<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Alcazar v. Rosas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-alcazar-v-rosas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>En Banc 9th Circuit refuses to create test for who is covered by the ministerial exception</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/13/en-banc-9th-circuit-refuses-to-create-test-for-who-is-covered-by-the-ministerial-exception/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/13/en-banc-9th-circuit-refuses-to-create-test-for-who-is-covered-by-the-ministerial-exception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Alcazar v. Rosas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=86275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/12/en-banc-9th-circuit-refuses-to-create.html">Religion Clause</a>: "In an en banc opinion in <a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/10/09-35003.pdf"><em>Alcazar v. Rosas</em></a>, (9th Cir., Dec. 10, 2010), the full 9th Circuit vacated the portion of the 3-judge panel's decision that adopted a new definition for who is a minister for purposes of the 'ministerial exception' doctrine." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/13/en-banc-9th-circuit-refuses-to-create-test-for-who-is-covered-by-the-ministerial-exception/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/13/en-banc-9th-circuit-refuses-to-create-test-for-who-is-covered-by-the-ministerial-exception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

