<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Alderman v. United States</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-alderman-v-united-states/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Court refuses to overturn bulletproof vest law; dissent on Commerce power</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/10/court-refuses-to-overturn-bulletproof-vest-law-dissent-on-commerce-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/10/court-refuses-to-overturn-bulletproof-vest-law-dissent-on-commerce-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Alderman v. United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=90571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUPREME_COURT_BULLETPROOF_VESTS?SITE=AP&#38;SECTION=HOME&#38;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#38;CTIME=2011-01-10-10-56-15">Associated Press</a>: "The Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a challenge against a federal law making it illegal for criminals to own bulletproof vests. The appeal had questioned Congress' lawmaking ability under the Commerce Clause . . . Justice Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia said they would have heard the case."

<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/01/dissent-on-commerce-power/">SCOTUSblog</a>: "Two Justices of the Supreme Court, <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-1555.pdf">in a dissent</a> that may reveal a new division in the Court over Congress’s power to pass legislation under the Commerce Clause, on Monday accused the Court majority of silently accepting 'the nullification' of the Court’s recent rulings on that power — especially, the decision in 1995 in <em>Lopez v. U.S.</em>" &#124; <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/alderman-v-united-states/">SCOTUSblog case page</a> for <em>Alderman v. United States</em>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/10/court-refuses-to-overturn-bulletproof-vest-law-dissent-on-commerce-power/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/10/court-refuses-to-overturn-bulletproof-vest-law-dissent-on-commerce-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

