One News Now (includes photo of Matt): Matt Bowman, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, applauds lawmakers’ desire to see those laws enforced, not repealed. “It’s right for the members of the United States House to be concerned that the administration of the federal government would decide not to enforce those laws,” says Bowman, “especially in light of the fact that the Alliance Defense Fund has represented already three clients in…the last year who have faith violations of these federal conscience laws.”
- Posted: 02/16/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- Tags: ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), ZZ: Cenzon-DeCarlo v The Mount Sinai Hospital
Robert Verbruggen writing at National Review Online: “[T]he majority of abortions — far from all, but the majority — serve as nothing more than routine birth control: Most women who have abortions became pregnant by willingly engaging in high-risk sexual activity, and many resort to abortion more than once . . . pro-lifers and moderate pro-choicers . . . need to face the fact that while programs designed to talk women out of abortion are one useful tool in a pro-life strategy, they will not significantly lower the abortion rate by themselves. Those who are truly concerned about abortion should have two priorities: first, overturning Roe v. Wade so that states may ban abortion; and second, in the meantime, designing an anti-abortion program that will appeal to women who use the procedure as birth control.”
- Posted: 01/21/2011
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.nationalreview.com
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Culture
OneNewsNow: “The American pro-life community is looking to future challenges after a recent Guttmacher report on abortion . . . Jeanne Monahan of the Family Research Council tells OneNewsNow that RU-486, the abortion pill, played a role in the totals. ‘Interestingly, [chemical abortions are] more expensive than surgical abortions,’ she notes. ‘So I find that fascinating just in as much as they’re touted as being easier on women, which is absolutely not true.’”
- Posted: 01/17/2011
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Contraception
ACLU Blog: “The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, will soon be issuing guidelines on what constitutes preventive care for women. Groups like the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Family Research Council and Alliance Defense Fund are trying to stop HHS from including birth control on the list of covered preventive services.”
- Posted: 01/13/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Group: Family Research Council (FRC), Group: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), Topic: Contraception, Topic: Insurance
Is There a Right to Have Children? Substantive Due Process and Probation Conditions That Restrict Reproductive Rights
Joanna Nairn, 6 Stan. J. Civ. Rts. & Civ. Liberties 1 (2010)
“This Article focuses on women who have been sentenced, as part of their probation, either to use specific forms of birth control or simply to avoid procreating. It begins by exploring the prevalence of these conditions, hampered by the difficulty in gathering data about probation conditions that are not appealed to higher courts. Using a combination of appellate opinions and reported trial court decisions, it notes that appellate courts have begun to break with the unanimous rejection of such conditions that characterized the first few decades of their reported use. Moreover, it highlights a pattern of appellate decisions that focus not on the constitutionality of these conditions but rather on their reasonableness in the particular case–a trend that has created inconsistency across courts. It then goes on to survey the Court’s substantive due process jurisprudence, noting the specificity with which the Court has defined protected rights and describing the three methods by which it deems rights fundamental. This Article also argues that it is likely that strict scrutiny would apply to probation conditions that restrict reproductive rights. Finally, it makes the case for invalidating such conditions under a strict scrutiny framework, arguing that the right implicated is fundamental and that there are less restrictive alternatives available.”
- Posted: 12/29/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Parental Rights
Janet E. Smith writing at Zenit: “The media are obsessed with the issue of the Catholic Church and condoms because they seem to believe that condoms are the solution to preventing the transmission of the HIV. Might it be time they began to think about other organizations, such as themselves, that might bear some responsibility? Who can deny that if people were living by the Church’s teaching on sexuality, if people were having only married heterosexual sex, there would be no problem with the HIV (and a host of other problems)?”
- Posted: 12/13/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.zenit.org
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Media
Mercator Net: “[T]here are tell-tale signs that a particular type of pollutant, the endocrine disruptor, is wreaking havoc on our ecosystems. And as the world’s rivers are in a crisis of ominous proportions, we are witnessing the alarming effects wrought by estrogenic substances on aquatic life. Feminized male fish that lay eggs and/or have lost their reproductive abilities have been found near waste water effluent areas . . . why are environmental crusaders hounding plastic manufacturers and the canned foods industry while ignoring the most obvious culprit: pharmaceuticals in our water supply? Not just what is dumped by manufacturers or consumers, but more importantly, what is flushed down the toilet after human consumption.”
- Posted: 11/16/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.mercatornet.com
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Environmentalism
Christian Science Monitor: “If the bill becomes law, it will give responsibility for family planning to the state. Part of that would include the distribution of free contraception for the poor, maternity care, and family planning. It would also break new ground for the relationship between the government and the Church . . . The Catholic Church, meanwhile, views the bill as an attack on life, Catholic values, and as a gateway to legalizing abortion.”
- Posted: 11/12/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.csmonitor.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Philippines, Global: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Contraception
OneNewsNow: “A major push is under way to have free contraception included under ObamaCare. A panel of experts advising the government meets in November to begin considering what kind of preventive care for women should be covered at no cost to the patient, as required under President Barack Obama’s overhaul.”
- Posted: 11/01/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Family Research Council (FRC), Group: National Catholic Bioethics Center, Group: Planned Parenthood, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance
|
Latest Posts
-
05/24/2012
The ADF Alliance Alert will not be published on Friday, May 25th and Monday, May 28th.
-
www.huffingtonpost.com
05/24/2012
Huffington Post: A measure allowing same-sex civil unions passed its first legislative step in Brazil’s Congress, where it has lingered for 16 years.
-
www.christianpost.com
05/24/2012
Christian Post: “There has to be a wall institutionally between the government and the church or religious groups,” he said. “But many have taken that law of separation to think that it means separating religion from politics, which is precisely the opposite of what the Founding Fathers wanted.”
|