<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/topic-department-of-justice-doj/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Obama DOJ forces Ark. University to allow biological male into female restrooms</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/24/obama-doj-forces-ark-university-to-biological-male-into-female-restrooms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/24/obama-doj-forces-ark-university-to-biological-male-into-female-restrooms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Colleges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Indoctrination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/24/Obama-DOJ-transgender-bathroom">Breitbart</a>: The Obama Department of Justice has reportedly ordered the University of Arkansas at Ft. Smith (UAFS) to allow a male student to use women’s bathrooms on campus. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/24/obama-doj-forces-ark-university-to-biological-male-into-female-restrooms/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/24/obama-doj-forces-ark-university-to-biological-male-into-female-restrooms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Obama may stay clear of court fight over Prop. 8&#8243; &#124; San Francisco Chronicle</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/obama-may-stay-clear-of-court-fight-over-prop-8-san-francisco-chronicle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/obama-may-stay-clear-of-court-fight-over-prop-8-san-francisco-chronicle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/05/19/MNEG1OH3AD.DTL">San Francisco Chronicle</a>: In fact, when he said the federal government should leave marriage to the states, he may have signaled that he's staying out of the case.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/obama-may-stay-clear-of-court-fight-over-prop-8-san-francisco-chronicle/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/obama-may-stay-clear-of-court-fight-over-prop-8-san-francisco-chronicle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ &#8216;actively&#8217; working to see DOMA overturned</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/doj-actively-working-to-see-doma-overturned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/doj-actively-working-to-see-doma-overturned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Dale Schowengerdt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=133893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=37837&#038;ref=BPNews-RSSFeed0516">Baptist Press</a>: "Everybody thought they were taking a neutral stance. They did not indicate they were going to actively attack its constitutionality," Dale Schowengerdt, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, told Baptist Press. ADF, a Christian legal group, has worked to defend the law . . . Technically, the Justice Department is involved only in lawsuits that challenge Section 3 of DOMA -- the section that prevents the federal government from recognizing gay "marriage." But the legal arguments the Justice Department is making easily could be applied to all of DOMA, including the section that protects states, Schowengerdt said. President Obama, meanwhile, is supporting a bill in Congress that would overturn all of DOMA. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/doj-actively-working-to-see-doma-overturned/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/16/doj-actively-working-to-see-doma-overturned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AZ Sheriff Joe Responds To DOJ Lawsuit: Racial profiling or Obama coverup?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/15/az-sheriff-joe-responds-to-doj-lawsuit-racial-profiling-or-obama-coverup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/15/az-sheriff-joe-responds-to-doj-lawsuit-racial-profiling-or-obama-coverup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=133662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/sheriff-joe-says-court-case-is-politics/">WorldNetDaily</a>: WND previously reported the attacks on Arpaio suggested White House coordination in an effort to remove from him from office or discredit him before his investigation uncovers more about Obama’s past. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/15/az-sheriff-joe-responds-to-doj-lawsuit-racial-profiling-or-obama-coverup/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/15/az-sheriff-joe-responds-to-doj-lawsuit-racial-profiling-or-obama-coverup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jonathan Adler: President says leave marriage to states while arguing it violates Federal Equal Protection</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/10/jonathan-adler-president-says-leave-marriage-to-states-while-arguing-it-violates-federal-equal-protection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/10/jonathan-adler-president-says-leave-marriage-to-states-while-arguing-it-violates-federal-equal-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 18:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=133457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Janathan Adler at <a href="http://volokh.com/2012/05/10/the-incoherence-of-president-obamas-stance-on-gay-marriage/">The Volokh Conspiracy</a>: Yet if DOMA is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause, then how could any state law barring recognition of same-sex marriages survive constitutional scrutiny? In other words, while the President says he believes that states should be allowed to reach “different conclusions at different times” on the question of same-sex marriage, the administration’s legal position is that a state’s refusal to treat opposite-sex and same-sex couples alike is unconstitutional. So while the President may say he’d like to leave this question to the states, that’s an option his administration has already taken off the table. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/10/jonathan-adler-president-says-leave-marriage-to-states-while-arguing-it-violates-federal-equal-protection/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/10/jonathan-adler-president-says-leave-marriage-to-states-while-arguing-it-violates-federal-equal-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Dept. plans to sue Arizona sheriff Arpaio for alleged racial profiling</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/10/justice-dept-plans-to-sue-arizona-sheriff-arpaio-for-alleged-racial-profiling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/10/justice-dept-plans-to-sue-arizona-sheriff-arpaio-for-alleged-racial-profiling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=133381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ARIZONA_SHERIFF_CIVIL_RIGHTS?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2012-05-10-10-15-54">AP</a>: Federal authorities have said they plan to sue Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio and his office over allegations of civil rights violations, including the racial profiling of Latinos. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/10/justice-dept-plans-to-sue-arizona-sheriff-arpaio-for-alleged-racial-profiling/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/10/justice-dept-plans-to-sue-arizona-sheriff-arpaio-for-alleged-racial-profiling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Issa circulates contempt resolution against AG Eric Holder</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/03/rep-issa-circulates-contempt-resolution-against-ag-eric-holder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/03/rep-issa-circulates-contempt-resolution-against-ag-eric-holder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 16:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=132790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/225207-rep-issa-circulates-contempt-resolution-against-obamas-attorney-general">The Hill</a>: Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) has circulated a draft copy of a resolution that would hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/03/rep-issa-circulates-contempt-resolution-against-ag-eric-holder/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/03/rep-issa-circulates-contempt-resolution-against-ag-eric-holder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Adult film&#8221; producer convicted in obscenity trial</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/27/adult-film-producer-convicted-in-obscenity-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/27/adult-film-producer-convicted-in-obscenity-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 23:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obscenity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=132420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBSCENITY_OR_ART?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2012-04-27-19-00-15">AP</a>: An adult film producer was convicted Friday of violating federal obscenity laws by selling movies depicting bestiality and extreme fetishes. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/27/adult-film-producer-convicted-in-obscenity-trial/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/27/adult-film-producer-convicted-in-obscenity-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawmakers move toward citing Holder for contempt</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/27/lawmakers-move-toward-citing-holder-for-contempt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/27/lawmakers-move-toward-citing-holder-for-contempt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=132384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2012/04/27/lawmakers_move_toward_citing_holder_for_contempt/?rss_id=Boston.com+--+Latest+news">Boston Globe</a>: A House Committee is preparing a contempt citation against Attorney General Eric Holder as it applies pressure for more documents from a flawed gun-tracking operation. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/27/lawmakers-move-toward-citing-holder-for-contempt/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/27/lawmakers-move-toward-citing-holder-for-contempt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chief Justice Roberts: “It seems to me the federal government just doesn’t want to know who’s here illegally&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/25/chief-justice-roberts-%e2%80%9cit-seems-to-me-the-federal-government-just-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-to-know-who%e2%80%99s-here-illegally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/25/chief-justice-roberts-%e2%80%9cit-seems-to-me-the-federal-government-just-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-to-know-who%e2%80%99s-here-illegally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 21:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Arizona v. United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=132122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/apr/25/supreme-court-casts-doubt-obamas-immigration-law-c/">Washington Times</a>: “It seems to me the federal government just doesn’t want to know who’s here illegally,” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said at one point.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/25/chief-justice-roberts-%e2%80%9cit-seems-to-me-the-federal-government-just-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-to-know-who%e2%80%99s-here-illegally/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/25/chief-justice-roberts-%e2%80%9cit-seems-to-me-the-federal-government-just-doesn%e2%80%99t-want-to-know-who%e2%80%99s-here-illegally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High court seems favorable to Arizona immigration law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/25/high-court-seems-favorable-to-arizona-immigration-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/25/high-court-seems-favorable-to-arizona-immigration-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Arizona v. United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=132079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/223659-justices-seem-favorable-to-arizona-immigration-law">The Hill</a>: The ideologically diverse group of justices pummeled Solicitor General Donald Verrilli with a morning full of questions, expressing serious doubts to the government’s claim that Arizona cannot require state law enforcement officials to verify a person’s legal status when they’re stopped on suspicion of committing a separate offense.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/25/high-court-seems-favorable-to-arizona-immigration-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/25/high-court-seems-favorable-to-arizona-immigration-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9th Circuit rejects DOJ request for expedited en banc review in marriage litigation</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/12/9th-circuit-rejects-doj-request-for-expedited-en-banc-review-in-marriage-litigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/12/9th-circuit-rejects-doj-request-for-expedited-en-banc-review-in-marriage-litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Golinski v. United States Office of Personnel Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=130929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/04/one-gay-marriage-case-slowing/#more-143026">SCOTUS Blog</a>: Raising new uncertainty about how fast one of the major test cases on same-sex marriage will move, the Ninth Circuit Court on Wednesday delayed for the time being any action on the Obama Administration’s plea for an immediate referral of that case to a full 11-judge bench of that appeals court.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/12/9th-circuit-rejects-doj-request-for-expedited-en-banc-review-in-marriage-litigation/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/12/9th-circuit-rejects-doj-request-for-expedited-en-banc-review-in-marriage-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dale Schowengerdt: The Administration’s Abdication on DOMA</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/09/dale-schowengerdt-the-administration%e2%80%99s-abdication-on-doma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/09/dale-schowengerdt-the-administration%e2%80%99s-abdication-on-doma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Dale Schowengerdt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Massachusetts v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=130666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-dale-schowengerdt-2/">Dale Schowengerdt</a> at <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/295466/administrations-abdication-doma-dale-schowengerdt">National Review Online</a>: It’s hard to describe how odd it is to hear a Department of Justice lawyer argue in court that a law passed by Congress should be struck down as unconstitutional. It is, after all, the DOJ’s job to defend laws passed by Congress. But as I sat at the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston on Wednesday listening to the appellate arguments for the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) cases, that’s exactly what I heard for 20 minutes from the DOJ lawyer. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/09/dale-schowengerdt-the-administration%e2%80%99s-abdication-on-doma/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/09/dale-schowengerdt-the-administration%e2%80%99s-abdication-on-doma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voter Fraud Video Demonstration: Young Man Offered Eric Holder&#8217;s Ballot</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/09/voter-fraud-video-demonstration-young-man-offered-eric-holders-ballot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/09/voter-fraud-video-demonstration-young-man-offered-eric-holders-ballot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=130627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/08/DC-Polling-Place-Holder-Ballot">Breitbart (video)</a>: In a new video provided to Breitbart.com, James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas demonstrates why Holder should stop attacking voter ID laws--by walking into Holder’s voting precinct and showing the world that anyone can obtain Eric Holder’s primary ballot. Literally. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/09/voter-fraud-video-demonstration-young-man-offered-eric-holders-ballot/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/09/voter-fraud-video-demonstration-young-man-offered-eric-holders-ballot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney General Files Letter Brief on Judicial Review in Response to Fifth Circuit Order</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/05/attorney-general-files-letter-brief-on-judicial-review-in-response-to-fifth-circuit-order/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/05/attorney-general-files-letter-brief-on-judicial-review-in-response-to-fifth-circuit-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=130573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://volokh.com/2012/04/05/attorney-general-files-letter-brief-on-judicial-review-in-response-to-fifth-circuit-order/">Volokh Conspiracy</a>: The letter is <a href="http://blog.pacificlegal.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Obamaletterbrief.pdf">here</a> . . .  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/05/attorney-general-files-letter-brief-on-judicial-review-in-response-to-fifth-circuit-order/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/05/attorney-general-files-letter-brief-on-judicial-review-in-response-to-fifth-circuit-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holder: Justice Department will respond to judge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/04/holder-justice-department-will-respond-to-judge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/04/holder-justice-department-will-respond-to-judge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=130441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_HEALTH_CARE_JUDGE?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2012-04-04-15-51-33">AP</a>: U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said Wednesday that the Justice Department will respond "appropriately" to a federal appellate judge in Texas who demanded a letter recognizing the authority of the federal courts to strike down laws passed by Congress. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/04/holder-justice-department-will-respond-to-judge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/04/holder-justice-department-will-respond-to-judge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Reich: We&#8217;re turning America into a giant casino</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/03/robert-reich-were-turning-america-into-a-giant-casino/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/03/robert-reich-were-turning-america-into-a-giant-casino/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=130351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Reich at <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Robert-Reich/2012/0403/We-re-turning-America-into-a-giant-casino?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+feeds%2Fcsm+%28Christian+Science+Monitor+%7C+All+Stories%29">Christian Science Monitor</a>: Organized gambling is a scam. And it particularly preys upon people with lower incomes – who assume they can’t make it big any other way, who often find it hardest to assess the odds, and whose families can least afford to lose the money. Yet with new, relaxed gambling laws, America is now opening the floodgates.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/03/robert-reich-were-turning-america-into-a-giant-casino/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/03/robert-reich-were-turning-america-into-a-giant-casino/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Department of Justice Drops Appeal and Pays Pro-life Sidewalk Counselor</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/02/department-of-justice-drops-appeal-and-pays-pro-life-sidewalk-counselor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/02/department-of-justice-drops-appeal-and-pays-pro-life-sidewalk-counselor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Holder v. Pine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=130113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lc.org/index.cfm?PID=14100&#038;PRID=1172">Liberty Counsel</a>: The Department of Justice (DOJ) has dropped its appeal in Holder v. Pine against pro-life sidewalk counselor Mary “Susan” Pine, who is represented by Liberty Counsel. The DOJ has agreed to pay $120,000 for this improper lawsuit. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/02/department-of-justice-drops-appeal-and-pays-pro-life-sidewalk-counselor/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/02/department-of-justice-drops-appeal-and-pays-pro-life-sidewalk-counselor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ asks 9th Circuit to bypass panel review in DOMA challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/27/doj-asks-9th-circuit-to-bypass-panel-review-in-doma-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/27/doj-asks-9th-circuit-to-bypass-panel-review-in-doma-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Golinski v. United States Office of Personnel Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=129667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/26/BAMF1NQIKD.DTL">San Francisco Chronicle</a>: But Obama's Justice Department asked the full appeals court Monday to bypass the customary three judges and convene an 11-judge panel.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/27/doj-asks-9th-circuit-to-bypass-panel-review-in-doma-challenge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/27/doj-asks-9th-circuit-to-bypass-panel-review-in-doma-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Department of Justice Drops “FACE” Lawsuit Against Denver Pro-Lifer</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/23/u-s-department-of-justice-drops-%e2%80%9cface%e2%80%9d-lawsuit-against-denver-pro-lifer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/23/u-s-department-of-justice-drops-%e2%80%9cface%e2%80%9d-lawsuit-against-denver-pro-lifer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Thomas More Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=129382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.thomasmoresociety.org/2012/03/21/u-s-department-of-justice-drops-face-lawsuit-against-denver-pro-lifer/">Thomas More Society</a>: Today, Thomas More Society attorneys secured agreement from the U.S. Attorney General’s office to dismiss all of the civil charges pending against Denver pro-life advocate Kenneth Scott, who had been accused of physically obstructing clients and employees of the Planned Parenthood of theRocky Mountains abortion facility. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/23/u-s-department-of-justice-drops-%e2%80%9cface%e2%80%9d-lawsuit-against-denver-pro-lifer/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/23/u-s-department-of-justice-drops-%e2%80%9cface%e2%80%9d-lawsuit-against-denver-pro-lifer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul: Demolishing Due Process</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/20/ron-paul-demolishing-due-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/20/ron-paul-demolishing-due-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=129113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=1955:demolishing-due-process&#038;catid=62:texas-straight-talk&#038;Itemid=69">Paul.House.Gov</a>: In what history likely will record as a turning point, Attorney General Holder bluntly explained that this administration believes it has the authority to use lethal force against Americans if the President determines them to be a threat to the nation. He tells us that this is not a violation of the due process requirements of our Constitution because the President himself embodies "due process" as he unilaterally determines who is to be targeted. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/20/ron-paul-demolishing-due-process/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/20/ron-paul-demolishing-due-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department hails Minnesota school-bullying settlement as model for schools across US</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/07/justice-department-hails-minnesota-school-bullying-settlement-as-model-for-schools-across-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/07/justice-department-hails-minnesota-school-bullying-settlement-as-model-for-schools-across-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=127944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washingto<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/justice-department-hails-minnesota-school-bullying-settlement-as-model-for-schools-across-us/2012/03/06/gIQAZZoSvR_story.html">n Post: A settlement with Minnesota’s largest school district over the harassment and bullying of students who are gay, or perceived to be gay, should serve as a model for other schools in the U.S., federal officials said Tuesday. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/07/justice-department-hails-minnesota-school-bullying-settlement-as-model-for-schools-across-us/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/07/justice-department-hails-minnesota-school-bullying-settlement-as-model-for-schools-across-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Republicans threaten AG Holder with criminal contempt</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/28/house-republicans-threaten-ag-holder-with-criminal-contempt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/28/house-republicans-threaten-ag-holder-with-criminal-contempt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=127147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/article/House-Republicans-threaten-Holder-2975302.php">MySanAntonio.com</a>: House Republicans threatened Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. with a criminal contempt of Congress citation Thursday, alleging the Department of Justice has refused for a year to turn over key documents in lawmakers' investigation of the failed Fast and Furious gun-tracking op
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/28/house-republicans-threaten-ag-holder-with-criminal-contempt/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/28/house-republicans-threaten-ag-holder-with-criminal-contempt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney General Holder Names Tony West Third In Command At DOJ</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/28/attorney-general-holder-names-tony-west-third-in-command-at-doj/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/28/attorney-general-holder-names-tony-west-third-in-command-at-doj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=127034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2012/02/attorney-general-holder-names-tony-west-third-in-command-at-doj-.html">Blog of the Legal Times</a>: Tony West, who has led the Justice Department's Civil Division since April 2009, was named today acting associate attorney general. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/28/attorney-general-holder-names-tony-west-third-in-command-at-doj/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/28/attorney-general-holder-names-tony-west-third-in-command-at-doj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ indicates denying same-sex couples military benefits is unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/20/doj-indicates-denying-same-sex-couples-military-benefits-is-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/20/doj-indicates-denying-same-sex-couples-military-benefits-is-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=126156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://jurist.org/paperchase/2012/02/doj-inidcates-denying-same-sex-couples-military-benefits-is-unconstitutional.php">Jurist</a>: US Attorney General Eric Holder [DOJ profile] sent a <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/documents/2012/02/letter-from-the-attorney-general-to-congress-on-litigation-involving-the-defense-of-marriage-act-1.php?page=2">letter</a> [text] Friday to Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) [official profile] stating that the Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] has decided that denying same-sex couples military and veterans benefits violates the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment [text] <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/20/doj-indicates-denying-same-sex-couples-military-benefits-is-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/20/doj-indicates-denying-same-sex-couples-military-benefits-is-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MA: Judge dismisses charges against peaceful pro-life activist allegedly beaten by police</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/15/ma-judge-dismisses-charges-against-peaceful-pro-life-activist-allegedly-beaten-by-police/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/15/ma-judge-dismisses-charges-against-peaceful-pro-life-activist-allegedly-beaten-by-police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Anti-Defamation League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: MassResistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Pro-Life Action League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Thomas More Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=125811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mass.-judge-dismisses-charges-against-peaceful-pro-life-activist-countersui">LifeSiteNews.com</a>: “Ever since Barack Obama came into office there has been an aggressive effort to undermine peaceful pro-life activity by casting pro-life activists as terrorists,” Scheidler said. “We’ve seen the Department of Homeland Security listing pro-lifers as potential terrorists. We’ve seen special meetings between the FBI and pro-abortion groups.” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/15/ma-judge-dismisses-charges-against-peaceful-pro-life-activist-allegedly-beaten-by-police/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/15/ma-judge-dismisses-charges-against-peaceful-pro-life-activist-allegedly-beaten-by-police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Carolina Sues Justice Department Over Voter-ID Law Block</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/07/south-carolina-sues-justice-department-over-voter-id-law-block/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/07/south-carolina-sues-justice-department-over-voter-id-law-block/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=124925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-07/south-carolina-sues-justice-department-over-voter-id-law-block.html">Bloomberg</a>: South Carolina sued the U.S. Justice Department over its decision to block a law requiring voters to show photo identification at polls, the state’s attorney general said. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/07/south-carolina-sues-justice-department-over-voter-id-law-block/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/07/south-carolina-sues-justice-department-over-voter-id-law-block/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matt Bowman: Obama&#8217;s DOJ Targets Pro-Life Free Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/23/matt-bowman-obamas-doj-targets-pro-life-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/23/matt-bowman-obamas-doj-targets-pro-life-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Matthew S. Bowman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Pine v. Holder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=123755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ADF Attorney Matt Bowman at the <a href="http://www.christianpost.com/news/obamas-doj-targets-pro-life-free-speech-67688/">Christian Post</a>: In one of the lesser-known manipulations of U.S. law to advance the pro-abortion agenda, the President's Department of Justice has for several years been availing itself of a statute originally written to stop violence to instead seek massive fines and injunctions against peaceful pro-life advocates who offer alternatives to women on public sidewalks. But this politicization of the law in favor of abortion yielded a mixed record this week. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/23/matt-bowman-obamas-doj-targets-pro-life-free-speech/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/23/matt-bowman-obamas-doj-targets-pro-life-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Carolina to sue Obama administration over voter ID law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/18/south-carolina-to-sue-obama-administration-over-voter-id-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/18/south-carolina-to-sue-obama-administration-over-voter-id-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=123390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/11/us-southcarolina-voterid-idUSTRE80A02520120111">Reuters</a>: South Carolina will sue the administration of President Barack Obama over its rejection of the state's new requirement that voters provide a photo ID, Attorney General Alan Wilson said on Tuesday. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/18/south-carolina-to-sue-obama-administration-over-voter-id-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/18/south-carolina-to-sue-obama-administration-over-voter-id-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Advances Obama Administration’s Case Against Elderly Pro-life Activist</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/17/judge-advances-obama-administration%e2%80%99s-case-against-elderly-pro-life-activist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/17/judge-advances-obama-administration%e2%80%99s-case-against-elderly-pro-life-activist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: FACE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=123257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/judge-advances-obama-administrations-case-against-elderly-pro-life-activist">LifeSiteNews.com</a>: A federal judge has ruled that the Justice Department’s may proceed with its prosecution of a peaceful 80-year-old pro-life counselor. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/17/judge-advances-obama-administration%e2%80%99s-case-against-elderly-pro-life-activist/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/17/judge-advances-obama-administration%e2%80%99s-case-against-elderly-pro-life-activist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberty Counsel: Eric Holder’s Political Prosecution of Pro-Life Educator Thrown Out of Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/16/liberty-counsel-eric-holder%e2%80%99s-political-prosecution-of-pro-life-educator-thrown-out-of-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/16/liberty-counsel-eric-holder%e2%80%99s-political-prosecution-of-pro-life-educator-thrown-out-of-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=123133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lc.org/index.cfm?PID=14100&#038;PRID=1143">Liberty Counsel</a>: Judge suspects conspiracy between Eric Holder’s DOJ and abortion clinic to violate pro-lifers’ First Amendment rights <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/16/liberty-counsel-eric-holder%e2%80%99s-political-prosecution-of-pro-life-educator-thrown-out-of-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/16/liberty-counsel-eric-holder%e2%80%99s-political-prosecution-of-pro-life-educator-thrown-out-of-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ Memo: Lawfullness of Recess Appointments During a Recess of the Senate Notwithstanding Periodic Pro Forma Sessions</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/12/memo-lawfullness-of-recess-appointments-during-a-recess-of-the-senate-notwithstanding-periodic-pro-forma-sessions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/12/memo-lawfullness-of-recess-appointments-during-a-recess-of-the-senate-notwithstanding-periodic-pro-forma-sessions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=122814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.justice.gov/olc/2012/pro-forma-sessions-opinion.pdf">DOJ</a>: The convening of periodic pro forma sessions in which no business is to be conducted does not have the legal effect of interrupting an intrasession recess otherwise long enough to qualify as a  "Recess of the Senate” under the Recess Appointments Clause.  In this context, the President therefore has discretion to conclude that the Senate is unavailable to perform its advise-and-consent function and to exercise his power to make recess appointments. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/12/memo-lawfullness-of-recess-appointments-during-a-recess-of-the-senate-notwithstanding-periodic-pro-forma-sessions/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/12/memo-lawfullness-of-recess-appointments-during-a-recess-of-the-senate-notwithstanding-periodic-pro-forma-sessions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice memo argues Obama recess appointments were legal</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/12/justice-memo-argues-obama-recess-appointments-were-legal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/12/justice-memo-argues-obama-recess-appointments-were-legal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=122810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/203853-department-of-justice-defends-obamas-controversial-recess-appointments">TheHill.com</a>: In a memo, Justice argued the pro-forma sessions held every third day in the Senate do not constitute a functioning body that can render advice and consent on the president’s nominees. It said the president acted consistently under the law by making the appointments. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/12/justice-memo-argues-obama-recess-appointments-were-legal/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/12/justice-memo-argues-obama-recess-appointments-were-legal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bruce Ackerman: Recess Appointments—Release the Legal Advice &#124; WSJ.com</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/11/bruce-ackerman-recess-appointments%e2%80%94release-the-legal-advice-wsj-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/11/bruce-ackerman-recess-appointments%e2%80%94release-the-legal-advice-wsj-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=122620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Ackerman at <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204257504577150651545098864.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h">WSJ</a>: Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley, writing for all eight Republican members on the Judiciary Committee, has asked Attorney General Eric Holder to elaborate the Justice Department's position on the key issues. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/11/bruce-ackerman-recess-appointments%e2%80%94release-the-legal-advice-wsj-com/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/11/bruce-ackerman-recess-appointments%e2%80%94release-the-legal-advice-wsj-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama administration defends healthcare law in Supreme Court brief</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/06/obama-administration-defends-healthcare-law-in-supreme-court-brief/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/06/obama-administration-defends-healthcare-law-in-supreme-court-brief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obamcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Virginia v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=122290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/legal-challenges/202811-obama-administration-defends-healthcare-law-in-supreme-court-challenge">The Hill</a>: The arguments in Friday’s brief are largely similar to the approach the Justice Department has taken in lower courts. The <a href="http://thehill.com/images/stories/blogs/healthwatch/dojbrief.pdf">brief</a> says the mandate is an acceptable use of Congress’s taxing power and also defends the policy under the Constitution’s commerce clause. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/06/obama-administration-defends-healthcare-law-in-supreme-court-brief/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/06/obama-administration-defends-healthcare-law-in-supreme-court-brief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

