Richard Land at WSJ.com: Polling from CNN shows that 57% of Iowa’s caucus participants were self-identified evangelicals, as in 2008, and they voted 32% for Rick Santorum. Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry each received 14% of evangelical votes, with Ron Paul (18%) and Michele Bachmann (6%) taking all but a smattering of the remainder.
- Posted: 01/06/2012
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: online.wsj.com
- Tags: Topic: Culture, Topic: Elections, Topic: Politics
KIVA.com ABC 7: Brown’s lawyers said there’s a more practical explanation. “It was late in the day (when we got the subpoena), and it said that we had to produce all of these documents the very next morning. This is like an 18-paragraph request for documents. There was not enough time to file all of these documents, so we filed a motion for a protective order. Under Texas law, when you file a protective order, you don’t have to produce the documents unless the court says you have to produce the documents. Once the court said to produce the documents, we produced the documents. Where’s the controversy?” said Brown’s Alliance Defense Fund lawyer, Joel Oster.
- Posted: 12/15/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.kvia.com
- Tags: ADF: Church Project, ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, ZZADF: 34933
El Paso Times: Brown’s attorney, Joel Oster, said the document released by Walker on Monday is unimportant, calling it “a non-issue.” . . . But Oster, one of Brown’s attorneys, downplayed the document’s significance. “The minutes that you refer to are a non-issue,” Oster said in an email. “They were properly given to the other side pursuant to the subpoena and the court’s instructions. They don’t state that the church itself was involved. “In any event, the court already stated that it believes that the church circulated the petitions. … What the court held, however, was that First Amendment rights were at stake and it would not stop the election.”
- Posted: 12/13/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.elpasotimes.com
- Tags: ADF: Church Project, ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, ZZADF: 34933
ADF Attorney Joel Oster appeared on the Bott Radio Network to discuss this case. | MP3 audio 22 mins
- Posted: 12/01/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- Tags: ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Texas, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Elections, Topic: Politics, ZZ: Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, ZZADF: 34933
Examiner.com: “Churches and ministries shouldn’t live in fear of being punished by the government for exercising their constitutionally protected right to free speech,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Joel Oster, who argued before the court on behalf of the parties sued by Cook. “The mayor is seeking to silence those who oppose his policies because he doesn’t like their views, but that’s neither legal nor constitutional. The recall petitions were circulated and submitted in full accordance with the law, and he cannot stop the election just because he doesn’t like the fact that some groups participated in a legitimate effort that he doesn’t favor.”
- Posted: 12/01/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.examiner.com
- Tags: ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Hoyt v. City of El Paso, ZZADF: 36052
El Paso Times: Joel Oster is senior counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, a group dedicated to ending any limits on churches’ political activities. He came from Kansas to defend the recall group. Oster argues that it’s not a violation of Texas law for corporations to help circulate recall petitions. He also says that if it is, then that law violates the First Amendment. “This case is about stopping an election,” Oster said, later adding, “This is absolutely a free-speech case. It’s nothing more than a free-speech case.”
- Posted: 11/28/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.elpasotimes.com
- Tags: ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Hoyt v. City of El Paso, ZZADF: 36052
OneNewsNow.com: So, ADF is challenging the constitutionality of the measure, and attorney Joel Oster further explains the objection. “Pastors and churches shouldn’t live in fear of being punished by the government for exercising their constitutionally protected right to free speech,” he contends. “No law or government official can rob a faith group of its constitutionally protected rights just because that official would prefer not to be removed from office.”
- Posted: 11/22/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Texas, Topic: Elections, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Hoyt v. City of El Paso, ZZADF: 36052
WorldNetDaily: “Pastors and churches shouldn’t live in fear of being punished by the government for exercising their constitutionally protected right to free speech,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Joel Oster in a statement. “No law or government official can rob a faith group of its constitutionally protected rights just because that official would prefer not to be removed from office.”
- Posted: 11/21/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.wnd.com
- Tags: ADF: Joel Oster, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Texas, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Elections, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Hoyt v. City of El Paso, ZZADF: 36052
The Hill: Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fla.) on Wednesday night said Republican governors and legislatures are purposefully pressing for the enactment of voter identification laws in order to suppress Democratic voter turnout in the 2012 election.
- Posted: 11/17/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: thehill.com
- Tags: Topic: Elections, Topic: Politics
The Hill: Three government contractors have filed a complaint against the Federal Election Commission (FEC) arguing a federal law that bars them from donating to political candidates is unconstitutional.
- Posted: 10/31/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: thehill.com
- Tags: Topic: Elections
Yahoo! News: So who is paying? The new study — by New York University Law School’s Brennan Center for Justice, the National Institute on Money in State Politics, and the Justice at Stake Campaign, a non-partisan reform group — found that a small group of super spenders plays the biggest role, using their money to buy the kind of judges they want hearing their cases.
- Posted: 10/31/2011
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: news.yahoo.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Docs: Studies, Topic: Elections
|

Latest Posts
-
www.bpnews.net
05/17/2013
Baptist Press: A florist who was told by the state of Washington she must provide her services for a gay wedding is countersuing the state, saying she has served gay customers her entire career and is concerned the state’s position on gay weddings will harm religious freedom.
-
www.nationalreview.com
05/17/2013
National Review: IRS scandal notwithstanding, on Tuesday, the (Republican-dominated) Texas legislature passed S.B. 346, a bill to force non-profit organizations and trade associations to disclose the names of the people who support them financially. The law exempts unions, but covers groups that spend more than $25,000 or more in independent expenditures about political candidates. This applies even if those expenditures are a tiny fraction of the group’s overall spending . . .
-
www.nytimes.com
05/17/2013
NY Times: At the first Congressional hearing into the I.R.S. scandal, J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration, told members of the House Ways and Means Committee that he informed the Treasury’s general counsel of his audit on June 4, and Deputy Treasury Secretary Neal Wolin “shortly thereafter.”

|