Patheos: Alliance Defending Freedom senior counsel Gregory S. Baylor, whose organization argued for the constitutionality of the program, defended it on the grounds that “parents should be able to choose what’s best for their own children.” “The ultimate winners in the Indiana Supreme Court’s decision are Indiana families who want to provide the best education for their children, whether it is public or private,” Baylor said March 26.
- Posted: 05/14/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.patheos.com
- Tags: ADF: Gregory S. Baylor, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Vouchers, ZZ: Meredith v. Daniels, ZZ: Meredith v. Pence, ZZADF: 34856
DFW Catholic: Alliance Defending Freedom senior counsel Gregory S. Baylor, whose organization argued for the constitutionality of the program, defended it on the grounds that “parents should be able to choose what’s best for their own children.” “The ultimate winners in the Indiana Supreme Court’s decision are Indiana families who want to provide the best education for their children, whether it is public or private,” Baylor said March 26.
- Posted: 05/10/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.dfwcatholic.org
- Tags: ADF: Gregory S. Baylor, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Vouchers, ZZ: Meredith v. Daniels, ZZ: Meredith v. Pence, ZZADF: 34856
Alan Sears at Alliance Defending Freedom: One of the quieter – though equally intense – battles for religious freedom in America is being fought almost daily on behalf of young school children. This week, two cases from two different parts of the country spotlight the obstacles being placed before people of faith, like you, who want nothing more than to select a school that best meets the needs of their children and grandchildren.
- Posted: 04/02/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: blog.alliancedefendingfreedom.org
- Tags: ADF: Alan E. Sears, ADF: Gregory S. Baylor, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, State: Montana, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Vouchers, ZZ: Meredith v. Daniels, ZZ: Meredith v. Pence, ZZ: Wilson v. Montana Office of Public Instruction, ZZADF: 34856, ZZADF: 39076
Wall Street Journal (via Google): “We find it inconceivable,” the justices wrote, that the framers meant to prohibit government spending from which a religious institution could ultimately benefit. Everything from police protection to city sidewalks benefit religious institutions, but “the primary beneficiary is the public,” and any benefits to religious groups are “ancillary and indirect,” said the ruling. “The direct beneficiaries under the voucher program are the families of eligible students and not the schools selected by the parents for their children to attend.”
- Posted: 03/27/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Vouchers, ZZ: Meredith v. Daniels, ZZ: Meredith v. Pence, ZZADF: 34856
AP: The Indiana Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the law creating the nation’s broadest school voucher program, clearing the way for a possible expansion.
- Posted: 03/26/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: ADF: Gregory S. Baylor, ADF: Press Releases, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Vouchers, ZZ: Meredith v. Daniels, ZZ: Meredith v. Pence, ZZADF: 34856
Garnett, Nicole Stelle, Are Charters Enough Choice? School Choice and the Future of Catholic Schools (January 19, 2012). Notre Dame Law Review, 2012; Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 12-50. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1988467
This contribution to a Notre Dame Law Review symposium on “Law and Educational Innovation” critiques the oft-repeated assertion that private-school-choice programs, such as tuition vouchers or tax credits, are unnecessary because charter schools provide sufficient educational choices. Arguing that policy makers have failed to come to terms with the profound, unfortunate consequences of Catholic schools’ rapid disappearance from urban neighborhoods, the essay builds a case for a shift in education policy that embraces both charter schools and private-school-choice mechanisms.
- Posted: 11/26/2012
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, Docs: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Charter Schools, Topic: Culture, Topic: Education, Topic: Vouchers
Religion Clause Blog: Now in Independent School District No. 5 of Tulsa County v. Spry, (OK Sup. Ct., Nov. 20, 2012), in a 7-2 decision, the Oklahoma Supreme Court reversed that decision on standing grounds. It held that the school districts which were plaintiffs in the lawsuit lack standing because they are not taxpayers who have a right to challenge the program . . .
- Posted: 11/21/2012
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Docs: Opinions, State: Oklahoma, Topic: Justiciability, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Vouchers, ZZ: Independent School District No. 5 of Tulsa County v. Spry
|

Latest Posts
-
www.nationalreview.com
05/20/2013
National Review: Sam Kazman and Michael Carvin have a great Forbes op-ed about their new Obamacare lawsuit, which could invalidate key portions of the law in the 33 states that did not set-up state-based health-insurance exchanges. Essentially, the lawsuit alleges that the IRS illegally rewrote the Affordable Care Act so that both the employer mandate and accompanying government subsidies applied in the 33 states that lack their own health-insurance exchanges . . . You can read the complaint here.
-
hosted.ap.org
05/20/2013
AP: Senior members of the Church of Scotland voted Monday to let some congregations choose ministers who are in same-sex relationships – an important compromise that must still pass further hurdles before it can become church law.
-
www.frc.org
05/20/2013
FRC Washington Update: After the ACLU filed a second lawsuit, Barronelle turned to our friends at Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF). Together, they’re countersuing Washington for violating her Christian beliefs. “Marriage has religious significance,” ADF argues, “apart from any civil significance. [Stutzman] believed that [servicing a gay marriage] would compel her to express a message with her creativity that violates God’s commands.”

|