Law.com (The National Law Journal): “The U.S. Senate ended the year having confirmed three nominees to federal circuit courts, half as many as were confirmed during President George W. Bush’s first year. Among nominees for district court judgeships, the difference is even more stark — nine won confirmation during 2009 compared with 22 during 2001. Six circuit nominees and four district nominees have passed through committee but not received a vote in the full Senate.”
- Posted: 01/05/2010
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.law.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Nominations
Jake Tapper, writing at ABC News: “President Obama recently named Amanda Simpson to be a Senior Technical Advisor to the Commerce Department. In a statement, Simpson, a member of the National Center for Transgender Equality’s board of directors, said that ‘as one of the first transgender presidential appointees to the federal government, I hope that I will soon be one of hundreds, and that this appointment opens future opportunities for many others.’”
- Posted: 01/04/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: blogs.abcnews.com
- Tags: Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Nominations, Topic: White House
Carl Tobias, Williams Professor at the University of Richmond Law School, writing at My San Antonio: “[T]he judiciary has 99 openings out of the 858 appeals and district court judgeships. These vacancies, which are 11 percent of the positions, erode the delivery of justice. When the 111th Senate’s second session returns in January, President Barack Obama should promptly nominate, and the Senate must expeditiously confirm, lower court judges, so that the bench will be at full strength.”
- Posted: 12/31/2009
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.mysanantonio.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Nominations
David Limbaugh writes at Townhall: “I’m wondering whether there’s anyone out there with the guts to pretend that it’s insignificant that President Barack Obama keeps appointing radical after radical to his czar positions. Can anyone honestly say Obama’s appointments don’t tell us a great deal about Obama himself — as if we needed any further proof he is a left-wing extremist?”
- Posted: 12/18/2009
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: Topic: Nominations, Topic: White House
Mario Diaz writes at Townhall: “No matter what your political party, no matter your religion or if you have none at all, we should all be concerned about loosing our most cherished liberties. It is those liberties that lie at the foundation of everything we believe as a nation. That is what is at stake with the nomination of Chai Feldblum to the EEOC. And every senator should approach it with that type of urgency. But it is up to us to make sure senators know we are watching and that we will remember how much they value our religious freedoms.”
- Posted: 12/10/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Nominations
The Family Research Council Blog has a roundup piece on the same-sex “marriage” / religious liberty conflict as interpreted by President Obama’s nominee to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commision, Chai Feldblum. The post includes video and excerpts of coverage from around the internet, including the ADF Alliance Alert.
- Posted: 11/18/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.frcblog.com
- Tags: ADF: Alliance Alert, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Family Research Council (FRC), Topic: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Nominations, Topic: Politics, Topic: White House
Law.coma: “The White House said late Monday that President Barack Obama has made two choices for the Federal Trade Commission: a business litigator from Los Angeles who worked on his presidential campaign and a consumer protection regulator who spent most of her career in Vermont.”
- Posted: 11/17/2009
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.law.com
- Tags: Topic: Nominations, Topic: White House
Findlaw: “Professor Carl Tobias recently argued that Senate Republicans are keeping President Obama from appointing federal judges. He is wrong on both his facts and his conclusions. As a reminder, the Democratic majority is 60-40 in the Senate and 12-7 on the Judiciary Committee. This is their largest majority in more than 30 years. It is time for Democrats and their defenders to stop making excuses and trying to blame everyone else. Those who want to achieve power, and who have been given power by the American people, should take responsibility for their own political actions.”
- Posted: 11/16/2009
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: writ.lp.findlaw.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Nominations
NewsMax: “Senate Republicans are gearing up to block the appeals-court nomination of U.S. District Judge David Hamilton, whose resume includes a stint as a fundraiser for ACORN, the community-organizing group recently tripped up by a series of embarrassing undercover videos. Conservative legal groups have described Hamilton as ‘ultra-liberal.’”
- Posted: 11/09/2009
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Court: 7th Circuit, Topic: Nominations
Slate: “But the larger issue is a new form of obstructionism in the Senate. It seems clear that Senate Republicans are prepared to take the partisan war over the courts into uncharted territory—delaying up-or-down votes on the Senate floor for even the most qualified and uncontroversial of the president’s judicial nominees.”
- Posted: 10/26/2009
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.slate.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Nominations
Kevin M. Scott and Wendy L. Martinek, Judicial Selection and Judicial Choice (2009). APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1450863
“[W]e have no rigorous, systematic evidence as to whether controversial nominees do, in fact, behave differently than other nominees once they don the black robe. Using data from 1977-2002 on nominations to the U.S. Courts of Appeals and the voting behavior of court of appeals jurists for the same period, here we empirically investigate whether judges who were considered more controversial during their confirmation process are more ideologically-driven in their voting behavior than other (less controversial) judges.”
- Posted: 09/25/2009
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Nominations
|

Latest Posts
-
www.bpnews.net
05/17/2013
Baptist Press: A florist who was told by the state of Washington she must provide her services for a gay wedding is countersuing the state, saying she has served gay customers her entire career and is concerned the state’s position on gay weddings will harm religious freedom.
-
www.nationalreview.com
05/17/2013
National Review: IRS scandal notwithstanding, on Tuesday, the (Republican-dominated) Texas legislature passed S.B. 346, a bill to force non-profit organizations and trade associations to disclose the names of the people who support them financially. The law exempts unions, but covers groups that spend more than $25,000 or more in independent expenditures about political candidates. This applies even if those expenditures are a tiny fraction of the group’s overall spending . . .
-
www.nytimes.com
05/17/2013
NY Times: At the first Congressional hearing into the I.R.S. scandal, J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration, told members of the House Ways and Means Committee that he informed the Treasury’s general counsel of his audit on June 4, and Deputy Treasury Secretary Neal Wolin “shortly thereafter.”

|