Ed Whelan at NRO: The Obama administration’s argument can’t withstand scrutiny. For starters, RFRA itself makes no distinction between “for-profit, secular companies” and “non-profit, religious organizations.”
- Posted: 05/09/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.nationalreview.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius, ZZ: Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37028
Baptist Press: A German family should be granted asylum in the U.S. because their s native government is denying a fundamental human right by preventing them from homeschooling their children, attorney Michael Farris told a three-judge panel of the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals Tuesday (April 23) in Cincinnati.
- Posted: 04/23/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.bpnews.net
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Country: Germany, Group: Focus on the Family, Group: Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), Topic: Asylum, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Education, Topic: Home Schooling, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Socialism, ZZ: Romeike v. Holder
Robert Knight at Townhall: A courageous German Christian couple refused to hand over their children to the government schools and fled to America three years ago. Now, the Obama Administration is trying to send them back. A likely outcome would be the state seizing the children and imprisoning the parents.
- Posted: 04/09/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Country: German, Group: Focus on the Family, Group: Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), Topic: Asylum, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Education, Topic: Home Schooling, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Socialism, ZZ: Romeike v. Holder
Matthew J. Frank at NRO: So the official position of the United States, in the Supreme Court anyway–notwithstanding the blandishments of the president of the United States–is that same-sex marriage is a constitutional right in those states that have civil unions, but that it is an “open question” whether this is so anywhere else. It might or might not be a constitutional right in, say, Mississippi, but it certainly is one in California!
- Posted: 03/26/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.nationalreview.com
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 26561, ZZADF: 33121
Pete Williams at NBC: Obama administration to express support for gay marriage before Supreme Court
Administration officials say the Justice Department will urge the U.S. Supreme Court to allow same-sex marriage to resume in California, wading into the protracted legal battle over Proposition 8 and giving gay-rights advocates a new court ally.
- Posted: 02/28/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: firstread.nbcnews.com
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Marriage and Family, Court: U.S. Supreme, State: California, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZADF: 26561
Business Insider: “[A]dministration lawyers worry that taking such an expansive view in legal briefs could unnerve some justices in the Supreme Court’s conservative wing, the people familiar with the matter said,” the Journal reported.
- Posted: 02/28/2013
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.businessinsider.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZADF: 26561
Heritage Foundation: President Obama has so many flip-flops in his policy positions that it’s hard to keep track. After running for President supporting traditional marriage, he “evolved” to support same-sex marriage—and now his Justice Department has officially urged the Supreme Court to overthrow the law of the land.
- Posted: 02/25/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Docs: Briefs, Group: Heritage Foundation, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 33121
Pink News: “There’s a critical mass of states that have spoken out and believe states should continue to have the right to define marriage as between one man and one woman,” said Jim Campbell of the anti-equal marriage Alliance Defending Freedom.
- Posted: 02/21/2013
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- Tags: ADF: Jim Campbell, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZADF: 26561
Baptist Press: A family homeschooling safely in rural Tennessee may be forced to return to their native Germany, where the parents likely face huge fines and criminal penalties, and could lose custody of their five school-age children. Uwe and Hannelore Romeike are looking to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to give them permanent refugee status. But Attorney General Eric Holder is disputing their case, arguing Germany’s ban on homeschooling fails to violate the family’s fundamental rights.
- Posted: 02/20/2013
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: bpnews.net
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Country: Germany, Group: Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Education, Topic: Home School, Topic: Immigration, Topic: School Choice, ZZ: Romeike v. Holder
Eugene Volokh at the Volokh Conspiracy:Of course, under the Free Exercise Clause as interpreted by Employment Division v. Smith (1990), the pastor’s religious belief would likely be constitutionally irrelevant — the duty to testify would likely be viewed as a generally religion-neutral law of general applicability, and even sincere religious objectors would not be entitled to a constitutional exemption. (I generally think this is the right approach.) There are some possible counterarguments. One might argue that the law is not generally applicable because the duty to testify includes a religious exemption for clergy (of any denomination) who refuse to testify about confidential communications that they feel religiously obligated to keep confidential. One might also argue that this case involves a “hybrid rights” claim, involving a supposed combination of a Free Exercise Clause claim and a freedom-from-compelled-speech claim.
- Posted: 02/05/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.volokh.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, Topic: Custody, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Consider Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr.’s most prominent client, President Obama. In May, in announcing his support for same-sex marriage, Mr. Obama said the issue should be decided state by state. In his Inaugural Address last month, Mr. Obama seemed to …
- Posted: 02/04/2013
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: topics.nytimes.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 26561, ZZADF: 33121
Reuters: On separate occasions in recent days, lawyers on opposite sides of a Supreme Court fight over same-sex marriage took an elevator to the fifth floor of the Department of Justice, entered a large conference room and made a pitch to Solicitor General Donald Verrilli and other top Obama administration lawyers.
- Posted: 01/28/2013
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.reuters.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Bench and Bar, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZADF: 26561
Al Daniel at SCOTUS Blog: In addition to the Office of the Solicitor General, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has seven litigating divisions, each headed by an Assistant Attorney General: the Antitrust Division, the Civil Division, the Civil Rights Division, the Criminal Division, the Environment and Natural Resources Division, the National Security Division, and the Tax Division. Each of these Divisions has a group of attorneys called either the Appellate Staff or the Appellate Section (collectively, “Appellate Staffs”).
- Posted: 12/14/2012
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.scotusblog.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)
The Hill: A new attorney general will face a thorough grilling from conservative senators on highly sensitive issues like the decision to stop defending the Defense of Marriage Act, attempts to close the Guantánamo Bay prison, moves to block the implementation of state voter ID laws and the department’s refusal to give Congress thousands of documents relating to a failed gun-tracking operation.
- Posted: 11/13/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: thehill.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Obamacare, Topic: White House
PJ Media: Ever since PJ Media’s blockbuster Every Single One Series documented the radical partisan lawyers hired as career civil servants in the Obama DOJ, many have asked me how this is accomplished. One way is that only attorneys are hired who have resumes which have obvious ideological histories. The Every Single One series provided the public copies of these resumes. They are filled with cues that were used in the hiring process to exclude some and include others. But Eric Holder is also personally furthering the cause of ideological hiring. One way Holder is accomplishing this goal is by recruiting from within identity politics organizations.
- Posted: 10/01/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: pjmedia.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Category: Featured, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)
NOLA.com: Federal District Court Judge Susie Morgan ruled Saturday that Justice Bernette Johnson has the seniority needed to succeed Catherine “Kitty” Kimball as chief justice of the Louisiana Supreme Court when Kimball retires early next year. In a decision issued just before 7 p.m., Morgan ruled that “any tenure accrued by Justice Johnson between Nov. 16, 1994 and October 7, 2000, is to be credited to her for all purposes under Louisiana law,” which would include determining whether she is the second most senior justice after Chief Justice Kimball.
- Posted: 09/04/2012
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.nola.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Group: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), State: Louisiana, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Nominations, Topic: Politics
Religion Clause Blog: In United States v. Rutherford County, Tennessee, (MD TN, Aug. 29, 2012), a Tennessee federal district court permitted neighbors of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro to intervene in a RLUIPA lawsuit brought by the Justice Department.
- Posted: 08/30/2012
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, State: Tennessee, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Islam, Topic: RLUIPA, ZZ: U.S. v. Rutherford County TN
The Church Report: But Kenneth Miller’s lawyer, Joshua Autry, told the jury he would prove his client believed Lisa Miller had full custody of Isabella when she fled the country. “Your decision is not going to be a referendum for or against civil unions in the state of Vermont,” Autry told the jury. “It’s going to be about whether, at the time of the removal, Janet Jenkins had parental rights.”
- Posted: 08/10/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.thechurchreport.com
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Marriage and Family, State: New Hampshire, State: Virginia, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Miller v Jenkins
World Magazine: Dale Schowengerdt with the Alliance Defending Freedom (formerly the Alliance Defense Fund) is one of those lawyers working with the House to defend DOMA in lower courts. In one challenge to DOMA in Philadelphia, he found himself standing on the side of the aisle where the Justice Department lawyer would normally stand, defending U.S. laws, while the Justice Department lawyer stood on the other side of the aisle. “When they made the announcement [that they wouldn't defend the law], we thought they’d just sit on the sidelines,” he said. “It was very strange to have the DOJ lawyer get up and attack the law.” [more]
- Posted: 08/01/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.worldmag.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZADF: 26561
Lyle Denniston at SCOTUS Blog: The petition by Edith Schlain Windsor is the fourth petition in recent weeks challenging the constitutionality of a key section of the federal Defense of Marriage Act. It is the fifth new case on the rights of same-sex couples; beyond the DOMA cases; the other petition tests an Arizona law that limits state workers’ benefits if they are living in a gay relationship.
- Posted: 07/17/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.scotusblog.com
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Marriage and Family, Court: U.S. Supreme, Group: ACLU, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 33121
Reuters: An ailing 83-year-old lesbian asked the Supreme Court on Monday to hear her legal challenge against a federal law that defines marriage as a union between a man and woman, attempting to place her case on a fast-track to the top court. | ACLU press release: Supreme Court Asked to Review Edie Windsor’s Challenge to “Defense of Marriage Act”
- Posted: 07/16/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Marriage and Family, Group: ACLU, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 33121
|

Latest Posts
-
www.bpnews.net
05/17/2013
Baptist Press: A florist who was told by the state of Washington she must provide her services for a gay wedding is countersuing the state, saying she has served gay customers her entire career and is concerned the state’s position on gay weddings will harm religious freedom.
-
www.nationalreview.com
05/17/2013
National Review: IRS scandal notwithstanding, on Tuesday, the (Republican-dominated) Texas legislature passed S.B. 346, a bill to force non-profit organizations and trade associations to disclose the names of the people who support them financially. The law exempts unions, but covers groups that spend more than $25,000 or more in independent expenditures about political candidates. This applies even if those expenditures are a tiny fraction of the group’s overall spending . . .
-
www.nytimes.com
05/17/2013
NY Times: At the first Congressional hearing into the I.R.S. scandal, J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration, told members of the House Ways and Means Committee that he informed the Treasury’s general counsel of his audit on June 4, and Deputy Treasury Secretary Neal Wolin “shortly thereafter.”

|