuit was filed, “the language of the [Dickey-Wicker] statute is clear” that it “bans public funding for any research that leads to the destruction of human embryos.” “NIH’s attempt to avoid Congress’s command by funding everything but the act of ‘harvesting’ is pure sophistry. The guidelines will result in the destruction of human embryos and are unlawful, unethical, and unnecessary,” he told LifeNews.com at the time. Sam Casey, General Counsel of Advocates International’s Law of Life Project, a public interest legal project involved in the case, pointed out . . .
- Posted: 05/19/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.lifenews.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Advocates International, Group: Family Research Council (FRC), Topic: Bioethics, Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research, ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius
|
Latest Posts
-
hosted.ap.org
02/09/2012
News from The Associated Press: The Virginia state Senate passed legislation Thursday allowing private adoption agencies to deny placements that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs, including opposition to homosexuality.
-
www.lifenews.com
02/09/2012
LifeNews.com: The liberal women on The View, Wednesday, shrieked at the “totalitarian” decision by a Texas judge to uphold a law requiring women to look at an ultrasound before having an abortion.
-
balkin.blogspot.com
02/09/2012
Jason Mazzone at Balkinization: By finding Proposition 8 to violate the Equal Protection Clause solely on the ground that it withdrew the right of marriage that gays and lesbians previously possessed in California (as a result the earlier state supreme court’s decision), Perry v. Brown produces a curious result. It appears to leave Proposition 8 partially intact.

|