<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Adar v Smith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-adar-v-smith/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>State sovereignty reigns in &#8216;gay&#8217; adoption case</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/12/state-sovereignty-reigns-in-gay-adoption-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/12/state-sovereignty-reigns-in-gay-adoption-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Austin R. Nimocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Adar v Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=115905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1456216">OneNewsNow.com</a>: Austin R. Nimocks, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, says the high court's decision not to hear the case "affirmed the rights of states as sovereign entities." "No state makes the law for another state" . . . <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/12/state-sovereignty-reigns-in-gay-adoption-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/12/state-sovereignty-reigns-in-gay-adoption-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court allows Louisiana&#8217;s refusal to acknowledge NY same sex adoption to stand</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/12/supreme-court-allows-louisianas-refusal-to-acknowledge-ny-same-sex-adoption-to-stand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/12/supreme-court-allows-louisianas-refusal-to-acknowledge-ny-same-sex-adoption-to-stand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Adar v Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=115874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/11/us-usa-rights-gays-idUSTRE79A3SX20111011">Reuters</a>: The Supreme Court refused on Tuesday to consider the rights of same-sex parents in a setback for two gay men who wanted both of their names listed on their adopted son's birth certificate. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/12/supreme-court-allows-louisianas-refusal-to-acknowledge-ny-same-sex-adoption-to-stand/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/12/supreme-court-allows-louisianas-refusal-to-acknowledge-ny-same-sex-adoption-to-stand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robyn Hagan Cain: &#8220;Full Faith and Credit Easiest Path to Marriage Equality?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/09/robyn-hagan-cain-full-faith-and-credit-easiest-path-to-marriage-equality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/09/robyn-hagan-cain-full-faith-and-credit-easiest-path-to-marriage-equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Adar v Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Perry v. Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=113078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robyn Hagan Cain at <a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/supreme_court/2011/09/full-faith-and-credit-easiest-path-to-marriage-equality.html?DCMP=NWL-pro_top">Findlaw</a>: If the Supreme Court hears Adar and decides that state officials need not afford full faith and credit to other state's documents, then same-sex marriage proponents continue with the status quo, wait a few years, and bring a Perry-type case when the Court is staffed with more marriage-equality-minded judges. If the Court hears Perry v. Schwarzenegger, and finds that there is no constitutional right to same-sex marriage, it could be years before a same-sex marriage challenge has another chance. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/09/robyn-hagan-cain-full-faith-and-credit-easiest-path-to-marriage-equality/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/09/robyn-hagan-cain-full-faith-and-credit-easiest-path-to-marriage-equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Pulling the rug out from underneath &#8220;gay adoption&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/18/under-the-u-s-supreme-court-pulling-the-rug-out-from-underneath-gay-adoption/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/18/under-the-u-s-supreme-court-pulling-the-rug-out-from-underneath-gay-adoption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Adar v Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=108362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A decision by a federal appeals court in New Orleans threatens to undermine hard-won gains by gays and lesbians, and the U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to review it. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/18/under-the-u-s-supreme-court-pulling-the-rug-out-from-underneath-gay-adoption/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/18/under-the-u-s-supreme-court-pulling-the-rug-out-from-underneath-gay-adoption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8217;2 dads&#8217; case goes to Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/13/2-dads-case-goes-to-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/13/2-dads-case-goes-to-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Adar v Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A gay rights organization is seeking Supreme Court review of the case of a gay couple who wanted both their names to appear on the birth certificate of the Louisiana child they adopted in New York." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/13/2-dads-case-goes-to-supreme-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/13/2-dads-case-goes-to-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FRC Praises Fifth Circuit for Affirming Traditional Family</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/14/frc-praises-fifth-circuit-for-affirming-traditional-family/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/14/frc-praises-fifth-circuit-for-affirming-traditional-family/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Austin R. Nimocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Adar v Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=101046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.centredaily.com/2011/04/13/2646679/frc-praises-fifth-circuit-for.html">Centre Daily (PR Newswire)</a>: Family Research Council (FRC) praised the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for ruling in <em>Adar v. Smith</em> that a Louisiana registrar's insistence that only one father's name could go on a birth certificate for a child adopted by a homosexual couple did not violate the child's right to equal protection under law, while not denying legal recognition of the New York adoption by both men . . . FRC submitted an amicus brief in the case, along with the Louisiana Family Forum, in support of the defendant, registrar Darlene Smith. Alliance Defense Fund Senior Legal Counsel Austin Nimocks authored the brief for FRC . . . 
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/14/frc-praises-fifth-circuit-for-affirming-traditional-family/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/14/frc-praises-fifth-circuit-for-affirming-traditional-family/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5th Circuit: Constitution does not require states to pretend two men can create a child</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/13/5th-circuit-constitution-does-not-require-states-to-pretend-two-men-can-create-a-child/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/13/5th-circuit-constitution-does-not-require-states-to-pretend-two-men-can-create-a-child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Austin R. Nimocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Adar v Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=100937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Appellate court rules that La. cannot be forced to issue a birth certificate to two NY men who adopted child born in La. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/13/5th-circuit-constitution-does-not-require-states-to-pretend-two-men-can-create-a-child/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/13/5th-circuit-constitution-does-not-require-states-to-pretend-two-men-can-create-a-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5th Circuit hears &#8220;gay&#8221; dads&#8217; La. birth certificate case</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/19/5th-circuit-hears-gay-dads-la-birth-certificate-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/19/5th-circuit-hears-gay-dads-la-birth-certificate-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Adar v Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=92212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_TWO_DADS?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2011-01-19-08-30-08">Associated Press</a>: "A federal appeals court will consider whether Louisiana must put both fathers' names on the birth certificate of a child adopted by a gay couple." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/19/5th-circuit-hears-gay-dads-la-birth-certificate-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/19/5th-circuit-hears-gay-dads-la-birth-certificate-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5th Circuit to re-hear same-sex couple&#8217;s challenge after Louisiana refuses to respect out-of-state adoptions</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/17/5th-circuit-to-re-hear-same-sex-couples-challenge-after-louisiana-refuses-to-respect-out-of-state-adoptions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/17/5th-circuit-to-re-hear-same-sex-couples-challenge-after-louisiana-refuses-to-respect-out-of-state-adoptions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Adar v Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=91711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lambdalegal.org/news/pr/la_20110114_federal-court-to-re-hear.html">Lambda Legal</a>: "The full 16-member U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments on Wednesday, January 19, 2011, regarding the New York adoption of a Louisiana-born baby boy by a same-sex couple." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/17/5th-circuit-to-re-hear-same-sex-couples-challenge-after-louisiana-refuses-to-respect-out-of-state-adoptions/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/17/5th-circuit-to-re-hear-same-sex-couples-challenge-after-louisiana-refuses-to-respect-out-of-state-adoptions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“What If Joey Has Two Daddies?”?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/30/%e2%80%9cwhat-if-joey-has-two-daddies%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/30/%e2%80%9cwhat-if-joey-has-two-daddies%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Marriage Law Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Ruth Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Adar v Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/2010/03/30/%e2%80%9cwhat-if-joey-has-two-daddies%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William C. Duncan writes at the <a href="http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/03/23/louisiana-amends-a-birth-cert-calling-two-men-parents/">Ruth Institute Blog</a>: "A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently issued an opinion ordering the State of Louisiana to issue an amended birth certificate for a child born in Louisiana but listing as the child’s parents two men . . . The implications of these errors are significant. The decision clearly dilutes the crucial constitutional concept of 'interstate pluralism, in Professor Jeffrey Rensberger’s phrase. It allows judges to substitute their judgments of law for the valid actions of legislators and administrative officials charged with making and enforcing a State’s law. It threatens to create a new national standard of parenting whereby a couple can force an unwilling State to participate in their project of acquiring a legally motherless or fatherless child." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/30/%e2%80%9cwhat-if-joey-has-two-daddies%e2%80%9d/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/30/%e2%80%9cwhat-if-joey-has-two-daddies%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Louisiana asks full 5th Circuit to rehear &#8220;2 dads case&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/04/louisiana-asks-full-5th-circuit-to-rehear-2-dads-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/04/louisiana-asks-full-5th-circuit-to-rehear-2-dads-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Adar v Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=54300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2010/03/state_appeals_birth_certificat.html">Times-Picayune</a>: "Attorney General Buddy Caldwell this morning asked the full 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn a decision requiring that Louisiana issue a birth certificate listing as fathers the two men who adopted a Shreveport-born infant in a New York court." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/04/louisiana-asks-full-5th-circuit-to-rehear-2-dads-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/04/louisiana-asks-full-5th-circuit-to-rehear-2-dads-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

