National Law Journal: Harvard Law School has announced a pilot program under which Harvard undergraduates may apply and gain acceptance during their junior year, provided they agree to work for two years in between graduation and beginning their legal studies. If the pilot program succeeds, the law school might expand eligibility to juniors at other universities, assistant dean and chief admissions officer Jessica Soban said.
- Posted: 05/17/2013
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.law.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Colleges, Topic: Education
Forum 18: China does not allow religious communities to run schools for children, even though regulations do not forbid the provision of religious education to minors. Nor is religious education provided in state schools. For students beyond school age, only state-approved religious groups affiliated with China’s five state-backed monopoly faiths are allowed to apply to set up institutions for the study of their faith or training of clergy, Forum 18 News Service notes. Restrictions are especially tight in Tibet and Xinjiang. The state limits the number of such institutions and their size. Establishing new colleges is cumbersome and long drawn out, even when successful. Their curricula must include “politics” and “patriotic” education, as defined by the state. The state also discourages religious activity on general university campuses. These restrictions reflect the authoritarian state’s desire to control religious groups, including by intervening in the training of their leaders and the level of education of their members.
- Posted: 05/17/2013
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.forum18.org
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: China, Global: Religious Liberty, Topic: Communism, Topic: Education
Eugene Volokh at the Volokh Conspiracy: Jonathan posted earlier today about Romeike v. Holder (6th Cir. May 14, 2013), which reject German homeschoolers’ asylum claim. The opinion is quite readable and persuasive, and I recommend it to those interested in the subject. But here’s my general thinking (reprised from 2010 post on the original immigration judge decision in the case), and stressing that I’m not an expert on asylum law:
- Posted: 05/15/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.volokh.com
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Global, Country: Germany, Global: Religious Freedom, Group: Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), Topic: Asylum, Topic: Education, Topic: Home School, Topic: School Choice, ZZ: Romeike v. Holder
One News Now: ADF attorney David Hacker says Des Moines Area Community College (DMACC) was barring student Jacob Dagel from freely handing out flyers protesting the use of college funds to subsidize a governor’s lesbian, “gay,” bisexual and transgender youth conference. “They required student to get permission ten days in advance of doing anything on campus, and then once they got that permission, they could only speak or hand out flyers or papers to their peers if they sat at a table in the student center,” Hacker details. “It’s a really restrictive policy and one that was clearly unconstitutional.”
- Posted: 05/15/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: David Hacker, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), Topic: Colleges, Topic: Education, ZZ: Dagel v. Des Moines Area Community College, ZZADF: 40530
Jonathan Adler reports on the ruling at the Volokh Conspiracy: The relevant legislation applies only to those who have a “well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A). There is a difference between the persecution of a discrete group and the prosecution of those who violate a generally applicable law.
- Posted: 05/14/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Global, Country: Germany, Global: Religious Freedom, Group: Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), Topic: Asylum, Topic: Education, Topic: Home School, Topic: School Choice, ZZ: Romeike v. Holder
Patheos: Alliance Defending Freedom senior counsel Gregory S. Baylor, whose organization argued for the constitutionality of the program, defended it on the grounds that “parents should be able to choose what’s best for their own children.” “The ultimate winners in the Indiana Supreme Court’s decision are Indiana families who want to provide the best education for their children, whether it is public or private,” Baylor said March 26.
- Posted: 05/14/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.patheos.com
- Tags: ADF: Gregory S. Baylor, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Vouchers, ZZ: Meredith v. Daniels, ZZ: Meredith v. Pence, ZZADF: 34856
DFW Catholic: Alliance Defending Freedom senior counsel Gregory S. Baylor, whose organization argued for the constitutionality of the program, defended it on the grounds that “parents should be able to choose what’s best for their own children.” “The ultimate winners in the Indiana Supreme Court’s decision are Indiana families who want to provide the best education for their children, whether it is public or private,” Baylor said March 26.
- Posted: 05/10/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.dfwcatholic.org
- Tags: ADF: Gregory S. Baylor, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Vouchers, ZZ: Meredith v. Daniels, ZZ: Meredith v. Pence, ZZADF: 34856
LifeNews: “Public schools should encourage, not shut down, the free exchange of ideas,” said Legal Counsel Jon Scruggs. “We commend Griggs County Central High School for believing in this principle and promptly allowing the pro-life poster to be redisplayed.”
- Posted: 05/09/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.lifenews.com
- Tags: ADF: Jonathan Scruggs, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: North Dakota, Topic: Education, ZZADF: 40685
Baptist Press: Alan Sears, president of Alliance Defending Freedom, noted that a key benefit of ADF’s involvement in helping defend religious freedom overseas is “the crucial perspective it gives us” for defending legal rights in America.”
- Posted: 05/08/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.bpnews.net
- Tags: ADF: Alan E. Sears, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Global, Country: Sweden, Global: Marriage and Family, Global: Religious Freedom, Global: Religious Liberty, Group: Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), Topic: Education, Topic: Home School, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: School Choice, ZZ: Johansson v Gotland Social Services, ZZ: Johansson v. Sweden, ZZADF: 28118
Matt Sharp at Alliance Defending Freedom: I’m often surprised by the number of school administrators under the mistaken belief that the First Amendment has an age limit. They think that while a kid is in elementary or middle school, they can stop them from expressing their views and that kids have to wait until high school to have constitutional rights.
- Posted: 05/08/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: blog.alliancedefendingfreedom.org
- Tags: ADF: Matt Sharp, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Minnesota, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Educaiton, Topic: Education, ZZ: A.Z. v. Nova Classical Academy, ZZADF: 40441
Des Moines Register (AP): “It was a non-issue the day after,” said Denson. “There was no need for a lawsuit in the first place.” Alliance Defending Freedom filed a lawsuit on behalf of Dagel in April. A motion followed shortly for a preliminary injunction to stop the policy from being enforced. “That’s news to me,” said David Hacker, a senior legal counsel at Alliance, about Denson’s comments that the policy has not been enforced since late March. “As far as we know, when we filed the lawsuit and we filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, the policy was still in the books.”
- Posted: 05/08/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.desmoinesregister.com
- Tags: ADF: David Hacker, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Topic: Colleges, Topic: Education, ZZ: Dagel v. Des Moines Area Community College, ZZADF: 40530
One News Now: Roger Kiska, legal counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom, explains the state’s point of view. “They’re absolutely oppressive with regard to parental rights. They believe that the only duty of the parents basically is to give birth and then the child belongs to the state,” he tells American Family News. “So we had known all along that this was going to be something that would have to be taken from Sweden and brought to the European level.” Kiska says the remaining option is to appeal to the European Court of Human Rights, which has jurisdiction over Sweden. [more]
- Posted: 05/07/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Roger Kiska, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Global, Country: Sweden, Court: European Court of Human Rights, Global: Marriage and Family, Global: Religious Freedom, Global: Religious Liberty, Group: Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), Topic: Education, Topic: Home School, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: School Choice, ZZ: Johansson v Gotland Social Services, ZZ: Johansson v. Sweden, ZZADF: 28118
Richard A. Epstein at WSJ: Law schools are under siege. Applications have dropped to around 54,000 annually, from around 100,000 in 2004. First-year enrollment has slipped to under 40,000 students, from 50,000 in 2010. Jobs are scarce—especially for students coming from lower-tier law schools. The average annual tuition has risen to just over $40,000 per year, from about $23,000 in 2001. Average debt on graduation has followed suit, jumping to about $125,000 in 2011, from $70,000 in 2001. No wonder many experts expect perhaps a dozen schools to close their doors within a year while other schools slash their class size, faculty and staff to stay open.
- Posted: 05/06/2013
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: online.wsj.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Colleges, Topic: Economy, Topic: Education
LifeSiteNews: Roger Kiska, the Alliance Defending Freedom’s senior legal counsel in Europe, was outraged by the court’s action. “It is beyond belief that a modern civilized country could allow such injustice to continue,” he said. “There is no evidence in the record that justifies the continued separation of this family. We will continue to fight for this family and on behalf of the principle that the European Convention condemns such acts.”
- Posted: 05/06/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.lifesitenews.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Global, Country: Sweden, Global: Marriage and Family, Global: Religious Freedom, Global: Religious Liberty, Group: Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), Topic: Education, Topic: Home School, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: School Choice, ZZ: Johansson v Gotland Social Services, ZZ: Johansson v. Sweden, ZZADF: 28118
One News Now: Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Roger Kiska contends that the state wants to be the parent of all students, indoctrinating them with the state’s ideology. “I’ve heard statements in Sweden and in France recently that the role of the parent is simply to give birth to a child, and then it’s the state’s duty to educate the child,” Kiska accounts. “That’s absolutely contrary to international law and morality.”
- Posted: 05/01/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Roger Kiska, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Global, Country: Sweden, Global: Marriage and Family, Global: Religious Freedom, Global: Religious Liberty, Group: Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), Topic: Education, Topic: Home School, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: School Choice, ZZ: Johansson v Gotland Social Services, ZZ: Johansson v. Sweden, ZZADF: 28118
HSLDA: Roger Kiska, the Alliance Defending Freedom’s senior legal counsel in Europe, was outraged by the court’s action. “It is beyond belief that a modern civilized country could allow such injustice to continue,” he said. “There is no evidence in the record that justifies the continued separation of this family. We will continue to fight for this family and on behalf of the principle that the European Convention condemns such acts.”
- Posted: 05/01/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.hslda.org
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Roger Kiska, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Global, Country: Sweden, Global: Marriage and Family, Global: Religious Freedom, Global: Religious Liberty, Group: Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), Topic: Education, Topic: Home School, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: School Choice, ZZ: Johansson v Gotland Social Services, ZZ: Johansson v. Sweden, ZZADF: 28118
|

Latest Posts
-
05/23/2013
Sadly, the Boy Scouts Executive National Council’s decision disregards not only the nearly 19,000 Americans who signed a petition urging BSA to ‘uphold the values that have defined the organization for over 100 years,’ but also the millions of Americans who have supported the program. Those promoting the agenda to change what the Boy Scouts have always been won’t rest until there is complete acceptance of any sexual preference for both leaders and members.
-
www.washingtonpost.com
05/23/2013
Washington Post: Jewish leaders in the media are in large part responsible for American acceptance of gay marriage, Vice President Biden said Tuesday night.
-
www.nationalreview.com
05/23/2013
Ed Whelan at National Review: There are two good reasons why the DOJ attorney’s argument that vindicating the RFRA rights of the business owners would violate the Establishment Clause was an “unexpected twist.” First, DOJ never made that argument in either of its Seventh Circuit briefs in the two cases. Second, there is good reason that it didn’t, for the argument is inane.

|