<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Topic: Polyamory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/topic-polyamory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CA: &#8220;Polyamorous woman Jaiya Ma has baby with lover while living with boyfriend&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/ca-polyamorous-woman-jaiya-ma-has-baby-with-lover-while-living-with-boyfriend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/ca-polyamorous-woman-jaiya-ma-has-baby-with-lover-while-living-with-boyfriend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2070634/Polyamorous-woman-Jaiya-Ma-baby-lover-living-boyfriend.html?printingPage=true">Daily Mail Online</a>: Jaiya Ma had been living her boyfriend Jon Hanauer, 49, for six years when he urged her to take a new lover. Within weeks, Jaiya, 34, fell for a furniture designer Ian Ferguson, 44, at a dance class, and a year later she fell pregnant with his baby. But Jon supported Jaiya, welcomed Ian into his home, and the two men helped deliver baby Eamon during an 'orgasmic' labour. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/ca-polyamorous-woman-jaiya-ma-has-baby-with-lover-while-living-with-boyfriend/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/ca-polyamorous-woman-jaiya-ma-has-baby-with-lover-while-living-with-boyfriend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wendy Wright: &#8220;Triparenting&#8221; Hogwash Slapped Down</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/02/wendy-wright-triparenting-hogwash-slapped-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/02/wendy-wright-triparenting-hogwash-slapped-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=119924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wendy Wright at <a href="http://www.turtlebayandbeyond.org/2011/turtle-bay-un/%E2%80%9Ctriparenting%E2%80%9D-hogwash-slapped-down/">Turtle Bay and Beyond</a>: A researcher from Sweden argues that if two parents are good, then why not three? In a paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics, Daniela Cutas is heavy on “may” and “might” conjectures and – as you’d expect – light on any evidence. As timing would have it, Cutas’ silliness was slapped down by a Canadian court when it ruled recently that polygamy is detrimental to women, children and society – basing its decision on solid evidence. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/02/wendy-wright-triparenting-hogwash-slapped-down/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/02/wendy-wright-triparenting-hogwash-slapped-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Marquardt: Get Ready for Group Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/16/elizabeth-marquardt-get-ready-for-group-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/16/elizabeth-marquardt-get-ready-for-group-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Surrogacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=118797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the prospect of group marriage far-fetched? Probably not. There are several avenues that could soon lead to legal recognition of unions involving three or more people. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/16/elizabeth-marquardt-get-ready-for-group-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/16/elizabeth-marquardt-get-ready-for-group-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginity, polyamory and the limits of pluralism</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/19/virginity-polyamory-and-the-limits-of-pluralism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/19/virginity-polyamory-and-the-limits-of-pluralism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=92198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Berger <a href="http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/berger/2011/01/19/virginity-polyamory-and-the-limits-of-pluralism/">writing in The American Interest</a>: "Conservative cassandras (please note: I am not one of them) are turning out to be <em>empirically</em> correct, even if one disagrees with their philosophy: once you legitimate same-sex marriage, you open the door to any number of other alternatives to marriage as a union of one man and one woman: polygamous (an interesting question for Muslims in Germany and dissident Mormons in Arizona), polyandrous, polygenerational – perhaps polyspecies?" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/19/virginity-polyamory-and-the-limits-of-pluralism/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/19/virginity-polyamory-and-the-limits-of-pluralism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polyamory in the 21st Century</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/15/polyamory-in-the-21st-century/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/15/polyamory-in-the-21st-century/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=86717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/12/1744">At The Public Discourse</a>, Andrew Haines reviews <em>Polyamory in the 21st Century</em> by Deborah Anapol: "Anapol’s account is designed as an all-around apologia of the consensual free love movement and attempts to radically and critically redefine the very meaning of sex . . . Two themes in Polyamory in the 21st Century are particularly striking: the author’s preoccupation with distinguishing love from lust; and the anthropological, relational, and ethical considerations she offers as a consequence of her findings." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/15/polyamory-in-the-21st-century/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/15/polyamory-in-the-21st-century/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Psychology Today: Sex, polyamory, and the wisdom of the body</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/03/psychology-today-sex-polyamory-and-the-wisdom-of-the-body/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/03/psychology-today-sex-polyamory-and-the-wisdom-of-the-body/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=80228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deborah Anapol, Ph.D., <a href="http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/love-without-limits/201011/sex-polyamory-and-the-wisdom-the-body">writing at Psychology Today</a>: "It doesn't matter what we call it, the fact is that my body can tell me if a lover is making love with someone else. My body can detect the blood type of a man I'm making love with and select a compatible match for conception. My body can refuse to respond if a potential lover is unhealthy in some way. If my body can do this, so can the bodies of others, but a closed mind will not listen when the body talks . . . For today's humans, sex almost always involves egoic considerations of one form or another. These considerations sometimes overpower the wisdom of the body and sometimes they don't." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/03/psychology-today-sex-polyamory-and-the-wisdom-of-the-body/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/03/psychology-today-sex-polyamory-and-the-wisdom-of-the-body/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FRC Lecture by Pat Fagan on Oct. 27th: Christian chastity vs Sex in the City: America&#8217;s future</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/27/frc-lecture-by-pat-fagan-on-oct-27th-christian-chastity-vs-sex-in-the-city-americas-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/27/frc-lecture-by-pat-fagan-on-oct-27th-christian-chastity-vs-sex-in-the-city-americas-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=78757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the greatest strengths of Western civilization (which comes straight from Christianity) is monogamy. This marital relationship became the DNA of the whole social structure of the West and all its societies. But for the last 200 years, there's been an assault on monogamy as part of the agenda to change our culture. Polyamory (multiple partners) is the competition. To learn more about this aggressive push to redefine the West, join us tomorrow, October 27, for a lecture by FRC's Dr. Patrick Fagan. Starting at noon at FRC's headquarters (801 G Street, NW, Washington, D.C.), Dr. Fagan will explain how this culture clash affects America's future. For more information or to register, <a href="https://www.adfmail.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=8b14277fb4484fe19a385e945b366731&#038;URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.frc.org%2fupcomingevents%2fculture-clash-in-the-us-monogamy-vs-polyandry-">click here</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/27/frc-lecture-by-pat-fagan-on-oct-27th-christian-chastity-vs-sex-in-the-city-americas-future/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/27/frc-lecture-by-pat-fagan-on-oct-27th-christian-chastity-vs-sex-in-the-city-americas-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Webcast: Culture Clash in the U.S.?  Monogamy vs. Polyandry</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/21/webcast-culture-clash-in-the-u-s-monogamy-vs-polyandry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/21/webcast-culture-clash-in-the-u-s-monogamy-vs-polyandry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=77633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More details about the event <a href="http://www.frc.org/upcomingevents/webcast-culture-clash-in-the-us-monogamy-vs-polyandry-#">available here.</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/21/webcast-culture-clash-in-the-u-s-monogamy-vs-polyandry/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/21/webcast-culture-clash-in-the-u-s-monogamy-vs-polyandry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brent Bozell: Polymorphous propaganda</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/24/brent-bozell-polymorphous-propaganda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/24/brent-bozell-polymorphous-propaganda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=73608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brent Bozell <a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/BrentBozell/2010/09/24/polymorphous_propaganda/page/full/">writing at Townhall</a>: "The sexual revolution always seems to have another frontier . . . HBO started the normalization of polygamy with its drama 'Big Love,' but TLC is openly pushing for the walls of judgment to come falling down. Its slogan for the show is 'Rethink love. Rethink marriage. Rethink family reality' . . . This isn't the only TLC show to promote the 'poly' -- yup, the hip new word -- lifestyle. They also aired a series this summer called 'Strange Sex,' which also had a plot about 'polyamory,' which is described as 'consensual, responsible non-monogamy.' TLC started as the Learning Channel; it's fast becoming the Libertine Channel." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/24/brent-bozell-polymorphous-propaganda/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/24/brent-bozell-polymorphous-propaganda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BC polygamy case may be used to test polyamory</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/16/bc-polygamy-case-may-be-used-to-test-polyamory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/16/bc-polygamy-case-may-be-used-to-test-polyamory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: In the matter of the Constitutional Question Act RSBC 1986 c. 68]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=72498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thaddeus M. Baklinski <a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/sep/10091504.html">writing at LifeSiteNews</a>: "Chief Justice Bauman reserved judgment on the [Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association] CPAA request [to declare whether polyamorists might be prosecuted as a result of a ban on polygamy]. BC Crown Attorney Craig Jones said there is currently no legal or psychological definition of polyamory on which Bauman could base a judgment. Federal Crown Attorney Deborah Strachan said that the CPAA request is tantamount to seeking immunity from future prosecution, which would be a violation of the court's right to prosecutorial discretion in Canada." For more information, see this ADF Alliance Alert compound tag: <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/country-canada+topic-polyamory/">http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/country-canada+topic-polyamory/</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/16/bc-polygamy-case-may-be-used-to-test-polyamory/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/16/bc-polygamy-case-may-be-used-to-test-polyamory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada: Polyamorists want court to declare group love legal</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/09/canada-polyamorists-want-court-to-declare-group-love-legal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/09/canada-polyamorists-want-court-to-declare-group-love-legal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=71610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Is polyamory the new gay? That's what John Ince and the Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association would have us believe . . . It's an anything-goes kind of relationship, as long as everyone is a consenting adult, participating in a spirit of love and harmony . . . what Ince and the association want is nothing less than the sweeping legal and social reform that occurred in 1967." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/09/canada-polyamorists-want-court-to-declare-group-love-legal/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/09/canada-polyamorists-want-court-to-declare-group-love-legal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada: Group says polyamory is consensual, not patriarchal like polygamy</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/08/canada-group-says-polyamory-is-consensual-not-patriarchal-like-polygamy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/08/canada-group-says-polyamory-is-consensual-not-patriarchal-like-polygamy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=71578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/breakingnews/group-seeks-position-on-sex-law-wonders-if-members-could-be-charged--102470554.html">Winnipeg Free Press</a>: "The lawyer for a group that advocates for allowing multiple spouses wants to know if a law against polygamy could also apply to his clients. John Ince, who represents the Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association, told B.C. Supreme Court that polygamy is based on a patriarchal system, while polyamorous are consensual." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/08/canada-group-says-polyamory-is-consensual-not-patriarchal-like-polygamy/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/08/canada-group-says-polyamory-is-consensual-not-patriarchal-like-polygamy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Monogamy Unnatural?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/is-monogamy-unnatural/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/is-monogamy-unnatural/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/is-monogamy-unnatural/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Megan Mcardle <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2010/08/is-monogamy-unnatural/62273/">writing at The Atlantic</a>: "If we're evolved to be polyamorous, why do we also seem to be evolved to be extraordinarily possessive?  . . . Lifetime monogamy may not be the evolved human template.  But I'm pretty sure that carefree polyamory isn't either."   <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/is-monogamy-unnatural/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/is-monogamy-unnatural/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should &#8216;Sex Week&#8217; worry college leaders?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/should-sex-week-worry-college-leaders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/should-sex-week-worry-college-leaders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Indoctrination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/should-sex-week-worry-college-leaders/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/college-inc/2010/09/should_sex_week_worry_college.html">Washington Post</a>: "Teaching about polyamory but not about monogamy or abstinence? . . . Brooks notes that denizens of the sex industry have been involved in some of the events . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/should-sex-week-worry-college-leaders/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/should-sex-week-worry-college-leaders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William C. Duncan: The More the Merrier</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/william-c-duncan-the-more-the-merrier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/william-c-duncan-the-more-the-merrier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/william-c-duncan-the-more-the-merrier/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Canada, which redefined marriage nationwide to include same-sex couples in 2005, against the backdrop of successful provincial lawsuits against the country's marriage law, could be moving on to bigger things -- literally. Specifically, polygamy and polyamory, as this case invokes the question of whether the government can continue to criminalize multiple-partner marriages . . ." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/william-c-duncan-the-more-the-merrier/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/02/william-c-duncan-the-more-the-merrier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Review: Polyamory as a Sexual Orientation</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/law-review-polyamory-as-a-sexual-orientation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/law-review-polyamory-as-a-sexual-orientation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=64904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ann E. Tweedy, <em>Polyamory as a Sexual Orientation</em> (June 29, 2010). Available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1632653">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1632653</a>

"This article examines the possibility of expanding the definition of 'sexual orientation' in employment discrimination statutes to include other disfavored sexual preferences, specifically polyamory. It first looks at the fact that the current definition of 'sexual orientation' is very narrow, being limited to orientations based on the sex of those to whom one is attracted, and explores some of the conceptual and functional problems with the current definition. Next the article looks at the possibility of adding polyamory to current statutory definitions of sexual orientation, examining whether polyamory is a sufficiently embedded identity to be considered a sexual orientation and the degree of discrimination that polyamorists face. After concluding that expanding current statutory definitions of sexual orientation to include polyamory would be reasonable, the article looks at some of the complications to making such a move, including potential policy implications and the conflicting evidence as to whether polys want specific legal protections." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/law-review-polyamory-as-a-sexual-orientation/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/law-review-polyamory-as-a-sexual-orientation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada: Anti-polygamy case gives rise to all kinds of family forms</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/09/canada-anti-polygamy-case-gives-rise-to-all-kinds-of-family-forms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/09/canada-anti-polygamy-case-gives-rise-to-all-kinds-of-family-forms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: In the matter of the Constitutional Question Act RSBC 1986 c. 68]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=62612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["While others -- such as Surreybased Wiccan priest Sam Wagar . . . contend that they have a religious right to practise polygamy, the polyamorists say that for them it's a matter of freedom of expression . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/09/canada-anti-polygamy-case-gives-rise-to-all-kinds-of-family-forms/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/09/canada-anti-polygamy-case-gives-rise-to-all-kinds-of-family-forms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A rebuttal to Theodore Olson</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/19/a-rebuttal-to-theodore-olson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/19/a-rebuttal-to-theodore-olson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Perry v. Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=48819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Lord responds to Olson's "<a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/229957/page/1">Conservative Case for Gay Marriage</a>" in <a href="http://spectator.org/archives/2010/01/19/a-rebuttal-to-theodore-olson/">The American Spectator</a>: "The fact that Olson seeks to impose the values of a handful of elite lawyers and judges on the people of California when they have made their views not only plain but constitutionally plain under the law is what concerns. Mr. Olson's 'lifetime of exposure to persons of different backgrounds, histories, viewpoints, and intrinsic characteristics" is apparently limited to a resulting sympathy for gays . . .  [I]t seems inescapable here that Olson has erred. If he has the passion he expresses for gay marriage, then his time would be more constructively spent for his cause convincing the voters of California and indeed other states. Seek consensus, convince, persuade, make the case. But, outstanding lawyer or not, resist the temptation to 'resolve' this by judicial fiat.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/19/a-rebuttal-to-theodore-olson/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/19/a-rebuttal-to-theodore-olson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patrick F. Fagan: Monogamy, Liberty, Polyamory and the Socialist State</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/08/patrick-f-fagan-monogamy-liberty-polyamory-and-the-socialist-state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/08/patrick-f-fagan-monogamy-liberty-polyamory-and-the-socialist-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=47576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The culture of the traditional family is now in intense competition with a very different culture. The defining difference between the two is the sexual ideal each embraces." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/08/patrick-f-fagan-monogamy-liberty-polyamory-and-the-socialist-state/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/08/patrick-f-fagan-monogamy-liberty-polyamory-and-the-socialist-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Polyamory, love&#8217;s new frontier&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/04/polyamory-loves-new-frontier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/04/polyamory-loves-new-frontier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=46944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Adherents call it responsible non-monogamy or polyamory, and the nontraditional practice is creeping out of the closet, making gay marriage feel somewhat last decade here in Massachusetts."  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/04/polyamory-loves-new-frontier/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/04/polyamory-loves-new-frontier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is monogamy realistic?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/29/is-monogamy-realistic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/29/is-monogamy-realistic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=40846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/10/28/monogamy.realistic.today/index.html">CNN Living</a>: "Lipton and Barash, who have been married 32 years and are the co-authors of 'Strange Bedfellows' and 'The Myth of Monogamy,' said serial monogamy may be more realistic -- a model in which people move from one committed long-term relationship to another and choose partners for different reasons at different stages of their life." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/29/is-monogamy-realistic/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/29/is-monogamy-realistic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Diversity and Political Freedom: How Can People With Different Approaches to Family Life Live Together in Free Societies?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/21/family-diversity-and-political-freedom-how-can-people-with-different-approaches-to-family-life-live-together-in-free-societies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/21/family-diversity-and-political-freedom-how-can-people-with-different-approaches-to-family-life-live-together-in-free-societies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Indoctrination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: World Congress of Families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=36530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF09H36.pdf">Family Diversity and Political Freedom: How Can People With Different Approaches to Family Life Live Together in Free Societies?</a></em>
World Congress of Families, Patrick Fagan, Ph.D., 8.12.2009

"The 'monogamous' and the 'polyamorous' cultures have totally different approaches to life, with religious worship and monogamous marriage being the defining differences in their different approaches to the sexual act. Coexistence necessitates that the differences be observed by giving parents of both cultures control over the programs that cause conflict: education, adolescent health and sex education. Monogamous men need to act to obtain this for the sake of their own children." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/21/family-diversity-and-political-freedom-how-can-people-with-different-approaches-to-family-life-live-together-in-free-societies/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/21/family-diversity-and-political-freedom-how-can-people-with-different-approaches-to-family-life-live-together-in-free-societies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polyamory &#8212; &#8220;ethical non-monogamy&#8221; &#8212; and the law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/03/polyamory-ethical-non-monogamy-and-the-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/03/polyamory-ethical-non-monogamy-and-the-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=31970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/law_and_life/2009/08/polyamory-ethical-non-monogamy-and-the-law.html">FindLaw</a>: "The law perhaps intersects most with polyamory in the realm of child custody and shared property.  Though appearing to offer seemingly unlimited choice and openness, even polyamorous relationships can go south.  It is at that time that polyamorists are likely to take a closer look at their legal rights to determine custody arrangements and how property will be divided." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/03/polyamory-ethical-non-monogamy-and-the-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/03/polyamory-ethical-non-monogamy-and-the-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsweek: &#8220;Polyamory has a coming out party&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/30/newsweek-polyamory-has-a-coming-out-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/30/newsweek-polyamory-has-a-coming-out-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Focus on the Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=31561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Researchers are just beginning to study the phenomenon, but the few who do estimate that openly polyamorous families in the United States number more than half a million, with thriving contingents in nearly every major city." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/30/newsweek-polyamory-has-a-coming-out-party/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/30/newsweek-polyamory-has-a-coming-out-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Some see polyamorous marriage as next civil rights movement&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/some-see-polyamorous-marriage-as-next-civil-rights-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/some-see-polyamorous-marriage-as-next-civil-rights-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=30921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We are the next generation after the gay and transgender communities." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/some-see-polyamorous-marriage-as-next-civil-rights-movement/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/some-see-polyamorous-marriage-as-next-civil-rights-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polyamorists call for group marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/05/13/polyamorists-call-for-group-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/05/13/polyamorists-call-for-group-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=24076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000010001.cfm">CitizenLink</a>: "As gay activists take aim at marriage across the country, other groups are raising their voices in the battle to redefine marriage. Polyamorists claim there’s no reason to confine a marriage to two people and are calling for 'equal marriage rights.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/05/13/polyamorists-call-for-group-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/05/13/polyamorists-call-for-group-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After same-sex &#8220;marriage,&#8221; bisexual polyamorous &#8220;marriage&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/05/07/after-same-sex-marriage-bisexual-polyamorous-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/05/07/after-same-sex-marriage-bisexual-polyamorous-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=23573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abby Ellin <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-05-07/threesome-marriages/full/">writing in The Daily Beast</a>: "Maine this week became the fifth state, and the fourth in New England, to legalize gay marriage, provoking yet another national debate about same-sex unions. The Lessins' advocacy group, the Maui-based World Polyamory Association, is pushing for the next frontier of less-traditional codified relationships. This community has even come up with a name for what the rest of the world generally would call a committed threesome: the 'triad.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/05/07/after-same-sex-marriage-bisexual-polyamorous-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/05/07/after-same-sex-marriage-bisexual-polyamorous-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sliding Toward Polyamory</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/07/22/sliding-toward-polyamory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/07/22/sliding-toward-polyamory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=6077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Muehlenberg has this post on his blog. It begins: Polyamory has gone big time. There are magazines and journals devoted to it, societies founded to further it, conferences held around the world to discuss it, and countless organisations in &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/07/22/sliding-toward-polyamory/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/07/22/sliding-toward-polyamory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emerging trend toward swing culture?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/07/21/emerging-trend-toward-swing-culture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/07/21/emerging-trend-toward-swing-culture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=6013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["All that's changing is that society's willing to look at it less judgmentally. People are now willing to say that their own sex lives are not as clean as the driven snow; that this takes place among upper-middle-class people, and there doesn't seem to be any harmful consequences to society at all." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/07/21/emerging-trend-toward-swing-culture/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/07/21/emerging-trend-toward-swing-culture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toronto: Residents upset by swingers clubs</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/06/25/toronto-residents-upset-by-swingers-clubs-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/06/25/toronto-residents-upset-by-swingers-clubs-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=5406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just weeks after residents of a gradually gentrifying west-end neighbourhood protested against the surprise appearance of a strip club on Toronto's Lake Shore Boulevard, they are now aghast that two so-called swingers clubs have recently set up shop nearby. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/06/25/toronto-residents-upset-by-swingers-clubs-2/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/06/25/toronto-residents-upset-by-swingers-clubs-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polygamy: The Capabilities Approach, Religious Practices, and the Importance of Recognition</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/06/04/polygamy-the-capabilities-approach-religious-practices-and-the-importance-of-recognition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/06/04/polygamy-the-capabilities-approach-religious-practices-and-the-importance-of-recognition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=4573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Certain religious practices create a clash between capabilities where the capability to religious belief and expression is in conflict with the capability of equal status and nondiscrimination. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/06/04/polygamy-the-capabilities-approach-religious-practices-and-the-importance-of-recognition/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/06/04/polygamy-the-capabilities-approach-religious-practices-and-the-importance-of-recognition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hartford Courant Promotes “Polyamory”</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/09/hartford-courant-promotes-%e2%80%9cpolyamory%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/09/hartford-courant-promotes-%e2%80%9cpolyamory%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Institute of Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=3422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Family Institute of Connecticut Blog has this post regarding a Hartford Courant article: &#8220;But with this article the campaign for polyamory has now taken its first step in Connecticut…and it was the push for same-sex marriage that made it possible. Just &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/09/hartford-courant-promotes-%e2%80%9cpolyamory%e2%80%9d/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/09/hartford-courant-promotes-%e2%80%9cpolyamory%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Head Of &#8216;Polyamory&#8217; Group Discusses Multiple Partners</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/08/head-of-polyamory-group-discusses-multiple-partners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/08/head-of-polyamory-group-discusses-multiple-partners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=3340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While polygamy involves having more than one spouse, Trask's group, which has 1,500 active members, including some in Connecticut, supports polyamory: having multiple loves of either sex with or without marriage. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/08/head-of-polyamory-group-discusses-multiple-partners/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/08/head-of-polyamory-group-discusses-multiple-partners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

