Finding the Middle Ground: Acuna v. Turkish and the New Jersey Supreme Court’s Reaffirmation of a Doctor’s Role Under the Doctrine of Informed Consent in the Digital Age
Allyson M. Rucinski, 29 Pace L. Rev. 797 (2009)
“For general medical procedures, many doctors have resorted to computer generated printouts, prepackaged pharmaceutical marketing pamphlets, and website referrals to satisfy the bare minimum duty under the doctrine of informed consent. Conversely, some states have taken it upon themselves to over-legislate in the area of abortion by requiring doctors to make excessive disclosures that are arguably moral, philosophical, or religious in nature. There needs to be a middle ground between these two extremes. The New Jersey Supreme Court provides guidance as to what this middle ground should be in its decision in Acuna v. Turkish.”
- Posted: 12/08/2009
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: digitalcommons.pace.edu
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Professional Regulation
|
Latest Posts
-
05/24/2012
The ADF Alliance Alert will not be published on Friday, May 25th and Monday, May 28th.
-
www.huffingtonpost.com
05/24/2012
Huffington Post: A measure allowing same-sex civil unions passed its first legislative step in Brazil’s Congress, where it has lingered for 16 years.
-
www.christianpost.com
05/24/2012
Christian Post: “There has to be a wall institutionally between the government and the church or religious groups,” he said. “But many have taken that law of separation to think that it means separating religion from politics, which is precisely the opposite of what the Founding Fathers wanted.”
|