Ed Whelan at NRO: Back in 2011 when I was the first to highlight the extraordinary position against religious liberty that the Obama administration adopted in the Hosanna-Tabor case, I elicited a tizzy on the Left when I raised the possibility that the administration’s hostility to the ministerial exception to federal antidiscrimination laws was part and parcel of a broader ideological agenda that would have gay causes trump religious liberty. The particular case of Hosanna-Tabor had nothing to do with issues of homosexuality, the critics observed, so they claimed not to see the connection.
- Posted: 05/07/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.nationalreview.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Conestoga Wood Specialties v. Sebelius
CNSNews: Bishop Thomas Tobin, head of the Catholic diocese of Providence, said the “gay marriage” bill signed into law in Rhode Island by its governor, Lincoln Chafee, constituted a “new challenge of the post-Christian era into which, clearly, we have now entered.”
- Posted: 05/07/2013
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: cnsnews.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, State: Rhode Island, Topic: Culture, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
Joe LaRue went on radio to discuss the situation: Pentagon backtracks on evangelization comments, investigation launched. | The Vicki McKenna Show —– MP3 audio 14:20 mins | WAVA Radio with Don Kroah —– MP3 audio 13:25 mins | The Zeb Bell Show —– MP3 audio 13:04 mins
- Posted: 05/07/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: ADF: Joe LaRue, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Military Religious Freedom Foundation, Topic: Atheism, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Military, ZZADF: 40897
Erwin Chemersinsky at ABA Journal: No decisions are more eagerly awaited from the U.S. Supreme Court than those in the marriage equality cases. Hollingsworth v. Perry and United States v. Windsor were argued on March 26 and 27, and most expect that the decisions will be announced at the end of June. Having just re-read the transcripts of the arguments, a few things seem clear.
- Posted: 05/06/2013
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.abajournal.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 26561, ZZADF: 33121
Benjamin L. Smith at First Things: Unfortunately the sentimentality surrounding this phrase can obscure the plain facts of the matter. New generations must replace old generations. There must be a never-ending supply of farmers, entrepreneurs, soldiers, voters, statesmen, taxpayers, intellectuals, and others for society to provide essential goods and services. Furthermore, there is overwhelming evidence of the sociological and economic benefits of traditional, heterosexual marriage. For all of these reasons the promulgation of heterosexual marriage contracts is justified by grave public necessity; the legal establishment of heterosexual marriage is justified by the common good.
- Posted: 05/01/2013
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.firstthings.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Culture, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
Robert McNamara and Paul Sherman at the National Law Journal: As if the facts of these cases weren’t provocative enough, the challenges to California’s law are complicated by the fact that the plaintiffs, practicing psychologists who are licensed in California, simply engage in “talk therapy” with their patients. As a result, these cases raise an important, unresolved constitutional question: Is the kind of one-on-one counseling and advice at issue in talk therapy “free speech” protected by the First Amendment?
- Posted: 05/01/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.law.com
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, Court: 9th Circuit, Group: Institute for Justice, State: Arizona, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Reparative Therapy, ZZ: Pickup v. Brown, ZZ: Welch v. Brown
CNSNews: Miami’s Catholic archbishop, Thomas Wenski, said establishing “gay marriage” would corrupt the natural setting for rearing children by a mother and a father, and further spread “moral relativism,” one of the signs that democracy is “on its way to totalitarianism.”
- Posted: 04/30/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: cnsnews.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, Topic: Culture, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Natural Law, Topic: Socialism
Marvin Olasky at Townhall: Today’s justices have a chance to do not only what’s right but what’s logical: If the Supreme Court affirms states rights on marriage, why not on abortion?
- Posted: 04/30/2013
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Sanctity of Life, Court: U.S. Supreme, State: California, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 26561, ZZADF: 33121
Edge Boston: trans woman won’t get to fulfill her dream of attending Smith College, a private women’s university in Massachusetts, because on government federal financial aid documents she is registered as a male . . . “We have a petition of over 3,700 signatures,” Schwartz said of the Change.org petition, noting plans to present the petition with the signatures to the school’s administration sometime this week. “We have a list of demands created as an organization
- Posted: 04/30/2013
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- Tags: Topic: Colleges, Topic: Education, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Transsexualism
Religion Clause Blog: In In re Alison Clark, (9th Cir., April 24, 2013), U.S. 9th Circuit Judge Harry Pregerson, acting in his capacity as Chair of the Federal Public Defender Standing Committee, held that the Administrative Office of the United States Courts acted wrongly in denying federal health care benefits to the same-sex spouse of an Oregon assistant federal public defender.
- Posted: 04/29/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Category: Featured, Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: In re Alison Clark
|

Latest Posts
-
05/23/2013
Sadly, the Boy Scouts Executive National Council’s decision disregards not only the nearly 19,000 Americans who signed a petition urging BSA to ‘uphold the values that have defined the organization for over 100 years,’ but also the millions of Americans who have supported the program. Those promoting the agenda to change what the Boy Scouts have always been won’t rest until there is complete acceptance of any sexual preference for both leaders and members.
-
www.washingtonpost.com
05/23/2013
Washington Post: Jewish leaders in the media are in large part responsible for American acceptance of gay marriage, Vice President Biden said Tuesday night.
-
www.nationalreview.com
05/23/2013
Ed Whelan at National Review: There are two good reasons why the DOJ attorney’s argument that vindicating the RFRA rights of the business owners would violate the Establishment Clause was an “unexpected twist.” First, DOJ never made that argument in either of its Seventh Circuit briefs in the two cases. Second, there is good reason that it didn’t, for the argument is inane.

|