Life, Death & the God Complex: The Effectiveness of Incorporating Religion-Based Arguments Into the Pro-Choice Perspective on Abortion | Stacy A. Scaldo at N. Ky. L. Rev.

Legal Periodical: Glucksberg, Lawrence, and the Decline of Loving’s Marriage Precedent

Conscientious Objection and Civil Disobedience | Legal Periodical

Assessing the Legal Bases for Conscientious Objection in Healthcare | Legal Periodical

Veiled Meaning: Tolerance and Prohibition of the Hijab in the U.S. and France

Carl Esbeck: A Religious Organization’s Autonomy in Matters of Self-Governance: Hosanna-Tabor and the First Amendment

Legal Periodical: Christian Legal Society v. Martinez: In Hindsight

Erica A. Holzer: “Defense of Marriage Acts: A Fifty State Survey”

Legal Periodical: Religion by Any Other Name? Prohibitions on Same-Sex Marriage and the Limits of the Establishment Clause

Legal Periodical: “Secularization by Law? The Establishment Clauses and Religion in the Public Square in Australia and the United States”

Legal Periodical: “The First Amendment’s Religion Clauses: The Calvinist Document That Interprets Them Both”

    Leah Farish, The First Amendment’s Religion Clauses: The Calvinist Document That Interprets Them Both, 12 J. of Religion & Society 1 (2010), Online: http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2010/2010-2.pdf.

    This paper suggests that the Westminster Confession of Faith’s provisions about church and state, revised in Philadelphia at the start of the Constitution’s ratifying convention, furnished much of the syntax and vocabulary for the First Amendment’s religion clauses. Recognizing
    the cultural links between the new American government and the Presbyterian Church, the author argues that it was natural for the founders to look to how the new Westminster Confession situated church and state. The author argues that Fisher Ames’s proposed wording for the First Amendment won immediate adoption because it resonated with the Confession, standing as it did in that culture for unity and good sense.


  • Posted: 03/26/2012
  • |
  • Category: Religious Liberty
  • |
  • Source: moses.creighton.edu

  • Tags: , ,

Legal Periodical: Exposing the Traditional Marriage Agenda

    Feinberg, Jessica, Exposing the Traditional Marriage Agenda (January 9, 2012). Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1982025

    The success of a social justice movement, especially with regard to issues upon which the public will be voting, depends in significant part on how the issues are defined or framed. Anti-same-sex marriage campaigns frequently urge voters to vote in favor of laws defining marriage as between a man and a woman in order to “protect traditional marriage.” Instead of framing the issue as a question of whether individuals of the same sex should be banned from marrying, anti-same-sex marriage campaigns often frame the issue as a question of whether traditional marriage should be protected from redefinition. This strategy has proven successful for anti-same-sex marriage campaigns. However, same-sex marriage opponents rarely have been challenged with regard to the meaning of “traditional marriage.” In exploring the history of marriage within the United States, it becomes clear that, contrary to the understanding of the term held by the general public, traditional marriage consists of much more than opposite-sex spouses. The requirements of traditional marriage also include permanence, gender roles, monogamy, and procreation. As it turns out, the leading anti-same-sex marriage organizations are well aware of these other requirements of traditional marriage and do a significant amount of work to protect them – work about which the public remains largely unaware. This Article argues that exposing the true meaning of traditional marriage and the leading anti-same-sex marriage organizations’ efforts to protect the other requirements of traditional marriage would be a helpful strategy for pro-same-sex marriage campaigns. Specifically, it would give same-sex marriage proponents an effective response to the argument that people should vote against same-sex marriage in order to protect traditional marriage and provide pro-same-sex marriage campaigns with a compelling new way to frame the issue.


  • Posted: 01/16/2012
  • |
  • Category: Marriage & Family
  • |
  • Source: ssrn.com

  • Tags: , , ,

Legal Periodical: Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion

Legal Periodical: Education in the Secular State: Whose Right is it?