Bloomberg: This is a blatant matter of abusing the rights of church officials to be involved in local affairs,” said Joel Oster, a lawyer in Kansas for the Alliance Defense Fund, a Scottsdale, Arizona-based group that represents religious organizations. “We are excited about this case because of the precedent that could be established.”
- Posted: 02/09/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.bloomberg.com
- Tags: ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Elections, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, ZZADF: 34933
National Organization for Marriage v. McKee, No. 11-1196 (1st Cir. Jan. 31, 2012)
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents the second chapter of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Maine laws imposing registration and disclosure requirements on entities that finance election-related advocacy. In a recent decision, we rejected claims made by one of the appellants here, the National Organization for Marriage (“NOM”), asserting that Maine’s laws regulating political action committees (“PACs”) are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. See NOM v. McKee, 649 F.3d 34 (1st Cir. 2011) (“NOM I”). We now consider similar contentions raised by NOM and co-appellant American Principles in Action, Inc. (“APIA”) concerning the law applicable to ballot question committees (“BQCs”). See Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 21-A, § 1056-B. Our decision in NOM I effectively disposes of most of appellants’ challenges to Maine’s BQC requirements. On the only substantively distinct issue — the constitutionality of the definition of “contribution” in section 1056-B — we conclude that the BQC law, like the PAC laws, is constitutional. We thus affirm in its entirety the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants.
- Posted: 01/31/2012
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Freedom, Court: 1st Circuit, State: Maine, Topic: Elections, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: National Organization for Marriage v McKee
OneNewsNow.com: Alliance Defense Fund attorney Joel Oster was back in court this week to take on the cited law. “The appeals court in Texas heard our case about whether or not a church can speak out on local political matters. The case went really well,” he accounts. “The argument was well presented, and the court, I believe, understands that even a church has free-speech rights and has a right to petition their government for the redress of grievances.”
- Posted: 01/27/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Church Project, ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, ZZADF: 34933
Richard Land at WSJ.com: Polling from CNN shows that 57% of Iowa’s caucus participants were self-identified evangelicals, as in 2008, and they voted 32% for Rick Santorum. Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry each received 14% of evangelical votes, with Ron Paul (18%) and Michele Bachmann (6%) taking all but a smattering of the remainder.
- Posted: 01/06/2012
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: online.wsj.com
- Tags: Topic: Culture, Topic: Elections, Topic: Politics
KIVA.com ABC 7: Brown’s lawyers said there’s a more practical explanation. “It was late in the day (when we got the subpoena), and it said that we had to produce all of these documents the very next morning. This is like an 18-paragraph request for documents. There was not enough time to file all of these documents, so we filed a motion for a protective order. Under Texas law, when you file a protective order, you don’t have to produce the documents unless the court says you have to produce the documents. Once the court said to produce the documents, we produced the documents. Where’s the controversy?” said Brown’s Alliance Defense Fund lawyer, Joel Oster.
- Posted: 12/15/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.kvia.com
- Tags: ADF: Church Project, ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, ZZADF: 34933
El Paso Times: Brown’s attorney, Joel Oster, said the document released by Walker on Monday is unimportant, calling it “a non-issue.” . . . But Oster, one of Brown’s attorneys, downplayed the document’s significance. “The minutes that you refer to are a non-issue,” Oster said in an email. “They were properly given to the other side pursuant to the subpoena and the court’s instructions. They don’t state that the church itself was involved. “In any event, the court already stated that it believes that the church circulated the petitions. … What the court held, however, was that First Amendment rights were at stake and it would not stop the election.”
- Posted: 12/13/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.elpasotimes.com
- Tags: ADF: Church Project, ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, ZZADF: 34933
ADF Attorney Joel Oster appeared on the Bott Radio Network to discuss this case. | MP3 audio 22 mins
- Posted: 12/01/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- Tags: ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Elections, Topic: Politics, ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, ZZADF: 34933
Examiner.com: “Churches and ministries shouldn’t live in fear of being punished by the government for exercising their constitutionally protected right to free speech,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Joel Oster, who argued before the court on behalf of the parties sued by Cook. “The mayor is seeking to silence those who oppose his policies because he doesn’t like their views, but that’s neither legal nor constitutional. The recall petitions were circulated and submitted in full accordance with the law, and he cannot stop the election just because he doesn’t like the fact that some groups participated in a legitimate effort that he doesn’t favor.”
- Posted: 12/01/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.examiner.com
- Tags: ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Hoyt v. City of El Paso, ZZADF: 36052
|
Latest Posts
-
hosted.ap.org
02/09/2012
News from The Associated Press: The Virginia state Senate passed legislation Thursday allowing private adoption agencies to deny placements that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs, including opposition to homosexuality.
-
www.lifenews.com
02/09/2012
LifeNews.com: The liberal women on The View, Wednesday, shrieked at the “totalitarian” decision by a Texas judge to uphold a law requiring women to look at an ultrasound before having an abortion.
-
balkin.blogspot.com
02/09/2012
Jason Mazzone at Balkinization: By finding Proposition 8 to violate the Equal Protection Clause solely on the ground that it withdrew the right of marriage that gays and lesbians previously possessed in California (as a result the earlier state supreme court’s decision), Perry v. Brown produces a curious result. It appears to leave Proposition 8 partially intact.

|