TCPalm: Kevin Theriot, the attorney representing the churches and senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund in Kansas City, Mo., said churches have operated in the Southport Shopping Center for at least the past nine years. He said the city began enforcing the zoning code only when it received a complaint against the churches. “Generally speaking, non-profits are allowed to locate without obtaining licensing similar to for-profit commercial enterprises, so there really hasn’t been any problems with them,” Theriot said. “Essentially, what the city told me is until somebody complains they usually don’t do anything. They are pretty much a complaint-based system. There are some definite problems with the code as a whole.”
- Posted: 08/12/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.tcpalm.com
- Tags: ADF: Kevin Theriot, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Florida, Topic: RLUIPA
Federicksburg.com: Elementary reason puts this fear to flight. The disabled children in question are already in a school with mostly non-disabled children. “They are not explosive,” says Erik Stanley, a Kansas attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, which is representing Calvary Christian. The notion that they would be violent, he adds, “is based on unfounded prejudices and stereotyping about the disabled.” Finally, the two groups–the non-disabled pupils and the disabled students–would study on different floors of the two-story building and attend classes at different times of the school day.
- Posted: 06/16/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: fredericksburg.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Virginia, Topic: RLUIPA, ZZ: Calvary Christian Church v. City of Fredericksburg
Religion Clause: 5th Circuit Interprets “Equal Terms” Clause of RLUIPA: In The Elijah Group, Inc. v. City of Leon Valley, Texas, (5th Cir., June 10, 2011), the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals weighed in on an issue that has split various circuits– what test to use to determine whether a zoning decision violates RLUIPA’s “equal terms” clause . . . Becket Fund issued a press release on the decision.
- Posted: 06/16/2011
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Group: Becket Fund, State: Texas, Topic: RLUIPA, ZZ: The Elijah Group Inc v. City of Leon Valley Texas
Charisma: “Churches should not be singled out for discrimination by a city’s zoning restrictions,” says John W. Mauck, lead counsel in the suit and an ADF alliance attorney. “The city of Mountain Home did the right thing by agreeing to this court order and letting this growing church meet on its leased property so it can exercise its constitutionally protected right to assemble—just like everyone else.” . . . “This case is just one of numerous lawsuits throughout the country demonstrating that many municipalities don’t understand the law. Zoning schemes may not exclude churches or single them out from similar uses for disfavored treatment,” ADF Senior Counsel Joseph Infranco explains.“This lawsuit had a great outcome, and we hope other cities in similar situations will take notice.”
- Posted: 06/14/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.charismamag.com
- Tags: ADF: Joe Infranco, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Idaho, Topic: RLUIPA, ZZ: No Limits Christian Ministries v. City of Mountain Home
ADF attorney Erik Stanley at The American Thinker: Zoning issues are not a concern, either. Calvary Christian Church has the approval of planning officials because it has met all zoning requirements to run such a facility. So, quite simply, no legitimate reason exists to oppose the opening of this school. There’s no reason to run up a taxpayer tab with needless litigation over a school that wants to help disabled children in need, that meets all safety and zoning requirements, and that is on firm footing under the law to do work that benefits everyone.
- Posted: 06/14/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.americanthinker.com
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Virginia, Topic: RLUIPA, ZZ: Calvary Christian Church v. City of Fredericksburg
Fredericksburg, VA Patch: The church’s lawsuit has been taken on by the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian non-profit organization which defends issues of religious liberty.
“Churches shouldn’t be singled out for discrimination, especially when attempting to expand their ministries to safely serve the needs of the community–in this case, disabled children,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Erik Stanley. “No disabled students would even be on campus at the same time as other students, and the church has the approval of planning officials because it has met all zoning requirements to run such a facility. There’s no legitimate reason for a denial, so the city’s stated reasons only serve to feed old stereotypes about the disabled.”
- Posted: 06/14/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: fredericksburg.patch.com
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Virginia, Topic: RLUIPA, ZZ: Calvary Christian Church v. City of Fredericksburg
Charisma: The Alliance Defense Fund filed a lawsuit Monday against the city, saying it is violating federal laws and that it has no real reasons to deny the permit.
“Churches shouldn’t be singled out for discrimination, especially when attempting to expand their ministries to safely serve the needs of the community—in this case, disabled children,” ADF Senior Legal Counsel Erik Stanley says.
- Posted: 05/25/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.charismamag.com
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Virginia, Topic: RLUIPA, ZZ: Calvary Christian Church v. City of Fredericksburg
Injury Board Blog Network: There are scores of other cases like these every year, filed by these groups and others, such as the Alliance Defense Fund, the Rutherford Institute, and many others… just as the Founders intended. The “tort reform” movement will eventually reach harm cases, through restrictions on the filing of any lawsuit, Americans don’t recognize the universality of the rights protected in our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
- Posted: 05/10/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: voices.injuryboard.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: Institute for Justice, Group: Pacific Justice Institute, Group: Rutherford Institute, Topic: RLUIPA
Times-Herald.com: “ADF attorneys argue that the county’s refusal is once again in violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, a federal law that prevents zoning officials from singling out churches for discriminatory treatment,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Erik Stanley. “Churches shouldn’t be singled out for discrimination by a county’s ongoing decisions,” said Stanley. “This is especially true when the church has already received all the recommended approvals through the appropriate channels and no other legitimate reason for denial has been given. “The county must learn to abide by the U.S. Constitution and federal law, which prohibits this kind of discriminatory treatment of churches.”
- Posted: 04/15/2011
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.times-herald.com
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Georgia, Topic: RLUIPA, ZZ: All Souls Church of God in Christ v. Coweta County, ZZ: Holiness Is the Way Ministries v. Coweta County
|
Latest Posts
-
hosted.ap.org
02/09/2012
News from The Associated Press: The Virginia state Senate passed legislation Thursday allowing private adoption agencies to deny placements that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs, including opposition to homosexuality.
-
www.lifenews.com
02/09/2012
LifeNews.com: The liberal women on The View, Wednesday, shrieked at the “totalitarian” decision by a Texas judge to uphold a law requiring women to look at an ultrasound before having an abortion.
-
balkin.blogspot.com
02/09/2012
Jason Mazzone at Balkinization: By finding Proposition 8 to violate the Equal Protection Clause solely on the ground that it withdrew the right of marriage that gays and lesbians previously possessed in California (as a result the earlier state supreme court’s decision), Perry v. Brown produces a curious result. It appears to leave Proposition 8 partially intact.

|