<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: ACLU of Ohio v DeWeese</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-aclu-of-ohio-v-deweese/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court still fuzzy on 10 Commandments</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/07/supreme-court-still-fuzzy-on-10-commandments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/07/supreme-court-still-fuzzy-on-10-commandments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: ACLU of Ohio v DeWeese]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=115737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1452488">OneNewsNow.com</a>: Geoffrey Surtees of the American Center for Law &#038; Justice (ACLJ), who represented Judge DeWeese, contends that the "'Philosophies of Law and Conflict' display, which includes the text of the Ten Commandments, is simply not an Establishment Clause violation. It was our hope that the Supreme Court would take the opportunity [to] correct the lower courts on this point of law, but for whatever reason, it chose not to do so." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/07/supreme-court-still-fuzzy-on-10-commandments/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/07/supreme-court-still-fuzzy-on-10-commandments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court turns away appeal from Ten Commandments judge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/03/court-turns-away-appeal-from-ten-commandments-judge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/03/court-turns-away-appeal-from-ten-commandments-judge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: ACLU of Ohio v DeWeese]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=115217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts-law/court-turns-away-appeal-from-ten-commandments-judge/2011/10/03/gIQA9BJ1HL_story.html">The Washington Post</a>: The Supreme Court has turned away another appeal from an Ohio judge who wanted to display a poster containing the Ten Commandments in his courtroom. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/03/court-turns-away-appeal-from-ten-commandments-judge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/03/court-turns-away-appeal-from-ten-commandments-judge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two groups battle over Commandments case</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/15/two-groups-battle-over-commandments-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/15/two-groups-battle-over-commandments-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: ACLU of Ohio v DeWeese]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=110788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1412112">OneNewsNow.com</a>: The American Center for Law &#038; Justice (ACLJ) is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an Ohio Ten Commandments case that deals with an issue that one attorney says is "constitutionally permissible." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/15/two-groups-battle-over-commandments-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/15/two-groups-battle-over-commandments-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio Ten Commandments Case Goes to Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/08/ohio-ten-commandments-case-goes-to-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/08/ohio-ten-commandments-case-goes-to-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: ACLU of Ohio v DeWeese]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=110207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/8497-ohio-ten-commandments-case-goes-to-supreme-court">The New American</a>: For over 10 years Ohio judge James DeWeese (left) has fought for his constitutionally guaranteed right to display the Ten Commandments in his courtroom. And during that entire time he has been thwarted by a series of federal court rulings fueled by manipulative arguments of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Now, with the help of the conservative American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), Judge DeWeese will try to take his case to the U.S. Supreme Court. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/08/ohio-ten-commandments-case-goes-to-supreme-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/08/ohio-ten-commandments-case-goes-to-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLJ: ACLU Has No Legal Standing in 10 Commandments Case, High Court Should Hear Case</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/02/aclj-aclu-has-no-legal-standing-in-10-commandments-case-high-court-should-hear-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/02/aclj-aclu-has-no-legal-standing-in-10-commandments-case-high-court-should-hear-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: ACLU of Ohio v DeWeese]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://aclj.org/10-commandments/aclu-has-no-legal-standing-in-10-commandments-case-high-court-should-hear-case">ACLJ</a>: We filed our Petition for Writ of Certiorari at the high Court a couple of months ago. Now, we have filed a reply brief arguing that the ACLU has no legal standing to bring a challenge against an Ohio courtroom display containing the Ten Commandments. An appeals court declared unconstitutional a poster displayed by Judge James DeWeese that included the Ten Commandments as part of an exhibit on legal philosophy. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/02/aclj-aclu-has-no-legal-standing-in-10-commandments-case-high-court-should-hear-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/08/02/aclj-aclu-has-no-legal-standing-in-10-commandments-case-high-court-should-hear-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit: Courtroom Ten Commandments held unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/02/6th-circuit-courtroom-ten-commandments-held-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/02/6th-circuit-courtroom-ten-commandments-held-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: ACLU of Ohio v DeWeese]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=94448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal appeals court ruled unanimously Wednesday that a local trial judge in Ohio has no constitutional right to hang in his courtroom a poster of the Ten Commandments along with his own pointed comments about "moral relativism" and the rule of law. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/02/6th-circuit-courtroom-ten-commandments-held-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/02/6th-circuit-courtroom-ten-commandments-held-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Philosophy&#8217; poster containing Ten Commandments gets judge back in spotlight</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/28/philosophy-poster-containing-ten-commandments-gets-judge-back-in-spotlight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/28/philosophy-poster-containing-ten-commandments-gets-judge-back-in-spotlight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Americans United for Separation of Church and State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: ACLU of Ohio v DeWeese]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=50052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2010/01/27/poster-with-10-commandments-puts-judge-back-in-spotlight.html?sid=101" target="_blank">Columbus Dispatch</a>: "A<span style="font-size: 14px;"> second constitutional challenge to an Ohio judge's display of the Ten Commandments in his courtroom is making its way through the court system. At issue is whether a new, self-designed and framed poster put up by Richland County Common Pleas Judge James DeWeese in his Mansfield courtroom is constitutional . . . "</span> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/28/philosophy-poster-containing-ten-commandments-gets-judge-back-in-spotlight/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/28/philosophy-poster-containing-ten-commandments-gets-judge-back-in-spotlight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

