<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Alcazar v. Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-alcazar-v-corporation-of-the-catholic-archbishop-of-seattle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Kevin Theriot: Court affirms churches&#8217; right to select pastor without gov&#8217;t interference</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/kevin-theriot-court-affirms-churches-right-to-select-pastor-without-govt-interference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/kevin-theriot-court-affirms-churches-right-to-select-pastor-without-govt-interference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Kevin Theriot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Church Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Alcazar v. Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Rosas v. Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=87564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ADF Attorney <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-kevin-theriot/">Kevin Theriot</a> writing at <a href="http://blog.speakupmovement.org/church/church-governance/court-affirms-churches-right-to-select-pastor-without-govt-interference/">Speak Up Movement / Church</a>: "This [9th Circuit's] en banc opinion [in <a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/10/09-35003.pdf"><em>Rosas v. The Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle</em></a>, No. 09-3500], which has more precedential value than opinions from 3 judge panels, first confirmed the vitality of the ministerial exception to prohibitions on employment discrimination. It explained that '[t]he Free Exercise Clause rational for protecting a church’s personnel decisions concerning its ministers is the necessity of allowing the church to choose its representatives using whatever criteria it deems relevant.  Indeed, the ministerial relationship lies so close to the heart of the church that it would offend the Free Exercise Clause simply to articulate a religious justification for its personnel decisions.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/kevin-theriot-court-affirms-churches-right-to-select-pastor-without-govt-interference/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/20/kevin-theriot-court-affirms-churches-right-to-select-pastor-without-govt-interference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9th Circuit Defines Ministerial Exception For Employment Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/17/9th-circuit-defines-ministerial-exception-for-employment-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/17/9th-circuit-defines-ministerial-exception-for-employment-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Church Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Title VII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Alcazar v. Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=55701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/03/9th-circuit-defines-ministerial.html">Religion Clause Blog</a>: "In <em><a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/03/16/09-35003.pdf">Alcazar v. Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle</a></em>, (9th Cir., March 16, 2010), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed under the 'ministerial exception' doctrine claims by two Catholic seminarians who alleged violations of Washington state's Minimum Wage Law . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/17/9th-circuit-defines-ministerial-exception-for-employment-cases/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/17/9th-circuit-defines-ministerial-exception-for-employment-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

