<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Topic: Senate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/topic-senate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Warnings issued over rushing through DADT repeal</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/warnings-issued-over-rushing-through-dadt-repeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/warnings-issued-over-rushing-through-dadt-repeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Daniel Blomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=87552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1258306">OneNewsNow</a>: "[T]he conservative legal group, Alliance Defense Fund, issued a statement after the vote saying 'The Senate's cave-in to pressure from activists to impose homosexual behavior on our military will place our troops' religious liberties in unprecedented jeopardy. Indeed, the first official casualty of this hurried vote may well be the religious freedom of chaplains and Service members.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/warnings-issued-over-rushing-through-dadt-repeal/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/warnings-issued-over-rushing-through-dadt-repeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DADT repeal raises concerns for chaplains</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/dadt-repeal-raises-concerns-for-chaplains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/dadt-repeal-raises-concerns-for-chaplains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Daniel Blomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=87550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/Religion/post/2010/12/dadt-dont-ask-dont-tell-chaplains/1">USA Today / Faith and Reason blog</a>: "Sunday morning brings the conservative evangelical voices with dire predictions for its impact on military chaplains . . . The Alliance Defense Fund's [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-daniel-blomberg/">Daniel Blomberg</a>] argues that by bowing to activists, the Senate is placing the <a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/DanielBlomberg/2010/12/17/pentagon_report_dont_ask,_dont_tell_about_religious_liberty_problems">religious liberty of troops and chaplains</a> in 'unprecedented jeopardy.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/dadt-repeal-raises-concerns-for-chaplains/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/dadt-repeal-raises-concerns-for-chaplains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DADT repeal will use military to impose radical agenda, critics say</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/dadt-repeal-will-use-military-to-impose-radical-agenda-critics-say/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/dadt-repeal-will-use-military-to-impose-radical-agenda-critics-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Daniel Blomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=87546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/dont-ask-dont-tell-repeal-will-use-military-to-impose-radical-agenda-critics-say/">Catholic News Agency</a>: "Opponents of the repeal warned it will turn the military into a tool to impose “a radical social agenda” on the country . . . In a November interview, [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-daniel-blomberg/">Daniel Blomberg</a>] of the Alliance Defense Fund said that under a repeal of the policy on homosexuals, one of those military goals will include support for 'incorporating and supporting homosexual behavior in the military.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/dadt-repeal-will-use-military-to-impose-radical-agenda-critics-say/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/dadt-repeal-will-use-military-to-impose-radical-agenda-critics-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An end to religious liberty in U.S. military?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/an-end-to-religious-liberty-in-u-s-military/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/an-end-to-religious-liberty-in-u-s-military/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Daniel Blomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=87548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1258106">OneNewsNow</a>: "The conservative legal group, Alliance Defense Fund, issued a statement after the vote saying 'The Senate's cave-in to pressure from activists to impose homosexual behavior on our military will place our troops' religious liberties in unprecedented jeopardy. Indeed, the first official casualty of this hurried vote may well be the religious freedom of chaplains and Service members.' ADF Litigation Counsel, [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-daniel-blomberg/">Daniel Blomberg</a>], went on to say 'no Americans, and especially not our troops, should be forced to abandon their religious beliefs.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/an-end-to-religious-liberty-in-u-s-military/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/an-end-to-religious-liberty-in-u-s-military/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask&#8221; repeal hinges on Senate time crunch</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/17/dont-ask-repeal-hinges-on-senate-time-crunch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/17/dont-ask-repeal-hinges-on-senate-time-crunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Daniel Blomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=87321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/dont-ask-repeal-hinges-on-senate-time-crunch/">Catholic News Agency</a>: "Its success or failure depends upon whether it is scheduled for a Senate vote as Congress comes to a close . . . [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-daniel-blomberg/">Daniel Blomberg</a>] of the Alliance Defense Fund, a repeal opponent, told CNA in November that chaplains are concerned that religious faith 'will be discriminated against in favor of the new political correctness that will be imposed by the Obama administration.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/17/dont-ask-repeal-hinges-on-senate-time-crunch/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/17/dont-ask-repeal-hinges-on-senate-time-crunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans block DADT repeal from floor vote</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/10/republicans-block-dadt-repeal-from-floor-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/10/republicans-block-dadt-repeal-from-floor-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Daniel Blomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=85880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.christianpost.com/article/20101210/republicans-block-don-t-askdon-t-tell-repeal-from-floor-vote/">Christian Post</a>: "'Don’t ask, don’t tell' proponents were handed another victory Thursday as the 17-year old ban on gays and lesbians serving openly in the military was narrowly spared in a Senate vote . . . [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-daniel-blomberg/">Daniel Blomberg</a>], an attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund, told NPR that chaplains could be charged with discrimination based on sexual orientation if they expressed that homosexual behavior is not in accordance with God’s will. 'And that could be career-ending for a chaplain,' he told the radio program." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/10/republicans-block-dadt-repeal-from-floor-vote/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/10/republicans-block-dadt-repeal-from-floor-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should the filibuster be eliminated?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/27/should-the-filibuster-be-eliminated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/27/should-the-filibuster-be-eliminated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=66679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sandy Levinson writes at <a href="http://balkin.blogspot.com/2010/07/when-might-filibusters-be-justified.html">Balkinization</a>: "I argued in my previous post that Joe Biden should declare that the Senate is not a continuing body and,therefore, that it can modify its rules by a majority vote, without facing a filibuster. Does this necessarily mean that the filibuster should be abolished lock, stock, and barrel? I think this is quite literally debatable, and I see two circumstances where we might want to retain the filibuster, even if, for example, we might want to drop the number of votes required to break a filibuster from, say, 60 to 55 . . . " &#124; <a href="http://www.fedsocblog.com/blog/should_the_filibuster_be_eliminated/#When:17:19:07Z">Via FedSoc Blog</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/27/should-the-filibuster-be-eliminated/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/27/should-the-filibuster-be-eliminated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

