<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Arizona Free Enterprise v. Bennett</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-arizona-free-enterprise-v-bennett/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stanley Fish: What Does the First Amendment Protect?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/07/stanley-fish-what-does-the-first-amendment-protect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/07/stanley-fish-what-does-the-first-amendment-protect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 07:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Arizona Free Enterprise v. Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Brown v. EMO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stanley Fish at the <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/04/what-does-the-first-amendment-protect/?hp">NYTimes.com</a>: And there you have it: a clash between the worship of freedom of speech and a concern for the quality of public life in relation to which free speech may sometimes be asked to take a back seat. It is the same clash that pits the freedom to play video games against society’s interest in fostering a generation of young adults responsive to its ideals and aspirations. We have seen this before — in the pornography cases, in the crush-video case, in the case upholding the right of an anti-gay ministry to picket the funerals of soldiers — and we shall certainly see it again. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/07/stanley-fish-what-does-the-first-amendment-protect/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/07/stanley-fish-what-does-the-first-amendment-protect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Kagan Principle: The more stubbornly corrupt the government is, the more justified it is in curtailing fundamental liberties.</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/the-kagan-principle-the-more-stubbornly-corrupt-the-government-is-the-more-justified-it-is-in-curtailing-fundamental-liberties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/the-kagan-principle-the-more-stubbornly-corrupt-the-government-is-the-more-justified-it-is-in-curtailing-fundamental-liberties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Arizona Free Enterprise v. Bennett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304450604576419832040452422.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h">WSJ.com</a>: The more stubbornly corrupt the government is, the more justified it is in curtailing fundamental liberties. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/the-kagan-principle-the-more-stubbornly-corrupt-the-government-is-the-more-justified-it-is-in-curtailing-fundamental-liberties/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/the-kagan-principle-the-more-stubbornly-corrupt-the-government-is-the-more-justified-it-is-in-curtailing-fundamental-liberties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court agrees to hear challenges to Ariz. campaign finance law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/30/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-challenges-to-ariz-campaign-finance-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/30/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-challenges-to-ariz-campaign-finance-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Arizona Free Enterprise v. Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: McComish v. Bennett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=84362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/other-races/130951-supreme-court-to-hear-arizona-election-financing-case">The Hill</a>: "The Supreme Court on Monday agreed <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/29/AR2010112902235.html">to hear</a> two legal challenges to Arizona's public financing of election campaigns." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/30/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-challenges-to-ariz-campaign-finance-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/30/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-challenges-to-ariz-campaign-finance-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to review Ariz. campaign finance law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/29/supreme-court-to-review-ariz-campaign-finance-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/29/supreme-court-to-review-ariz-campaign-finance-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Arizona Free Enterprise v. Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: McComish v. Bennett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=84082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUPREME_COURT_CAMPAIGN_FINANCE_ARIZONA?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2010-11-29-10-23-22">Associated Press</a>: "The Supreme Court said Monday it will consider dismantling an Arizona rule that gives extra money to publicly funded candidates who face privately funded rivals." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/29/supreme-court-to-review-ariz-campaign-finance-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/29/supreme-court-to-review-ariz-campaign-finance-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

