<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/topic-federal-communications-commission-fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s Fox broadcast licences targeted by US ethics group</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/02/rupert-murdochs-fox-broadcast-licences-targeted-by-us-ethics-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/02/rupert-murdochs-fox-broadcast-licences-targeted-by-us-ethics-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=132667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/may/01/rupert-murdoch-fox-licences-us">Guardian</a>: FCC called on to revoke licences in wake of British parliamentary report as phone hacking scandal widens abroad. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/02/rupert-murdochs-fox-broadcast-licences-targeted-by-us-ethics-group/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/02/rupert-murdochs-fox-broadcast-licences-targeted-by-us-ethics-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC asks Supreme Court to uphold fine for Super Bowl &#8216;wardrobe malfunction&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/19/fcc-asks-supreme-court-to-uphold-fine-for-super-bowl-wardrobe-malfunction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/19/fcc-asks-supreme-court-to-uphold-fine-for-super-bowl-wardrobe-malfunction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Indency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Fox Television Stations v. FCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=131539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/222341-fcc-asks-supreme-court-to-uphold-fine-for-super-bowl-wardrobe-malfunction-">The Hill</a>: The Federal Communications Commission on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to review whether the FCC has the authority to fine CBS for broadcasting a split-second glimpse of singer Janet Jackson’s bare breast in 2004. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/19/fcc-asks-supreme-court-to-uphold-fine-for-super-bowl-wardrobe-malfunction/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/19/fcc-asks-supreme-court-to-uphold-fine-for-super-bowl-wardrobe-malfunction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats &#8216;skeptical&#8217; about FCC&#8217;s political ad rule</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/21/democrats-skeptical-about-fccs-political-ad-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/21/democrats-skeptical-about-fccs-political-ad-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=129233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/217121-democrats-skeptical-about-fccs-political-ad-rule">The Hill</a>: Two Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee questioned Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski in a letter on Tuesday about his agency's proposal to require TV stations to keep online databases of political advertising. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/21/democrats-skeptical-about-fccs-political-ad-rule/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/21/democrats-skeptical-about-fccs-political-ad-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC cracks down on religious broadcasters</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/01/fcc-cracks-down-on-religious-broadcasters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/01/fcc-cracks-down-on-religious-broadcasters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Religious Broadcasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=117422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/67260.html">POLITICO.com</a>: If a church broadcasts the word of God on TV without closed captions, it risks incurring the wrath of the FCC. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/01/fcc-cracks-down-on-religious-broadcasters/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/01/fcc-cracks-down-on-religious-broadcasters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLJ Defends Ban on Television Indecency in Supreme Court Filing</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/15/aclj-defends-ban-on-television-indecency-in-supreme-court-filing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/15/aclj-defends-ban-on-television-indecency-in-supreme-court-filing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: FCC v. Fox TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=113588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/14/3909962/aclj-defends-ban-on-television.html">PR Newswire - sacbee.com</a>: The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) today filed a <a href="http://c0391070.cdn2.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/pdf/FCC-v%20Fox-TV-ACLJ-Supreme-Court-Amicus-Brief.pdf">friend-of-the-court brief</a> in the U.S. Supreme Court defending the ability of government authorities to outlaw public indecency, whether in person or on broadcast TV. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/15/aclj-defends-ban-on-television-indecency-in-supreme-court-filing/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/15/aclj-defends-ban-on-television-indecency-in-supreme-court-filing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC officially kills Fairness Doctrine, wiping it from rules</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/23/fcc-officially-kills-fairness-doctrine-wiping-it-from-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/23/fcc-officially-kills-fairness-doctrine-wiping-it-from-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=111524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/177775-fcc-strikes-83-outdated-rules-including-fairness-doctrine">The Hill</a>: Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski announced the elimination of 83 outdated and obsolete agency rules on Monday, including the controversial Fairness Doctrine. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/23/fcc-officially-kills-fairness-doctrine-wiping-it-from-rules/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/23/fcc-officially-kills-fairness-doctrine-wiping-it-from-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Documents show FCC coordinated &#8216;Net Neutrality&#8217; effort with outside group</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/03/documents-show-fcc-coordinated-net-neutrality-effort-with-outside-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/03/documents-show-fcc-coordinated-net-neutrality-effort-with-outside-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Judicial Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=105418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/2011/06/conn-carroll-documents-show-fcc-coordinated-net-neutrality-effort-outside"> Washington Examiner</a>: Documents made public yesterday by Judicial Watch describe extensive collusion by Federal Communications Commission officials with a left-wing advocacy group in a campaign to expand government regulation of the Internet. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/03/documents-show-fcc-coordinated-net-neutrality-effort-with-outside-group/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/03/documents-show-fcc-coordinated-net-neutrality-effort-with-outside-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High court asked to reinstate FCC indecency policy</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/21/high-court-asked-to-reinstate-fcc-indecency-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/21/high-court-asked-to-reinstate-fcc-indecency-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Indecency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=101751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama administration is asking the Supreme Court to reinstate a policy that allows federal regulators to fine broadcasters for showing nudity and airing curse words when young children may be watching television. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/21/high-court-asked-to-reinstate-fcc-indecency-policy/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/21/high-court-asked-to-reinstate-fcc-indecency-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net Neutrality Override: The House votes to stop the FCC&#8217;s Internet power grab.</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/12/net-neutrality-override-the-house-votes-to-stop-the-fccs-internet-power-grab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/12/net-neutrality-override-the-house-votes-to-stop-the-fccs-internet-power-grab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=100830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704529204576257153583865300.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h">WSJ</a>(full text via <a href="http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&#038;pz=1&#038;cf=all&#038;ned=us&#038;hl=en&#038;q=Net+Neutrality+Override">Google</a>): The Obama Administration continues to ignore court decisions on Internet regulation and use agencies like the Federal Communications Commission to circumvent Congress. We're happy to see House Republicans vote to overrule this behavior. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/12/net-neutrality-override-the-house-votes-to-stop-the-fccs-internet-power-grab/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/12/net-neutrality-override-the-house-votes-to-stop-the-fccs-internet-power-grab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morality in Media says Obama Administration must appeal 2nd Circuit decision invalidating the FCC broadcast indecency policy</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/11/morality-in-media-says-obama-administration-must-appeal-2nd-circuit-decision-invalidating-the-fcc-broadcast-indecency-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/11/morality-in-media-says-obama-administration-must-appeal-2nd-circuit-decision-invalidating-the-fcc-broadcast-indecency-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Morality in Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Fox Television Stations v. FCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=100630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to protect American families from an onslaught of indecency on network television, the U.S. Department of Justice must appeal the July 2010 2nd Circuit decision in <em>Fox Television Stations, et al., v. FCC </em>(lead Circuit Court docket is 06-1760) which invalidated the FCC broadcast indecency policy, according to Morality in Media general counsel Robert Peters.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/11/morality-in-media-says-obama-administration-must-appeal-2nd-circuit-decision-invalidating-the-fcc-broadcast-indecency-policy/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/11/morality-in-media-says-obama-administration-must-appeal-2nd-circuit-decision-invalidating-the-fcc-broadcast-indecency-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House Says It Will Veto House Efforts to Scuttle New Internet Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/white-house-says-it-will-veto-house-efforts-to-scuttle-new-internet-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/white-house-says-it-will-veto-house-efforts-to-scuttle-new-internet-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 22:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=100059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/tech/white-house-says-it-will-veto-house-efforts-to-scuttle-internet-fairness-rules-20110404">National Journal</a>: The House Rules Committee was meeting on Monday evening to consider a measure to repeal the Federal Communications Commission's regulations, designed to prevent Internet carriers from blocking websites that use too much bandwidth. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/white-house-says-it-will-veto-house-efforts-to-scuttle-new-internet-rules/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/white-house-says-it-will-veto-house-efforts-to-scuttle-new-internet-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court dismisses Verizon lawsuit against FCC net neutrality rules</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/court-dismisses-verizon-lawsuit-against-fcc-net-neutrality-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/court-dismisses-verizon-lawsuit-against-fcc-net-neutrality-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=100021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-tech/post/court-dismisses-verizon-lawsuit-against-fcc-net-neutrality-rules/2011/04/04/AFfxDNdC_blog.html">Washington Post</a>: But the decision, on a technicality, may be a short-lived victory for the FCC. Verizon Communications said it plans to file another complaint against the agency’s so-called net neutrality rules, once the regulations are officially introduced in the Federal Register. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/court-dismisses-verizon-lawsuit-against-fcc-net-neutrality-rules/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/court-dismisses-verizon-lawsuit-against-fcc-net-neutrality-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heritage Foundation: Big Government Vs. the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/heritage-foundation-big-government-vs-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/heritage-foundation-big-government-vs-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=99969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/04/04/morning-bell-big-government-vs-the-internet/?utm_source=Newsletter&#38;utm_medium=Email&#38;utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell">Heritage Foundation Morning Bell</a>: The policy the FCC is trying to enact is known as “net neutrality,” an unfortunately vague code word for government regulation of the Internet. Supporters of net neutrality will tell you the regulation is necessary to keep the Internet “free and open” and to prevent corporations from “throttling” network speeds, making it faster to download some things, slower to download others. And, in this doomsday, apocalyptic, dystopian future, only the FCC can save the day with more and more government regulations. FCC, stay home, the reality is much different. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/heritage-foundation-big-government-vs-the-internet/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/heritage-foundation-big-government-vs-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon challenges &#8220;net neutrality&#8221; rules</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/20/verizon-challenges-net-neutrality-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/20/verizon-challenges-net-neutrality-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=92748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://us.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE70J72N20110120?ca=rdt">Reuters</a>: "Verizon Communications is going to court to challenge the top U.S. telecommunications regulator, saying the FCC overstepped its authority with the recent adoption of open Internet rules." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/20/verizon-challenges-net-neutrality-rules/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/20/verizon-challenges-net-neutrality-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit ruling opens the door to more nudity</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/10/2nd-circuit-ruling-opens-the-door-to-more-nudity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/10/2nd-circuit-ruling-opens-the-door-to-more-nudity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: ABC v. FCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=90541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/tv/bottoms_up_TVD8XC31Te6v2kQTNAWc0J#ixzz1AM2dCtnY">New York Post</a>: "The US Second Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated the $1.21 million worth of fines that the FCC levied against ABC after alleging that the network violated broadcast indecency standards for daring to show actress Charlotte Ross' naked behind during a 2003 episode of 'NYPD Blue.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/10/2nd-circuit-ruling-opens-the-door-to-more-nudity/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/10/2nd-circuit-ruling-opens-the-door-to-more-nudity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Mary Bono Mack: The federal pat-down of the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/05/rep-mary-bono-mack-the-federal-pat-down-of-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/05/rep-mary-bono-mack-the-federal-pat-down-of-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Open Society Institute (OSI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=89802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Mary Bono Mack (R-Calif.) <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/135937-the-federal-pat-down-of-the-internet-rep-mary-bono-mack">writing at The Hill</a>: "Federal regulation of the Internet, also known as network neutrality, has been seen as the holy grail for the media regulation obsessed left-wing special interest groups like Moveon.org, Free Press and George Soros's Open Society Institute for the latter half of the past decade . . . it really does not matter that only 21 percent of Americans support federal regulation of the Internet over the free market or that these regulations will deter capital investment which create private sector jobs." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/05/rep-mary-bono-mack-the-federal-pat-down-of-the-internet/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/05/rep-mary-bono-mack-the-federal-pat-down-of-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit: TV can&#8217;t be fined for &#8216;NYPD Blue&#8217; nude shot</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/04/2nd-circuit-tv-cant-be-fined-for-nypd-blue-nude-shot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/04/2nd-circuit-tv-cant-be-fined-for-nypd-blue-nude-shot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: ABC v. FCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=89667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A federal appeals court says the Federal Communications Commission cannot fine broadcasters for showing a woman's nude buttocks on a 2003 episode of 'NYPD Blue.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/04/2nd-circuit-tv-cant-be-fined-for-nypd-blue-nude-shot/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/04/2nd-circuit-tv-cant-be-fined-for-nypd-blue-nude-shot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ: www.internet.gov</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/30/wsj-www-internet-gov/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/30/wsj-www-internet-gov/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=89022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203525404576049951815563410.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h">Wall Street Journal</a>: "The FCC's brazen power grab is already producing a welcome backlash on Capitol Hill. GOP Representative Marsha Blackburn says she'll introduce legislation to prohibit the FCC from enforcing net neutrality rules. And Senate Commerce Committee Ranking Member Kay Bailey Hutchison plans to introduce a 'resolution of disapproval' under the Congressional Review Act, which allows Congress to overturn regulatory agency orders with a simple majority in the House and Senate." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/30/wsj-www-internet-gov/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/30/wsj-www-internet-gov/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rasmussen: Just 21% want FCC to regulate Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/28/just-21-want-fcc-to-regulate-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/28/just-21-want-fcc-to-regulate-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=88534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/december_2010/just_21_want_fcc_to_regulate_internet_most_fear_regulation_would_promote_political_agenda#">Rasmussen Reports</a>: "The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that only 21% of Likely U.S. Voters want the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to regulate the Internet as it does radio and television. Fifty-four percent (54%) are opposed to such regulation, and 25% are not sure." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/28/just-21-want-fcc-to-regulate-internet/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/28/just-21-want-fcc-to-regulate-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Fund: The net neutrality coup</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/22/john-fund-the-net-neutrality-coup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/22/john-fund-the-net-neutrality-coup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=88157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Fund <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703886904576031512110086694.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h">writing in the WSJ</a>: "The Federal Communications Commission's new 'net neutrality' rules, passed on a partisan 3-2 vote yesterday, represent a huge win for a slick lobbying campaign run by liberal activist groups and foundations. The losers are likely to be consumers who will see innovation and investment chilled by regulations that treat the Internet like a public utility." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/22/john-fund-the-net-neutrality-coup/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/22/john-fund-the-net-neutrality-coup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC says gov&#8217;t has power to regulate Internet traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/fcc-says-govt-has-power-to-regulate-internet-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/fcc-says-govt-has-power-to-regulate-internet-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=88025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703581204576033513990668654.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories">WSJ</a>: "Federal telecommunications regulators approved new rules Tuesday that would for the first time give the federal government formal authority to regulate Internet traffic, although how much or for how long remained unclear." FCC press release is available for download <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/recentReleases.do">here</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/fcc-says-govt-has-power-to-regulate-internet-traffic/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/fcc-says-govt-has-power-to-regulate-internet-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heritage Foundation: It&#8217;s time to stop the FCC Internet czars</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/heritage-foundation-its-time-to-stop-the-fcc-internet-czars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/heritage-foundation-its-time-to-stop-the-fcc-internet-czars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=87871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Brownfield <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2010/12/21/morning-bell-its-time-to-stop-the-fcc-internet-czars">writing at The Heritage Foundation / The Foundry</a>: "Imagine a future where the Internet is governed by unelected bureaucrats in Washington, DC, who rule at their own whim, regardless of legislators’ demands or judicial rule. Sadly, that future is now. Today, the Federal Communications Commission is poised to make an unprecedented power grab and <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/134545-copps-will-not-block-net-neutraliy-internet-line-regs-will-pass">assert the authority</a> to regulate the Internet, despite opposition from Congress and a contrary federal court ruling. And while it’s a story that has gone largely unnoticed amid Congress’ big-ticket lame duck decisions, it’s a tale of unchecked government expansion that must be told." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/heritage-foundation-its-time-to-stop-the-fcc-internet-czars/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/21/heritage-foundation-its-time-to-stop-the-fcc-internet-czars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The FCC&#8217;s Threat to Internet Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/the-fccs-threat-to-internet-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/the-fccs-threat-to-internet-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=87534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert M. McDowall writes at the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703395204576023452250748540.html">Wall Street Journal</a>: 'Net neutrality' sounds nice, but the Web is working fine now. The new rules will inhibit investment, deter innovation and create a billable-hours bonanza for lawyers. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/the-fccs-threat-to-internet-freedom/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/the-fccs-threat-to-internet-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Times: Wave goodbye to Internet freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/03/washington-times-wave-goodbye-to-internet-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/03/washington-times-wave-goodbye-to-internet-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=84898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/dec/2/wave-goodbye-to-internet-freedom/">Washington Times</a>: "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is poised to add the Internet to its portfolio of regulated industries." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/03/washington-times-wave-goodbye-to-internet-freedom/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/03/washington-times-wave-goodbye-to-internet-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Republican says there&#8217;s &#8220;no doubt&#8221; new leadership needed at FCC</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/key-republican-says-theres-no-doubt-new-leadership-needed-at-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/key-republican-says-theres-no-doubt-new-leadership-needed-at-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 20:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=84642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/131207-blackburn-80-page-of-internet-regs-suggest-fcc-needs-new-leadership">The Hill</a>: "The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) net-neutrality effort suggests the agency needs to replace its top leadership, Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) said in an interview with The Hill on Tuesday." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/key-republican-says-theres-no-doubt-new-leadership-needed-at-fcc/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/key-republican-says-theres-no-doubt-new-leadership-needed-at-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upton: Battling net-neutrality part of keeping GOP &#8220;Pledge&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/upton-battling-net-neutrality-part-of-keeping-gop-pledge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/upton-battling-net-neutrality-part-of-keeping-gop-pledge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=84553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/131459-upton-battling-net-neutrality-part-of-keeping-gop-pledge">The Hill</a>: "Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) suggested the GOP would have to work to dismantle net-neutrality rules if it to keep the promises they made to voters in the run-up to the midterm elections, including a vow to scrutinize how federal policies impact the economy." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/upton-battling-net-neutrality-part-of-keeping-gop-pledge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/upton-battling-net-neutrality-part-of-keeping-gop-pledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC chairman to propose plan for net neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/fcc-chairman-to-propose-plan-for-net-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/fcc-chairman-to-propose-plan-for-net-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=84532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/01/AR2010120100014.html">Washington Post</a>: "The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission plans to announce Wednesday a controversial proposal that would prohibit Internet providers from favoring or discriminating against any traffic that goes over their networks." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/fcc-chairman-to-propose-plan-for-net-neutrality/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/fcc-chairman-to-propose-plan-for-net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC seeks to regulate Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/22/fcc-seeks-to-regulate-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/22/fcc-seeks-to-regulate-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=83309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/45371.html">Politico</a>: "Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski is putting together a net neutrality proposal and plans to take action on [net neutrality] as early as next month, according to several sources with knowledge of the situation . . . The long-running net neutrality debate centers around rules that would require Internet service providers to treat all web traffic equally. Internet companies like Google and Skype want net neutrality rules applied to both wireline and wireless networks, but network operators including AT&#038;T, Verizon and Comcast say they need flexibility to manage web traffic on their lines." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/22/fcc-seeks-to-regulate-internet/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/22/fcc-seeks-to-regulate-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR CEO Vivian Schiller key architect of FCC gov&#8217;t takeover of the news</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/26/npr-ceo-vivian-schiller-key-architect-of-fcc-govt-takeover-of-the-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/26/npr-ceo-vivian-schiller-key-architect-of-fcc-govt-takeover-of-the-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=78501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tara Servatius <a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/TaraServatius/2010/10/25/npr_ceo_vivian_schiller_key_architect_of_fcc_govt_takeover_of_the_news/page/full/">writing at Townhall</a>: "Schiller, a former New York Times executive, is one of a few dozen power players working with the Federal Communications Commission, the Federal Trade Commission and a leftist group called Free Press to 'reinvent journalism.' That’s how the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opp/workshops/news/jun15/docs/new-staff-discussion.pdf">FTC describes it</a>. The FCC calls what they are doing the 'Future of Journalism.' Free Press, a think tank funded by leftist billionaire George Soros, among others, calls it 'the new public media.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/26/npr-ceo-vivian-schiller-key-architect-of-fcc-govt-takeover-of-the-news/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/26/npr-ceo-vivian-schiller-key-architect-of-fcc-govt-takeover-of-the-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC&#8217;s appeal of indecency case applauded</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/30/fccs-appeal-of-indecency-case-applauded/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/30/fccs-appeal-of-indecency-case-applauded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/30/fccs-appeal-of-indecency-case-applauded/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=33604">Baptist Press</a>: "Pro-family advocates applauded the Federal Communications Commission's decision to appeal a court ruling they fear could open broadcast television to the use of even more profanities and obscenities." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/30/fccs-appeal-of-indecency-case-applauded/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/30/fccs-appeal-of-indecency-case-applauded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC appeals negative decency ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/29/fcc-appeals-negative-decency-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/29/fcc-appeals-negative-decency-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Fox News Television v. FCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=70655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1138778">OneNewsNow</a>: "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has decided to appeal a court decision that makes it impossible for the agency to restrict indecency in media . . . 'In my mind, they had to appeal either this case or the Janet Jackson  Super Bowl wardrobe malfunction case, which is going to be decided  soon,' notes Pat Trueman, who heads the <a href="http://pornharms.com/">War on Illegal Pornography</a> . . . Trueman, who is also an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), tells OneNewsNow the outcome is vital because lower courts have not been favorable toward the FCC." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/29/fcc-appeals-negative-decency-ruling/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/29/fcc-appeals-negative-decency-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concerned Women applaud FCC&#8217;s appeal of indecency ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/27/concerned-women-applaud-fccs-appeal-of-indecency-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/27/concerned-women-applaud-fccs-appeal-of-indecency-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Concerned Women for America (CWA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Fox News Television v. FCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=70486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.christiannewswire.com/~chrisvn5/news/1901714792.html">ChristianNewsWire</a>: "Concerned Women for America's (CWA) CEO Penny Nance applauded the FCC's move saying: 'We are pleased to see the FCC is standing up for families and the agency's power to regulate indecency granted by "We the People."  CWA's half-million members around the country called on FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski to appeal the decision and we stand with the FCC as they ask the Second Circuit to reconsider its wrongful decision.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/27/concerned-women-applaud-fccs-appeal-of-indecency-ruling/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/27/concerned-women-applaud-fccs-appeal-of-indecency-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC appeals ruling on indecency restrictions</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/26/fcc-appeals-ruling-on-indecency-restrictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/26/fcc-appeals-ruling-on-indecency-restrictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Fox News Television v. FCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=70443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/115947-fcc-appeals-court-ruling-on-indecency-policy">The Hill</a>: "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is appealing a federal court ruling that its indecency policy is unconstitutional, arguing the decision makes it all but impossible for the agency to enforce restrictions on broadcasting nudity or profanity." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/26/fcc-appeals-ruling-on-indecency-restrictions/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/26/fcc-appeals-ruling-on-indecency-restrictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just 29% say FCC does a good job regulating profanity, sexual content and violence</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/04/just-29-say-fcc-does-a-good-job-regulating-profanity-sexual-content-and-violence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/04/just-29-say-fcc-does-a-good-job-regulating-profanity-sexual-content-and-violence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obscenity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=67385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/july_2010/just_29_say_fcc_does_a_good_job_regulating_profanity_sexual_content_and_violence">Rasmussen Reports</a>: "A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 29% of Adults say the FCC is doing a good or excellent job regulating profanity, sexual content and violence on television and radio. Twenty-eight percent (28%) feel the FCC is doing a poor job monitoring content." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/04/just-29-say-fcc-does-a-good-job-regulating-profanity-sexual-content-and-violence/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/04/just-29-say-fcc-does-a-good-job-regulating-profanity-sexual-content-and-violence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Churches may face fines for wireless mics</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/30/churches-may-face-fines-for-wireless-mics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/30/churches-may-face-fines-for-wireless-mics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/30/churches-may-face-fines-for-wireless-mics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/BPnews.asp?ID=33441">Baptist Press</a>: "Churches could face six-figure fines if they continue to use wireless microphones that operate within a spectrum the Federal Communications Commission has set aside for public safety entities. 'Certain wireless microphones have operated in frequencies that are needed for public safety. When these microphones were first designed, the frequencies they used were in between the frequencies that television stations used to broadcast television programs,' the FCC explained." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/30/churches-may-face-fines-for-wireless-mics/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/30/churches-may-face-fines-for-wireless-mics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

