<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Topic: Legal Periodicals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/topic-legal-periodicals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jeremy Waldron: What is Natural Law Like?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/jeremy-waldron-what-is-natural-law-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/jeremy-waldron-what-is-natural-law-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Natural Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Waldron, Jeremy, What is Natural Law Like? (May 17, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2061672 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/jeremy-waldron-what-is-natural-law-like/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/jeremy-waldron-what-is-natural-law-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David E. Steinberg: The Myth of Church-State Separation</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/david-e-steinberg-the-myth-of-church-state-separation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/david-e-steinberg-the-myth-of-church-state-separation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David E. Steinberg, The Myth of Church-State Separation, 59 Cleveland State Law Review 623-644 (2011), Available at: http://works.bepress.com/david_steinberg/1 The Myth Of Church-State Separation by David E. Steinberg Abstract This article asserts that the church-state separation interpretation of Establishment Clause history is simply &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/david-e-steinberg-the-myth-of-church-state-separation/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/david-e-steinberg-the-myth-of-church-state-separation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erica A. Holzer: &#8220;DoMA Statutes and Same-Sex Divorce Litigation&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/erica-a-holzer-doma-statutes-and-same-sex-divorce-litigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/erica-a-holzer-doma-statutes-and-same-sex-divorce-litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holzer, Erica A., DoMA Statutes and Same-Sex Divorce Litigation (March 5, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2060603 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2060603
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/erica-a-holzer-doma-statutes-and-same-sex-divorce-litigation/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/erica-a-holzer-doma-statutes-and-same-sex-divorce-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Stokes Paulsen: The Priority of God (a Theory of Religious Liberty)</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/michael-stokes-paulsen-the-priority-of-god-a-theory-of-religious-liberty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/michael-stokes-paulsen-the-priority-of-god-a-theory-of-religious-liberty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paulsen, Michael Stokes, The Priority of God (a Theory of Religious Liberty) (2012). Pepperdine Law Review, 2012, Forthcoming; U of St. Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2061162 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/michael-stokes-paulsen-the-priority-of-god-a-theory-of-religious-liberty/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/michael-stokes-paulsen-the-priority-of-god-a-theory-of-religious-liberty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: Animus Thick and Thin: The Broader Impact of the Ninth Circuit Decision in Perry v. Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/14/legal-periodical-animus-thick-and-thin-the-broader-impact-of-the-ninth-circuit-decision-in-perry-v-brown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/14/legal-periodical-animus-thick-and-thin-the-broader-impact-of-the-ninth-circuit-decision-in-perry-v-brown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Perry v. Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=133527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hunter, Nan D., Animus Thick and Thin: The Broader Impact of the Ninth Circuit Decision in Perry v. Brown (March 19, 2012). Stanford Law Review Online, Vol. 64, pp. 111-116, 2012; Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-063. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2056396 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/14/legal-periodical-animus-thick-and-thin-the-broader-impact-of-the-ninth-circuit-decision-in-perry-v-brown/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/14/legal-periodical-animus-thick-and-thin-the-broader-impact-of-the-ninth-circuit-decision-in-perry-v-brown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: Standing on the Edge: Standing Doctrine and the Injury Requirement at the Borders of Establishment Clause Jurisprudence</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/27/legal-periodical-standing-on-the-edge-standing-doctrine-and-the-injury-requirement-at-the-borders-of-establishment-clause-jurisprudence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/27/legal-periodical-standing-on-the-edge-standing-doctrine-and-the-injury-requirement-at-the-borders-of-establishment-clause-jurisprudence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=132379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mary Alexander Myers, <a href="http://www.vanderbiltlawreview.org/2012/04/standing-on-the-edge-standing-doctrine-and-the-injury-requirement-at-the-borders-of-establishment-clause-jurisprudence/" target="_blank">Standing on the Edge: Standing Doctrine and the Injury Requirement at the Borders of Establishment Clause Jurisprudence</a>, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 979 (2012). <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/27/legal-periodical-standing-on-the-edge-standing-doctrine-and-the-injury-requirement-at-the-borders-of-establishment-clause-jurisprudence/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/27/legal-periodical-standing-on-the-edge-standing-doctrine-and-the-injury-requirement-at-the-borders-of-establishment-clause-jurisprudence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Use of Legal Scholarship by the Federal Courts of Appeals: An Empirical Study</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/25/the-use-of-legal-scholarship-by-the-federal-courts-of-appeals-an-empirical-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/25/the-use-of-legal-scholarship-by-the-federal-courts-of-appeals-an-empirical-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=132142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Schwartz	 &#038; Lee Petherbridge at the <a href="http://legalworkshop.org/2012/02/22/the-use-of-legal-scholarship-by-the-federal-courts-of-appeals-an-empirical-study">Cornell Law Review</a>(2/22/2012): The study produces three important results.  First, the data collected support the interpretation that the use of legal scholarship by the U.S. circuit courts of appeals has not declined.  Rather, the use of legal scholarship by such courts has increased.  Taken together, the data gathered in this study call into serious question the conventional wisdom that courts have little use for legal scholarship.  Second, the study provides evidence that a relatively small cohort of judges is responsible for the overwhelming majority of citations.  Third, this study develops statistical arguments about which factors influence a court’s decision to cite legal scholarship. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/25/the-use-of-legal-scholarship-by-the-federal-courts-of-appeals-an-empirical-study/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/25/the-use-of-legal-scholarship-by-the-federal-courts-of-appeals-an-empirical-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical:  Compulsory Vaccination, the Constitution, and the Hepatitis B Mandate for Infants and Young Children</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/16/legal-periodical-compulsory-vaccination-the-constitution-and-the-hepatitis-b-mandate-for-infants-and-young-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/16/legal-periodical-compulsory-vaccination-the-constitution-and-the-hepatitis-b-mandate-for-infants-and-young-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Vaccinations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=131209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holland, Mary S., Compulsory Vaccination, the Constitution, and the Hepatitis B Mandate for Infants and Young Children (February 28, 2012). Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, Vol. 12, No. 1, p. 39, 2012; NYU School of Law, Public &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/16/legal-periodical-compulsory-vaccination-the-constitution-and-the-hepatitis-b-mandate-for-infants-and-young-children/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/16/legal-periodical-compulsory-vaccination-the-constitution-and-the-hepatitis-b-mandate-for-infants-and-young-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: A Marriage is a Marriage is a Marriage: The Limits of Perry v. Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/legal-periodical-a-marriage-is-a-marriage-is-a-marriage-the-limits-of-perry-v-brown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/legal-periodical-a-marriage-is-a-marriage-is-a-marriage-the-limits-of-perry-v-brown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Perry v. Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=129014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[West, Robin L., A Marriage is a Marriage is a Marriage: The Limits of Perry v. Brown (2012). Harvard Law Review Forum, Vol. 125, pp. 47-53, 2012; Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-027. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2020293 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/legal-periodical-a-marriage-is-a-marriage-is-a-marriage-the-limits-of-perry-v-brown/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/legal-periodical-a-marriage-is-a-marriage-is-a-marriage-the-limits-of-perry-v-brown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: Protecting Speech From the Heart: How Citizens United Strikes Down Political Speech Restrictions on Churches and Charities</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/12/legal-periodical-protecting-speech-from-the-heart-how-citizens-united-strikes-down-political-speech-restrictions-on-churches-and-charities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/12/legal-periodical-protecting-speech-from-the-heart-how-citizens-united-strikes-down-political-speech-restrictions-on-churches-and-charities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Church Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=128300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weitzel, Paul D., Protecting Speech From the Heart: How Citizens United Strikes Down Political Speech Restrictions on Churches and Charities (May 20, 2011). Texas Review of Law &#038; Politics, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1848267 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/12/legal-periodical-protecting-speech-from-the-heart-how-citizens-united-strikes-down-political-speech-restrictions-on-churches-and-charities/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/12/legal-periodical-protecting-speech-from-the-heart-how-citizens-united-strikes-down-political-speech-restrictions-on-churches-and-charities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal periodical by Carl H. Esbeck: A Religious Organization’s Autonomy in Matters of Self-Governance: Hosanna-Tabor and the First Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/12/legal-periodical-by-carl-h-esbeck-a-religious-organization%e2%80%99s-autonomy-in-matters-of-self-governance-hosanna-tabor-and-the-first-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/12/legal-periodical-by-carl-h-esbeck-a-religious-organization%e2%80%99s-autonomy-in-matters-of-self-governance-hosanna-tabor-and-the-first-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Church Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=128296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Esbeck, Carl H., A Religious Organization’s Autonomy in Matters of Self-Governance: Hosanna-Tabor and the First Amendment (March 6, 2012). Engage, Forthcoming 2012; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2016930 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/12/legal-periodical-by-carl-h-esbeck-a-religious-organization%e2%80%99s-autonomy-in-matters-of-self-governance-hosanna-tabor-and-the-first-amendment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/12/legal-periodical-by-carl-h-esbeck-a-religious-organization%e2%80%99s-autonomy-in-matters-of-self-governance-hosanna-tabor-and-the-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: &#8220;Religious Freedom in Private Lawsuits: Untangling When RFRA Applies to Suits Involving Only Private Parties&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/05/legal-periodical-religious-freedom-in-private-lawsuits-untangling-when-rfra-applies-to-suits-involving-only-private-parties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/05/legal-periodical-religious-freedom-in-private-lawsuits-untangling-when-rfra-applies-to-suits-involving-only-private-parties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: RFRA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=127649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sara Lunsford Kohen. 2011. "Religious Freedom in Private Lawsuits: Untangling When RFRA Applies to Suits Involving Only Private Parties" ExpressO Available at: http://works.bepress.com/sara_kohen/3

Religious Freedom in Private Lawsuits: Untangling When RFRA Applies to Suits Involving Only Private Parties, for publication discusses when courts should apply the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”) in cases in which the federal government is not a party. Congress passed RFRA in reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Division v. Smith. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/05/legal-periodical-religious-freedom-in-private-lawsuits-untangling-when-rfra-applies-to-suits-involving-only-private-parties/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/05/legal-periodical-religious-freedom-in-private-lawsuits-untangling-when-rfra-applies-to-suits-involving-only-private-parties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard F. Duncan: &#8220;By the Waters of Babylon: Christian Libertarianism in the Age of Obama&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/27/richard-f-duncan-by-the-waters-of-babylon-christian-libertarianism-in-the-age-of-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/27/richard-f-duncan-by-the-waters-of-babylon-christian-libertarianism-in-the-age-of-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=126837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Duncan, Richard F., By the Waters of Babylon: Christian Libertarianism in the Age of Obama (February 23, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2010131 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/27/richard-f-duncan-by-the-waters-of-babylon-christian-libertarianism-in-the-age-of-obama/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/27/richard-f-duncan-by-the-waters-of-babylon-christian-libertarianism-in-the-age-of-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stanford Law Review Online: The Ninth Circuit’s Perry Decision and the Constitutional Politics of Marriage Equality</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/22/stanford-law-review-online-the-ninth-circuit%e2%80%99s-perry-decision-and-the-constitutional-politics-of-marriage-equality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/22/stanford-law-review-online-the-ninth-circuit%e2%80%99s-perry-decision-and-the-constitutional-politics-of-marriage-equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Perry v. Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=126588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2012/02/stanford-law-review-online-the-ninth-circuit%E2%80%99s-perry-decision-and-the-constitutional-politics-of-marriage-equality.html?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ConcurringOpinions+%28Concurring+Opinions%29">Concurring Opinions</a>: The <em><a title="Stanford Law Review Online" href="http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/">Stanford Law Review Online</a></em> has just published an Essay by Yale’s William N. Eskridge Jr. entitled <a title="The Ninth Circuit’s Perry Decision and the Constitutional Politics of Marriage Equality" href="http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/perry-marriage-equality"><em>The Ninth Circuit’s</em>Perry <em>Decision and the Constitutional Politics of Marriage Equality</em></a>. Eskridge provides an accessible summary of the opinion and defends the judgment against detractors who claim it went too far—or didn’t go far enough <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/22/stanford-law-review-online-the-ninth-circuit%e2%80%99s-perry-decision-and-the-constitutional-politics-of-marriage-equality/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/22/stanford-law-review-online-the-ninth-circuit%e2%80%99s-perry-decision-and-the-constitutional-politics-of-marriage-equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: Indonesia&#8217;s Blasphemy Law: Bleak Outlook for Minority Religions</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/20/legal-periodical-indonesias-blasphemy-law-bleak-outlook-for-minority-religions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/20/legal-periodical-indonesias-blasphemy-law-bleak-outlook-for-minority-religions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=126207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crouch, Melissa, Indonesia&#8217;s Blasphemy Law: Bleak Outlook for Minority Religions (January 26, 2012). Asia Pacific Bulletin (East-West Center), No. 146. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1995154 This brief article discusses Indonesia’s 2010 Constitutional Court &#8216;Blasphemy Law&#8217; ruling, which leaves so-called &#8216;deviant&#8217; groups &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/20/legal-periodical-indonesias-blasphemy-law-bleak-outlook-for-minority-religions/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/20/legal-periodical-indonesias-blasphemy-law-bleak-outlook-for-minority-religions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical by Richard F. Duncan: The Tea Party&#8217;s Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/13/legal-periodical-by-richard-f-duncan-the-tea-partys-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/13/legal-periodical-by-richard-f-duncan-the-tea-partys-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=122993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Duncan, Richard F., The Tea Party's Constitution (January 13, 2012). Available at SSRN: 
<a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1984699">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1984699</a></strong> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/13/legal-periodical-by-richard-f-duncan-the-tea-partys-constitution/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/13/legal-periodical-by-richard-f-duncan-the-tea-partys-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical by George W. Dent: &#8220;Perry v. Schwarzenegger: Is Traditional Marriage Unconstitutional?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/21/legal-periodical-by-george-w-dent-perry-v-schwarzenegger-is-traditional-marriage-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/21/legal-periodical-by-george-w-dent-perry-v-schwarzenegger-is-traditional-marriage-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Perry v. Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=121390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George W. Dent, Perry v. Schwarzenegger: Is Traditional Marriage Unconstitutional?, 12 Engage (J. of Fed-Soc. Practice Groups) (Nov. 2011) <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/21/legal-periodical-by-george-w-dent-perry-v-schwarzenegger-is-traditional-marriage-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/21/legal-periodical-by-george-w-dent-perry-v-schwarzenegger-is-traditional-marriage-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: What Did Jesus Do?: Answering Religious Conservatives Who Oppose Bullying Prevention Legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/20/legal-periodical-what-did-jesus-do-answering-religious-conservatives-who-oppose-bullying-prevention-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/20/legal-periodical-what-did-jesus-do-answering-religious-conservatives-who-oppose-bullying-prevention-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Indoctrination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=121309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weddle, Dan and New, Kathryn E., What Did Jesus Do?: Answering Religious Conservatives Who Oppose Bullying Prevention Legislation (October 18, 2011). New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, Vol. 37, p. 325, 2011. Available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1945737">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1945737</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/20/legal-periodical-what-did-jesus-do-answering-religious-conservatives-who-oppose-bullying-prevention-legislation/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/20/legal-periodical-what-did-jesus-do-answering-religious-conservatives-who-oppose-bullying-prevention-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Religion &amp; Gender&#8221; Legal Journal launched</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/19/religion-gender-legal-journal-launched/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/19/religion-gender-legal-journal-launched/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=121201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online <a href="http://www.religionandgender.org/index.php/rg/index">here</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/19/religion-gender-legal-journal-launched/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/19/religion-gender-legal-journal-launched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical by Jeffrey A. Brauch: Faith-Based Law Schools and an Apprenticeship in Professional Indentity</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/19/legal-periodical-by-jeffrey-a-brauch-faith-based-law-schools-and-an-apprenticeship-in-professional-indentity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/19/legal-periodical-by-jeffrey-a-brauch-faith-based-law-schools-and-an-apprenticeship-in-professional-indentity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Colleges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=121193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey A. Brauch, <em><a href="http://www.regent.edu/acad/schlaw/blogs/docs/legalpedagogy/braucharticle.pdf">Faith-Based Law Schools and an Apprenticeship in Professional Identity</a></em>, U. of Toledo L. Rev. at 593 (Spring 2011)

This short essay discusses professional identity in two ways. First, it addresses Carnegie's diagnosis of law schools' failure to effectively train students in professional identity and why that failure matters. Second, it describes how faith-based law schools are uniquely poised to provide  a professional identity apprenticeship. In particular, it discusses how Regent University School of Law is accomplishing exactly what Carnegie proposed.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/19/legal-periodical-by-jeffrey-a-brauch-faith-based-law-schools-and-an-apprenticeship-in-professional-indentity/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/19/legal-periodical-by-jeffrey-a-brauch-faith-based-law-schools-and-an-apprenticeship-in-professional-indentity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: Marriage Inequality: Religious Exemptions and the Production of Sexual Orientation Discrimination</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/12/legal-periodical-marriage-inequality-religious-exemptions-and-the-production-of-sexual-orientation-discrimination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/12/legal-periodical-marriage-inequality-religious-exemptions-and-the-production-of-sexual-orientation-discrimination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>NeJaime, Douglas, <em>Marriage Inequality: Religious Exemptions and the Production of Sexual Orientation Discrimination</em> (December 7, 2011). California Law Review, Forthcoming; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2011-46. Available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1969560">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1969560</a>
</strong>

As more states consider marriage recognition for same-sex couples, attention turns to the conflict between marriage equality and religious liberty. Legal scholars are contributing substantially to the debate, generating a robust academic literature and writing directly to state lawmakers urging them to include a “marriage conscience protection,” containing a series of religious exemptions, in marriage legislation. Yet the intense scrutiny of religious freedom specifically in the context of same-sex marriage obscures the root of the conflict. At stake is the relational enactment of sexual orientation; same-sex relationships constitute lesbian and gay identity, and religious objections arise largely in response to such relationships. Same-sex marriage is merely one form of sexual orientation identity enactment, and religious objections to same-sex marriage are merely a subset of objections to sexual orientation equality. By exposing the connections between same-sex relationships and lesbian and gay identity, this Article argues for an antidiscrimination regime that includes same-sex relationships more comprehensively; in doing so, it resists the use of marriage as antidiscrimination, both for same-sex couples and religious objectors. Yet even as the “marriage conscience protection” proposed by religious liberty scholars misapprehends the basis of the underlying conflict, its sweeping language threatens to reach into the antidiscrimination domain and target lesbians and gay men based not primarily on their marriages but instead more generally on their same-sex relationships. By permitting religious organizations, as well as some employers, property owners, and small businesses, to discriminate against same-sex couples throughout the course of the couples’ married lives in situations far removed from marriage itself, the “marriage conscience protection” may have unintended consequences that would threaten substantial progress made in antidiscrimination law. Worse yet, using the term “marriage conscience protection” to label instances of discrimination against same-sex relationships would hide an increasing amount of sexual orientation discrimination that antidiscrimination law is just beginning to address. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/12/legal-periodical-marriage-inequality-religious-exemptions-and-the-production-of-sexual-orientation-discrimination/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/12/legal-periodical-marriage-inequality-religious-exemptions-and-the-production-of-sexual-orientation-discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Government persecution does target homeschoolers&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/18/government-persecution-does-target-homeschoolers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/18/government-persecution-does-target-homeschoolers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Home School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=116149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=355409">WorldNetDaily</a>: The battle lines over homeschooling rights overseas and in the United States have been sharpened by the publication of a law journal article that concludes that Germany does persecute homeschoolers and that the first waves of its impact already have hit the U.S. The article, "Germany Homeschoolers as 'Particular Society Group': Evaluation Under Current U.S. Asylum Jurisprudence," was written by Miki Kawashima Matrician and published recently in the 2011 Boston College International and Comparative Law Review. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/18/government-persecution-does-target-homeschoolers/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/18/government-persecution-does-target-homeschoolers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: &#8220;Sexual Rights and religion: Same-sex Marriage and Lawmakers&#8217; Catholic Identity in Argentina&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/18/legal-periodical-sexual-rights-and-religion-same-sex-marriage-and-lawmakers-catholic-identity-in-argentina/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/18/legal-periodical-sexual-rights-and-religion-same-sex-marriage-and-lawmakers-catholic-identity-in-argentina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=116110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(abstract only below)

<strong>Juan Marco Vaggione, <em>Sexual Rights and religion: Same-sex Marriage and Lawmakers' Catholic Identity in Argentina</em>, 65 University of Miami Law Review 935-954 (2011).</strong>

The legal regulation of marriage in Argentina has undergone reforms that, in a variety of ways, have dismantled religion's influence over law. While these reforms reaffirm the centrality of marriage in the construction of the sexual order, they also redefine marriage, distancing it from the sacrament defended by the Catholic Church. In 1888, civil and religious marriages were distinguished from one another as part of a reform process in response to late-century secularist and liberal ideologies. 1 Church and State became, at least legally, autonomous with respect to marriage; while the latter regulated the civil contract, the Church only concerned itself with the celebration of the religious sacrament. However, the legal construction of marriage was, of course, substantiated by the religious doctrine. Almost a century later, in 1987, 2 the related Divorce Law was passed, 3 made possible largely by the recent restoration of democracy and the influence of women's movements in the region. 4 The law distanced itself from religious sacrament by establishing the solubility of the bond as a constitutive part of the institution of marriage. Finally, in 2010, a new reform took place through which marriage was authorized between same-sex couples, 5 arising from a demand primarily promoted by the movement for sexual diversity. This reform broke from the principle of Catholic doctrine that the sexes are complementary and generated complete equality in marriage between partners of the same or opposite sexes. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/18/legal-periodical-sexual-rights-and-religion-same-sex-marriage-and-lawmakers-catholic-identity-in-argentina/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/18/legal-periodical-sexual-rights-and-religion-same-sex-marriage-and-lawmakers-catholic-identity-in-argentina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teresa Collett: Human Dignity and Supreme Court Jurisprudence</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/06/teresa-collett-human-dignity-and-supreme-court-jurisprudence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/06/teresa-collett-human-dignity-and-supreme-court-jurisprudence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=115583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Teresa Collett at <a href="http://uffl.org/blog/2011/10/03/human-dignity-and-supreme-court-jurisprudence/">University Faculty for Life</a>: SRN has a new article entitled The Jurisprudence of Dignity (<a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1928768">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1928768</a>). The author, Leslie Meltzer Henry, identifies the variety of meanings given to the word “dignity” in Supreme Court cases: institutional status as dignity, liberty as dignity, equality as dignity, personal integrity as dignity, and collective virtue as dignity. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/06/teresa-collett-human-dignity-and-supreme-court-jurisprudence/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/06/teresa-collett-human-dignity-and-supreme-court-jurisprudence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teresa Collett: Abortion, Paternity and Fathers’ Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/06/teresa-collett-abortion-paternity-and-fathers%e2%80%99-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/06/teresa-collett-abortion-paternity-and-fathers%e2%80%99-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=115581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Teresa Collett at <a href="http://uffl.org/blog/2011/10/05/abortion-paternity-and-fathers-rights/">University Faculty for Life</a>: Earlier this year I posted <a href="http://uffl.org/blog/?p=1303">a link</a> to an editorial arguing that fathers should have a right to veto the abortion of their children . . .   I expressed the view that while it is possible that the Court would reverse its opinion on notification of husbands, but I saw very little prospect of success for a consent requirement. SSRN has a new article, <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1930829">Fathers and Abortion</a>, by Ezio Di Nucci . . . <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/06/teresa-collett-abortion-paternity-and-fathers%e2%80%99-rights/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/06/teresa-collett-abortion-paternity-and-fathers%e2%80%99-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religion Clause: Recent Articles of Interest</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/19/religion-clause-recent-articles-of-interest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/19/religion-clause-recent-articles-of-interest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Gregory S. Baylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Christian Legal Society v Martinez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=113861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2011/09/recent-articles-of-interest_19.html">Religion Clause: Recent Articles of Interest</a>: Gregory S. Baylor and Ronald Chen, <a href="http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/detail/did-the-supreme-court-properly-decide-christian-legal-society-v-martinez">Did the Supreme Court Properly Decide Christian Legal Society v. Martinez?</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/19/religion-clause-recent-articles-of-interest/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/19/religion-clause-recent-articles-of-interest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: The Role of Economics in the Discourse on RLUIPA and Nondiscrimination in Religious Land Use</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/19/legal-periodical-the-role-of-economics-in-the-discourse-on-rluipa-and-nondiscrimination-in-religious-land-use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/19/legal-periodical-the-role-of-economics-in-the-discourse-on-rluipa-and-nondiscrimination-in-religious-land-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: RLUIPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=113863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noda, Tokufumi Joshua, <em>The Role of Economics in the Discourse on RLUIPA and Nondiscrimination in Religious Land Use</em> (September 14, 2011). Boston College Law Review, Vol.1, 2011. Available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1927649">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1927649</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/19/legal-periodical-the-role-of-economics-in-the-discourse-on-rluipa-and-nondiscrimination-in-religious-land-use/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/19/legal-periodical-the-role-of-economics-in-the-discourse-on-rluipa-and-nondiscrimination-in-religious-land-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: The Unconstitutionality of Supreme Court Recusal Standards</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/14/legal-periodical-the-unconstitutionality-of-supreme-court-recusal-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/14/legal-periodical-the-unconstitutionality-of-supreme-court-recusal-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=113505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virelli, Louis J., <em>The Unconstitutionality of Supreme Court Recusal Standards</em> (September 1, 2011). Stetson University College of Law Research Paper No. 2011-12. Available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1920826">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1920826 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/14/legal-periodical-the-unconstitutionality-of-supreme-court-recusal-standards/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/14/legal-periodical-the-unconstitutionality-of-supreme-court-recusal-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: Lynch v. Donnelly and the Terminal Silliness of Secularized Religious Symbols</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/12/legal-periodical-lynch-v-donnelly-and-the-terminal-silliness-of-secularized-religious-symbols/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/12/legal-periodical-lynch-v-donnelly-and-the-terminal-silliness-of-secularized-religious-symbols/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Lynch v. Donnelly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=113195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gedicks, Frederick Mark, <em>Lynch v. Donnelly and the Terminal Silliness of Secularized Religious Symbols</em> (September 5, 2011). Nevada Law Review, 2011. Available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1922802">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1922802</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/12/legal-periodical-lynch-v-donnelly-and-the-terminal-silliness-of-secularized-religious-symbols/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/12/legal-periodical-lynch-v-donnelly-and-the-terminal-silliness-of-secularized-religious-symbols/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: &#8220;Constitutional Divide: The Transformative Significance of the School Prayer Decisions&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/12/legal-periodical-constitutional-divide-the-transformative-significance-of-the-school-prayer-decisions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/12/legal-periodical-constitutional-divide-the-transformative-significance-of-the-school-prayer-decisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=113207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven D. Smith, <em>Constitutional Divide: The Transformative Significance of the School Prayer Decisions</em>, 38 Pepperdine Law Review 945-1020 (2011) <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/12/legal-periodical-constitutional-divide-the-transformative-significance-of-the-school-prayer-decisions/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/12/legal-periodical-constitutional-divide-the-transformative-significance-of-the-school-prayer-decisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/07/legal-periodical-the-declining-influence-of-the-united-states-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/07/legal-periodical-the-declining-influence-of-the-united-states-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law, David S. and Versteeg, Mila, <em>The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution</em> (September 6, 2011). Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper, Forthcoming; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1923556">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1923556 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/07/legal-periodical-the-declining-influence-of-the-united-states-constitution/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/07/legal-periodical-the-declining-influence-of-the-united-states-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: &#8220;The Constitutional Right to (Keep Your) Same-sex Marriage: Why the Due Process Clause Protects Marriages that Cross State Lines, Even if Conflict of Laws Cannot&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/legal-periodical-the-constitutional-right-to-keep-your-same-sex-marriage-why-the-due-process-clause-protects-marriages-that-cross-state-lines-even-if-conflict-of-laws-cannot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/legal-periodical-the-constitutional-right-to-keep-your-same-sex-marriage-why-the-due-process-clause-protects-marriages-that-cross-state-lines-even-if-conflict-of-laws-cannot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sanders, Steve, <em>The Constitutional Right to (Keep Your) Same-sex Marriage: Why the Due Process Clause Protects Marriages that Cross State Lines, Even if Conflict of Laws Cannot</em> (August 24, 2011). Available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1903386">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1903386</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/legal-periodical-the-constitutional-right-to-keep-your-same-sex-marriage-why-the-due-process-clause-protects-marriages-that-cross-state-lines-even-if-conflict-of-laws-cannot/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/06/legal-periodical-the-constitutional-right-to-keep-your-same-sex-marriage-why-the-due-process-clause-protects-marriages-that-cross-state-lines-even-if-conflict-of-laws-cannot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: Navigating the Path of the Supreme Appointment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/01/legal-periodical-navigating-the-path-of-the-supreme-appointment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/01/legal-periodical-navigating-the-path-of-the-supreme-appointment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rhodes, Charles W. (Rocky), Navigating the Path of the Supreme Appointment (July 20, 2011). Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1890734 Nominees to the Supreme Court historically boasted political backgrounds as congressmen, governors, &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/01/legal-periodical-navigating-the-path-of-the-supreme-appointment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/01/legal-periodical-navigating-the-path-of-the-supreme-appointment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: &#8220;The Sounds of Silence: Law Clerks, Policy-Making and the Supreme Court of Canada&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/01/legal-periodical-the-sounds-of-silence-law-clerks-policy-making-and-the-supreme-court-of-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/01/legal-periodical-the-sounds-of-silence-law-clerks-policy-making-and-the-supreme-court-of-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sossin, Lorne, The Sounds of Silence: Law Clerks, Policy-Making and the Supreme Court of Canada (1996). U.B.C. Law Review, Vol. 30, pp. 279-308, 1996. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1911416 It is no longer controversial to refer to the Supreme Court of &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/01/legal-periodical-the-sounds-of-silence-law-clerks-policy-making-and-the-supreme-court-of-canada/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/01/legal-periodical-the-sounds-of-silence-law-clerks-policy-making-and-the-supreme-court-of-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: &#8220;Anti-Choice: When Having a Choice Dminishes Family Solidarity&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/31/legal-periodical-anti-choice-when-having-a-choice-dminishes-family-solidarity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/31/legal-periodical-anti-choice-when-having-a-choice-dminishes-family-solidarity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=112320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stith, Richard T., <em>Anti-Choice: When Having a Choice Dminishes Family Solidarity</em> (August 18, 2011). International Journal of the Jurisprudence of the Family, Forthcoming; Valparaiso University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1911917 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/31/legal-periodical-anti-choice-when-having-a-choice-dminishes-family-solidarity/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/31/legal-periodical-anti-choice-when-having-a-choice-dminishes-family-solidarity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

